?Impact

We bury 60-70 persons/year in domestic homicide, and 3% of 60 is 1.8. It seems that those old Catholics and Christians are doing worse than Muslims.

What does that nonsense have to do with what I said? Your Islamophobic petition may attract a lot of signatures, but that is not a problem with Islam it is a problem of non-thinking Islamophobes. If you had a petition to remove the supremacy of God from the constitution then you would get intelligent signatures instead.

Go back and read what I wrote. How you deduce that from what I wrote is a complete mystery.

The only genetic property right we have is our own, and that right begins at birth. Participating in consensual sexual intercourse however obligates us to care for any resulting offspring until they have gained independence (yes hard to define).

The challenge is to understand and be able to understand and address those things. While modern medicine has made great strides, there are many areas where is comes up very short. Severe and chronic pain certainly have a big effect on quality of life. That being said, yes pain killers can be easily abused and that abuse itself leads to a degradation in quality of life. Like many things, we need to find the right balance.

False premise. Yes if you are a loyal adherent to the mass brainwashing of people like Ezra Levant than you swallow that swill but the reasoned masses do not. I notice that your Islamophobic petition is not about protecting the single rule of law in Canada, but about attacking Islam.

So the obvious question is what are "Islamic Rules"? Do we accept only what is explicitly in the Quran, or do we interpret it through the record of the teachings of Muhammad (sunnah)? If we do accept an interpretation, then which one do we accept as there are several. Do we use reasoning to apply the law to new circumstances, and do we need an authority or consensus of authorities to arrive at these interpretations. Sharia seems to encompass all of the above, and that is where the mass confusion is. Is Sharia simply rules in how to live my life, or is it rules to be enforced by others on me. Once we have the enforcement by others, and the many interpretations then we are no longer following Allah but other men.

Yes, get one that points into the car.

Pro choice is not pro abortion, that is just something you pro enslavement people try to pretend. Yes, one of the principal policies of the Liberal party is to be pro choice. Every party has several principal policies and if you don't agree with them then don't join or support that party. That policy was developed at and voted on in a party convention, and is something the leader of the party just like any other member must adopt. This is about the party and not the leader, what part of democracy is hard to understand?

Law, the only law is in the brain of Ezra Levant. Why don't we debate ghosts on Mars, that would have as much basis in fact as this thread.

One real source. Have you read the text of the motion? Obviously not because your allegation is not supported by it in the least. You listen to Levant and then just repeat nonsense.

Ok, so this changes to You have to worry about the mid-term elections and this one changes to nobody is interested in you anymore as you are out soon. You can make some decisions but your successor will overturn them anyway. Seems worse to me.

I asked for a quote or original source, and you provided shyte.

...either that or because the twisted, demented copy you got from Levant bears zero resemblance to the truth. Did he mention that his right wing nutjob friends have issued death threats and such to this MPP.

Original source, not the rantings of Ezra Levant and company. We want the original wording, not a twisted and demented take on them. How about the Ontario Legislature Hansard, that is the official record.

I said a source, not toilet paper.

Could you provide a source for that allegation? Where is the text of the bill she is presenting, or when did she make such statement either in or outside of the legislature?

The principals are the same. The location of relevant controls and displays for the specific plane can be easily researched. They were not interested in all the complex issues involved in flying, just in being able to turn off transponders, minor daytime navigation, and the very basics of flight. They were not interested in takeoff and landing, the most involved parts of flying. I don`t know if anyone has studied their flights to see if they were following landmark navigation. While neither of the two flights into the WTC had their flight data recorder or cockpit voice recorder recovered, there should be enough radar tracks both with and without the transponder to see if they were turning at major landmarks.

The member in question certainly used his downtime listening to current affairs "Day after day, I watched the minister give evasive and non-transparent answers to simple questions.". Would it not be appropriate so spend some of that downtime reflecting on the decade where his own party ignored the issues of Canadians?

If you are talking about Harrit's 2009 paper, then that has already been discussed in detail. Write your Congressman and ask them to fund NIST to reopen an investigation into what will likely turn out to be chips of paint that were applied to a structure 50 years ago. Will you guarantee however if that is the result then you, Gage, and all the truthers will forever hold your peace? Perhaps first Gage & Harritt should step up and defend their many failures. Well remind me when he actually publishes something on the topic.

I own the road around my vehicle and he next 100 metres in front of it, or that empty parking space I spotted from two aisles over. Get on my property and you are trespassing and I will exercise my second amendment rights. There is no such thing as "road rage", that is just some modern PC term. Now get off my lawn.

It's alleged presence... or is not the grand deceiver allowed to hold those making the allegations to the same standard that they want to hold others to? How about to only a small fraction of that standard? b.t.w. I watched one of Gage's propaganda films last night, I see where you got your brainwashing from. About 25% of the film was about how people can't accept different views, but of course he doesn't tell you that also must apply to his crackpot theories as well.

The claim is about super thermite, where the component metallic elements are not simply ground down to fine particles but made using a special process that is fairly expensive so it is assumed that only the military could do it in volume. Nobody however has answered what the volume would be, and how much it would cost. More important how that could be put in the WTC, and how it magically escaped being ignited by the fires until the magical time of controlled demolition. There is no great secret in how nano particles are created, but it does involve some precise process control so not likely to be done in your average garage. Basically the metal is heated very quickly beyond melting point, but not quite to boiling point so it is liquified. By passing an inert gas across the heating element at the right volume and pressure the rate of evaporation is carefully controlled so very fine particles are created before they cool and solidify. That is a very high level simplified description, but the point is that you would need to build very specialized equipment and to do that in any sort of volume it would be expensive.

I assume you are talking about the employees in the Refugee Protection Division and Refugee Appeal Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. How do you suggest we structure such hiring practices, and remain conformant to the law? Are you specifically talking about the senior people in these divisions? My guess is that Sylvia Cox-Duquette meets your requirement, but certainly Ken Sandhu has one of those funny sounding names that says we need to investigate his background as who knows where he came from before he started working for the Ontario Public Service in 1971. Since however you seem to think it is a big problem, obviously you have some evidence to suggest that the "Refugee Boards" are composed entirely of foreign born refugees with a built-in bias.

I agree with investing in resources to speed up the process. Currently however just over 50% are rejected as they don't qualify as refugees, how do you think that will increase to 95% with more resources?