Goddess

I'll give you an example: annual flu shots. Public health experts have long assumed flu shots were effective in the elderly. But, paradoxically, all the studies done failed to demonstrate an acceptable benefit. Instead of considering that they, the experts, could be wrong – instead of believing the scientific data – the public health experts assumed the studies were wrong. After all, flu shots have to work, right? An important and definitive “mainstream” government study done nearly a decade ago got little attention because the science came down on the wrong side of the narrative Big Pharma was promoting. It found that after decades and billions of dollars spent promoting flu shots for the elderly, the mass vaccination program did not result in saving lives. In fact, the death rate among the elderly increased substantially. So the NIH launched an effort to do “the” definitive study that would actually prove, for the first time, once and for all, that flu shots were beneficial to the elderly. The government would gather some of the brightest scientific minds for the research, and adjust for all kinds of factors that could be masking that presumed benefit. But when they finished, no matter how they crunched the numbers, the data kept telling the same story: flu shots were of no benefit to the elderly. Quite the opposite. The death rate had increased markedly since widespread flu vaccination among older Americans. The lead author of the study, Lone Simonsen, had agreed to do an on camera interview with the media on her study results, which she felt were very important. However, her bosses at the National Institutes of Health blocked the interview. However, here is her commentary on her study: Commentary: Benefits of influenza vaccine in US elderly—new studies raise questions | International Journal of Epidemiology | Oxford Academic (oup.com) Dr. Walter Orenstein was among the first to notice the problem when he headed up the Centers for Disease Control’s national immunization program. Below is a transcript of his 2006 interview with Sharyl Attkisson of CBS News: In that interview, this part was quite prophetic: So what’s an older person to do? The CDC says they should still get their flu shots. That it could make the flu less severe or prevent problems not reflected in the total numbers. But watch for CDC to likely shift in the near future more toward protecting the elderly in a roundabout way by pushing to vaccinate more children and others around them who could give them the flu. And here's the study: Impact of Influenza Vaccination on Seasonal Mortality in the US Elderly Population | Geriatrics | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network In our study, however, we examined influenza-related deaths in the entire US elderly population by estimating seasonal numbers of excess all-cause deaths. These estimates, which provide the best available national estimates of the fraction of all winter deaths that are specifically attributable to influenza,5,28 show that the observational studies must overstate the mortality benefits of the vaccine. For the 33 seasons studied, influenza-related mortality (excess all-cause mortality) was always less than 10% of the total number of winter deaths among the elderly (Table 1). This period included the 1968 pandemic and the severe 1997-1998 season29 during which the mismatched vaccine formulation provided little protection30; for both of these seasons, the estimated influenza-related mortality was probably very close to what would have occurred had no vaccine been available. We conclude, therefore, that there are not enough influenza-related deaths to support the conclusion that vaccination can reduce total winter mortality among the US elderly population by as much as half. Our findings indicate that the mortality benefits of influenza vaccination may be substantially less than previously thought but for different reasons among different age groups. Here is an Italian study showing the same results as the other countries: Influenza-related mortality in the Italian elderly: No decline associated with increasing vaccination coverage - ScienceDirect I work in healthcare during H1N1 and asked the doc I worked for if I should get that shot or other flu shots and he told me NO. He said he saw no benefit in annual flu shots to his elderly patients and that in many cases, he saw their health went downhill because of them. He would give them the shot if they wanted it, but he never pushed it on his patients. The doc I worked for was one of the VERY FEW I saw who actually kept up with medical studies. Most docs get their info from MSM, just like you do. And from Pharma reps who visit them regularly and give incentives for prescribing their drugs. This is also worth a read: Education: Flu Vaccine - Physicians for Informed Consent So, yes. I think all vaccines should be independently re-evaluated.

You'd know better than me. I don't pay much attention to CBC or CTV.

As many times as they tell you to. And whatever they tell you to inject in the future, too, since we gave up our medical bodily autonomy rights. You're all brilliant.

