Goddess

Do you need me to make airplane noises while I spoon-feed you? Read it or don't. Educate yourself or don't. IDGAF

Oh, I'm sorry. Did you finally post the names of the scientists and the links to the peer-reviewed medical articles that you are following that I asked for months ago, and I missed it?

Crying out "conspiracy theory!!" every time you encounter a complex subject, isn't going to cut it in intellectual discourse anymore. This is not a conspiracy theory. It's very serious problem that has been brewing for decades. See below: How Bill Gates and his partners took over the global Covid pandemic response - POLITICO And here's a commentary on the article, in case it's over your head:

Let me guess? Quick Google search? You probably never heard of this guy before.

By the new definition, orange juice is a "vaccine".

If you want to know more, please read the studies and analyses on this thread:

BTW, the author of that article is Dr. Aseem Malhotra, a former staunch advocate of the covid inoculations. He is a highly respected British cardiologist and expert in evidence-based medicine and was prompted to take a critical look at the vaccine data after the unexpected death of his father 6 months after vaccination, which is totally consistent with the 5 month delay time for clotting. He spent 6 months carefully studying the data and consulting with other top scientists. He’s now calling for a halt to the vaccines based on the data. He “slowly and reluctantly” came to the conclusion he was wrong about the safety and efficacy of the COVID vaccines. His journey was documented in his first paper. He mentions he teaches evidence-based medicine and follows all the principles. How many journals refused to publish his papers? The answer is zero. He simply submitted the papers to one of the very few medical journals with no ties to big pharma and no advertising and would take a paper of 10,000 words. It was split into two articles because the journal has a size limit for a single article. He started working on the paper 9 months ago. After a 3 month double blind peer-review, the papers were accepted. The big problem they have in discrediting him is they can't figure out why he changed his mind (other than the scientific evidence of course). He has everything to lose by speaking out. Dr. Aseem Malhotra is a hero. When he learned he was wrong, he did the right thing: publicly admitted his mistake and called for the halt to the vaccines. He was publicly advocating for the vaccines and he himself is double jabbed with the COVID vaccines. When a personal event made him question what he had been told, he spent 6 months looking at the data and publicly admitted he was wrong. I can relate to this. It was my sister's vaccine injury that made me start looking at things more critically. He did this at considerable risk to his reputation. He’s the type of doctor that the authorities and the medical community should be listening to. Instead they are trying to silence and discredit him and his work. They should be ashamed of their actions. History will not be kind to them. The truth will eventually come out. Those who stonewall the inevitable will suffer the consequences.

BTW, the author of that article is Dr. Aseem Malhotra, a former staunch advocate of the covid inoculations. He is a highly respected British cardiologist and expert in evidence-based medicine and was prompted to take a critical look at the vaccine data after the unexpected death of his father 6 months after vaccination, which is totally consistent with the 5 month delay time for clotting. He spent 6 months carefully studying the data and consulting with other top scientists. He’s now calling for a halt to the vaccines based on the data. He “slowly and reluctantly” came to the conclusion he was wrong about the safety and efficacy of the COVID vaccines. His journey was documented in his first paper. He mentions he teaches evidence-based medicine and follows all the principles. How many journals refused to publish his papers? The answer is zero. He simply submitted the papers to one of the very few medical journals with no ties to big pharma and no advertising and would take a paper of 10,000 words. It was split into two articles because the journal has a size limit for a single article. He started working on the paper 9 months ago. After a 3 month double blind peer-review, the papers were accepted. The big problem they have in discrediting him is they can't figure out why he changed his mind (other than the scientific evidence of course). He has everything to lose by speaking out. Dr. Aseem Malhotra is a hero. When he learned he was wrong, he did the right thing: publicly admitted his mistake and called for the halt to the vaccines. He was publicly advocating for the vaccines and he himself is double jabbed with the COVID vaccines. When a personal event made him question what he had been told, he spent 6 months looking at the data and publicly admitted he was wrong. I can relate to this. It was my sister's vaccine injury that made me start looking at things more critically. He did this at considerable risk to his reputation. He’s the type of doctor that the authorities and the medical community should be listening to. Instead they are trying to silence and discredit him and his work. They should be ashamed of their actions. History will not be kind to them. The truth will eventually come out. Those who stonewall the inevitable will suffer the consequences.

