Goddess

You did that all by yourself? Impressive. P.S. Since NDP support everything Liberal, your Orange riding is actually a Liberal riding.

It's much more than sometimes. That's why the NDP was nearly obliterated in the last election.

What do you call this?

In the last few years, it's been pretty much 100% of the time. But I'm sure you know that.

It's a dragnet, so.......yes.

Even more reason to let them do their job.

They sent out troops to arrest and deport people like this: Arrested: Worst of the Worst | Homeland Security The question, which none of you want to answer is: Why does the left-wing WANT these people in the country?

The NDP and Greens vote whichever way the Liberals do. They oppose nothing the Liberal party does.

They support enacting of laws that allow rapists and pedophiles out on the street immediately. They oppose the repealing of those laws. They support importing people from countries that have no respect for women and girls, with little to no vetting. They oppose and call "racist" anyone who doesn't. They support judges giving house arrest and low sentences to immigrants who rape and molest. They oppose tightening up immigration laws and vetting of immigrants. Yes.

If "Trust me, bro" from the most scandal-riddled, corrupt government in Canadian history is good enough for you, well....OK then. It might not be to actual investors, though.

Oversight Project Clears ICE Officer in Minneapolis - Oversight Project This determination has been made from the perspective of the officer at the moment force is used, not from hindsight or a third party viewpoint. Evidence clearly shows that the activist drove her car into the ICE officer prior to the discharge of the officer’s firearm. A vehicle used in this manner constitutes a deadly weapon. Federal policy states that firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless the vehicle is operating in a manner that threatens the officer’s life, which is the case in this instance. These standards are reinforced by the Supreme Court precedent under Graham v. Connor. Video evidence reveals that moving out of the path of the moving vehicle was not possible. Where deadly force is necessary, officers are trained to shoot to eliminate the threat. The press memorandum is in the article, if you want to read it.

It seems they had already given her a fair amount of leeway - she had been blocking them with her vehicle all morning, blaring the horn. She was not there to just drop her kid off at school and go home, that claim is debunked. She knew these were not "masked strangers" as robo claims. She had been around these agents all morning. She had likely been asked to move repeatedly. Maybe now they were going to arrest her or give her a warning, as they ordered her to get out of the vehicle. She refused. As someone said, she didn't plan on getting shot that morning. But she placed herself in a highly volatile situation, putting herself in a leading position of rebellion against authority. I do think she really thought she could disobey their orders, clip an agent with her vehicle and speed away without anything happening to her. Not very smart.

There are a few groups advising citizens on how to impede ICE agents, including ICE WATCH MINNESOTA, the group this woman was affiliated with. This is from their Legal Resources folder on Instagram: While they do warn of "legal risks", it doesn't seem like they are informing people of this: I don't see anywhere that these groups are telling people to deliberately run their vehicles into agents, but they ARE hyping them up and putting people in heat-of-the moment situations, where they are clearly on the wrong side of the law. Here is some of their information on resisting agents:

In all the videos you can hear the car engine revving as she accelerates towards the officer. You can see the street is icy, I think it would have been worse if she had better traction.

Of course not. But it wasn't a masked stranger. It was a bunch of clearly marked law enforcement officers that she had been antagonizing the entire morning. Or they could arrest her or give her a warning on the spot. THEY get to choose. She was told to exit the vehicle, she chose instead to disobey, speed up and drive away, while her lover cheered her on to "Drive! Drive!"

If Americans don't like the laws about illegal immigrants, they should change them. Even the Democrats did not do that the entire time they were in power. It all boils down to this, IMO - If she had stopped her car and gotten out of the vehicle when she was ordered to, would she still have been shot?

There is no interest shown BECAUSE THERE IS A TANKER BAN, thus - no way to get the oil to market. You're relying on a "Trust me, bro" from the Net Zero nutbar that the ban will go away if there is a builder? Where are you getting that from? Even Smith was not able to get Carney to bend on the tanker ban.

You said he was not aware of it. ☝️ Was he aware or was he not? You said he was not aware, now you're saying you said the opposite.

It's the left opposing deportations. WTF are you talking about? I never said anything of the sort. Find the quote where I said "immigrants have higher rates of child molesting." And "immigrants" are not what the problem is here. It's "illegals". You can have your belief that flinging open the borders to everyone with little to no vetting is a good thing, and others are allowed to believe it is not.

Of course he is. One of his campaign promises was to reduce inter-provincial trade barriers. He even set a date it would be done by. That has not happened and we haven't heard another word about it.

Liberal supporters seem not just content with crumbs falling from table, they are thrilled by them. Who is going to build a pipeline if there's a tanker ban? You can get the oil into the pipe, but you can't get it to world markets. This is so basic. It's like telling a manufacturer of widgets that the entire world wants - Yes, build the widgets, box them up for shipping. Oh, by the way, semi trailers, airplanes and trains are not allowed on the highways surrounding you. Are Liberal supporters that daft? Is it the 14th booster?

OK. You don't see the contradiction in your words, there? On the one hand - you don't prioritize superficial traits. But on the other hand, if the superficial trait of "likeability" is not there, it doesn't matter to you what policies they present. 🤪

The question was - why is it so important to you that Liberal party failures are never mentioned or discussed?

Again: Why are citizens and entire neighborhoods trying to protect molesters?