A bit more on the SV40 promoter used in the covid jabs. Refresher - SV40 is an abbreviation for simian vacuolating virus 40 or simian virus 40, a polyomavirus that is found in both monkeys and humans. Like other polyomaviruses, SV40 is a DNA virus that sometimes causes tumors in animals, but most often persists as a latent infection. SV40 has been widely studied as a model eukaryotic virus, leading to many early discoveries in eukaryotic DNA replication and transcription. "Eukaryotic" cells have a membrane-encased nucleus. Discussion of this paper: Nuclear Targeting of Plasmids and Protein-DNA Complexes - Research Projects - Dean Lab - University of Rochester Medical Center Note the stated goal of this research: In this paper, Dean shows that particular parts/sequences of the SV40 have a function of transporting DNA into the cell nucleus. And modern sequencing tools label those automatically, but they were missing in the sequencer results manufacturers provided. Why? The "FUNCTION" of putting the SV40 promoter in the injections is so the DNA gets right into the cell nucleus. Remember when they told us that the DNA in the shots DEFINITELY DOES NOT get into your cell nuclei? 😬 And don't say "They didn't know!" Here's just one paper from 1999: Sequence requirements for plasmid nuclear import - PubMed (nih.gov) Got that? "facilitates maximal transport." Going back to WHY this was in the injections. This seems a likely explanation: Simian virus 40 in humans | Infectious Agents and Cancer | Full Text (biomedcentral.com) So, it's interesting that Big Pharma is now shifting their business model from covid jabs to.........mRNA jabs for CANCER. Just sayin'

Uh-huh. Yes, we've all had to get the polio, smallpox, measles/mumps/rubella shots several times a year, since we were children or we'd all be dead by now. You can tell a vaccine works by how many times a year you have to inject it.

Which nobody who is well-versed in epidemiology, virology, immunology or biology ever recommended. Keep throwing punches at that ghost all you want.

I've posted hundreds of studies and datasets. You're still repeating things you heard on MSM four years ago. So......... I'm going to go with the latest studies.

None of your opinions are supported by science.

Can you explain why, during the "deadliest pandemic in human history", mandates DID NOT APPLY to the government? There's thousands of videos and pictures from governments all over the world, putting masks on FOR THE CAMERAS and then taking them, laughing and joking, walking & talking with no social distancing. Remember when we were told not to travel for X-mas or see family and then like half our government jetted off on tropical vacations? Or when Neil Ferguson - the godfather of lockdowns - got caught boinking his mistress while he locked everyone else down? And Boris Johnsons' parties during lockdown? I mean, seriously - NONE of this rang any alarm bells with ANY of you, that maybe....just maybe.....it was all a farce and the ones making the rules for the rest of us, didn't even believe what they were saying? They locked you down for 2 years, destroyed businesses and families, disadvantaged children for years to come, bankrupted people, stole $1.3 trillion dollars from us .......and YOU ID!0TS are here defending them.

What he says at the beginning of that video is "people without comorbidities are simply not at the same level of risk as seniors, in fact it's minimal." Your contention has always been that everybody is at the same level of risk, which was an unscientific view that was promoted by the media at the beginning of covid and has LOOOOOONGGGGGG since been debunked. The Col is correct here. You, again, are incorrect. The point of posting the video is (which you ignore because it proves you wrong) covid "deaths" were being deleted.

Oh, OK. I was right then. You don't have the mental capabilities to understand what's being said. Life is difficult when you're a person who still believes your covid jabs aren't working because Goddess didn't get any. 🤣

Yes. Lt. Col Redman was the head of Alberta's Emergency Responses. He brings the receipts in that testimony, so.......either you didn't watch it or you don't care about the information or what it means. Or you don't' understand what was being reported. I bet it's the latter.

LILLEY: Carney is Trudeau's new adviser with lots of conflicts (msn.com) This comes with a whole host of possible conflicts of interest that neither Carney nor the Liberal Party have addressed. According to his LinkedIn profile , Carney remains a finance adviser to the British government. He’s also on an advisory board for a finance firm named PIMCO. In addition, he is a board member at online payments firm Stripe, a board member for Bloomberg Philanthropies and Chair and Head of Transition Investing at Brookfield Asset Management, a major global commercial real estate firm. In addition to his business work, Carney is the United Nations Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance. He is also a board member of the World Economic Forum, a position he has held since 2010. They mention Dominic Barton, who had a conflict of interest with McKinsey and then suddenly McKinsey was getting millions of dollars for "consulting". I don't think I've ever seen a government so openly handing out so much money to cronies and insiders.

I posted about this before. It came out during the NCI hearings.