Independent scrutiny.

The institutions have been compromised. They were compromised many years ago. If you're not aware, this has been an issue in the US for about 20 years - many people smarter than you or I have been warning that it is dangerous to have the Pharma industry paying the CDC and FDA and funding doctors and scientists. Fauci has spent his entire career concentrating power in himself and the institutions he runs. The scientists I am listening to right now are the ones who have not been compromised by accepting Fauci bribes. They are the ones who have actually followed the science, established and emerging. The Pharma funded ones are unfortunately the ones running the show now - Fauci has made sure of it. They don't follow science, they allow no questioning of what they say and they have to forced by law to reveal their clinical data. Pfizer's application to the FDA for the EUA came attached to a $2.3 million wire transfer. If you don't see the conflicts of interest, I can't help you. But believe me, Big Pharma doesn't give a goddamn about you. And by paying off the FDA and CDC, they ensure those institutions don't either. Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine - Part 2 | Malhotra | Journal of Insulin Resistance Underlying causes for this failure include regulatory capture – guardians that are supposed to protect the public are in fact funded by the corporations that stand to gain from the sale of those medications. A failure of public health messaging has also resulted in wanton waste of resources and a missed opportunity to help individuals lead healthier lives with relatively simple – and low cost – lifestyle changes. There is a strong scientific, ethical and moral case to be made that the current COVID vaccine administration must stop until all the raw data has been subjected to fully independent scrutiny. Looking to the future, the medical and public health professions must recognise these failings and eschew the tainted dollar of the medical-industrial complex. It will take a lot of time and effort to rebuild trust in these institutions, but the health – of both humanity and the medical profession – depends on it.

Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine - Part 1 | Malhotra | Journal of Insulin Resistance Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine - Part 2 | Malhotra | Journal of Insulin Resistance

Why People in Germany Get Vaccinated - Prof. Harald Walach (harald-walach.info) How true is this? ?

Why would anyone accept a titers reading in mouse data as a sign of vaccine efficacy in a variant specific vaccine booster, when the titers being measured were already elicited by the previous vaccine that was known to not stop Omicron?

Thanks. I keep asking for everyone to share what they are basing their decision and thoughts on, but all I get are MSM headlines, a Scientific American article and insults. I bet I've posted about 50 peer-reviewed medical studies along with other supporting information but all these people who have been screaming "Follow the science!" suddenly have no interest in it, now that it's flooding in. I'm starting to suspect they never did.

I see. So no proof.

Got nothin', hey? Just like I thought.

And where is your proof for any of those statements?

What is your explanation for why all the highly vaccinated countries are experiencing wave after wave of covid, while the lowest vaccinated countries are not? What is your explanation for why the vaccinated are getting re-infected and re-re-infected over and over again? If the vaccine is working, why isn't it working?

So come debate me.

