WestCanMan

Good comeback eyeball. We both know that if you had a single fact you'd spit it out. Sad fact is that you're left making sandbox insults instead of debating because your track record for being correct is somewhere south of 0%

What does it matter whose search history results are being spammed with garbage by Google? The point is that they're doing it.

According to their own lawyers, this is why the CBC is suing: LMAO. As if the people who were too stupid to know about CBC's bias were ever in danger of learning anything. https://thepostmillennial.com/taxpayer-funded-cbc-will-not-disclose-their-legal-costs-in-lawsuit-against-conservative-party?fbclid=IwAR2tDAx8WDHXsSQAaBxwU7-kDnj3o4lhXqdY5IvxxmgqVJPWc5tRZv2VIeU

https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/atlanta/family-says-man-killed-by-police-was-27-year-old-father-four/AWYFPVV46FAWNOEEQ37DDSZUUE/?fbclid=IwAR12m9TO2QubonFZCxtG5hFokvnUxnT6Ay7TtaJRfd5Kj-Q_8H8Ep9N-Uak Police were called to Wendy's where this guy was asleep in his car. He failed a field sobriety test and then resisted arrest, stole a taser, ran away and when he pointed the taser at the police he got shot. MSM is quick to ignore the fact that he attacked police officers, they only see the end result and act like there was no good reason for the shooting. Too bad so sad Rayshard. You were an idiot, and now instead of paying for a DUI ticket you're pushing up daisies. CTV just said "He was running from the police and got shot in the back. CTV is pure filth.

Currency in the CHAZ: 1 Weed 2 Meth 3 Cheezies 4 New TVs 5 BLMCards & AntifaCards (New credit cards that look like bricks, made out of brick. You insert them into the window of any store. Unlimited credit.)

Worth noting that when CTV first tweeted this, the whole angry confrontation at the front was edited out. Those snakes did everything they could to make this look worse than it was. Here's the official version of the details from the world's foremost expert on climate change, race relations in America, Coronavirus and now Canadian law: https://edmonton.ctvnews.ca/very-disturbing-to-see-greta-thunberg-speaks-out-on-video-of-chief-allan-adam-s-rcmp-arrest-1.4982917 There ya have it ya frickin' buncha idjits! NONE OF YOU HAD THE RIGHT ANSWER! It was "shameful abuse". Book 'em Danno.

I agree with everything you said, but the punch when he was on the ground needs some explanation in my opinion. The Cheif's an old drunk guy. There were two big cops there. Not to say that for sure that was abuse, but there's a chance it was and if so, it was against a senior citizen. Just total speculation - side note - - unrelated - I've heard cops say, in defence of female cops being on the force, that they bring a different energy/perspective/solution set to the table sometimes. I wonder if this is an instance where a female cop arriving at the scene might have resulted in a better outcome. Does that make me insane?

If a meteor hits the CHAZ I'll run out and buy a stack of bibles.

Exactly. Just like that liberal turd in Minneapolis who cheered the destruction of low-income housing with the tweet "BURN THAT SHIT DOWN!!!!!!!! BURN IT ALL DOWN!!!!!!" and then called the cops when the rioters got too close to his own precious home.

Everyone knows that it's a big deal that CNN is keeping their moronic viewers in the dark. It's just funny to see how happy they are to be there.

You're watching a propaganda video and intentionally disregarding all common sense to believe it. Surely you must understand that force has been used to strip people of their rights to operate their businesses and to have the protection of the police, which they pay for, in their homes? The people who own homes and businesses there are American citizens with inalienable rights who will be able to sue the City of Seattle and the Washington State Gov't if they don't take action to remedy this promptly. I hope that they sue the Mayor and the Governor personally. It might be a possibility if they're acting outside of their constitutional obligations.

China has taken over the #1 spot as the most dangerous country in the world to do business with. At the time that he took out the mortgages it probably didn't seem like a big deal but it is now. He needs to get rid of those ASAP, even if it means that he has to sell his properties.

