Goddess

But.....but....but......it was such an INSPIRING speech! It galvanized the WORLD! I mean, it was up there with Martin Luther King's "I Have A Dream" and anything ever said by Nelson Mandela.

No. When I'm posting on a topic, I rarely am speaking directly to YOU. But you follow me around the board, replying to everything I post, and my notifications are FILLED TO THE BRIM with you desperately searching every morning for any of my posts and downvoting them. You clearly are wanting my attention. Every day. Everyone can see it.

Exactly. Because it's a security clearance that Trudeau made up, so he could put things in there and parliamentarians would not be able to speak about them or act on them. And you fell for it!!!!! You dumba$$!!!! 🤣

Of course you do. That's why you are so desperate to catch my attention every day. 🤣

Liberal or NDP partisans who claim Poilievre doesn’t have a security clearance and imply that there must be some nefarious reason, don’t know or even try to understand the difference between a security clearance which Poilievre has held for over 20 continuous years (at Level I initially as all MP’s receive & then at Level II for the last decade, and as all junior ministers require) & still holds and the temporary 30-day NSICOP clearance which was offered to the opposition leaders in the wake of the election interference commission report, which had a classified annex related to a redacted NSICOP annual report issued in June 2023. A Level III (top secret) security clearance which is required by senior ministers in specific portfolios, has never ever been provided to an opposition member just because they are in a specific shadow minister position - let alone to an opposition leader. The PM, on a case-by-case basis, can brief any member of the opposition on any classified topic at any time. In fact, if you are the Minister of Defence with a Level III clearance-enhanced and you are shuffled to the backbenches, you don’t get to keep your clearance. Frequently those with Level II clearances or below can keep their clearance as long as it is renewed IAW the requirements, even if they become opposition members. Level III (top secret) is while so employed and does not remain active, if it’s not required. So..... what makes a NSICOP clearance so unique? And why is it foolish for an opposition leader to obtain one even temporarily as Singh, May & Blanchet did? It primarily boils down to two added caveats that you must agree to: 1. You waive Parliamentary privilege to speak about anything that you have read, heard or seen in a classified NSICOP setting, which even includes making mention of anything that appears in the annual public NSICOP report. 2. You cannot act on what you have read, heard or seen or tell anyone else about it. In other words, if you were to read that a government minister had knowingly accepted financial help from a foreign gov, you would risk being charged criminally & sentenced to prison for up to 5 years if you asked the PM about this allegation in QP, even if it was all over the media. Why would an opposition leader take questioning the PM in QP off the table? If that same opposition leader learned that one of his MP’s that was willingly working with a foreign gov't - he couldn’t act on it, couldn’t tell the MP you were on to them & certainly couldn’t fire them. This is a lifetime restriction! And let’s not forget that in Canada, the PM requires no enhanced security background checks and is the sole decision maker on who receives classified information & what is de-classified, so if an opposition leader or an MP needs to know something he can tell them anytime. I don’t oppose in any way opposition leaders getting Level III (top secret) security clearances if they get monthly or quarterly briefings organized by the PMO, otherwise it’s absolutely useless, but before that happens we need politicians, the media and the millions of useful id10ts in Canadian voter rolls to stop conflating the very different aspects of a so-called top secret security clearance & a NSICOP security clearance. That’s just pure politics and being misused by partisans intent on demonizing Poilievre.

6 men charged with luring minors for sex, released on promise to appear: Six men arrested after human trafficking investigation in Durham focused on minors | Durham Radio News

Nope. Yes, military people are very loyal to Canada. That doesn't mean they cheerlead "whoever rules the roost." And I don't know any that are as endlessly dense and hopelessly gullible, as you. Hopefully you grow out of it one day.

You started in the military when you were 2 ????? I don't believe you were in the military. I know a lot of people in the military. A lot. And NONE of them act like you. NONE of them think like you.

He's just a whiny b!tch. He's not interested in the article anyways. His mind is already made up - the liberals are political gods and they deserve constant pom-poms, no scrutiny and no accountability.

He is listed as endorsing it as an MP. And he's promoting it. NSICOP has already been shut down as unconstitutional by 2 lower courts. Why do Liberals and their id10t supporters all think the Charter is toilet paper and can be disregarded whenever it suits them? You would never put up with this from the Cons. You clearly don't understand how security clearances work.

RE: the NSICOP security clearance. So Bruce Fanjoy has started a petition to force all parliamentarians to sign this additional security clearance. I don't think CBC has ever covered a petition before, but they sure did this time. This NSICOP clearance was invented by Trudeau to gag parliamentarians. Anything the Libs are doing and don't want the public to know about, they will include in this NSICOP reports and parliamentarians can not only not talk about it (jail time up to 10 years) but they also cannot do anything about what they see in it. That means if they don't want their MPs named as traitors, they put it in the report and no one can say anything about it. WHAT NEITHER THE CBC, NOR FANJOY MENTION: This bogus security clearance has already been struck down by 2 lower courts and is now before the Supreme Court, as being unconstitutional.

So you get to be an a$$ all you want, on every thread, to anybody you want, but he's not allowed to respond. STFU, you psycho.

