Goddess

He thinks 30% more deaths after mass vaccination is GOOD. A SUCCESS!! You're not going to convince him it might be.....not be a good thing. Because he's an id!0t. They don't like data. They like CBC headlines. Wheeeeeeee!

I have. Every country's VAERS equivalent says so. And not just more injuries and deaths - a much larger variety of injuries: cardiac, hema issues, neuro, prion diseases, you name it.

COVID-19 vaccination decisions and impacts of vaccine mandates: a cross sectional survey of healthcare workers in Ontario, Canada - Chaufan - Journal of Public Health and Emergency (amegroups.org) Conclusion: "Mandated vaccination policies in Ontario have negatively affected healthcare workers’ well-being, patient care, and the health system’s sustainability. This study.. highlights and underscores the need for not only evidence-informed, but also ethics-informed, policies, esp during health emergencies." "We conclude that if, by the OECD criteria (as analyzed in this peer-reviewed paper), the policy of mandated vaccination for HCWs has failed, this failure, along with the contested efficacy and safety of Covid-19 vaccines, their negative impact on HCWs’ wellbeing, staffing levels, and patient care, and the threat that mandates represent to longstanding bioethical principles such as informed consent and bodily autonomy, negates any basis—policy, scientific, or ethical—to continue with the practice." ******************** It's estimated that Ontario lost 15% of HCW due to: 1) quitting because of the mandates 2) took early retirement because of the mandates 3) being fired because of the mandates 4) long term side effects/ disability from the forced injections And now Canada has a health-care crisis....for an injection that doesn't confer immunity, doesn't stop infection, doesn't stop transmission, has documented adverse events, has not reduced deaths, hospitalizations or ER visits.

This book on the history of pharma scandals, how corruption in medicine reached a new apex during COVID, and how nobody has been punished for lies during the pandemic about the vaccines, masks, and lockdowns, by investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson. Excerpt from the book: Chapter 3: “Third Rail” Vaccines Has your doctor warned you about potential side effects each time you or a loved one got a vaccine? Under established ethics guidelines, you should be informed about everything from the risk of paralysis to brain damage and death, depending on the vaccine. If you weren’t told of these risks, then did you truly give your informed consent to be vaccinated? It was a long time ago, but I recall being surprised when I first discovered public health officials using official channels to perpetrate vaccine misinformation. I was startled by their manipulation of news and information. A large part of their propaganda campaign revolves around mislabeling accurate facts as “disinformation,” smearing certain scientists, and falsely attacking people as “anti-vaccine.” Let me pause to state something that should be obvious. It’s not “anti-vaccine” to ask questions, research, or report about vaccine safety. In all my years of investigating topics, this one stands alone in terms of the magnitude of orchestrated pushback it draws. When I broke international news about deadly rollovers of Ford Explorers outfitted with Firestone tires, nobody suggested I was “anti-car” or “anti-tire.” That would be absurd. When I uncovered fraud at the Red Cross involving 9/11 donations, nobody suggested I was “anti–Red Cross,” “anti-charity,” or “anti-9/11 donations.” When I investigated other drug safety issues, nobody considered me to be “anti-medicine.” If I were to talk about studies showing that some people are allergic to penicillin, it wouldn’t make me “anti-penicillin.” Ask yourself why the game changes when it comes to vaccines. The fact that people feel compelled to say, “I’m not anti-vaccine . . .” before making perfectly grounded statements or asking rational questions speaks to the success of one of the most influential propaganda movements of our time. One of the cruelest things our government does is smear the poor parents of vaccine-injured children. For daring to speak publicly about what happened to their loved ones, these parents are attacked by public health officials and held up to ridicule by the media. Parents have told me the government has proven vindictive and they fear if they don’t keep their mouths shut, the government will take back payments awarded by courts to care for their vaccine-injured children. They’re literally bullied into silence. I think part of the reason why vaccine interests are so intent on neutralizing parents is that parents are the most important and credible spokesmen when it comes to vaccine safety. By definition, they weren’t “anti-vaxxers.” They vaccinated their children. All medicine has side effects. But in today’s manipulated information landscape, efforts to learn the most about side effects of vaccines, products given multiple times to virtually every American, are actively discouraged. We’re made to think that questions are not even to be raised. This is the antithesis of good science and public health. Without risks being addressed, our national vaccine program is neither as safe nor as effective as it could be. The fact that even medical professionals who should know better treat vaccine safety as a third rail not to be touched makes no logical sense and serves as an important giveaway that a commanding narrative is in play.

