Goddess

So you agree with Maduro, then? That the ONLY reason the Americans did what they did was to take control of Venezuela's oil? I agree that is part of it (oil reserves), even a large part. But there are a lot of other reasons, too. It's no coincidence that the Chinese were nearby when this happened. Are you okay with the Chinese taking over Venezuela's oil? I assume you are, because you also think China is Canada's best buddy. It's very odd to me how much your ideas align with China's. You support both Canada and Venezuela being run by China and don't seem to understand why the US would not want Communist China in our hemisphere. I was thinking up til now that you are a radical left Liberal, but now I'm wondering if you're actually socialist/communist? Your ideas certainly lean very far towards socialism/communism and you support those regimes and oppose democracies.

It wasn't a sovereign country. It had been taken over by a dictator, drug cartels and various foreign entities. He's just going to wait for us to implode on our own - economically, socially, the Chinese influence. Canadians, like the Venezuelans, will be grateful for US takeover. It's why he has zero interest in us right now. He's just waiting. Once our collapse starts influencing US interests, he'll do something. And Canadians, who will be sick of eating out of dumpsters and watching all our money flee the country with corrupt politicians, will welcome a chance for a better life.

This independent investigative journalist has compiled financial data for 575 First Nations in Canada. Link to publicly available data below his explanation. CDN First Nations wealth, and wealth per capita, taken from Financial Statements. CDN First Nations are required by law to make public their Financial Statements But in 2015 Justin Trudeau said 'Don't worry, though I swore an Oath to uphold the laws of Canada, I'm going to selectively enforce them based on race.' He should have been evicted on this alone. However, most bands do file them, or at least most Financial Statements are available, (but not always up to date). But they are PDF's which makes it extremely difficult for us plebs to comprise encompassing financial data. I suggest it's on purpose. So I downloaded all 575 Financial Statements, and manually scraped the data for accuracy. I wanted to see the CASH of each band, and the ACCUMULATED SURPLUS (Net Equity). Then I scraped the Reserve population of each band, and correlated the PER CAPITA WEALTH. The CASH position is not the total Financial Position, like Investments, Receivables, etc, but just CASH! Like the Wiikwemkoong who have $755M in cash (from a settlement). Why do we have to keep funding them? Private sector accounting uses "Net Equity" to show Total Assets - less Total Liabilities Band Statements use Canadian public sector accounting standards, and the term "Accumulated Surplus", which assumes perpetual funding. Samson Cree Nation expects perpetual funding. Each Reserve population is published as a webpage, not a database, but I scraped that too, to get a per capita correlation. On Reserve is directly tied to Band wealth, where off Reserve is not dealt the same. Why do some bands have no one on Reserve, but yearly funding? To add transparency I have made all 575 financial statements available for download, as well as the spreadsheets complied to make the data for the webpage. If you find an error please let me know. Why did I do this? Because there is no accountability in First Nations financing. We pay for them as a single entity, but many band members are far wealthier than the average Canadian per capita, and so when will it stop? Can't we ask a financial questions, or is that rAcIsT? I hope this helps people who want to know where their taxes are being spent, and find corruption within government. I did this so everyone can investigate, to reduce misinformation, and to bring accountability. I don't make money from X and I don't want any money from you. But once see the Financial Statements, and factor taxpayer funding, an entire new picture comes to light, and many more questions arise. Far more than just when will it stop, but WTF is going on?? LINK: Canadian First Nations Financial Data I think that most Indigenous are just like you and me, governed by people who tell lies, grease their friends, make shady deals, and foster division to detract from accountability. Band members sued their own Nation to get Band financial statements. Federal Court Orders Thunderchild First Nation to Disclose Financial Records - NetNewsLedger

Most interesting is that it's mainly the public and independent journalists starting these investigations in each state. We are the media now.

