Goddess

Interesting to note that Hungary has rejected the globalist EU demands for mass immigration. Their crime stats reflect that, as well.

Here, I just quickly found this: Hungary gives full income tax exemptions to moms with two or more kids—what if the U.S. did the same? Hungary’s tax exemption isn’t just about economics; it’s about acknowledging the value of motherhood. It’s about recognizing that raising children is work—and that work contributes to a nation’s future. By easing the tax burden, Hungary is offering moms what so many say they need most: breathing room. Breathing room that could mean covering the cost of daycare without sacrificing retirement savings. The ability to buy a reliable family car or build an emergency fund without stress. It could mean finally feeling like there’s enough—enough to provide, enough to plan, enough to exhale. Mothers who work will be eligible for this benefit no matter their income level, age, or how old their children are. It’s not a short-term measure, either—the exemption remains in place for as long as a mother is raising her children. Prime Minister Orbán also noted that the family tax allowance—ranging from 10,000 HUF (about $26) to 165,000 HUF (roughly $430) monthly, depending on how many children are in the home—is available to fathers, too. Of course, Hungary’s approach isn’t perfect. But it’s still a rare example of a government putting money where its values are when it comes to families.

Hungary has done this. Have a certain number of children and you're exempt from income taxes for life. I think it's fairly recent, so not sure if the effects, good or bad, have had enough time to develop. But since affordability is the #1 reason given for not having a family, it seems like a good program.

They're looting Canada of whatever is left in the taxpayer trough. Carney is the head oinker.

Then we should make it affordable for Canadians to have children. The #1 reason people give for not starting a family is affordability.

This is a good illustration of the futility of immigration at all, let alone mass immigration:

No. I think it's a few greedy people who knew they were going to make billions of $$ and a network of useful id10ts, like yourself. It's not really all that far-fetched. Big Pharma has a long history of doing exactly that. Heard about the opioid crisis? The "vast vast majority of doctors" recommended that, too. Heard about Vioxx? Thalidomide? Gardasil? The swine flu fiasco of 1976?

It takes about 10 years of testing before a vaccine is marketed. Why were mRNA injections never marketed after "decades" of experiments? Do you know the answer to that? Because I do.

In March 2022, Dr. Joseph Fraiman taped an internal call between FDA directors and physicians who were concerned about mRNA side effects in their patients – including the cardiac arrest and sudden death of a 7-year-old days after being injected with Pfizer's mRNA vaccine. "This was a top level meeting of directors," Dr. Fraiman revealed to Ask Dr. Drew in Sept 2023. "This entire meeting terrified my entire work group." The call – legally recorded by Dr. Fraiman – included FDA Director Dr. Peter Marks, Dr. Peter Doshi, Dr. Celia Witten, Dr. Sarah Walinsky, Dr. Lorrie McNeill, and many other experts. "What they're saying here is they're not doing statistical testing on adverse events. This is really insane to me," Dr. Fraiman continued. "You know there's a problem if the vaccine group has a higher rate of them." In the call, UCLA pediatric specialist Dr. Patrick Whelan told FDA directors that he filed a VAERS report about a 7-year-old patient who "had a cardiac arrest following his first Pfizer vaccination" but says he "didn't receive any follow up." "The patient died about 8 days later," says Dr. Whelan. "There's something wrong with the reporting system." Listen to the call at: https://youtu.be/OTBQXRnBHkE

Absolutely everything eyeball wrote is FALSE. We did not know how many children were dying from the jab and we still do not know. We are finding out now and it will take years before the full extent of the damage is known. Eyeball, you are repeating false information from the beginning of the covid fiasco and you refuse to accept any new information or data. This was an EXPERIMENTAL injection with EXPERIMENTAL non-medical interventions. Why do you not understand that? As the data comes out, we will learn more and more. Yet, you are firm in refusing to accept the results of all this experimentation. I get it - you cheerled and demonized all through this. It looks really bad for you. You will either need to humble yourself and accept that you were manipulated into the mass hysteria for nothing and that it caused much unnecessary death or you can cling to all the unscientific measures that were HOPED for at the beginning. I doubt you will move forward. You supported killing children for adults and that - in almost every culture and almost every time period throughout history - has been morally unacceptable. It's why you disgust me.

