blackbird

I simply reported what I read about miniscule emissions and my belief that man is not the cause of global warming. Take it or leave it.

No its not up to me to prove anything. I have already given my evidence. You must prove I am wrong.

You are lying. I never made any claims of a scientific nature. All I am doing is pointing out simple facts that are on wikipedia. It simply says fossil emissions from man are miniscule. It says 99.8 or 99.9 percent of the CO2 in the atmosphere is natural or coming from nature. That is what makes life possible. So I am making no scientific claims as you falsely say.

No, it is you that needs to provide proof. I am not the one imposing taxes or regulations on society. You don't understand the basic principles of justice. The climate has always changed. Do you know what you are talking about?

Whenever government or anyone wants to do something that has negative consequences on other people or society in general, the onus of proof is on those who want to do something. That means the onus of proof is on the government to prove what they claim before imposing taxes, regulations, or anything else on society. Since man-made climate change has not been proven, it is wrong of the government to be doing what they are doing.

No, there has always been lots of false science. Climate change or global warming cannot be proven in a lab. That means it is all speculation. Speculation is not science.

Proponents of Climate Alarmism or man-made climate change have given no proof that this tiny percentage of fossil emissions is causing global warming. Since you support those who are making the claim, how about you give the proof? Have you ever heard of the basic human right "a man is innocent until proven guilty"? I'll go with common sense, rather than climate alarmism that blames man for everything.

The federal government has decided to resume funding to UNRWA. This article reveals a lot about UNRWA. Israeli determination is needed to dismantle UNRWA (msn.com) " New data from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs shows that the UNRWA situation is even worse than we thought: at least 15 UNRWA employees took part in the October 7th massacre, meaning they are rapists and murderers. UNRWA truck crosses into Egypt from Gaza at Rafah border crossing, November 27, 2023 (credit: REUTERS/AMR ABDALLAH DALSH)© Provided by The Jerusalem Post UNRWA truck crosses into Egypt from Gaza at Rafah border crossing, November 27, 2023 (credit: REUTERS/AMR ABDALLAH DALSH) 2,135 of UNRWA employees in Gaza are active in terrorist organizations, 485 of them in the military wing, and 18 of them are school principals. It's no wonder that terror infrastructure was found in 32 of UNRWA schools in Gaza. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs defines UNRWA as "beyond repair" - it has simply become an arm of Hamas. So why is it so difficult to promote a coalition that will put an end to the UN organization that manufactures more and more Palestinian refugees and reinforces their illusion that one day Israel will cease to exist and be handed over to them?

Good question! There are some that have common sense on here.

So consensus is now proof? I looked at your link and it does not prove anything. Just a claim. Funny the comments below your link oppose what you say.

Your problem is you listen to the false teachings of Rome to tell you how to understand the Bible. Why don't you admit it? If you cherry pick one verse and interpret it in a way that contradicts countless other verses then you should know your interpretation is wrong. You are ignoring the mass of verses that say salvation is by believing in Jesus Christ. You cherry pick one verse in James and interpret it to fit in with your idea that salvation or justification is by works and ignore the rest of the Bible. You do the same thing with one verse that that mentions believe and be baptized when countless verses demonstrate salvation is by faith or believing and baptism is not mentioned. You then throw in your claim that they must say "faith alone" to satisfy you which is a complete erroneous idea. Over a hundred verses clearly teach salvation is by believing; nowhere does it say a verse must use the words "faith alone". The words "faith alone" is only a summary of what Reformers believe. Nobody said those specific words have to appear in Scripture. The countless verses mean exactly the same thing as faith alone. Salvation comes first before you can work for God. One is justified by faith alone. Read Romans. Once a person is saved or born again, then they serve God. You don't work to become a Christian. That is false religion. That is the difference between the world's false religions and Biblical Christianity. In Biblical Christianity, God saves the person and then he works or follows Christ. Rome has reversed that and eliminated grace through faith and instead added works (and sacraments, etc.) God saves people by His grace. People cannot save themselves. I understand it is hard to believe that one doesn't save themselves by their own efforts, but that is what God's grace means. It is human nature to think man must be in control and do everything to "earn" salvation. That is not God's grace. Let God be God and stop thinking man must by his own efforts save himself or by some man-invented rituals or sacraments.

Is that your only proof that it must be true? I get it; if an idea is accepted it must be fact. Sorry to inform you but many things have been later found to be false. Take a look at the Neanderthal pig's tooth and pre-human remains that were later found to be non-human or false claims. What the mobs believe proves nothing.

Another man has been arrested for going on a stabbing rampage in Vancouver. Several people were attacked and it turns out the suspect was out on bail or parole. It was just a few months ago that another guy attacked people in Chinatown Vancouver and he was released from some kind of institution on a temporary pass even though he had a violent history. Another violent offender was just released on bail in Vancouver as well. The police said they can't do anything because it is the courts that decide to release people. The police prefer that dangerous offenders be kept in custody, but they said they don't have the power to do that. The legal system is failing citizens badly and something needs to be done.