Saw this post on X: One of the most common lines thrown at Pierre Poilievre is that he’s a “20-year career politician with no real education.” It sounds sharp until you stop and look at who Canadians are actually being asked to choose between. Pierre entered politics young, yes. Not because he was appointed, elevated, or parachuted in, but because voters kept choosing him. For two decades, Canadians renewed his mandate at the ballot box. That isn’t stagnation. That’s accountability. It means he’s spent his adult life answering directly to voters, defending ideas publicly, losing debates, winning others, and adjusting based on real feedback from people living with the consequences. And the idea that he’s “uneducated” doesn’t hold up either. Pierre has a university degree, but more importantly, he has practical fluency. He understands budgets because he’s spent years dissecting them line by line. He understands inflation because he’s questioned central bankers directly. He understands housing because he’s studied permits, taxes, bottlenecks, and delays. Education isn’t just credentials on a wall. It’s mastery of material, and Pierre demonstrates that every time he speaks without notes. What often gets overlooked is the contrast. Mark Carney came into office with no political experience at all. No time as an MP. No elections fought. No campaigns run. No years of public accountability to voters. His experience is impressive, but it comes from central banking, boardrooms, and advisory roles, not from earning trust repeatedly in open elections. That difference matters. Politics isn’t just about understanding systems, it’s about listening, persuading, and being corrected by the public when you get it wrong. That difference shows up clearly in how each man views people. In Values, Carney consistently frames progress as something that flows from well-designed systems rather than from individual judgment. His instinct is to build guardrails first, rules first, incentives first, and let personal choice operate only within those boundaries. It reflects a command-and-control mindset, where behaviour is shaped by rules and costs rather than trust and consent. Pierre’s worldview is the opposite. He believes Canadians are capable, adaptable, and responsible when government gets out of their way. He doesn’t see hardship as a teaching tool or sacrifice as a virtue. He sees them as signals that something isn’t working. His focus on affordability, productivity, and choice comes from the belief that people don’t need to be guided into doing the right thing, they need room to do it themselves. Another lazy criticism is that Pierre is “always whining.” That only works if you ignore what the job of the opposition actually is. Questioning the government isn’t negativity, it’s accountability. Pointing out rising costs, broken promises, stalled housing, and falling productivity isn’t complaining, it’s doing the work Canadians elected him to do. Opposition leaders are supposed to keep pressing until problems are fixed, not stop asking because it makes those in power uncomfortable. What some call whining is really persistence. Pierre keeps asking the same questions because the problems haven’t gone away. If groceries are still expensive and housing is still out of reach, the questions shouldn’t stop. Silence would be easier. Agreement would be safer. But that wouldn’t serve Canadians. Liberals also like to claim Pierre “voted against” things like $10-a-day childcare or dental care. That’s a convenient half-truth. In Parliament, MPs don’t vote on individual promises inside a bill, they vote on the entire package. Pierre didn’t vote against affordable childcare or dental care as ideas. He voted against large, poorly designed bills that bundled popular programs with massive spending, weak oversight, rising deficits, and unclear long-term costs. His position has been consistent: if a policy affects millions of Canadians and billions of dollars, the whole bill needs to be properly costed, targeted, and accountable. Voting no isn’t opposing help, it’s opposing sloppy legislation that creates future problems Canadians end up paying for. Some people also point to the fact that Pierre lost his riding in the last election, as if that disqualifies him. It shouldn’t. He lost in a moment defined by intense national polarization and very specific local dynamics, not scandal or incompetence. He accepted the result immediately, respected the voters, and kept doing the job he was elected to do, holding the government to account. Losing a seat doesn’t make someone weak. How they respond to it tells you who they are. Pierre didn’t lash out, make excuses, or disappear. He showed respect for democracy and kept working. When scrutiny gets dismissed as whining, what’s really being said is that accountability is inconvenient. And that should worry anyone who believes democracy works best when leaders are challenged, not protected. That’s why Pierre sounds different. He doesn’t speak in abstractions. He doesn’t ask people to accept hardship as a virtue. He talks about paycheques, rent, groceries, fuel, and whether effort still leads somewhere. That doesn’t come from theory. It comes from paying attention. So when Liberals say “20 years in politics” as an insult, what they’re really saying is that Pierre understands the system well enough to challenge it. And when they praise Carney’s credentials, they’re quietly admitting he hasn’t yet been tested by the one thing that matters most in a democracy, repeated consent from voters. For a lot of Canadians, that contrast isn’t a flaw. It’s the point. Pierre Poilievre represents something simple and deeply Canadian: the belief that leadership should start with trust in people, not control through systems. And for more Canadians every day, that belief feels less like ideology and more like common sense.

And Washington state now, too.