You would think ones like eyeball, barky, robo et al - they would be embarrassed at how easily manipulated they were during covid and ashamed of their support for things like lockdowns and forcing experimental medicine on children and pregnant women. But no. They're still here. Super-proud of themselves. And demonizing everyone who was not easily manipulated and was already well-informed of the above information. They've been demonizing me and calling me a conspiracy theorist and a loon for years now. Even after they've been proven wrong over and over and over again. One of the sickest exchanges I've ever had on here was with eyeball, who after FINALLY admitting that yes, some children probably died from the jabs - it was worth it because some 90 yr old granny got a couple more weeks.

Are Lockdowns Effective in Managing Pandemics? - PMC This was a good study because it examined the cost/benefit analysis of lockdowns, which was NOT done during covid. You're a fuquing ****** if you still support this. We can never let them do this to us again. All you braindead lemmings - you cheered while governments killed more children than covid ever would have. And you let them do it for MONEY. The following research questions have been formulated: What has been known about lockdowns’ effectiveness in saving/prolonging life in previous pandemics; what is the COVID-19 evidence regarding lockdowns’ effectiveness in saving/prolonging life; which factors determine the human cost of lockdowns—side-effects that shorten life; how can the human cost of lockdowns be estimated based on economical parameters; what is the quantitative estimation for lockdowns’ human cost? Finally, we tried to understand how decision-making was actually performed. The Spanish Flu was one of the deadliest pandemics in centuries, and for sure the most lethal of well-documented pandemics [9]. The highest mortality was detected among the 20–40 years age group [10] and so caused sizable demographic damage—unlike COVID-19. This being said, there was no panic then and the response was mainly based on common sense—see references in sect. II.2 of the Collection [4]. The leaders generally presumed reasonable and rational behavior of the citizens: e.g., quarantine practices were almost exclusively voluntary. Closure of the non-entertainment business was out of discussion [11]. School closure was discussed but often rejected due to the obvious outcome: children’s bands roaming in dirty streets could boost the infection spread more than gathering in supervised and relatively clean schools [12]. The effectiveness of various closures has not been proven. It should be mentioned that the same conclusions—no clear benefit of lockdowns in case of pandemic—were made by national and international bodies before COVID-19 emerged. Namely, several governments prepared detailed plans of response to influenza-like pandemics years ago—see the programs of the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2007) [16], Israeli Ministry of Health (2007) [17] and more references in sect. II.4 of the Collection [4]. Israel probably had the most elaborate plan which relied on the unique experience of civil-military partnership (ref. II.4.4 in the Collection [4]). Noteworthy, the World Health Organization (WHO) published its comprehensive 91-page preparedness plan [6] in October 2019! All these response plans mentioned lockdowns, if at all, as a means of last resort only. The WHO document, for example, explicitly mentioned that: social distancing measures “can be highly disruptive” and should be carefully weighted travel-related measures are “unlikely to be successful”; “border closures may be considered only by small island nations in severe pandemics” contact tracing and quarantine of exposed individuals are not recommended in any circumstances. All the above plans were abandoned without any serious discussion at the very beginning of the COVID-19 crisis: The authors failed to find a single mention of these plans in publications of national health ministries in either country. Lockdowns, border closures, contact