In case you hadn't noticed from real life, vaccinated people are getting covid over and over and over. Albert Bourla - CEO of Pfizer - and Biden are poster children for this. This issue is hugely important since if people can catch Covid more than once, this pandemic has the potential to never end. The data is really starting to come in now, that these reinfections and re-reinfections are vaccine driven. Let's look at the data from several countries - Bulgaria, Portugal and South Africa. Bulgaria is 30% vaccinated. Portugal is 95% vaccinated and 70% boosted. At one time they said there was nobody left in Portugal to vaccinate. Portugal is a steaming pandemic dumpster fire, whereas Covid basically does not exist in Bulgaria. These two countries are also an experiment. The outcome of the experiment is that Covid vaccines failed. Check out this chart of covid cases per million: Here's South Africa, one of the lowest vaxxed countries. S. Africa is 35% vaccinated and 5% boosted: The situations in these countries could not be any more different: while Ba4 and Ba5 were blips on the radar in South Africa, these same variants are driving a deadly wave of Covid in highly vaccinated Portugal. The deaths in Portugal are coming fairly close to the level of the first Omicron wave and are still rising, so there is no telling how high they will go. In South Africa however, deaths are about 1/6th of their winter deaths and generally look like Ba4/5 wave was a non-event there. Mind you, Portugal has a decent Western medical system and South Africa is a poorer country. While Portugalians are older on average, about 20% of South Africans are infected with HIV. So even though these are not perfectly equal countries, these differences balance each other. Just about everyone in Portugal had covid by the end of last winter. This current wave of infections and deaths in Portugal is driven by reinfections. Infections and reinfections drove vaccinated Portugal deaths way past the unvaccinated South Africa deaths, despite a better medical system in Portugal. Why are reinfections happening? Because boosted people are unable to acquire proper immunity upon infection. They are forced to endure endless covid reinfections, that further damage their immune systems, inviting more illness. This is, sadly, happening in the over-vaccinated West, as the unvaccinated countries of the world are enjoying herd immunity. Yes, herd immunity comes at a cost, but that cost is behind the people of those countries. Thanks to the wonders of haphazardly developed and poorly tested “vaccines”, we have 70% of the Western population treated with experimental, unproven substances that ended up disabling immunity, enabling endless reinfections, and we have the pandemic that never ends, dumpster-fire-style. There is no denying that some unvaccinated people also get reinfected. I don't want to minimize their experience. However, the Pfizer trials show, that the largest share of reinfections is in the vaccinated and it is driven by vaccination. This randomized controlled trial concerns vaccinating young kids and proved beyond doubt that vaccination causes repeated reinfections. Look at Page 38: (RCTs are the gold standard of testing.) What is that page saying? There were a total of 12 kid participants who managed to get two covid infections within the time frame of the trial. 11 of them were vaccine recipients and only one received no vaccine. Because Pfizer did the scientifically forbidden and unblinded the trial too early, like they did with the adult trials. Out of 12 kids who had two covid infections, only ONE was in the never-vaccinated group! Mind you, as the above passage says, all of these 12 reinfected children, never had Covid prior to the trial. So what caused vaccinated children to develop a disproportionate amount of repeat infections? The vaccine, of course. It is a randomized controlled trial, after all. Thanks to Pfizer, we finally know that Covid reinfections are real and that their vaccine causes them by disabling natural immunity. In the 2-4-year-old group all reinfections happened in the vaccinated participants, five of six were from the first-vaccinated group. “All of these participants received 3 doses of assigned study intervention, except for one participant in the BNT162b2 group who received two doses”. We have a smoking gun that reinfections are vaccine driven. Why do vaccinated people keep getting re-infected? It's OAS. Also, Chile is another country to watch - highly vaccinated, getting ravaged by Omicron Ba4 and Ba5.

You have no idea how many "crackpot" scientists there are or what their credentials are. Most were at the top of their fields and refused to be bribed by Big Harma. You also have no idea how many are joining their ranks, now that the data is coming in. Bi Harma execs are also leaving in droves, they know which way the wind is blowing. Heads are gonna roll and they don't want to be around when that happens.

Mouse Schwab says "Safe and effective!"

Maybe the boosters are like the first 2 doses: "Myocarditis means it's working!"

Maybe not. All 10 mice vaccinated with the Moderna Ba5 booster became infected with that variant AFTER receiving the booster. The only claim to fame was the mice had less viral load IN THEIR LUNGS but just as much as usual in their noses. The worst performing mouse had 10,000 times more virons in their lungs than the best performing mouse. They claim this is somehow helpful in people but can't explain how or why. Most people infected with Ba5 do not experience lung issues, so I'm not sure it's relevant but I guess they have to find SOMETHING good about these boosters. Information like this is why I read the medical studies and not MSN headlines.

I'm done with him. I've posted so many actual medical studies, linking them all, often with further reading and info on the scientist's credentials and patiently explained what OAS and immune imprinting are and what the data is showing in various countries. Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla and Biden is the best advertisement that the censored scientists are right. 4X vaxxed, on Pax and had covid twice within weeks. That's OAS. Slapping you right in the face. I'm not feeling threatened by someone who gets his information from MSM headlines. I know a metric f^%$kton more than he does. He knows it too. That's why he just follows me around the board insulting me, without addressing anything.