Didn't watch the video, but all left-wing radicals believe Islam is a benign social system. All of them. A lot of the lefties think Islam is superior. They think it's on par with benevolent democracy. It's why they welcome it into Western cultures. Mark Carney said Muslim vales are exactly the same as Canadian values. Historically, that is not the case: Afghanistan used to be Buddhist. Pakistan was once Hindu. Lebanon (including Palestine) used to be Christian. Turkey, North Africa and Syria, all used to be Christian. Today, they're all Islamic hellholes. Do you really think Islam is going to deviate from such a successful, 1400 year old method of conquest? Establish mosques Create enclaves Grow the population Claim victimhood Resist the host country's authority and customs Exploit lawfare Institute Sharia Secede Take Control

Perhaps nothing is getting done in Canada because the Canadian Climate Institute, which received a $30 million grant to plug government climate crap is actually an empty 12' X 14' office in downtown Toronto with zero employees working at it. I follow independent journalist Andy Lee and she personally checked out and filmed the.....empty.....office.

Then give them all YOUR money for a year.

I think most lefty radicals know there are aspects to Sharia Law that are amoral. Their argument they give is that the majority of Muslims don't want those parts of Sharia. Which is not true. Look at the 57 Muslim/Sharia ruled countries (I guess Iran is the exception right now - Goooooo, Iranians!!) and the instituting of Sharia Law in parts of the UK, which now deny women rights that British Law grants them.

Here is lawyer, Jeff Childers' substack on the Minnesota thing and why legacy media is loathe to touch it and how it's exploding on X and all the citizen journalists who are doing the investigating FOR corporate media. ☕️ FRAUD FATHER ☙ Monday, December 29, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠

Not ALL Samidoun!!!!! Haha, beat you left-wing radicals to it.

Ohio, who has the second highest Somali population in the US, is now also investigating Somali day cares. It's not looking good. Citizens are calling and going to see for themselves what is going on at each individual day care and posting the results.

They should ship the whole lot of them back to Somalia. They're all in on it. Either directly or by keeping silent about it.

No, they don't.

2017 - snuck across the border illegally 2018 - refugee claim denied 2019 - appeal denied 2020-2025 - chillin' in Toronto on taxpayer's dime 2025 - arrested for trying to kidnap Jewish women at gunpoint and immediately released on bail Go ahead, all you far-left radicals. Defend and support this. While your wives and daughters live in fear. Explain to us all why you want THIS guy out on the street, but the convoy people in jail.

It's not compassion that's unaffordable. It's suicidal empathy. Gays do not need a year's income just for being gay. This is 2026. We've been ok with gays since at least my generation. Let me remind you - Iggy Pop, Grace Jones, David Bowie, Prince, Debbie Harry (who loved trans people) and the entire gender-bending punk movement. We gave you all that. Canada is a stupid country. You're being ridiculous. We're broke. Maybe trying to virtue-signal how ok you are with gays. They don't need free money any more than any of the rest of us.

You never make any sense. You just justified giving money away to gays because "the world is awash with wealth". Wheeeeeee! Are you completely unaware that the vast majority of the world's wealth is being hoarded by 1-3% of the elite parasites? Free money for gays, who are not any more oppressed than any other group BTW, where do you think that comes from? Taxpayers, you dolt! Do you ever listen to yourself? You're completely barking mad. I think it's all those jabs. They cross the blood/brain barrier and studies show they are increasing cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's. Spike protein - right to your brain.

I bet you still believe in trickle-down economics, too. 🙄

Nick Shirley posted video of parents "dropping kids off" then immediately putting them back in the car. The day care gets the full subsidy and kicks back some to the parents. Apartment building full of Somalis, where they "lend" each other kids to make it seem like they have more kids than they really do, resulting in higher benefits. A "taxi service" that claims to shuttle people to and from appointments, etc.....that has no records of any riders, but gets fully subsidized for providing the service.

Apparently, it's "racist" to notice when brown people are committing fraud. Nick Shirley Explodes After Walz Brands Fraud Critics 'Racist' as Minnesota Scandal Erupts | IBTimes UK

It's looking worse and worse, too. Day care fraud, taxi fraud, benefits fraud......it's insane.

And that's why we're broke.

They come from countries where fraud, scamming, deceit and lying is a way of life. Anyone who thinks the same thing isn't happening here is an id10t. Oh, yeah - I forgot that Canada has "magic soil". The second they step off the plane, it's instant reformation. 🙄

I'm thinking the 2025 assassination of Minnesota state representative, Melissa Hortman, is likely connected to this. She was the only Democrat who voted against further handouts to immigrants in Minnesota.