Goddess

Plus, she lost billions of our dollars under her watch and nobody in the Liberal party is interested in finding where it went. https://thepostmillennial.com/catherine-mckenna-vows-to-do-a-better-job-over-lost-billions/

The problem with the mRNA shots is that the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) take the mRNA to every system of the body - they DO NOT stay in the arm, as promised. Thus, the wide variety of adverse events that can occur. And remember, DNA contamination has been confirmed multiple times in shots from all across the world - so the LNPs are taking contaminants to all parts of the body - including the brain. I don't believe the technology is anywhere near ready for use in humans.

So when you get your COVID-19 Vaccine, after 3 months you get these bonuses: +140% Mild Cognitive Impairment +23% Alzheimer's Dementia +68% Depression +44% +93% Anxiety, dissociative, stress, somatoform +++sleep disorders ++ sexual disorders increased risk of psychosis within 7 days especially if you're in your 30's, with only 50% chance of recovery

Now that we know for sure that both Pfizer and Moderna covid vax cross the Blood Brain Barrier (BBB), here are three studies just published regarding covid vax and brain damage: 1. A potential association between COVID-19 vaccination and development of alzheimer's disease - PubMed (nih.gov) South Korean study of 519,330 vaccinated and 38,687 unvaccinated. mRNA vaccinated at 3 months: +140% higher Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): +23% higher Alzheimer's Disease (AD) +++ 2. Psychiatric adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination: a population-based cohort study in Seoul, South Korea - PubMed (nih.gov) South Korean study of 4,348,412 individuals living in Seoul, South Korea Depression +68% Anxiety, dissociative, stress, somatoform +44% Sleep disorders +93% Sexual disorders +++ 3. Frontiers | New-onset psychosis following COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review (frontiersin.org) "Our systematic review aimed to examine cases of new-onset psychosis following COVID-19 vaccination." A total of 21 articles described 24 cases of new-onset psychotic symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination 54% were female, mean age 34 years, mean onset time was 6 days. Duration of psychotic symptoms ranged between 1 and 2 months with a mean of 52 days. Overall, 50% of patients achieved full recovery. (50% didn’t)

From Mark Oshinkie substack today: During the Scamdemic, given their political bias and need to make money, especially from their Pharma sponsors, the media and PR industry have conducted a relentless, multi-front crusade to promote Anthony Fauci and thus, indirectly, the governmental Public Health apparatus and the overarching notion that we all owe our survival to drugs and hospital systems. I’ve never understood why people liked or believed Fauci. I’ve heard people say they thought he was “smart.” After all, he was a “doctor.” But he was really a bureaucrat, and seemingly, during his many years of disservice, a bad one. None of his Coronamanic recommendations ever made sense. Given his Scamdemic performance, Fauci is Exhibit A for a mandatory federal retirement age or administrative term limits. He was the J. Edgar Hoover of his time. Though I guess I’m missing the point: the bureaucracy is used largely to effect political and economic control, not to improve human lives. Viewing Fauci’s fans more charitably, one might say they were irrationally fearful news junkies. They felt they needed an “expert” to protect them and Fauci was the designee. If Fauci didn’t exist, someone would have invented him. I’ve never been intrinsically impressed by either people appointed to positions of authority, MDs or those who attended big-name colleges. I’ve seen people from each of these three categories make multiple poor decisions. Professional respect is earned, not bestowed. Everyone’s performance is subject to continual evaluation. Fauci repeatedly made illogical or dishonest statements that were somehow considered authoritative. For example, while he insisted that the shots would stop infection or spread, when he already knew they didn’t; coronavirus vaccines had never worked. Neither had masks, lockdowns, school closures nor asymptomatic testing stopped the transmission of respiratory viruses. Following a hiatus, Fauci has been back in the news lately, promoting his characteristically boastful and dishonest autobiography, for which he received a $5 million advance from his politically-aligned, liberal publishing industry backers. During his recent book tour, as he has since March, 2020, Fauci continues to avoid interviews with those who might confront him regarding the pervasive illogic and untruths in his public pronouncements. Instead, he fields only softball questions from fawning interviewers, e.g., “Does it bother you that the people who criticize you now have the benefit of hindsight?” Fauci said this did bother him and recited the phony, self-exculpatory “We didn’t know” mantra. Meanwhile, back in reality, I and many others called out the folly of Fauci’s beloved “Mitigation” crusade from Day 1. We were told we knew nothing and received little exposure. Fauci’s recent book is just the latest installment of the Coronamania propaganda onslaught that began in February, 2020. Recently, PBS re-aired a year-old documentary, in the American Masters series, about Fauci. Initially, this film made me wonder how PBS defines a “Master.” There’s plainly a political/ethno-racial litmus test; nearly all of the over 270 Masters profiled in other episodes are in the liberal Pantheon, as is America’s purported “favorite doctor” and “foremost infectious disease expert.” Media labels can badly mislead a hero-worshiping public. Before being exposed as frauds, or worse, Jeffrey Epstein was called an astute “financier,” Sam Bankman-Fried was an “altruistic visionary” and Bernie Madoff was a “trusted money manager” and “philanthropist.” Numerous media-hyped politicians and sports figures have later performed poorly and have been found to have professional or personal skeletons in their closets. By any objective measure, Fauci has done a terrible job over the past four years. Instead of exhibiting mastery, he’s caused vast, deep harm. But by being photographed in a white coat, despite not ever being in a lab or even treating an actual patient in decades, by invoking something that sounded sort of technical and by helping to oust Trump, Fauci became a hero to news addicts. Fauci congratulates himself for doing a great job on Covid, too. Yet, nations whose officials understood that government disruption of normal life for all people—including the vast majority who are those under 80 and reasonably healthy, were never at risk—had better outcomes than did the US. Despite having only 4% of the world’s population and the world’s best-capitalized hospitals, the US had over 30% of the world’s reported Covid deaths. Did US hospitals kill ostensible Covid victims? Neither while portraying himself on PBS or in other appearances I’ve seen, as the nation’s guardian of public health, does Fauci ever mention the core reality: SARS-CoV-2 simply didn’t threaten the vast majority of people. If Americans had lived normally, all reasonably healthy people would have survived without causing all of the consequent societal, economic and vaxx-induced physical damage. It seems likely that NIAID’s $6 billion budget, which Fauci boasts about managing, could be cut with very little health effect. Various individuals familiar with the Covid response have observed that while Fauci was the most visible player in the federal Covid response, he was simply a front man for the Department of Defense’s (DOD’s”) Biosecurity apparatus/Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (“DARPA”). Even if true, this ignores that the undersized Fauci had an outsized role in shaping public opinion. He could have told the truth and chose not to. Perhaps someone made him an offer he couldn’t refuse. But ultimately, with great titular power comes great responsibility. One in such a position must be willing to take one for the team. To tens of millions, Fauci was a media-created hero. It was easier for Americans to go along with the crowd and worship and obey this charlatan than it was to think critically about, and dismiss, all of the double-talk and lies he spouted. Ultimately, if there were no TV, there would have been no “Pandemic.”