I don't think any of them will face trial, unless something too big to ignore comes up in a trial against Strzok or some other low-level player. I think that Schiff may have to step down as the Chair of the House Intel Committee. That's as far as that will go. I'd like to see some sharp progress made against Biden after the election, and Trump is POTUS for another 4 years. It's a joke that Joe Biden didn't have to at least answer for why his son was so blatantly profiting from Joe's official government business overseas. If the Chinese gov't invests $1.5B with the Trump family businesses you know that the Dems will be apoplectic. But they dealt with Joe Biden's son, so the Dems are equally insistent that no investigation should be done. They're pure scum and their sycophant, idiot horde is no better.

Nailed it. I worked with a Jamaican guy for about 8 years. Knew him pretty well. He talked about racism once in a blue moon. I don't think he was really affected by it. His wife was white and they had been together for a long time. I knew him from about '95 to 2003. Anyhow, one day he started to talking to me about gays in Jamaica. "We don't have gays in Jamaica because if we find out anyone's gay we just beat the fuck out of them." He thought it was funny. I said "Why is being gay any different than being black or white"? He seemed like he was about to get really mad for a second and he said "WTF do you mean b that?" I said something like: People are born to be gay, or born to white/black and there's nothing you can do about it. It's just luck. About 5% of the population is gay. Why is it any different to beat them up for being gay than it is to beat up a black person? Two takeaways: 1) I was kind of offended that he'd think I was down with gay bashing, 2) I thought it was ironic that he could so strongly identify with how bad racism was to him and yet he'd think it was ok to be bigoted against gays. Made me think about "First they came for the __________s and I wasn't a _______ so I didn't say anything....." I worked in the trades with quite a few gay people, one of them said to me "I hate rich people". I could tell he thought that it would be a popular topic, I didn't think it made much sense, so I asked him why he hated all rich people. He said: "What have they ever done for me?" I asked what he had ever done for them. He had nothing. Why is it any different to hate all rich people than it is to hate all gay people? Now the LGBTQ community is banning police from the gay parade in VCR again, and allowing BLM. Makes me wonder, when gay people were being beaten up for no good reason, did they call on black terrorists or did they call the police? I bet they called the police. Sorry gay people, you've lost my support entirely. If there's a petition to cancel the gay parade I'll sign it. I don't appreciate your discrimination against police.

You're lying again. You chimed in to support Michelle Obama, and Michelle Obama is basing her call to high school kids to go out a get angry and focus that anger all based on the assumption that this was a racist attack. You're back to name-calling because you just got caught between telling the truth or backing the ignorant bitch who's supporting rioting, looting, arson and cop-killing. I bet they just weren't thinking that Floyd was going to die. They were probably guilty of believing that their boss knew what he was doing, and they didn't know he was a murderer. Not a lot of people suspect that the person they're with is a murderer. What is it, really? Our government treated it like it was babyshit until March 16th, two full months after we learned about it. They literally did nothing at all. Then they started acting like it was Ebola. Now that the results are in, it's just a nudge for people who are already walking on the edge of their grave, and it's severe for a handful of random people who are already sick but not deathly ill. Global pandemic? Not the current strain.