Carney’s energy superpower talk isn’t cutting it—we need action - The Hub "The pancake stack of investment-killing climate regulations introduced by former ministers of environment Catherine McKenna, Jonathan Wilkinson, and Steven Guilbeault is not only largely intact; additional phases of their legacy policies are kicking in, and new ones are being added by Carney." You tell me, just how "different" is his approach to the previous LPC Trudeau government, when in fact it is likely WORSE: -> ECCC from Dec 19, proposing a new and aggressive approach to industrial carbon pricing that not only contradicts the Alberta-federal MOU, it adds uncertainty to any new plans being considered for electricity, O&G, etc. -> Then came finalized methane regs which the Canadian Gas Association says will cost $3000/CO2 tonne to comply with and CAPP says will impose $14.6 billion in compliance costs. Just as we are trying to get FID on two major LNG projects -> Then Canada said they were going to continue work on a green taxonomy, and named the Canadian Climate Institute to lead it, which is viewed by many in industry as ideological, some of their proposals as even “radical." -> Meanwhile other legacy policies and reviews from the Trudeau era continue, such as new 2025 building code - Greenhouse Gas provisions (OpGHG) , that will limit choice in home heating to achieve net zero, ie harder to build for natural gas heating. This is a classic bait and switch, Carney is smarter than Trudeau. He is telling Canadians one thing and doing the opposite by keeping existing regulations in place and sneakily tucking in new ones. We need to wake up before it’s too late, and I fear it may already be.

He has the same security clearance all politicians have, and have always had. He just refused to get Trudeau's new, added, special clearance that comes with a gag order.

You get so emotionally discombobulated and desperate to defend Liberal failures that you don't pay attention to what you say, let alone understand what anyone else is saying. You get so frenzied every time you see someone post that maybe Carney isn't doing what he's supposed to be doing, that you jump into issues you have no clue about, have never even looked into and then quickly google something, ANYTHING, and go with the first sentence you see. It's so obvious you are grossly uninformed about so many issues, you're like a rooster that thinks it plays a crucial part in the sun coming up.

50% of us fell for the joke and the bait.

That's not what you said before. You said Poilievre wouldn't collaborate with Carney, not that he didn't offer to go to the US. The fact is - Carney is the PM, if he wanted to collaborate, he could've invited Poilievre along and I'm sure he would've gone. If Poilievre just went on his own, you'd be reacting like you are to Jivani. You'd say he's not staying in his lane, that he has no business going to the US. The truth is - it doesn't matter what Poilievre does, you will find something to criticize about it. Just like it doesn't matter how much the Libs f&%k up - you're going to wave your pom-poms for it. You're so emotional and tribally loyal that actual policy doesn't even enter whatever brain you have. Whatever our politics, failure hurts real people. I'd rather see things work out well for everyone. You do not.

Committee today is debating C-15 the Budget Implementation Act. Patty Hadju was scheduled to testify. First thing she says: "I'm sorry, Mr. Chair. You're gonna have to tell me what C-15 is." 🙄 Prepared much?

Riiiiiiiigggghhhhht...... 🙄 Because Carney invented a bunch of new cabinet positions he calls "secretaries of state" or something. The opposition has to have a shadow minister for each of them. Carney's new positions come with a raise - they get more than regular MP's. The Conservative shadow ministers do not. They agreed to receive the same pay as the regular MPs. He has offered many times. Carney has refused. In fact, Carney has refused to collaborate with anyone. That was the biggest complaint with the budget. The NDP, the Bloc, the Conservatives - all said he did no collaboration with other parties. He barely consulted with his own party. I've seen many articles about how Carney is running Canada like he's the CEO, not the Prime Minister. You're welcome of course, to have your own opinion on things. But you don't get to say your opinions are facts. Your opinions are often based on emotional thinking and mostly not on any facts. Even your posts are mainly juvenile emotional outbursts.

Are you suggesting.....**GASP**.......that's there's a CABAL of people controlling our governments?

Or.....you're just uninformed. As usual. So, it sounds like you're hoping, with both fingers crossed, that Jivani makes no headway on trade with the US and really, really, really resent the Conservatives trying to collaborate to make it happen, using a diplomatic "in" they have. That doesn't sound very "Elbows up."

Sure. If you ignore all the stuff that happened in between there. As I always say, a Liberal could rape a 9-yr-old on live TV and you'd cheer for it.

Of course, the argument is "Not all Muslims". Unfortunately for that argument, the experience of every other country that has taken in masses of Muslims, is that when their numbers are large enough they start demanding Sharia law courts, ethnic enclaves become "no-go" zones, white women start getting raped in larger & larger numbers and lose the safety of walking the streets unharassed, Islamic calls to prayer start blaring in the early morning hours, Halal foods start getting subsidized, Sharia banking is brought in, they demand more and more immigration from their countries. No matter how much you think Mohammed at work is "a really nice guy", when push comes to shove, man's innate instinct for tribalism takes over and he will, if not outright support Muslim takeovers, at least say nothing about it. The Muslims who do speak out and do report radicalization in their mosques are rare.

And the Liberal gov't . Why do you deny it? Both Kinder Morgan and now the newly lost $1 billion Glencoe project in Quebec - both companies have directly blamed the liberal gov't for hindering and delaying their projects. Are they lying? And there's a myriad of other companies that have said the same thing. And we don't know how many other companies just don't even try. We also know that the feds could easily green light these infrastructure projects, cut through the red tape and make the investment environment more attractive. But they refuse to. Why? Actually, Canada fails. And it will continue to fail until people like you get your head out of the Liberal's a$$, stop excusing their failures and start facing reality.