This is a moot point for me now - I'm old. 🤣 I wouldn't want to be on the frontlines, no. Maybe supportive in another capacity. The majority of my friends feel the same, but again, we're all old. I do have one female friend who served in Afghanistan. She was shot there - in the wrist. She has no regrets about her service and I would say, from her stories, she held her own and deserves just as much respect as any of the men.

Part of IPC’s revision stems from its earlier reliance on “assumptions and inference” to “address major gaps in publicly accessible evidence,” the body acknowledged earlier this month. 🤔 In the last few years, I'm becoming more and more aware of, and baffled by, all the various authorities' use of models, assumptions and inferences in making decisions and reporting such things as "facts" to the public. Garbage In, Garbage Out

Part of the economic pickle we are in right now is because there were SOOOOOO many citizens who took the benefit fraudulently. I know two who did. And there's was no reason why 15 year olds still living at home should have been collecting it. That part was ridiculous.

I guess you know more women like that than I do. Agreed. Which is why so many women don't like being physically beaten into submission by men.

Canada's lowest tax jurisdiction has higher taxes than America's highest tax jurisdiction. And what do we have to offer people for all their taxes? A declining standard of living. If you want to have a successful country tomorrow, you need people to invest today and for that they need disposable income.

True. But I think when most of us ask for equality, what we are asking for is respect and personal dignity.

It's respecting the differences and making reasonable accommodations where possible for the weaknesses of each gender. Men have their inherent weaknesses, too. Physical strength is not what wins every situation in life.

Perfect. Thank you. I'm guessing that would be appreciated on all the other threads you're mucking up, too.

So you're going to continue mucking up threads with nonsense until other people stop interacting with you, while you are allowed to continue being a juvenile. Is that it?

I do hope there are some silent readers of both this thread and the Trickle thread. Because once people realize what they injected with, and what they injected their children with and what the consequences are long-term, it's going to get ugly. Is my prediction.

If this poster IS an adult, it reminds me of a relationship I had once with a giant man-baby. Came home exhausted from work one night and he threw a tantrum because I said I didn't feel like making dinner (even though he got home hours before me.) I remember the exchange we had, I said, "Are you an adult? Do you live in a house? Is there food in the house? What did you do before I got here? Do that again." I realized that I really needed to deal with him like I did with my children. Which worked, but is not a good basis for an adult relationship.

See, that's your problem. This is not a game. It's a forum so adults can discuss topics of concern.

"Billy gets to stay up til 10 pm! Why can't I stay up til 10 pm, too?" Gawd, you remind me of my children when they were 6. Thankfully, they grew up.

From the Covid Subcommittee Senate hearings: We learn that top officials at the FDA wanted more time to understand the implications of myocarditis & pericarditis on children. These FDA officials were fired. (I posted about it in the Trickle thread at the time it happened.) BIG PHARMA DOES NOT LOVE YOU. THEY DO NOT LOVE YOUR CHILDREN. Get educated.

So your choice is to NOT control yourself. See, this is why we all think you're 12 years old.

He's a classic narcissist. The WHY for him is always someone else's fault. Listen to all the interviews with Liberals since after this election - They really think the problem is that Canadians want them to do MORE of what they have already been doing and that they want it done FASTER. They think the problem is that Canadians are too stupid to understand their "vision" for Canada and that they need to be clearer on the "messaging."

Shouldn't their priority be serving Canadian's interests, not revenge?