Most people uncritically believe the author whose work they read first, and the news sources they habitually consume. Psychologists have often confirmed the “primacy effect,” i.e., the first thing people hear or read about a given topic endures in their perception/belief. We see this here. Covid deaths go UP by 30%, hundreds of studies & datasets, and these ones are still defending the "success" of the injections. In general, people defend their lives and want to believe that effort is rewarded. Hence, they don’t like to feel time they’ve spent “educating” themselves was wasted. Believing their initial, or usual, sources also affirms peoples’ belief in their own good judgment regarding source selection. One-stop informational shopping also removes the cognitive challenge and dissonance that conflicting sources might present. Believing the first thing they read relieves people of the responsibility to do—and saves the time needed for—additional reading. The pop Covid literature portrays Covid as a terrible killer; many people are emotionally drawn to this—and other—crisis narratives. Authors often assert that very few—or zero—deaths would have occurred if we had locked down sooner or if everyone had worn masks and later, vaxxed and boosted. All of that is ludicrous, especially because the vast majority of those who reportedly died of Covid were already not long for this world. The mitigation and Pharma interventions were nothing but corrupt and bankrupt theater. We have never been able to stop, let alone vaccinate against a respiratory virus. Never. Those who swallowed the Covid-fear hook, line & sinker did nothing more than watch/listen to mainstream news reports regarding Covid, yet saw/see themselves as well-informed. They think they knew/know more after such "exploration” than they knew before they began. Yet, because these sources mislead them, many end up knowing less. It’s beyond ironic that governments and media outlets who rail against mis/disinformation routinely engage in these practices, especially during the Scamdemic. As one of many examples, the bureaucrats, pols and newspeople insisted the shots were “safe and effective” and would “stop infection and spread.” Tens of millions blindly believed this initial message and vilified those who thought more carefully and refused to inject. The non-vaxxers were right. Instead of focusing on agenda-driven sources, people would have seen a clearer picture of SARS-CoV-2 risk by trusting what they directly observed. If the virus had really been killing healthy, non-old, everyone would have seen, early on and with their own eyes—or heard, from familiar, trusted others—credible evidence of the virus’s purported, population-wide lethality. Many will hold onto their initial belief that Covid was a terrible threat that warranted lockdowns, vaxx crusades and additional, astronomical Public Health subsidies. Bureaucrats and Pharma will continue to lavishly fund university research and more shots to “stop the next Pandemic!”

Canada takes in other countries' terrorists, gives them citizenship and protects them, and then wonders why we have bad relations with other countries.

That is a years old talking point from MSM that is not borne out by the data. Stop repeating what you've heard on CBC and start looking at the data. I've posted it all here. It's not like any other vaccine. The injuries and deaths from it far eclipse all other vaccines put together.

You realize you're the fringe minority now and no one thinks you're a hero for it anymore, right? Please tell us also when you have a prostate exam or get your Viagra prescription renewed. You know, since you believe medical decisions are no longer private and everything should be shared.

Dr. Vinay Prasad, whom I've introduced you to quite a few times over the last few years. This is one of the experts you all pissed on.

Remember when everyone here attacked me and said there were no adverse events from the jabs? I sure do. And now some are still here saying "Well, of course vaccines have adverse events for some people, we always knew that!" But you sure denied it at the time!!! and quoted me all kinds of CBC articles about how it never ever happens with the covid injections. 100% safe. That's what you all said.

OpenSAFELY: Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in children and adolescents | Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science (ox.ac.uk) Results: A vaccinated child has about 3/4 of a % better chance of not testing positive than an unvaccinated child. 0.6 of a % at not having to attend the ER. A little over 1/2 a % better chance for not getting hospitalized with covid. Forcing children to be vaccinated so they can play hockey, was immoral and ethically evil. This study shows it has almost 0 benefit for children. But............ it does do this for them: (Those rates are low, BTW, according to the many other studies I've posted here and the reports in VAERS. For instance, like many others, Sean Hartman's death would not be included in this stat for Canada.) This is for Sean Hartman, who gave his life so Eyeball could live. I hope Dan gets justice for losing his only child. I've followed his grief since it happened and it is profound. He was offered money to drop the lawsuit, but he decided to reject the offer and go ahead with suing the Canadian gov't and Pfizer.

