Goddess

Your reading comprehension is very.......poor. We are all aware that you are a Carney super-fan.

I am, actually. Liberal supporters, which make up slightly more than half of Canadians, do not think like me. At all. They support legislation that lets child rapists loose on the streets. It doesn't even hit their radar. They do not care. I cannot. As I said, letting rapists and pedos go free is a deal-breaker for me. The Liberal party introduced the legislation and have fought like hell to keep it in place. They deeply believe in letting pedos go free. It's a moral/ethical thing for me. Obviously not for you.

A Pfizer whistleblower. Which I know, you are against whistleblowers and their testimony counts for less than zero to you. Pfizer gives kickbacks to individual US government people and governments around the world, so it stands to reason that our government also took money from them. I realize you will likely believe we have the only world government who didn't take money from Pfizer, because you believe very strongly that the Liberal government is totally honest and not able to be corrupted in any way whatsoever. 🙄 You have excused, justified, denied and belittled any Liberal party corruption, so I don't really give a flying fig what you have to say about much of anything. You're willfully blind and ignorant. It doesn't matter what the Libs do, you'll support it and vote it in.

You have more faith in Canadians than I do, then. I'm sure the Libs will again come up with some new boogeyman to scare the gullible, depends-wearing crowd. They could even recycle "The Americans have tanks at our borders!" thing again, I mean - most of the Liberal supporters on this forum are STILL pooping their pants over that. There's no money left in the middle class - Liberal Party needs that boomer money & assets to keep the spending spree going. No way they're giving that up.

I disagree. Liberal supporters will need to double down to justify them electing these exact same incompetent people - 4 times. They don't give a sh!t about the economy. They don't give a sh!t about policy. They'd rather see Canada burn down than admit they were wrong. Look at all you Liberal supporters here. Every damn day. Supporting, justifying, excusing, denying.

No. I never once said he was in control. I said he advised and Trudeau followed. I know this because he's currently doing all the things he advised Trudeau to do AND what he did in the UK - high tax, high spending, print money, grab control, crack down on citizens, unlimited expense accounts with no accountability for tax dollars, institute Net Zero policies and "investments", stifle all industry in the name of the green god. You're the one saying Trudeau didn't listen to him. The Trudeau Liberals were well on the way to destroying Canada and all your vote did was hand the keys over to the Carney Liberals, which consist of all the Trudeau Liberals minus Trudeau, to "Finish it."

That's a lot of twisting and turning to try and convince yourself that Carney, as Trudeau's special advisor on the economy since 2020, had no influence over Trudeau. Especially in light of the fact that he's still implementing the same types of policies and economic practices that Trudeau was. Yet, you claim Trudeau wasn't listening to him back then. Do another back flip! So entertaining watching you guys twist yourself into pretzels to distance Carney from Trudeau. 🤪

International student program blasted by Canada’s auditor Between 2023 and 2024, more than 153,000 post-secondary international students were identified as potentially non-compliant with study permit conditions, but officials had funding to probe only 2,000 cases annually...... The department began 4,057 investigations, but 41 per cent of these cases could not be closed because of a lack of response from students. The government audit also examined the status of the 549,000 people whose study permits expired in 2024 and found that 93 per cent of people were allowed to remain in Canada. It also did not pursue 800 cases involving fraudulent documentation discovered after permits were approved." Feds Cost Thousands Of Jobs | Blacklock's Reporter Liberal supporters: "Let's elect these people in again!! They really know what they're doing!" 🤪

Carney is the inventor of Net Zero and you're saying Trudeau didn't listen to him? The billions of $$ poured into batteries that benefitted Brookfield that all went belly up? Carney had no hand in that? Carney wrote an op-ed saying Trudeau should invoke the Emergency Act and freeze bank accounts and de-bank Canadian citizens. Trudeau didn't listen to that advice? Trudeau outspent every other PM in Canada's history, ALL UT TOGETHER and Carney is currently blowing that overspending out of the water. But you think Trudeau wasn't listening to him? Why do you think Trudeau would hire him on to advice him on everything economy and then not listen to anything the guy said? Too bad we banned straws, you're really grasping for one here.

