Goddess

My point is - we are dealing with a multi-billion dollar industry that has repeatedly been caught and fined for fraud. The FDA and CDC are captured agencies who work hand-in-hand with Big Pharma. They approve dangerous drugs based solely on Pharma's claims that they are safe and then are EXTREMELY slow at pulling them from the market. As far as the corruption in the industry (although I suspect you don't really care about it), myself and WestCan have both reported that medical journals are now quietly removing fraudulent articles from their websites and archives. This is in response to many whistleblowers who have come forward with evidence of medical scamming and fraud in Pharma-paid-for studies. This is why I tend to put more faith in studies conducted independently from Big Pharma, by independent labs and scientists. They have no skin in the game. And they have everything to lose by reporting truthfully, yet they still do it. Big Pharma has been secretly “ghostwriting” articles in top medical and oncology journals to trick doctors into buying their drugs. Which they then prescribe to YOU, and receive kickbacks for. Here’s how the scam works: First, pharma pays companies big money to ghostwrite studies that look legit. Then, they approach doctors, offering them prestige in exchange for slapping their names on these ghostwritten studies. Once published in top medical journals, these articles deceive other doctors into prescribing their drugs, believing the results are authentic. This scheme tricks doctors into promoting treatments based on false research, driving up drug sales while putting patients at risk. One of the doctors/scientists that have tried for years to expose this is Dr. Russell Blaylock. If you search him, you'll find him listed as some kind of crackpot. But this man warned early on of the dangers from aspartame, which is why he is viewed as insane. But who's been proven correct on aspartame? Dr. Blaylock. This is just ONE example of this entire industry having gone completely awry and no longer working in the best interests of people, but solely in the interests of $$$$. If you really start looking into it, (I'm positive you won't) you would shocked at what's been going on. You would be shocked to know how LITTLE childhood vaccines are tested. So no - I'm not saying ALL vaccines are bad. I'm saying ALL vaccines should be subject to true trials by independent labs and scientists. I think we should be DEMANDING this. I kinda hope RFK Jr. gets into gov't because cleaning up this industry has been his passion for many years and I do believe it would go a long ways to actually, truly improving health around the world. But, of course, he is also a "crackpot", amiright???? Or you can go back to sleep and believe all is well and Big Pharma really loves and cares about you. Nighty-night!

Well, if that's your interpretation, then you are incorrect. That's not what this study is saying at all. It is not comparing the two. Haha, NOPE. That's not the way this works. You want everybody - babies included - jabbed endlessly with an experimental genetic injection that doesn't stop infection or transmission and (according to the study you just posted) the spike in it causes clots and thrombo issues. The onus is on YOU to prove.

No, I'm annoyed that you are consciously uninformed on the extent of Pharma corruption. You clearly have no interest in finding out what's going on in the industry, so......maybe either get informed so we can discuss it, or be ready for people to leave the discussion when they find out you don't know much about it and don't want to know. **shrug**

This is a lie. From the start, I advocated for the Great Barrington Declaration. The thousands of doctors and scientists who authored it were accused by Fauci (in his famous words, a "devastating takedown" of the Declaration) of wanting to let it rip. You bought into the lies, like usual. And you keep repeating them despite being shown that they are lies. Since then, the majority of scientists now see that following the advice in the Declaration would have been far better. The study and article says the opposite. “There is no such thing as a SARS-CoV-2 infection that does NOT have prolonged consequences.” That's not what it is saying at all. We're talking about the SPIKE here. Numerous studies have shown that the body does NOT continuously produce spike after having the infection. Numerous studies have shown that spike production from the injections DOES go on indefinitely. You have to take this information and add it to other studies because this study does not incorporate information from other studies. Use your brain. I assume since you posted the study, that you accept its' findings that the spike binding with fibrin is causing clots and thrombo issues, yes? The "IF" in this case is mostly surprise that you accept this now. I've posted many studies that show this and you've consistently rejected ALL of them. You have no proof of that. In fact, if you accept this study that the infection-induced spike binding with fibrin causes these issues, then you have to accept that the vax-induced spike does that exact same thing. Are you rejecting that idea? Than you will have to produce evidence that the infection induced spike and the vax-induced spike are completely different and have different mechanisms. Fixed it for ya. Again - your claim is that the infection-induced spike causes issues, but that the vax-induced spike does not. 1. That is not what this study's methodolgy focus was for determining or comparing. Not even a hint of that. 2. You need to provide evidence of the above claim.