Wow! The whole point of my post is to show that man does not emit enough CO2 to have any affect on climate change. You obviously didn't even bother reading it or never absorbed it. Are you sure you know what the word "anthropogenic" means?

You're not making sense. You don't explain what you mean or why. I know from experience you don't engage in any meaningful discussions. So go away and don't waste my time.

Most religions are false. The Bible has the truth because it came from God, not fallible men. Science is not infallible and has often been proven to be wrong. Man does not know everything, especially about such things as the origin of the universe and life. It would be wise to show a little humility and admit we don't know everything and maybe not much really. But to go against God's written revelation is really foolishness.

Total man-made fossil CO2 emissions in the atmosphere is only 0.1 to 0.2% of total greenhouse gases. Canada's fossil emissions are 1.511% of total world fossil emissions. China, the largest emitter by far, emits 32.884% of total world fossil emissions. So first it is highly unlikely that humans are causing global warming or climate change. Secondly, carbon tax on Canadians will not do anything to slow or reduce climate change because our contribution to greenhouse gases is almost nothing. List of countries by carbon dioxide emissions - Wikipedia

1. Man-made CO2 is 0.1% to 0.2% of the total atmospheric greenhouse gases. 2. The fossil CO2 emissions of several countries in percentages of all fossil emissions for all countries for 2022 is: Canada 1.511% Australia 1.021% Brazil 1.212% China 32.884% Japan 2.810 % U.S. 12.600% India 6.991% Russia 4.956% --- List of countries by carbon dioxide emissions - Wikipedia The total fossil emissions are so minute it is extremely unlikely in my opinion that this has an affect on climate change. It appears that 99.8 or 99.9% of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are natural. This is according to information on wikipedia. China's emissions are 32.884% of total man-made CO2 emissions. So no matter what Canada does it will make no difference to the total fossil emissions in the world because Canada's emissions are only 1.511% of the world's fossil emissions. That should be obvious to any reasonable person who looks at these figures.

That's not exactly what Bible believers believe, but we do believe in a heaven and a hell, which are clearly taught in Scripture. Nobody claims the earth is "disposable". The Bible teaches to be good stewards of everything. In other words, be responsible. Do not pollute the environment. Carbon dioxide is not pollution. It is a necessary part of life on earth. When Trudeau says he is putting a price on pollution with the carbon tax, he is not being truthful. CO2 is not pollution. However that is another topic.

Evolution is a philosophical necessity of atheism. An important issue in the debate is on the topic of irreducible complexity. "A major contribution to the question of the credibility of evolution was Michael Behe's book "Darwin's Black Box," in which he drew attention to many marvelous micro-biological systems which exhibit what he termed "irreducible complexity." The importance of irreducible complexity is that Darwin had stated that if any case could be brought forward where development could not have been achieved by small successive advances, then his theory would be disproved. Irreducible systems provide that disproof. Evolutionists have fought irreducible complexity fiercely, but many scientists have become convinced that intelligent design is an undeniable feature of living organisms, and a strong "Intelligent Design" group has emerged. Many articles by Behe and the Design group can be found on the internet. Behe explains his stand in Evidence for Intelligent Design. One of his colleagues, William Dembski's "Still Spinning" illustrates the tricky tactics of the opponents of design and how they can be dealt with." Studies in Evolution - Reformation International Schools (refcm.org)

You are applying a negative inference to that verse. In other words you are claiming Jesus is saying baptism is necessary for salvation but the verse doesn't say that. You are twisting the meaning. If it meant baptism was necessary it would say so, but it doesn't. Countless other verses say salvation is by faith. None say if you are not baptized you will not be saved. Show one verse that says if someone is not baptized they can't be saved?

That may be true with you. Maybe someone else will get something from my postings. You reject Biblical truth at your own peril. However, not everyone is saved. I gave you the information to try to help but you rebuffed it. You can't say you were not told. Just a little warning. God is merciful but those who reject his free offer of mercy and salvation have chosen their own path. "18 Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth. 19 Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will? 20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus? {repliest…: or, answerest again, or, disputest with God?} 21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour? 22 What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction: {fitted: or, made up} 23 And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory, 24 Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles? " Romans 9:18-24

You are lying. Tax fraud is illegal behavior and it happens under every government. You falsely claimed the Conservative government was allowing them to evade taxes. You have given no proof that the politicians were complicit in tax evasion. That is an outright lie.

Canada's socialized health care system is failing Canadians. Four million Canadians do not have a family doctor. So much for socialized health care. Canada ranks last in primary health care access among 10 wealthy countries: report (msn.com)

Any proof?