Goddess

Yes. My sister is permanently disabled from the vax, so I pretty much deal with it every day.

Alright, then. YOUNG cranky dude. I kind of always feel sorry for people who just go through life miserable. 😞

He seems like a really old, cranky dude. I don't think I've ever seen a not angry post from it. "Get off my lawn, you little whippersnappers!"

Or the left has no sense of humour....??

Some people posting on here, this is all I see: I am so stupid that I 100% believe everything the government tells me!!

You're on the interwebs now, doorknob.

"Fact-checkers" say that's not true. But X is full of videos of it today. From lots of different countries. "Don't believe your lying eyes".

🙄

What are you talking about, then? 🤔 Are people voting for whoever is put forward as a candidate or not?

Agree. I kind of feel that way with the US elections right now. I have no horse in that race, but I think the Dems could have run a french fry as a candidate and they all would have jumped on board. Voting based on policies is almost completely gone.

In the words of Mark Oshinkie today: How an experience is remembered is important. During four-plus years of phony, alarmist Covid narrative, increasing numbers of people have gradually, belatedly figured out that the whole thing was a strategic, extreme, and extremely damaging overreaction based on a series of lies. Some still haven’t perceived these lies. Others know they’ve been lied to but won’t admit that they were slow to figure this out. Many who bought or sold the overreaction lamely maintain that “We couldn’t have known” that this virus wasn’t so bad or that all of the disruption was “worth it, because it saved millions of lives.” The media and government are doing their damnedest to preserve these foundational myths. Doing so assuages their audiences’ consciences and soothes their egos, which have deservedly taken big hits following their naive support of the absurd lockdowns, school closures, masking, testing-and-tracing and the epically failed shots. Perpetuating the disinformation that animated Coronamania also shields them from accountability for the destruction they’ve caused. I write largely to dispel these lies. I want people to accurately remember what happened. Some say that awakening people to the scam is important because it will prevent an overreaction to “the next Pandemic.” I’m not looking that far ahead. It’s important to tell the truth now, for its own sake. Of the people who have engaged with me on this topic, most have relied on bogus “facts” that are easily debunked. If people predicate their views on these falsehoods, their memories will be faulty. Napoleon said, “History is a series of lies, agreed upon.” I’ll continue to bear witness to the Covid myths and illogic. The more people who do the same, the better. The Scamdemic’s implementers and those they conned want you to act as if the Scamdemic never happened. I also write to link plainly visible, residual dysfunction to its Scamdemic origins. I want to remind people why social life has attenuated, why Americans are more divided than ever, why young people are academically, socially and psychologically damaged, why stuff costs so much, why there are fewer houses for sale and fewer jobs, why birth rates are declining and why people don’t trust the media, doctors, the government or mail-in election results, et al. I still bring up the Scamdemic during direct encounters. This makes people uncomfortable and testy. Good. Creating discomfort has value. How many times have you heard people say, in other contexts, that it’s virtuous to “afflict the comfortable?” By continuing to mention Coronamania, I’m afflicting those who were comfortable during that time, when billions lost age-limited life experiences, jobs and businesses, the ability to gather for weddings and funerals, killed themselves or died other deaths of despair. The Covid overreaction deserves enduring focus. Many have proclaimed that people should “never forget” other dark chapters of human history. If the public isn’t continually reminded of what governments and the media have done since March 2020, these institutions will continue to shift public focus to the next, shiny object, media-designated crises here or abroad: foreign wars, monkeypox, J Lo, trans boxers, et al, ad infinitum. I’m not so distractible. Ultimately, those of us speaking and writing against the Scam are in an arms race and a war of attrition against the Mania mongers. The Scamdemic liars will continue to sell their phony narrative. They’ve accrued much money, political gain and social control by doing so. Why stop now, when they can consolidate and attempt to legitimize their gains? The liars also have, as they have since March, 2020, infinitely more resources and access to mass audiences than do those identifying the lies. Expect more slow, mournful solo-piano-soundtracked PBS shows and documentary films about how the magically worst, most aberrant virus in history killed millions; as if the statistics were accurate and as if multitudes haven’t died throughout history at ages far lower than the ostensible Covid death average of 80 years. Expect Pharma and governments to fund somber granite memorials, including fountains filled with crocodile tears for all the superannuated Covid victims. Expect many more histrionic news accounts about the latest viral “surge.” And more ads promoting the latest booster. Above all, I write, as I have since March, 2020, to affirm and accompany the sensible, perceptive people who saw the Scam and who understandably felt that much of the populace had lost their minds. It’s been exasperating to be surrounded by lunacy. That memory hasn’t gone away. It never will. In a failed attempt to silence me, some wish to silence me by insincerely and patronizingly saying they feel sorry for me because I’m “unable to move on.” Nice try. No one needs to worry about my mental health. Prior to the Scamdemic, some of these same people told me that I was the “most grounded” or “sanest” person they knew and that they “loved” me for this. I haven’t lost my sanity; it enabled me to see the Scam when most of my peers lost their heads. If the Coronamanic pitiers need an object/target for their emotion, they can turn their search inward and feel guilty about the profound harm they caused by buying an obvious overreaction and aggressively supporting the bizarre “mitigation” and injection crusades. After that, they can feel sorry for those who don’t have enough to eat, can’t walk or lack human connection, or those injured or killed by the shots, et al.

