hot enough

It matters not what the legal implications were/are, what matters is the social/moral implications and the legal implications which describe the US illegally invading Iraq and Afghanistan on the flimsiest of lies, which you seem to have swallowed, hook, line and sinker. That how cultish folks often act.

There would never have been any SCoC ruling because that would require the Cdn government to have to deal with the fact that they were intimately involved with USA war criminals/terrorists. It's amazing how people can get so duped by the most consummate liars ever to plague the planet. Iraq WMD, OBL responsible for 911, Gulf of Tonkin, totally tight with the Taliban until the US needed a boogeyman, ... . The ultimate irony!

What is good for the goose ... . "As Nazi Germany's number one trading partner in the United States, [.........] is proud to reaffirm its support for the people of Nazi Germany and we will continue to build on our historic partnership," Abbott stated. "Anti-Nazi Germany policies are anti-[.......] policies, and we will not tolerate such actions against an important ally."

In one of the strangest things that has ever happened in all of western societies' famous conundrums, we find that sixteen years after three WTC towers were blown up by people unknown, there is still not any evidence, none at all, that supports the United States governments' contentions that 19 Arab hijackers flew planes into targets. There is voluminous evidence that the groups charged with investigating these crimes lied, in a baldfaced manner, engaged in scientific fraud, and did what no scientist should ever do, keep their data secret.

Zero evidence again, and total delusion, avoiding all these stark realities. And all the dishonest people just allow your patent dishonesty.

Hilarious. But you can never provide any evidence for your wacky USGOCT. And you ignoring such stark realities. That is not at all reflective of a person of responsibility. Try dealing with these total impossibilities, any one of which sinks the USGOCT. You are looking at John Gross, touching a previously molten/vaporized steel beam/girder. No legal/legitimate fuel source was available to melt/vaporize the steel, molybdenum or lead. The fictional hijackers didn't melt/vaporize all this metal. They didn't bring the nanothermite that was NECESSARY to create the almost 6% of WTC dust being made up of iron microspheres, 1500 times the amount that is found in normal office dust. These iron microspheres can only come from the reactions of a thermite/thermate/nanothermite reaction.

How can you be so "naive" or intellectually dishonest, it's hard to tell with the whoppers you have tried to advance. You think the US military needs det cord? Have you ever heard of remote controlled detonation. Gee you have! You know that cell phones can be used for this. And you don't think the US government has access to all the latest gadgets?

You made a tiny, weak plea that you might be an intellectually honest person, but you immediately fall back into what can only be stark delusions. How can you deny the picture proof that you have seen with your own eyes? And all the other equally intellectually dishonest folks, it's truly remarkable.

I have told you many times that it doesn't matter how the explosives got in there, it is indisputable that they did. You look at pictures of molten/vaporized steel collected by FEMA for dog's sakes, the picture of John the gross liar Gross holding the end of a previously molten/vaporized steel beam and you deny these stark realities. RJLee Group tells of molten metals that are 100% impossible according to the USGOCT. Do you deny this stark reality too? And you don't consider that that is stunning intellectual dishonesty, especially when you have long ignored these irrefutable proofs and that there are many other impossibilities in the USGOCT story and zero evidence to support it.

Such stunning "intellectual" cowardliness.

Now you are either lying big time or you are totally incompetent. You are looking at John Gross, touching a previously molten/vaporized steel beam/girder. No legal/legitimate fuel source was available to melt/vaporize the steel, molybdenum or lead. The fictional hijackers didn't melt/vaporize all this metal. They didn't bring the nanothermite that was NECESSARY to create the almost 6% of WTC dust being made up of iron microspheres, 1500 times the amount that is found in normal office dust. These iron microspheres can only come from the reactions of a thermite/thermate/nanothermite reaction.

Now you, the actual conspiracy theorist, flat out lies. The existence of molten steel (or iron) was inexplicitly denied by one of the authors of the NIST reports, engineer John L. Gross. [8] At a lecture at the University of Texas in October 2006, Gross was asked a question about “a pool of molten steel,” to which he replied: “Let’s go back to your basic premise that there was a pool of molten steel. I know of absolutely nobody – no eyewitnesses said so, nobody’s produced it.” [9] http://www.consensus911.org/point-tt-6/ That, above is the gross liar, John Gross of NIST.

I have never denied that there was training involved. The US government isn't that stupid that they wouldn't cover that base somewhat. What you ignore is the fact that Hani Hanjour could not rent a Cessna. Speaking of problems with reading comprehension, ... What you also ignore is that you can't even provide any evidence for the existence of any hijackers. What you also studiously ignore is that you haven't, because you can't address the impossibility of the molten/vaporized steel, the vaporized lead, the molten molybdenum, the iron microspheres to your wacky USGOCT. This is pathological denial on a grand scale and it affects many more than just you.

Your typical zero evidence post. You are the fabricator who says the evidence is out there but you can never provide any.

This is what people who have no evidence always say.

The thread is entitled, Providing proof/evidence that supports the US 911 Conspiracy Theory and you, actually no one has ever offered one piece of evidence for the wackiest of all time USGOCT. If you are a pilot then you are lying because real pilots, aeronautical engineers state that the Arabs didn't have the necessary skills. You still haven't even provided any evidence for there being any hijackers. You still haven't produced any evidence for the alleged planes being the same ones as the nonsensical USGOCT. You still haven't addressed the impossibility of the molten/vaporized steel, the vaporized lead, the molten molybdenum, the iron microspheres. You're the one who believes in wacky conspiracy theories.

Maybe the folks who wear this type of clothing aren't the brainwashed ones. ================== The results were clear. As the report puts it: "The amount of heat gained by a Bedouin exposed to the hot desert is the same whether he wears a black or a white robe. The additional heat absorbed by the black robe was lost before it reached the skin." Bedouins' robes, the scientists noted, are worn loose. Inside, the cooling happens by convection – either through a bellows action, as the robes flow in the wind, or by a chimney sort of effect, as air rises between robe and skin. Thus it was conclusively demonstrated that, at least for Bedouin robes, black is as cool as any other colour. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/aug/19/most-improbable-scientific-research-abrahams

What a doofus Oliver is. Whining about human rights records. Neither China or Kazakhstan planned the Iraqi genocide of the 1990s, nor did they illegal invade a bunch of sovereign nations. The USA/UK/... did!

Actually, it sinks your goofy conspiracy, the one that you can't provide a single piece of evidence for. It must be noted, as always, zero evidence and to boot, patent dishonesty. Hani Hanjour, a fella they wouldn't even rent a Cessna to. Oh and by the way, you still haven't provided any evidence that there were any hijackers, ever. Why can't you ever provide any evidence for your conspiracy theory?

It gets top priority when it is used for propaganda purposes, doesn't it, Michael? And how many were murdered in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, ... by western war criminals/terrorists?

You absolutely despise evidence and truthfulness. Learning to solo a small plane is not at all like a 757. Captain Robin Lloyd points out how dishonest you are being. And not a boo from any of those pilots. Why? Because there were no hijackers. None of you can provide any evidence for the existence of any hijackers. In fact, none of you USGOCT conspiracy theorists can provide any evidence at all for the USOCT. Never have never will, because there isn't any. Simulator Recreation Demonstrates Pentagon Attack Impossibility

You, and of course Rue, never offer any evidence for your silly contentions.

As always, zero evidence from Rue. Try some sources because you don't know anything about the science or the events. Steel was melted and vaporized. That couldn't have happened on 911 without the aid of the known nanothermite.

I gave you plenty of cites, Michael, which you have dutifully ignored, as you always do.