Jump to content

hot enough

Member
  • Posts

    4,100
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by hot enough

  1. Why would you make such a ludicrous comparison? There is plenty of US genocide, war crimes, terrorism, rapes, planned baby killing, rapes, beheading people, death lists/death squads, slashing women's breasts off, skinning people alive, US torture chambers, ... .
  2. Are you suggesting that the same conditions were present on 911 in the twin towers and WTC7 as those of gas welding? Are you suggesting that jet fuel/office furnishings can melt/vaporize steel [2,750F/4900F]; vaporize lead [3,180F]; melt molybdenum [4,170F]? Are you suggesting that jet fuel/office furnishings can melt/create iron microspheres [2,800F] amounting to 6% of WTC dust? When you actually get around to answering these many questions and their implications for your goofy, totally crazy USGOCT, included some evidence.
  3. That's how you handle the situation whenever your intellectual abilities fail you, sapper.
  4. Well, at least you are your usual dishonest self.
  5. Are you suggesting that the same conditions were present on 911 in the twin towers and WTC7 as those of gas welding? Are you suggesting that jet fuel/office furnishings can melt/vaporize steel [2,750F/4900F]; vaporize lead [3,180F]; melt molybdenum [4,170F]? Are you suggesting that jet fuel/office furnishings can melt/create iron microspheres [2,800F] amounting to 6% of WTC dust?
  6. That's all you have done is lie about being a pilot, along with your frequent lies about 911, which you are doing again right here and now. Are you suggesting that jet fuel/office furnishings can melt/vaporize steel [2,750F/4900F]; vaporize lead [3,180F]; melt molybdenum [4,170F]? Are you suggesting that jet fuel/office furnishings can melt/create iron microspheres [2,800F] amounting to 6% of WTC dust?
  7. You are being typically evasive, again, as always, never offering any evidence or even remotely plausible explanations. Are you suggesting that jet fuel/office furnishings can melt/vaporize steel [2,750F/4900F]; vaporize lead [3,180F]; melt molybdenum [4,170F]? Are you suggesting that jet fuel/office furnishings can melt/create iron microspheres [2,800F] amounting to 6% of WTC dust? Why would anyone trust a guy who lies about being a pilot?
  8. I'm not the least bit upset. I know of language boobs. I am some kind of language guru and I know from MH's nonsensical post and your jumping in the pool to save him that neither of you are remotely close to even being remotely competent at explaining language.
  9. I't s always "fairly simple science" that you can never explain or offer any evidence for. Are you suggesting that jet fuel/office furnishings can melt/vaporize steel [2,750F/4900F]; vaporize lead [3,180F]; melt molybdenum [4,170F]? Are you suggesting that jet fuel/office furnishings can melt/create iron microspheres [2,800F] amounting to 6% of WTC dust?
  10. I think finally, you are beginning to understand, which can be seen by how you are now [and always] backing out of the room, mumbling about how something urgent has arisen.
  11. You seem to hold this weird notion that you are making some sense. I understand all the factual issues that have occurred here. What you don't have the slightest conception of are the language issues. MH thought he was pointing himself up as a language guru when he, also, knows nothing of language. As I said, these "language gurus" make the most ludicrous suggestions to illustrate how bright they are, when it is they who are being ludicrous. I do hate idiots like Lynne Truss pretending they know of language when they most certainly do not. Why have you gone to such great lengths to illustrate that you endeavor to include yourself?
  12. Neither of which have any validity. Science long ago proved that that is total nonsense. You have a dog who revealed himself to a bunch of people from long ago who saw mystery in everything in their little universe. They created all these myths, which were coalesced into the bible, which more adults indoctrinated their unthinking children into believing. What you have in religion is, all you have is, a bunch of frightened, unthinking children who never really ever grow up. "believed to be" are the operative words, with zero proof/evidence, just this childish wish that it is all true.
  13. I think they accomplished one thing, Argus, and that is that it made you leap up to illustrate that you don't really grasp what freedom of speech means.
  14. That is not your view at all, sapper. You are one who actively sabotages in order to hamper/constrain free speech, with the desired result as you see it, to contain/hide the truth when it conflicts with your blinkered views.
  15. Crosby, like many others doesn't know how deeply evil, how malevolent the USA is.
  16. You don't know enough about English or, evidently, logic to be making these kinds of statements. Reality [and you, which I have had to point out to you at least twice] says AG was not saying that. The only one who was suggesting such a totally crazy, nonsensical, goofy notion was Michael Hardner, which I have suggested he garnered from Lynne Truss or some other crazy, goofy prescriptivist. Let me TRY to explain it to you once more - these goofy prescriptivists often try to make their language points by reducing their arguments to total absurdities. The only joke was Michael's attempted correction and you, sticking up for him, because you assumed the same nutty absurdity.
  17. You really are terribly confused, Rue. You science deniers don't have a theory, or theories. You all have the same bogus US government official conspiracy theory, a theory that is so totally out to lunch, a theory none of you even know much about and none of you ever even discuss the USGOCT because you all know it is wacko. The video you posted does not "counter our theories", as you assert, it actually makes a case, a terrible one but nevertheless, a case for you folks who can't even address your own USGOCT. I told you you were totally confused, which is why you have these wild, disjointed replies which never actually say anything about the science or the events. Aluminum always pours silvery in daylight conditions. This molten iron was staying yellow hot despite falling hundreds of feet. Aluminum cannot do that. This one event illustrates the USOCT is bogus. FEMA describes, with pictures, molten/vaporized steel girder/beams that come from WTC7 and from one of the twin towers. What fuel source was there, Rue, that could have done that? Did the Arab hijackers bring some thermate with them and hurl it over to WTC7 to melt/vaporize the steel beam/girder? What fuel source was there, Rue, that could have melted molybdenum, 4,700F? What fuel source was there, Rue, that could have vaporized lead, 3,180F?
  18. bcsapper: Nobody thinks Army Guy was cooking neighbourhood mothers, but as that's what it sounded like, it was worthy of comment. This is how people who know nothing about language react even when they themselves don't think the nutty notion is realistic. These are "kibitzers and nudniks", someone tells them something goofy about language and they run to repeat it, thinking it makes them look smart.
  19. No, that is NOT what it sounded like. You, yourself stated that. How come you, and every other sentient English speaking human on the planet understands fully in speech when no one adds an apostrophe. Michael was simply trying to show off.
  20. Explain what is wrong with "Tim Horton's".
  21. You can blame whoever you want but the issue is precisely that "Nobody thinks Army Guy was cooking neighbourhood mothers, but as that's what it sounded like". No, that isn't what it sounded like and you noted that yourself. Idiots like Lynne Truss think they have such a great grasp on language, grammar, punctuation when they don't and those that follow these no-nothings are not any better. It's one thing to point out what is right/appropriate but it is stupidity personified to use specious reasoning.
  22. Those were the original terrorists and they haven't slowed a lick since.
  23. The only thing that Americans know less about than the English language, is other countries' everything and their own country's history.
×
×
  • Create New...