Jump to content

hot enough

Members
  • Posts

    4,100
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by hot enough

  1. How many years service did you do then? Before or after your service to the old cow?
  2. What saved you, a sex change operation?
  3. Your wish is my command. Your selectivity highlights your claim as being a specious one, Goddess. This discussion that has all of a sudden got your knickers in a twist goes back to Betsy/Blackbird.
  4. Either you are flat out lying or you are miserably uninformed. It wasn't called "super duper nanothermite" by the US government scientists at the military labs where they developed nanothermite. It was designated as a super thermite. Why? Because it was so energetic that it was more powerful than many of the explosives commonly used in controlled demolitions. It, the nanothermite, was so powerful that it caused the twin towers to come down as if the thousands of tonnes of structural steel below the impact zones had the strength of custard pudding. Actually the twin towers came down faster than that but this comparison helps explain it to those who are not very scientifically adept. When thousands of tonnes of structural steel had held up the twin towers since, when? 1987?, the only thing that could change that strength into custard pudding is a controlled demolition.
  5. Yet these communist countries are top performers in the world economy.
  6. Popes have always made stupid requirements but that hasn't stopped dumb folks from not being livid. I think you should have hung tight with your last "evidence".
  7. This new evidence has convinced me, Goddess.
  8. Wow, now Muslims are being accused of forcing young Muslim women into nunneries. There's obviously a much larger piece of the sky falling than we previously thought. Chicken Littles, grab your signs and go screeching thru the streets!!
  9. Your right to free speech does not include a right to ignorance and then a claim that you, sitting in that world of ignorance, have a right to express your free speech, without being called on your dismal knowledge about this specific topic. Free speech comes with responsibilities, first and foremost, bring yourself up to speed on the topic you wish to opine upon.
  10. Why do you insist on making this about me? It is not MY PREMISE! Why did you totally ignore, The red/gray chips found in WTC dust were unreacted particles of nanothermite. They had ZERO legal/legitimate reason to be there. In fact, normal thermite had ZERO legal/legitimate reason to be there. What is it that you can not grasp about "total impossibility"? A total impossibility that makes the USGOCT a total impossibility. What makes you hold these myriad total impossibilities in a functioning portion of your brain that allows it to believe the fiction you do?
  11. What you said before was total nonsense, and seemingly it is all you have to hang your hat on. But you adopt this imperious stance like you actually made some sense. There are "thermite matches" developed by the same US military labs that developed NANOTHERMITE. These thermite matches are incredibly precise and easily controlled and they can be set off by remote control. Nanothermite can be mixed up in a liquid gel and when dried it can be sprayed and even painted on. Are you also ignoring the largest elevator upgrade in modern history that took place in the twin towers from 1994 to just before 911? Are you also ignoring the insulation upgrades, remember, nanothermite can be spray applied, that took place during those same years on the same floors where the alleged 911 planes crashed? I'm shocked by your ignorance of the above. There are no experts who support the USGOCT. Did you even read the first post of this thread? Don't you think it is incumbent upon people who participate in discussions to bring themselves up to speed? There are no experts writing on 911 that support the USGOCT. There are no studies being done by anyone who supports the USGOCT to replicate NIST's findings because there is no NIST data available for them to work with. Why would scientists, whose studies are so full of truth, hide their data? Why would you accept such totally unscientific crap?
  12. Cryptic when you catch yourself out.
  13. In the catholic school system.
  14. But you understand and seemingly support the caste system of not at all great England.
  15. You're obviously mistaken because you haven't provided any proof for anything. That is not at all academic. And now you are maligning the job of housewife, which is a career path that I believe is still open to women. Yes, have been for centuries. Really!!?? You are attempting to advance this nonsense when nuns are forbidden from becoming priests???
  16. What a grand hypocrite!! Had you done a wee bit of study in history, even remembering the propagandist movies you've seen, you would know that the white man is the world's leader in fighting and killing each other. American whites were scalping Indians and slaughtering them long before there was the "nation" known as the USA. The California government paid a bounty on Indian heads, men, women and children. That sounds just like a Hitler argument for him "helping" the Jewish people.
  17. It would help if "they" had something of merit one could consider. Topaz has the courage to speak out. What is holding you back, the lame "det cord" argument? The red/gray chips found in WTC dust were unreacted particles of nanothermite. They had ZERO legal/legitimate reason to be there. In fact, normal thermite had ZERO legal/legitimate reason to be there. What is it that you can not grasp about "total impossibility"? What makes you hold these myriad total impossibilities in a functioning portion of your brain that allows it to believe the fiction you do?
  18. You must be because the USOCT conspiracy theorists because they never provide any evidence nor do they accept hard scientific proof.
  19. You, PIK, are advancing the notion that you somehow know better than a learned judge on a recent case. Tell me, did you come to this conclusion before or after you read the entire written decision?
  20. I wonder I wonder why you are aren't outraged by the fact that the USA/UK created ISIS and are both totally culpable/responsible for any and all crimes precipitated by the US/UK initial supreme war crime, the illegal invasion of sovereign nations.
  21. But you don't believe NASA when it comes to global warming, Argus. Can you not see your own hypocrisy?
  22. That is called propaganda, something that you have never shown any ability to discern, Betsy. You swallow it like mother's milk. And disgorge it like empty bible prophecies.
  23. That's not supported by the evidence, Betsy, you know that stuff that you have a great aversion to. The USA pretty much founded their entire first century of raping and pillaging the planet upon the fatuous notion that a god would bless their crimes as a god given right to rape and pillage. The Brits pulled the same bullshit for a long time too. Canadian and US [Australia & NZ too] genocides against indigenous peoples all had the imprimatur of the christian god.
  24. I thought that Taxme pretty uniformly described this evil as one that covers all religions, Rue. "I wish that we lived in a world where there was no religion at all. Religions have nothing to be proud of." Wherein the above do you find "lip service to sentiments you don't apply equally to all religions"?
×
×
  • Create New...