tracing, and quarantines became the main instruments. Numerous deaths can be attributed to the interruption of normal social life and routine regular social interactions. The direct factors are [25,26]: increased mortality due to postponement of diagnoses and routine treatments increase in mortality due to non-arrival at hospitals increase in mortality due to a decrease in the level of income and as a result—use of less safe cars, reduction in the scope of physical activity, etc. “deaths of despair” caused by drugs, alcohol, and suicide following loss of social-economic status increase in violence, including domestic violence; dismantling of families severe health damage to the elderly in particular—physical and mental deterioration (usually irreversible) due to loneliness, lack of movement, and routine supportive care. Since increased income led to life extension, it is logical to conclude that lost income means lost lives. Corresponding references can be found in sect. I.3 of the Collection [4]. Therefore, any decision potentially harmful to personal income should be scrutinized, and decision-makers should not ignore the loss of life caused by loss of income and corresponding loss of socioeconomic status and self-respect [31,32]. Accepting certain or very probable death for money is morally unacceptable. Another comparison can be made if we remember that the average age of people dying of COVID-19 was around 80, with 3–6 QALY per death lost. Therefore, 500,000 QALY are equivalent to roughly 100,000 COVID-19 deaths. Even if we assume that lockdowns saved 1.5 daily deaths per million [20] for a whole year (365 days), after multiplying by 9.2 million (population of Israel) we arrive at about 5000 lives saved—just about 5% of the lockdowns’ human cost. In other words, it can be estimated that even if the lockdowns saved some lives, in the long term they killed 20 times more. As mentioned above, the prepared response plans, both national and international, were abandoned without any serious discussion at the very beginning of the COVID-19 crisis. The actual response consisted of instruments that had been considered ineffective and counter-productive. The extent of human life loss has probably never been calculated and has never been taken into consideration in the decision-making process. One of the first reports recommending strict lockdowns (26 March 2020) explicitly stated [42]: “we do not consider the wider social and economic costs of suppression, which will be high”. Anyhow, societies have never been informed about these considerations and calculations. The implemented policy relied on compulsion instead of compassion and private initiative (with very few exemptions). The governments ignored alternative ways to protect groups at risk—see Sect. V.3 of the Collection [4]. The forecasts which were chosen for political decision-making systematically overestimated the COVID-19 threat, supporting excessive measures—see references in sect. III.1. of the Collection [4]. Political leaders and government officials systematically “instilled fear in the population, thereby contributing to the making of mass hysteria” [43]. The evidence-based approach was actually abandoned, as blatantly reasoned in the pro-lockdown open letter to the UK Chief Medical Officers [44]: “Whilst it is always helpful to have more data and more evidence, we caution that in this complex and fast-moving pandemic, certainty is likely to remain elusive. ‘Facts’ will be differently valued and differently interpreted by different experts and different interest groups. A research finding that is declared ‘best evidence’ or ‘robust evidence’ by one expert will be considered marginal or flawed by another expert.” Lockdowns were still imposed during the subsequent waves (autumn/winter 2020/21 and 2021/22, to say nothing about the 2022 spring lockdowns in PRC [45]) as if they had been proven effective—despite the above-mentioned evidence. Not surprised. He's completely unmoved by dead children and has stated repeatedly that he would support every last bit of it again.