I can't figure out if he's literally stupid or just pretending to be stupid. Either way, best to ignore it. You can tell they're all brainwashed because anything you or I post, there's 47 of them clamoring for cites and arguing against actual medical studies and datasets and demanding context and perspective. And not one of them knows the basics of how the human immune system works or cares to find out. Eyeball comes in, says anything he wants and none of them demand cites or context or studies or data or discussion. They know he's on the same team - covid was the deadliest disease in the history of mankind and totally worth destroying the economy, killing and maiming people who had no risk, closing schools for years, bankrupting small business, giving a trillion dollars to billionaires, terrorizing the populace.....it was a wonderful time where they were "heroes" and could let loose self-righteous freak outs on "granny-killers" and nazis. It was glorious for them. They're all psychopaths. The most you'll get out of them is "Welllllll, but we didn't know." Yes, we did know. We bloody well knew. The science of immunology, virology and vaccinology didn't change in the last couple of years. You were just lied to. You chose to believe the liars because they scared the pants off you. You're a coward and have learned nothing. Enjoy your blood clots and heart attacks.

He's saying if those kids hadn't died, the average age would have been older. He's also assuming they were perfectly healthy children. You know, like the Alberta boy who died of covid. He was perfectly healthy except for the terminal brain cancer, so he is one of those 17,000 who died "of covid".

Useful id10t has become a personality identity. 🤣

His entire argument is that when a vax is outstandingly successful, you will see deaths, hospitalizations and cases INCREASE. MSM has done its job on these 2. A total rejection of epidemiology, virology and vaccinology.

The average age of death from covid is 83. None of the above people were in any danger from covid. The jabs are all risk, no benefit for anyone not elderly, obese or already terminally ill. Yet you support force vaccinating everyone, including babies, because you think other people should die or be maimed for life or lose their careers and jobs if they refuse.... for you, in spite of what....8 jabs? 9? 10? So.....

The Preface of "The Real CdC"

These people have a profound and misplaced trust gov't and gov't agencies ALWAYS put citizen needs first and NEVER act for money, power or influence or personal gain. Even if they say, Oh well, yes, at times in the past, gov't has acted badly......their position is that during covid, NO ONE was after power or money or influence. The entire response was motivated by love for humanity. Pharma loves you. Your gov't only wants the best for you. They have to believe that because the alternative is......disturbing and would require them to do something.

Make up your mind. Is a baseless assertion or a possible motive? If it's a possible motive, then it's not a baseless assertion, is it? It's like a man who takes a $1million life insurance policy out on his wife and then murders her. It's not a baseless assertion to conclude his motive was money. In fact, that's an important part of prosecution. Are you like eyeball who believes that it is immoral if we infer the motivation is the insurance money, and that the murderer has to confess he did it for money or it's wrong and immoral to infer why? That seems to be what you're saying. And eyeball has stated exactly that many times here - unless the person confesses, it is wrong and immoral to infer motive as to why they did what they did. It's why he rejects any conclusions that anyone had less than stellar motives during covid - none have them have confessed to having less than stellar motive, so we MUST conclude they are all innocent. eyeball has stated many times that unless they CONFESS, they are innocent saints. Is that what you believe too? Because you seem irrationally enraged that anyone would infer any part of the covid response was for money, even after knowing it was the biggest wealth transfer in human history.

Fuque you. All the way to Hell.

Of course it does. He questions nothing and is angry with anyone else who asks questions. In the US, docs/hospitals got over $40,000 for a covid death and nothing for a flu death. That's a huge incentive to test people with a PCR test run at 45 cycles and diagnose them with covid, rather than they were in a car accident or have brain cancer. Exactly. Your view is that the covid response DIDN'T GO FAR ENOUGH.

Fuque the kids. Eyeball is safe. That's all that matters. Canada once cherished its children, but under pressure, that love faltered. Instead of protecting the young during COVID, we immersed them in our fears, neglecting their well-being and jeopardizing our future.