I just read that study. At least they're finally admitting the blood clots, haha 🙄 This part has been known for quite awhile. In fact when I posted the actual studies about it, you mocked them. The spike produced by having the infection is short-lived. In numerous studies, the spike produced by the shots is still producing spike up to a year later. If the spike does this - causes blood clots, etc - and the shots produce spike for longer periods of time than having the infection and people are injecting new spike into their bodies several times a year......you see where this is going? Right where thousands of doctors and scientists warned it would go. 😬

II think that instead of a traditional political divide of being left or right, the division today is between people who accept the technocratic biosecurity surveillance regime for our future, and those who will resist it.

I pretty much lost faith in humanity after covid. The majority of people are demanding censorship, tyranny and government involvement in every aspect of their lives.

It was. I did it in the appropriate threads.

A new study published in the Journal Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety this week: Wearing face masks as a potential source for inhalation and oral uptake of inanimate toxins – A scoping review - ScienceDirect The study was a “scoping review” that examined the potential toxic effects of face masks on human health by rounding up other studies. Researchers analyzed twenty-four relevant studies, focusing on the content and release into people’s bodies of known toxic substances from face masks. Especially extended mask wearing. The scientists found evidence of concerning levels of several toxic substances in face masks, including: Microplastics and nanoplastics Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) Phthalates and phthalate esters Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) Heavy metals (lead, cadmium, cobalt, copper, antimony) Titanium dioxide particles Confirms this recent study, as well: Super small pieces of plastic are invading human brains, scientists say (thehill.com) A lot of these microplastics settle in the brain..... .....which explains the mask fanatics, IMO. In passing, the toxic mask study mentioned chronic “mask-induced exhaustion syndrome” (MIES), which looks increasingly suspicious after combining the two studies. Anyway, the mask study concluded that, while masks can helpfully filter large particles, they may less helpfully introduce toxic substances into folks’ airways and gastrointestinal tracts: “On top of that,” the researchers noted, “there was and still is no empirical evidence for the effectiveness of the masks in limiting the spread of viruses in the general populace.” Four years later, the embargo against REAL science, related to face masking is finally over. Somebody tell the holdouts.

For most, not til they realize they're in a cage. For some, never.

I asked you to look into it. It won't do any good for me to tell you it's corrupt. You need to see it for yourself. Yes, there's corruption to a degree in every industry. But this is a LOT more corrupt than you think. This is a thread on censorship.

I bet Trudeau's taking notes......

It's difficult to discuss them when you are so uninformed on what is going on with Pharma and refuse to inform yourself. All is not well there, not even close. If we can't even agree there is corruption in the industry, there's not much to discuss. You will never accept that there are problems because you refuse to inform yourself of them. No. There are placebo trials and then there are what the FDA calls "placebo" trials. Unless you acknowledge that you don't understand the difference and why it's important, it's difficult to discuss this with you.

Why Did Zuckerberg Choose Now to Confess? ⋆ Brownstone Institute On many subjects important to public life today, vast numbers of people know the truth, and yet the official channels of information sharing are reluctant to admit it. The Fed admits no fault in inflation and neither do most members of Congress. The food companies don’t admit the harm of the mainstream American diet. The pharmaceutical companies are loath to admit any injury. Media companies deny any bias. So on it goes. Every dissident, and every normal person who had some sense that something odd was going on, was made to feel like some sort of crazy cretin who held nutty and probably dangerous views that were completely out of touch with the mainstream. What does it mean that Zuckerberg now openly admits that he excluded from view anything that contradicted government wishes? It means that any opinions on lockdowns, masks, or vaccine mandates – and all that is associated with that including church and school closures plus vaccine harms – were not part of the public debate. We had lived through and were living through the most significant far-reaching attacks on our rights and liberties in our lifetimes, or, arguably, on the history record in terms of scale and reach, and it was not part of any serious public debate. Zuckerberg’s censorship – and this pertains to Google, Instagram, Microsoft’s LinkedIn, and Twitter 1.0 – denied the public a choice on the central matter of lockdowns, masking, and shot mandates, the very issues that have fundamentally roiled the whole of civilization and set the path of history on a dark course. And it is not just the US. These are all global companies, meaning that elections in every other country, all over the globe, were similarly affected. It was a global shutdown of all opposition to radical, egregious, unworkable, and deeply damaging policies. When you think about it this way, this is not just some minor error in judgment. This was an earth-shattering decision that goes way beyond managerial cowardice. It goes beyond even election manipulation. It is an outright coup that overthrew an entire generation of leaders who stood up for freedom and replaced them with a generation of leaders who acquiesced to power exactly at the time it mattered the most. (The above author also wrote a great article on the 1969 flu: The 1968-69 “Hong Kong Flu” Pandemic Revisited ⋆ Brownstone Institute

