?Impact

Where is Trump's birth certificate... long form

Excellent point, we need some rallies with a poster of Pence in striped prison attire and crowds shouting lock him up.

First speech to Congress Nielsen ratings: Bush - 39.79 million Obama - 52.37 million Trump - 47.74 million I sure we will be getting some 'alternative facts' from Sean Spicer in the near future

Yes, the difference is clear. There is no evidence that Clinton's email was ever hacked, but according to Tony Cook at the Indy Star who broke the Pence story they have seen the email exchange between Pence and his top homeland security advisor discussing matters of global terrorist attacks. Pence was hacked.

That would make you a refugee

Yes, the Global Adjustment is a large factor in electricity pricing. Wind and solar make up about 10% of the Global Adjustment. The bulk of the Global Adjustment goes to OPG and to non-OPG generators. The non-OPG ones include both natural gas and nuclear (ie. Bruce).

I am simply looking at real data, not imagined increases. You are the one making assumptions. You are assuming that the rate will skyrocket. Perhaps that will be the case, but so far the statistics do not confirm your assumption.

It doesn't appear that way to me. No mention of how the costs break down, no mention of all the subsides and barely scratches the surface of debt due to nuclear. I would say it was a very amateur piece of work. I don't know who this Tom Cardoso guy is, saw him for the first time on CTV yesterday.

The issue here is lying under oath to Congress. I'm sure many Democrats also tied their shoes every morning, but that is irrelevant.

The cost of gas would be far more than current hydro costs, and then you would have the additional problem/cost of maintaining the generator. Solar may pay for itself in the long run for a small percentage of homeowners, but not most. Those that are able to make money from solar today are because they sell [excess] to the grid, alternative storage costs would be too high.

Last year just under 2500 refugee claimants crossed the border into Canada illegally. The rate is up this year, and if this increased rate continues there will be just over 2600 this year. Time to build a multi-billion dollar wall?

Either that, or have a silent spell checker. Ok, then show me their results. Not some weak video from months ago that doesn't provide anything of substance except saying they will publish later this spring.

Sounds like an oxymoron. Usually those who make the claim turn out to be fiscally incompetent and socially awkward.

Again, if there were explosions as you allege, what do they have to do with your theory of burning thermite? Sorry, I didn't know I am obligated to respond to your non-issue within a few minutes. I will try to do better next time. Halsey said nothing to cooperate your story, all he stated is that he has problems with the NIST model. Since he is being paid by the truthers, what did you expect him to say? When his grad students actually publish their findings we will have something to look at.

Hulsey has stated very little, but somehow you are extrapolating that little bit to support wild theories. When his 2 grad students actually complete their report, we will see what his team has come up with. Until then there is nothing to go on. I am not aware of NIST changing their story. Certainly they responded to questions from the public, and elaborated in later FAQs but their story has not changed. How does you alleged body being 'shot' out of a window collaborate your theory of burning nanothermites? Yes, there is much to be explained, and much will never be explained, but cooking up some wild theory that has a million times more problems doesn't solve the issue.

I trust the evidence, and not the truther conspiracy theories. I have read their alternative story, and it does not match the evidence. They talk about nothing happening in the first four frames of the video from camera 3, yet clearly there is something happening. The penthouse is collapsing, which is 100% in agreement with the NIST assessment that has the interior of the building collapsing first.

Yes and the science clearly says that a controlled demolition did not take place. There is still much that remains unresolved or partially resolved, but alternative explanations like controlled demolition do not match the evidence. No, not the first 2.5 seconds. The first 1.75 seconds were slower than free fall, the next 2.25 seconds were close to free fall (within margin of error), and the final 1.9 seconds were slower than free fall.

You have referenced that FEMA document many times, but haven't even read how it concludes: The rate of corrosion is also unknown. It is possible that this is the result of long-term heating in the ground following the collapse of the buildings. It is also possible that the phenomenon started prior to collapse and accelerated the weakening of the steel structure. A detailed study into the mechanisms of this phenomenon is needed to determine what risk, if any, is presented to existing steel structures exposed to severe and long-burning fires.

You too quick for me, I corrected. I know a Sissons, must have been a fault in my old brain wiring.

I had CTV on in the background, and both Trudeau and Sessions held their press conferences about the same time. Guess which one CTV covered.

Just to add to the never ending story of Trump and Russia, apparently his son-in law Kushner met with the Russian ambassador in December.

Both Trump and Trudeau seem to have the same challenges, and even appear to coordinate their activities. Today they both held press conferences at with their respective naval forces. Today they also both went for a run. Trudeau took a run on the beach with the sailors, and Trump ran away from reporters asking questions about his attorney general.