Shady

Many more social conservatives believe in living will's. And living will's already exists, as oppose to Government assisted suicide. If anyone wants to go through the legal process of setting up a living will, there's nobody standing in the way to stop them. I have no idea what or who "priests for life" is, or any other groups you're referring to. But again, there's nothing standing in the way of somebody going through the process to obtain a living will.

It's kind of sad that I need to explain it to you.

I also agree. Anyone who dislikes Canada as much as he does, really needs to get the hell out. However, I suspect his words speak louder than his actions will.

How about instead, you head over to Federal Politics, and tell us all what crime Mulroney has been charged with. Seeing as though you're so informed.

Living will's are the remedy in such situations. They're the answer. Not assisted suicide.

One can provide dignity of life without resorting to assisted suicide. The alterative you suggest is in direct violation of the hippocratic oath. And gives Government the potential of much too much power over people's lives.

I know the threats spiked, particularly during his last couple of years in office. I'd bet they're comparable. It's also rich to see members of the leftwing complain about the Nazi references to Obama and his plans. This from a group who used the Bush is Hitler theme constantly through his entire 8 years in office. I didn't hear much from the media about that either. It's only now that they seem to have a problem with it. Gee, I wonder why.

The real bombshell is that General Electric, parent company of NBC and MSNBC was selling components to Iran that make IED's. These IED's have claimed the lives of thousands of American troops.

Um, why is it that I love Glenn Beck? I have never once reference anything from him, or even mentioned his name until now. You're a liar.

Actually, the semi-literate bottom feeders who believe their shortcoming are the fault of everyone else are the base constituent of the Democrat party. Usually they want Government to "fix" their problems, usually for "free."

Hmm, I don't remember the same concern over the number of death threats President Bush received, especially during his second term in office. Interesting how that works. And of course the blame must lie with Republicans. It couldn't be that because Obama's moving at record speed, trying to shove everything under the sun down the throats of Americans, to the point where Congress doesn't even read the legislation it's voting on. No, that couldn't a part of the protests and hostility. It's all the Republican's fault. Even though polls show the Obama is upside down on most of his agenda items by double-digits. And the link provided is loaded with half-truths and falsehoods (no suprise coming from Dobbin) God forbid angry protestors disagree with Dear Leader on legislation. Yes, he OPENLY carried a pistol. He wasn't trying to hide anything. And he was across the street from where the town hall meeting was held, and left before the event even took place. Thank you press, for covering the goings-on of legal activites. In a related story, somebody stopped at a redlight, and another person turned left on an advanced green.

Well, since you claim to have been paying attention. What crime has he been charged with?

That's how Martin and the Liberals achieved their balanced budgets. On the backs of the Province's ability to provide healthcare. They cut funding to the bone. And then he has the nerve to criticize provinces for struggling, while at the same time, Liberals were shoveling money to their cronies, and buying $100 dollar golf balls.

Dobbin is about as intellectually dishonest as I've ever seen a poster be in this forum. It's no wonder he's earned the title of political hack.

Looks like I was ahead of the curve last week... Was Bill Clinton's visit to North Korea worth the time, energy, and prestige? No way Are the North Korean people not being assured, through their megaphone media, that the sun shines so consistently out of the rear end of their celestial boss that even powerful U.S. statesmen will appear at the airport to bring apologies, pay tribute, and receive custody of uninvited guests in the workers' paradise? Slate

Thank you. That's all I was getting at. If he's charged and found guilty, then fine, he obviously needs to go to jail. But the fact that there isn't even an option on the poll, to even think, even as remotely impossible as some may find, that he's not guilty of a crime, is pretty unfair.

I disagree. The flag burning, America hating, terrorist sympathizing, socialist abortionists are the base of the Democrat party.

Don't bother. You obviously don't understand the concept of supply and demand. The more doctors, the less they're in demand, the lower the price. It's pretty simple, except apparently for you. Instead you like to go on and on, as if on some shakespearean soliloquy.

Small and medium size businesses create most of the jobs in our economy. Anyone who has contempt for small and medium size businesses, and especially self-employed business people, is highly ignorant. Running a business is a very difficult job. And every business, no matter how large, in the beginning was a small business, many of which started by someone who was then self-employed. You don't just create a large corporation out of thin air, or in a matter of a few days. Bill Gates started Microsoft in his garage. If this idiot poster was around back then, he woulda been screaming at Gates to "get a real job."

He probably meant outlandish. Thank God you noticed.

In as much as the Democrats are just the party of terrorist sympathizers, flag burners, and communist abortion lovers. See. We can all stereotype.

Other than Rush Limbaugh, I have no idea who else you're referring to. Please speaking english instead of leftwing wacko talk. Thanks.

Well then. I guess the Clinton Administration has a lot of explaining to do.

What does "for the most part" mean? It means you do. And you have. That's because you don't want to comment on McGuinty's Liberals. You attack other provincial non-Liberal parties for deficit spending, and a lack of health services, but you can't comment on McGuinty's Liberals in Ontario, because they're 10 times worse than the examples you cite elsewhere. That may be your opinion. My opinion is that you thrive on hypocrisy and half-truths. Like in this case, where Liberals cut actual medical necessities, and you have the nerve to attack the NDP for not committing to funding sex-change operations. Shame on you.

No, but other Democrats do. And if an idea is evil, why is it so bad to refer to it as such?