U of Guelph was home of Dr. Byram Bridle, PhD in immunology, Professor of Viral Immunology with a focus researching immune responses to viruses, particularly in vaccine development and cancer research. He was Canada's #1 cancer researcher. The Canadian government charged him with investigating the mRNA jabs before they were rolled out. He came back with a less than favourable review and was promptly blacklisted and his research halted and was banned from being on campus. Officials at the U of Guelph then created fake websites and Twitter profiles of Dr. Bridle and slandered him through those. I posted about all this at the time. It probably didn't help that according to a Pfizer whistleblower, top Canadian politicians received about $11 million in kickbacks from Pfizer. But, ya, U of Guelph - what a bunch of woke clowns.

So Trudeau DIDN'T listen to anything he said? Is that what you're saying? I mean, c'mon. We all know Justin "Budgets will balance themselves" Trudeau had zero economic ability. That's the whole reason why he hired Carney. And you're saying he had no influence on Trudeau? No one followed his advice? GTFO.

There’s a certain magic trick in politics. Not the fun kind. The kind where your wallet disappears, then reappears lighter, and the guy on stage expects applause. That’s what this “Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit” is. Mark Carney says he’s “putting money back in your pocket.” Let’s translate that into plain English. Government drives up costs through taxes, regulation, and inflation… then sends you a partial refund and expects a thank-you note. That’s not affordability. That’s damage control. The Core Problem They Won’t Admit Canada didn’t wake up one morning with high grocery prices by accident. We built this. Carbon taxes layered onto fuel, transport, and production Supply management that keeps food prices artificially high Regulatory drag that slows competition and raises costs Monetary policy that inflated everything from housing to milk Then comes the punchline: “Here’s $1,900 to help.” That’s like flooding the basement, handing you a mop, and calling it leadership. The Illusion of Help Benefits like this feel good. That’s the point. They’re designed to hit the emotional brain, not the analytical one. Quick cash creates the illusion of relief. But step back and run the numbers: If government policy raises your annual cost of living by $3,000 to $5,000… And they give you $1,900 back… You’re still behind. Worse, now you’re dependent on the system that caused the problem. That’s not a safety net. That’s a feedback loop. The Incentive Problem Here’s the uncomfortable truth most politicians won’t say out loud: If government can fix a problem cheaply, it loses the excuse to control more of your life. So instead, we get complexity. Programs. Rebates. Credits. Transfers. Each one adds a layer. Each layer adds cost. Each cost justifies the next “benefit.” Round and round it goes. Meanwhile, the original problem, high prices, weak productivity, capital flight, stays put. What Real Affordability Looks Like Real affordability doesn’t come from cheques. It comes from removing the choke points: Lower taxes on production and energy Faster approvals to build housing and infrastructure Competitive markets instead of protected ones Stable money that doesn’t quietly erode purchasing power In other words: stop making things expensive in the first place. The Hard Line Carney’s pitch is simple: “We’ll take less from you… after we take too much.” That’s not leadership. That’s a controlled retreat from a problem they helped create. You don’t fix affordability by recycling people’s own money through Ottawa. You fix it by letting them keep it in the first place. Actionable takeaway: Next time you hear “we’re putting money back in your pocket,” ask one question: Why was it taken out in the first place?

On a personal level, I think they see it, they must, it's so basic - if you continually overspend, waste your money and give all your money away, eventually you go bankrupt. For some reason, on a governmental level, they think this doesn't happen and that it's a GOOD thing. I ran my own business and am running a business for someone else now, so this is obvious to me. Have these people never ran a business or budgeted for their own needs? There are basic accounting practices and now this Liberal government wants to deviate from standard, internationally accepted accounting practices. Not one Liberal supporter has any concern about this. The only thing I can think is that these people are just incredibly stoopid and gullible.