This has always been one of the most damning aspects of the covering up of the jab's failure. I don't understand how anyone who claims to be a critical thinker can gloss over this. 80-90% vaxxed rate. And yet MORE and YOUNGER people dying from the disease they were vaxxed against. Yet the variants were far less lethal. And by 2022, the "dry tinder" - the ones most vulnerable, the very elderly, the terminally ill, the grossly obese - had already died. Only the completely brainwashed believe the spin that this jab was "successful".

And this one from "Melanie in Saskatchewan". She's a good writer, you should follow her if you're on "X". Carney’s Liberals: From Bay Street Boardrooms to National Betrayal. Canadians, wake up. The #CarneyLiberals are not just stumbling through another week of governance; they are ransacking the country with a brazenness that would make even Justin Trudeau blush. This is not leadership. This is looting, plain and simple, dressed up in the pinstripes of a former central banker who parachuted into power promising elbows-up grit but delivering nothing but elbows-deep corruption. Mark Carney, the self-proclaimed saviour who swapped his Goldman Sachs Rolodex for 24 Sussex, has turned #Parliament into his personal piggy bank, and we are all paying the interest. Let's start with the elephant in the boardroom: that $500 million "green steel" subsidy to @AlgomaSteelInc in Sault Ste. Marie. The entire project depends on a massive new electricity feed to power electric-arc furnaces that are supposed to replace coal. Where is that power coming from? A cluster of wind farms in Prince Township, Nova Scotia, owned and operated by none other than Brookfield Renewable Partners, the same #Brookfield where @MarkJCarney still holds roughly $6 million in unexercised stock options and performance units that vest based on Brookfield's share price and renewable-energy profits. In other words, every kilowatt-hour #Algoma buys from those turbines flows straight to Carney's personal bottom line. Taxpayers fund the subsidy, Algoma gets the grant, Brookfield gets the long-term power contract and the carbon credits, Carney's own regulations created, and the prime minister's brokerage account gets fatter. Meanwhile, Algoma is already preparing to lay off half its remaining workforce. This is the most blatant act of self-dealing we have seen from a sitting prime minister in modern history. If @PierrePoilievretried to steer a pipeline contract to a company that owed him millions, the @CBC would run a week-long special. With Carney, they call it "visionary industrial policy." And do not even get me started on the Ukraine cash grab. Just as a $100 million #corruption scandal erupts in #Kyiv, forcing two cabinet ministers to resign amid oligarchs laundering funds, including to #Russia , what does Foreign Affairs Minister @AnitaAnandMP do? She jets off to #NATO and pledges another $235 million of OUR money, pushing for Ukraine's membership like it's a loyalty card at Tim Hortons. Nearly $900 million in six months, folks, while our #veterans wait months for benefits and families scrape by on #foodbanks. Anita Anand calls it an "investment," but it's #extortion dressed as aid. Why the rush to reward thieves? Because the #Liberals are neck-deep in this swamp, using #Canadian generosity as cover for their globalist buddies. Trudeau started the fire; Carney is pouring gasoline, all while lecturing us on sacrifices. Hypocrisy does not even begin to cover it. Then there is the Alberta #MOU, a pragmatic move that finally unlocks pipelines and the fossil fuel POTENTIAL to shield us from Trump's tariffs and boost energy independence, something long overdue in this resource-rich nation. But watch Carney's #hypocrisy shine through like a boardroom spotlight. This is the same man who sermonized endlessly about green transitions during his campaign, wooing voters with promises of climate action that now evaporate faster than a Liberal surplus. He personally assured Green Party leader @ElizabethMay that her support for his budget would buy iron-clad environmental protections. This week May went public with her shock and dismay, openly admitting that propping up Carney's budget was a #GraveMistake and that he broke his word the moment the votes were counted. Too bad she did not listen to the voters who warned her from the start. The voters who have taken the time to research Mark Carney discovering his dirty little secrets. As of right now, no one can credibly say Elizabeth May has good judgement skills. Former Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault bolted in disgust, nine Liberal MPs are grumbling about betrayal, and even Trudeau loyalists in caucus are whispering that their Bay Street boss is unraveling. Liberal insiders spill that Carney runs government like a Fortune 500 conglomerate, slashing public servants while padding executive perks, treating Canada as just another asset to flip for profit. This is not pragmatism; it is pure duplicity, a cave-in to reality that exposes Carney's campaign pledges as hollow sales pitches. How does PSAC executives feel now? He did not just pivot; he sold out his own script, proving Liberals are weather vanes spinning for personal gain, costing Canadians jobs, security, and trust in the process. Fiscal insanity ties it all together. Carney's budget, that $78 billion deficit bomb, promises infrastructure miracles while slashing public servants and ignoring housing hell. It is Trudeau 2.0, but with fancier spreadsheets and zero accountability. Productivity craters, GDP stutters negative, and yet Carney struts like Canada's G7 champ. Newsflash, Mark: We are the laggards, not the leaders, and your Bay Street buddies are laughing as they short the loonie. This cabal of elites thinks Canadians are too busy surviving to notice. Wrong. From Brookfield wind-farm windfalls to Ukraine slush funds, the Carney Liberals embody everything rotten in #Ottawa: entitlement, enrichment, and endless excuses. #Hypocrisy and #Incompetence like this pi$$ me off royally, and it has cost Canadians everything, from soaring costs and barren dinner tables to shattered dreams and broken families. As much as some Canadians may disagree or hate to hear it, Pierre Poilievre gets it right, day after day in Question Period, demanding answers Carney literally flees from like a bad audit. It is time to end this farce. Conservatives stand ready to restore sanity, axe the waste, and put Canada first, not some globalist Rolodex. Carney, your options are running out. Pack your bags for London. The real work of cleaning house needs to start now. Melanie in Saskatchewan