Former CBC reporter Marianne spoke recently at hte NCI hearings regarding censorship. Her talk was more of a confessional, as her voice dramatically described the irresistible pressure on reporters to conform during the pandemic and help spread government propaganda and misinformation. For instance, Marianne explained how she was made to ignore vaccine-injured citizens who contacted her directly for help getting their stories out: “I felt the crushing burden and the weight of their truth not being given a voice. I felt I had failed these people as a journalist. I had witnessed in a very short time a collapse of journalism, news gathering, and investigative reporting. The way I saw it, we were pushing propaganda. To define propaganda: it’s information, ideas, opinions or images that give one part of an argument, which are broadcast, published, in order to influence opinion.” More well-covered was an astonishing letter that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg sent this week to Congressman Jim Jordan, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee. Remarkably, the letter has received wide media coverage, such as in a USA Today op-ed headlined, “Republicans were right: Zuckerberg admits Biden administration censored your Facebook feed.” Like Marianne’s clip, Zuckerberg’s letter was similarly confessional, since it began by admitting that during the pandemic, Facebook allowed the government to control the information it was permissible for U.S. citizens to receive. From Zuck’s letter: Although Zuckerberg commendably owned the blame for bowing to the pressure, it’s not quite that simple. The government strongly suggested censorship, and Facebook understandably yielded to that pressure. This two-stepping was just a thinly disguised charade designed to give Biden’s officials plausible deniability that they never directly censored anybody. It’s just a dumb cover story and nobody believes it. What big tech company could resist focused government pressure? "That’s a nice platform you have there, it would be a shame if something happened to it, cough, TikTok, cough." TikTok resisted and failed. Musk continues to resist, and he’s paying the price. Anyway, and this may be the more significant point, Zuckerberg also expressed “regret” about demoting the true Hunter Biden laptop story, and disclosed that the FBI’s warning was not about the laptop per se, but more broadly about “Russian disinformation” related to the “Biden family and Burisma.” Meaning, Biden’s bribery problems. In other words, just like in any tinpot dictatorship, the Biden Administration successfully misused its domestic police force, the FBI, to control information about any politically embarrassing topic, not just “dangerous health misinformation” related to the pandemic.

It's not about whether the placebo trials were good enough for me. There were no true placebo trials. Period.

Well, I don't see the point in discussing it when neither of you even understand what a true placebo trial is.

I discussed all this previously, in regard to the covid jabs, quite a few times. There are no true placebo trials of the childhood shots. There's entire books written about this that also discuss the "efficacy" part. If "just trust us" is good enough for you, that's fine. Just say so. And stop demonizing others who want more information before making decisions.

Incorrect.

Uh-huh. But you dont' ask questions of the people you should be asking questions of.

No. I said I didn't question it.

Would you sign your child up for this for $3000? Would you do it if you knew that some of the children who were volunteered by their parents for the covid vax trials were injured permanently and were abandoned by Big Pharma? Would you accept "just trust us" from an industry that had been continuously caught and fined for medical fraud and was the cause of the opiod epidemic? Tell me again why it's immoral to question this.

There are no true placebo studies for most vaccines. Note: TRUE placebo studies. There's a difference. I really wish more people would look into the problems with the US healthcare/pharma system. There's a reason why Americans are the least healthy people on the planet. It's not just vaccines, the entire system is corrupt. They don't make hundreds of billions of dollars a year by curing illnesses.

I didn't think to question any of it when my kids were small. Everyone just did it. For my travelling years, yes, I researched and chose which ones I would take. When I research anything, I never ever ever just rely on what the manufacturer says. Of course they're going to tell you their product is great.

It's like a fuquin' religion. Just BEEELLLIEEEVVVEEE. Don't question. Ignore previous fraud. Attack any who ask questions, as heretics.