Plus, the less than a dollar a day tax cut has already been eaten up - and then some - by higher taxes on everything else and the inflation. And Carney's plan is for carbon taxation to continually increase, year over year. The tax cut LinkSoul thinks is so amazing, in reality, has benefited no one, will benefit no one, fueled inflation and is now a $14 billion debt our grandchildren will bear.

He's been directing economic policy in Canada for 6 years now. The immigration levels, the carbon taxes, the spending, the stifling of industry, giving all our money away to Ukraine and tranny bean farmer in the Congo - all him. How's it going? Article from 2020. Mark Carney helping Justin Trudeau craft economic recovery plan to pull Canada out of recession | Financial Post The fact that the Carney Liberals are going to continue to fight for their ability to declare the Emergency Act any time they feel like it - all the way to the Supreme Court and disregarding the ruling of 4 other Justices - is evidence that this is not a "new government". It's the same one. Carney was the one advising Trudeau to invoke the Act and to freeze bank accounts. He wants that power. Desperately.

I don't wonder at all.

It's disgusting they way they've laughed all the way through the middle class being decimated in Canada. Thy haven't figured out yet - they're the only ones with money and assets left and the Liberal party wants it. They're next on the food chain. "Elbows Up" as an economic strategy - simply genius. 🙄

LOL It's what you do here. Every. Single. Day. You justify everything the Liberal party has done and is doing. You support it all. Yes. I think children should be protected from predators. You think people should be protected from internet memes. "Psychoanalyzing" I can only go by what you guys vote for - letting child rapists go free, higher taxes, higher carbon taxes, no accountability for the Liberal government, higher & higher immigration levels, no industry in Canada. If you didn't "like" it, you wouldn't vote for it. Yes, yes. Everything happening in Canada is just soooooooo hilarious to you. Laugh it up until we're all in the poor house. And your children. And your grandchildren. It's just so, so funny to you, isn't it? In case you haven't noticed - it's only you Liberal supporters laughing about Canada right now.

At the very least - even if they don't "like" it, they're totally fine with child rapists being let out onto the streets. It's a non-issue, they don't care about it. Children's safety from predators doesn't even hit their radar. Where to me - that should be the Justice Minister's main concern - the safety of all Canadians. But his main concern is censorship bills. And apparently it is to you too. You voted for censorship bills over the safety of children. Pretty sick, IMO. You can keep trying to justify it here all you want. I will never agree with you that censorship comes first and protecting children from predators comes dead last.

This is the typical Liberal behaviour that just......astounds me. They think child rapists being released back onto the streets is hilarious. This is just absolutely 100% sick and psychopathic. Our children are in danger and you're laughing about it.

No, I don't wonder. I'm aware of what happens when a government funds a country's media. Media being weaponized by government has happened all throughout history. The results are always the same. The media tells you that you must have to have compassion and understanding for child rapists and release them as soon as possible......and you fall for it. Every fuquing time. And you vote for it. Every fuqing time.

Sorry, but you don't get to claim you give a sh!t about the safety of children and then support legislation that allows child rapists to go free and continue voting for the party that created that legislation, enacted it and has repeatedly ignored pleas to change it. You just don't. You either support keep child rapists in jail and vote for that, or you support letting them go free and vote for that. There is no middle ground here. And we all know which you voted for. You've told us repeatedly - the Liberal Party is your choice. You think they're doing a great job and so you support them in everything.

Of course you do. It's why you support the legislation. You think you're a better person because you consider the troubled past of a child rapist and let him go free. "IF"? See, right there. You support the law that lets them go free. You can't even admit it's a bad law. And police, normal people, justices, a lot of people have been screaming from the rooftops FOR YEARS that this law needs to change. Liberals have refused. And you support them in that. And you're not even sure it is a problem. Yes, yes. The solution - to you - is let them all go free.

Scientists can be bought just as easily as politicians. It's why the first place I go on any study is the Conflicts of Interest at the end. Who is paying for this study?