This is the problem, if you vote for a particular candidate because your favorite singer is, you are too stupid to vote.

This is the graph of NYC deaths. It's quite different from every other city, in that there is no "waves". Just a sharp spike in March/April of 2020. Testimony in Congress is that this indicates some type of "event", like a bombing or natural disaster. A bunch of deaths within a few weeks and then......nothing.

I find it a bit amusing that 2 of the 4 vaccines people were forced to take, have been pulled from the market for safety issues and you're all still here defending the remaining 2. 😎 But it's not a cult.......

I do have a lot of questions. 🙂 Like: Why was the public not allowed to know about people who were harmed or died immediately after vaccination? Why was SV40 put in the injections? Why did they lie about natural immunity? Why were people who died of other things counted as covid deaths if they died within 30 days of a positive test, but if someone died within 30 seconds of being injected, it was "definitely not the vaccine"? Why did we ban all proven treatments for respiratory viruses and start new ones that doctors had to comply with or be fired? Why did they lie about Ivermectin? Why did they lie about children being at risk? Why all the censorship of science and scientists? Why no scientific debate or discussion? Why did they lie about the lab-leak? "Social distancing"? Masks? Except for Sweden (who did falter to peer pressure a bit), why did we throw the world's pandemic plan out the window? When we knew the jabs didn't prevent infection or transmission, why the demonization of the unvaccinated? Why the mandates? If nothing about the last few years pinged your "spidey senses", then you were not paying attention. If you think you can shame me for asking questions about all this, you cannot. You simply cannot.

Diversity is our strength. 🙂

The pandemic may be over, but the experiment isn't. Perhaps you were unaware that at the time the injections came out, they were experimental and there was NO long-term safety or efficacy data on them and that research would be on-going? YOU may not be interested in what that research is saying, but some of us are. If I was part of a medical experiment, I would be quite interested in how it was going.

You don't say? Weird. Because every morning when I get to work and MSM pops up, there's usually at least 2 articles about covid and boosters.

Really. COVID Booster Shots: How Often Should You Get Them? | U.S. News (usnews.com) You’re considered up-to-date with COVID vaccines if you have finished your primary COVID vaccine series and you’ve had the most recent booster dose as recommended by the CDC. Have you done that? Gotten every booster? What are you guys on now - #10? #11? If you haven't, you're not considered "fully vaccinated". Are you a.......**GASP, CLUTCHES PEARLS ** ........ "anti-vaxxer"?

Oh? You haven't been encouraged to get every booster that comes out? Were never threatened with losing your job if you didn't get the shots? How odd. Most people's experience was quite different than your's.