We'll probably never know for certain. There was no conformity in specifics of reporting and for most of it, literally everything was a "covid death". As I reported before, there were a lot of deaths in the US due to the use of ventilators and remdesivir, and in the UK due to midazolam. Fortunately for Canada, we dawdled on purchasing vents and by the time we got them, the US had already figured out it was the vents that were killing people. So our $1billion worth of vents went unused and were recently sold for scrap for (I think it was) $6 each. But at least the Liberal politicians and insiders made great money by investing in vent companies. Frank Baylis, especially. Former Liberal MP questioned over ventilator contract at ethics committee | National Post NY Governor is being questioned by Congress because his nursing home policies killed many of the elderly.

I'm not. I posted about it at the time. Here. I even found a CTV article on it, knowing that's important to you guys. If it's not reported by the CTV, it's "crazy anti-vaxxer stuff", right 🤣 B.C. COVID data: Death count may obscure vaccine benefit | CTV News On April 2, the province began reporting "30-day, all-cause mortality" in its weekly COVID-19 updates. This means anyone in the province who dies within 30 days of a positive lab test for the coronavirus is reported as a COVID-19 death, regardless of whether the disease actually caused the fatality.

He's painted himself into a corner, for sure.

I'm not sure what the official number is now. Health Canada was quietly deleting covid deaths, last I heard 16,000 had been deleted. One of the (many) things I found odd was that deaths were pronounced "covid deaths" if they tested positive at any time within the PREVIOUS 30 days. Even if they clearly did not have symptomatic covid. Where were all "correlation does not equal causation" people then, hmmmmmm? Yet, people have died within minutes of getting the jabs, and according to VAERS - the majority of people who died after vaccination died within the first 24-48 hours. The "first 24 hours" would include minutes or hours post-vax. When this happens and you point it out as significant and worthy of investigation, suddenly all the "correlation does not mean causation" people come out with fists flying.

I posted a news article about a woman in Texas (?) who thought her teen son MIGHT have had covid and she made him ride in the trunk of the car to get to the doctor and was stopped by police. That's how bad the brainwashing was.

I wont' admit that, because they're' not. The decisions and views of experts who were correct on everything - those decisions were based on science. These are all people who were at the top of their fields. That's why they've all been proven to have been correct. The "experts" paraded in the media - they've all been wrong. On literally everything. Because none of their advice was based on science. It was political or they were paid to promote Pharma views. This is why it's important for the public to at the very least, have a basic understanding of things. We can disagree on the reasons why these "experts" were so badly wrong on everything, but No. I was posting the studies and datasets and already established science on coronaviruses and vaccines here, very early on. I was following the science. It's the rest of you that aren't. The science didn't' change - you were just wrong the whole time.

Instead we followed Ferguson. Look him up, too. The guy's a ******. Ioannidis was correct from the beginning on covid IFR. Ferguson had a record of vastly exaggerating risk. Again, if you're happy with Ferguson.....gawd help us next time.

Am I? The world's top epidemiologists from Harvard, Yale and Oxford formulated the Great Barrington Declaration very early on and were absolutely vilified for it. It advocated for non-panic and focused protection of at risk groups. This was early October, 2020. When Fauci found out about it, he commanded his staff to do a "devastating takedown" of it. Which they did. If you're happy with public health bureaucrats taking over pandemic decisions instead of the world's top epidemiologists, biologists, virologists and scientists, then.....yes. We will have to agree to disagree. Gawd help us next time.

They were shut down, blacklisted and silenced and denigrated in the MSM. Were you unaware that for years, any one who said anything against "the narrative' was attacked mercilessly, including experts at the top of their various fields? Ya. Ya, we did. We had the 2 cruise ships and Italy. We had John Ionniddis. I tried to bring all this up, with references, datasets and experts and again, was attacked. Anthony "I am The Science!" Fauci. The world's pandemic plan called for experts in a variety of fields to gather together and make decisions based on risk/benefit analyses. This would have included economists, child psychologists, statisticians, data analysists, politicians, scientists of all sorts. That's what I hope we do next time. Instead we turned it all over to public health, who considered exactly ZERO of those other things. I believe it was Collins who recently came out and admitted this was the greatest mistake made during covid - turning all decisions on everything over to public health bureaucrats. I posted about it here.

I said I think they should all be re-evaluated. 🙄 LOL. Wow, I've posted repeatedly about the use of vents and remdesivir (which started in NY), lots of links and references. The US stopped using vents because that's what was killing people. It's why Canada's vents sat un-used and were just recently sold for scrap. You pretending to not know what I think is pretty lame-o.