Saw this post on "X" today: Canada Torched $200 Million on a Pass Most Families Will Never Touch Today I can’t even pretend to laugh, because the reality behind it is infuriating. Canada proudly announces its newest “gift” to the nation: the Canada Strong Pass. “Free” parks. “Free” museums. VIA Rail discounts. And the crown jewel—5 or 6 weeks of ‘free’ Banff access. As if families across the country are sitting around thinking, “Wow, you know what I really need? A temporary discount on a vacation I can’t afford.” It’s insulting. Not just out of touch—borderline delusional. The Real Costs They Hope You Don’t Look At Let’s talk about an actual family of four in Grande Prairie trying to use this “free” holiday: •Fuel: $190–$230 •Food: $470–$750 •Hotel: $500–$900 •Parking/shuttles: $40–$100 Total: $1,200–$1,980 Savings from the pass? $22. Twenty. Two. Dollars. That’s not a benefit. It’s a slap in the face. It’s the government tossing you pocket lint and acting like they paid your rent. A 1% “discount” masquerading as national generosity. A PR stunt pretending to be policy. A shiny distraction from problems they can’t—or won’t—actually address. And Here’s Where the Anger Really Kicks In With the same $200 million, Canada could fund: •Hundreds of doctors •Thousands of nurses •Thousands of teachers For an entire year. Real people. Doing real work. Solving real problems. Serving real communities. But instead? We get a pass most Canadians will never use, because they can’t afford the surrounding costs just to get there. It’s like giving someone drowning a coupon for swimming lessons. Useless. Tone-deaf. Performative. We’re not tackling affordability—we’re painting over it with a vacation brochure. We’re not helping families stretch their budgets—we’re giving them access to places they have no financial pathway to reach. We’re not investing in health care or education—we’re burning money on optics. And then acting like we should all be grateful for it. This Isn’t Policy This is government theatre at its most detached. It’s leadership that’s forgotten what life actually costs. Leadership convinced that a postcard solution solves a cost-of-living crisis. Meanwhile: Groceries are skyrocketing. Rent is suffocating. Heating is brutal. Kids are eating less nutritious food because parents can’t afford healthy options. People are waiting months—months—to see a doctor. Teachers are stretched to the breaking point. And instead of addressing any of that? We get a 1% discount on a $1,500 trip. A piece of paper that doesn’t put food on the table. Doesn’t shorten hospital waits. Doesn’t keep the heat on. Doesn’t ease a single real burden. It’s not just bad policy. It’s a fundamental misread of what Canadians actually face every single day. A free pass to Banff is not support. It’s not relief. It’s not help. It’s a joke. A distraction. A shiny object dangled in front of a population exhausted from carrying the weight of rising costs while their leaders congratulate themselves for “helping.” Canadians don’t need postcards. They don’t need press releases. They don’t need commemorative passes. They need tangible, meaningful, real-world support. And the fact that $200 million was spent on anything but that? That’s the part that cuts deepest.

Does anyone else here remember 2003 as being the same as 2020 onward? Sorry dude, nothing like 2020 has ever happened in the history of mankind.