I'll give you an example: annual flu shots. Public health experts have long assumed flu shots were effective in the elderly. But, paradoxically, all the studies done failed to demonstrate an acceptable benefit. Instead of considering that they, the experts, could be wrong – instead of believing the scientific data – the public health experts assumed the studies were wrong. After all, flu shots have to work, right? An important and definitive “mainstream” government study done nearly a decade ago got little attention because the science came down on the wrong side of the narrative Big Pharma was promoting. It found that after decades and billions of dollars spent promoting flu shots for the elderly, the mass vaccination program did not result in saving lives. In fact, the death rate among the elderly increased substantially. So the NIH launched an effort to do “the” definitive study that would actually prove, for the first time, once and for all, that flu shots were beneficial to the elderly. The government would gather some of the brightest scientific minds for the research, and adjust for all kinds of factors that could be masking that presumed benefit. But when they finished, no matter how they crunched the numbers, the data kept telling the same story: flu shots were of no benefit to the elderly. Quite the opposite. The death rate had increased markedly since widespread flu vaccination among older Americans. The lead author of the study, Lone Simonsen, had agreed to do an on camera interview with the media on her study results, which she felt were very important. However, her bosses at the National Institutes of Health blocked the interview. However, here is her commentary on her study: Commentary: Benefits of influenza vaccine in US elderly—new studies raise questions | International Journal of Epidemiology | Oxford Academic (oup.com) Dr. Walter Orenstein was among the first to notice the problem when he headed up the Centers for Disease Control’s national immunization program. Below is a transcript of his 2006 interview with Sharyl Attkisson of CBS News: In that interview, this part was quite prophetic: So what’s an older person to do? The CDC says they should still get their flu shots. That it could make the flu less severe or prevent problems not reflected in the total numbers. But watch for CDC to likely shift in the near future more toward protecting the elderly in a roundabout way by pushing to vaccinate more children and others around them who could give them the flu. And here's the study: Impact of Influenza Vaccination on Seasonal Mortality in the US Elderly Population | Geriatrics | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network In our study, however, we examined influenza-related deaths in the entire US elderly population by estimating seasonal numbers of excess all-cause deaths. These estimates, which provide the best available national estimates of the fraction of all winter deaths that are specifically attributable to influenza,5,28 show that the observational studies must overstate the mortality benefits of the vaccine. For the 33 seasons studied, influenza-related mortality (excess all-cause mortality) was always less than 10% of the total number of winter deaths among the elderly (Table 1). This period included the 1968 pandemic and the severe 1997-1998 season29 during which the mismatched vaccine formulation provided little protection30; for both of these seasons, the estimated influenza-related mortality was probably very close to what would have occurred had no vaccine been available. We conclude, therefore, that there are not enough influenza-related deaths to support the conclusion that vaccination can reduce total winter mortality among the US elderly population by as much as half. Our findings indicate that the mortality benefits of influenza vaccination may be substantially less than previously thought but for different reasons among different age groups. Here is an Italian study showing the same results as the other countries: Influenza-related mortality in the Italian elderly: No decline associated with increasing vaccination coverage - ScienceDirect I work in healthcare during H1N1 and asked the doc I worked for if I should get that shot or other flu shots and he told me NO. He said he saw no benefit in annual flu shots to his elderly patients and that in many cases, he saw their health went downhill because of them. He would give them the shot if they wanted it, but he never pushed it on his patients. The doc I worked for was one of the VERY FEW I saw who actually kept up with medical studies. Most docs get their info from MSM, just like you do. And from Pharma reps who visit them regularly and give incentives for prescribing their drugs. This is also worth a read: Education: Flu Vaccine - Physicians for Informed Consent So, yes. I think all vaccines should be independently re-evaluated.

You'd know better than me. I don't pay much attention to CBC or CTV.

As many times as they tell you to. And whatever they tell you to inject in the future, too, since we gave up our medical bodily autonomy rights. You're all brilliant.

A bit more on the SV40 promoter used in the covid jabs. Refresher - SV40 is an abbreviation for simian vacuolating virus 40 or simian virus 40, a polyomavirus that is found in both monkeys and humans. Like other polyomaviruses, SV40 is a DNA virus that sometimes causes tumors in animals, but most often persists as a latent infection. SV40 has been widely studied as a model eukaryotic virus, leading to many early discoveries in eukaryotic DNA replication and transcription. "Eukaryotic" cells have a membrane-encased nucleus. Discussion of this paper: Nuclear Targeting of Plasmids and Protein-DNA Complexes - Research Projects - Dean Lab - University of Rochester Medical Center Note the stated goal of this research: In this paper, Dean shows that particular parts/sequences of the SV40 have a function of transporting DNA into the cell nucleus. And modern sequencing tools label those automatically, but they were missing in the sequencer results manufacturers provided. Why? The "FUNCTION" of putting the SV40 promoter in the injections is so the DNA gets right into the cell nucleus. Remember when they told us that the DNA in the shots DEFINITELY DOES NOT get into your cell nuclei? 😬 And don't say "They didn't know!" Here's just one paper from 1999: Sequence requirements for plasmid nuclear import - PubMed (nih.gov) Got that? "facilitates maximal transport." Going back to WHY this was in the injections. This seems a likely explanation: Simian virus 40 in humans | Infectious Agents and Cancer | Full Text (biomedcentral.com) So, it's interesting that Big Pharma is now shifting their business model from covid jabs to.........mRNA jabs for CANCER. Just sayin'