It's human nature, sadly, that until something happens to YOU, you can pretend it doesn't exist and call everyone liars when it happens to THEM. Last summer, my daughter got home at 1 am and went downstairs to say Hi, how was your evening, glad you're home. Half-asleep, I missed a step and fell, dislocating my shoulder, but I thought I had broken my arm. She drove me to the closest hospital, which looked like a war-zone. Homeless people and junkies sprawled all over the waiting room. It was filthy - garbage all over. It stunk. Got checked in and waited 4 hours. I was the only real patient in there. Every 20 mins or so, a nurse would come out, try to rouse one of the junkies and ask if they wanted to see a doctor. They would barely wake up "Ya, ya, ya, I wanna see a doctor." My daughter went over and talked to the security guard "This doesn't even seem like a hospital." He said, "It's not. It's a homeless shelter. If you can stand the pain, go home and wait until the other hospital opens at 9 am." The other hospital is no longer open at night, I assume for the reasons I saw at this hospital - homeless and junkies and filth. I did get in fairly quickly the next day - x-ray and sling. I did dislocate my shoulder, but it had popped back in on its own. I've never taken medical advice from a security guard before, but he was right. Healthcare in Canada is definitely NOT the rosy picture the Libs and their supporters say it is. Parents of B.C. boy who died after five-hour hospital wait speak out | Vancouver Sun BC Conservatives demand answers after 17-year-old boy died Ontario couple whose teenage son died after 8-hour wait in ER calls for law reform | CBC News Canada wait-list deaths: 23,000 Canadians died, report finds

Apparently, the FDA has the evidence.

How do you know this? Just because he didn't provide them to YOU personally doesn't mean they weren't provided to the FDA, VAERS, his lawyers, any number of people. There are penalties for submitting false reports to VAERS, both fines and imprisonment. Are you claiming that VAERS is mostly nothing but false reports? It's actually how the clotting issue with the Johnson & Johnson jab was identified and also the reason for the Astra Zeneca recall. It also identified the myocarditis post-vaccination that parents were concerned about and the CDC finally had to acknowledge. Misinformation about VAERS and other Adverse Event (AE) reporting tools | Misinformation Wiki Why are you lying about this?

Thank you for this. My original point was simply that Canada's precarious financial position and tanking economy is affecting women and children here in Canada and maybe we should start spending more tax dollars on looking after our own and less on the handful (maybe?) of trans rice farmers in Viet Nam. Barky, the chihuahua, was just trying to distract from that point. He doesn't really care if Canadian women and children are struggling.

If you don't find the information credible, fine. I'm just wondering why you're demanding the death certificate and autopsy report from ME. Surely you know I don't have access to that information. You know who does? The FDA. I doubt you read the article, though. You don't think this information was provided to the FDA, either from the father directly (since he met with them, although I'm sure you will say he is lying about that, too, and that the picture of him with Makary is faked) and/or were uploaded to VAERS. You don't think this information was provided to his attorneys? You don't think it's at all credible that his son is one of the 10, since he met directly with the head of the FDA right before the memo came out? And you call me a conspiracy theorist 🤣 You're the one claiming everything about this is fake - the FDA is lying, the father is lying, the pictures are fake, the meeting is fake, the kid is not actually dead, the memo is lying, and no children have ever died from the jab. All because they didn't publicly release the kid's private medical records. GTFO, you braindead doofus.

You're demanding private death and autopsy certificates from ME for a claim made by the FDA, following an investigation by the FDA or else you won't believe their claim of child deaths. Who's being absurd?

All of them. It's YOUR claim. It's not my assertions. It's the FDA's. I'm agreeing with you. They should publicly release ALL the death certificates, ALL the autopsy reports, ALL the private medical records for each and every death by covid or by covid jab. So far, only a few individuals - mostly independent journalists, lawyers, individual data analysts have been successful in FOIPing some information. I'm not mocking you - I truly do believe, like you - that ALL this information should be released publicly. For ALL the deaths, not just the ones from the jabs.

Oh, by the way. You and I have always disagreed on the actual number of covid deaths in Canada. Please provide death certificates, autopsy reports, emergency room visit records, private medical records for EACH one.

No, no. I'm agreeing with you. It's obvious the FDA is lying and no children died of the covid jabs. Obviously if it were true, they would release all the death certificates, autopsy reports, emergency room reports, private medical records for each one. I mean they did that for each covid death claimed during the pandemic, so why wouldn't they do it now? Claiming children died from the covid jabs without publicly releasing all those records - it's obviously a conspiracy.