John: "I have cancer and ebola." Jacob: "I know how you feel man. I had gout in March of 2016." FYI pretty much everyone on earth has a sob story that puts yours to shame. In case you weren't aware, Viking raiders savaged the British Isles for centuries. It was basically impossible for a king with an army of 30,000 to stop raiding parties of 200 men 1,000 years ago. They'd show up, kill a bunch of people, stay overnight drinking, take what they wanted (including slaves), and they could be 80 miles away across the water before men could even be sent to where they were. There was no radar. No phones to let people know you needed the army. The importance of sea power was hammered into the conscious of the British over the course of centuries. Yes, the nasty British suffered too. It was actually the original Lord of the Isles who turned that tide, but that's a different story. No, we live in a world where people can latch onto whatever "truth" they want to make themselves feel better. There's a whole "News" Network dedicated to fake programming. "Trump colluded!!!!!!!" Nope. Even CNN knew that was a lie over a year ago. "Kavanaugh tried to rape Dr Ford when they were in high school!!!!!! Dr Ford's story has to be believed!!!!!!" Nope. She can't name a month, a year, a location, none of her friends or family have ever heard of story, she lives her life completely contrary to the phobias that she claims to have as a result of the incident, she has never filed a police report, Kavanaugh has 100s of people who are willing to 100% vouch for his character including several women who worked for him. "It's no big deal that Joe Biden's kid did $1.5 Billion in business with the communist bank of China and that he also got a $30K per month job at Burisma! Joe didn't even know! Ok, he lied about that, but he still doesn't need to be investigated because the Dems already vetted him!!!!" "Walls are racist!!!' "People were forced to drink out of toilets!" "Trump invented the idea of separating kids from the people who brought them over the border!!!!!! OK Obama did it too but he did it non-racistly!!!!!!! OK, Obama's administration let some kids go back with the human traffickers that had them but how is that relevant!" "Nicholas Sandman taunted that old native guy!!!!! What a little white supremacist!!!" "It's too early to say that Omar Mateen was a terrorist!! He was more likely responding to Trump's dog-whistling about gays! This is a gun laws issue! If AK-47s were illegal this never would have happened!" Honestly every single one of those stories was just blatant bullshit from the start and half the population of the US and most of the population of Canada was sucked in by all of them. They defended those moronic positions well after it was time to give up the ghost. People are so god-damned stupid that after the first 11 lies they believe the 12th story like it's gospel, even when it smelt a bit fishy from the get-go. There's no "with us or against us" there's "I'm programmed and I will never respond to facts that are contrary to the narrative that I've been spoon-fed". Honestly look at that entire list of stories that used to seem like they were true. How many of them can you no longer defend with the sad filter of hindsight? Why the fuck would you just glom onto the next bullshit story from those clowns? After all this time, shouldn't you have at least one "Gotcha WestCanMan" story to crow about by now? ("Well he let Americans come home so you can't say 'travel ban' " is just an example of stupidity, it's not a gotcha FYI). I didn't even fill my whole list yet. There's LOTS more.

So why is it that "it had to be racism" until another possible scenario was dumped in your lap? There was a nearly infinite number of other possible scenarios before people from the bar spoke up. We didn't know about them eyeball. FYI there's not just 1 scenario now, is there? Maybe Floyd was selling drugs to teenage girls and some of them died of Fentanyl. You don't know, do you? Maybe Cauvin was a pedophile and Floyd was trying to convince a little girl to testify against him. You just don't know. The whole point of this exercise is - don't fucking pretend that you KNOW when you don't fucking KNOW. Two of the other cops were rookies. Chauvin was a 19-yr vet. One of them mentioned twice that maybe they should roll him over. In the military and police, rookies don't order their superiors around. A backlash happened against states that had completely ridiculous covid laws. People should be allowed to work in their own gardens. The government in the US doesn't get to strip individuals of every freedom that they are entitled to just because a really strong version of the common cold comes along.

I laugh at this part: There are armed idiots all over the place. It's not free of "police" at all. Also they have a wall. WTF is that about? Aren't those things "RACIST!!!!!!!!!!!!"? Soon they'll be offering a look at what a community without food and water looks like. Also, I hope Trump cuts off their gov't cheques. They're autonomous, right?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/11/chaz-seattle-autonomous-zone-police-protest Inslee is a total turd lol: What's worse: that he really doesn't know wtf is going on, or that he does know, and he's lying, and not doing anything about it? The governor and the mayor are acting like this is no big deal, but there are Americans with homes and businesses there who have inalienable rights as American citizens which are being trampled on. This wasn't a democratic separation of a small city-state, it's an armed takeover. This isn't people protecting their own land, it's people taking land from Americans. This needs to end soon or it ends badly for a lot of people. Not necessarily the armed a-holes holding the city, I don't doubt that at some point it will end with an amnesty period, but there are businesses which employ a lot of theses hapless losers, which will be destroyed.

This isn't the first time you brought this up. Is it really that big of a deal eyeball? You talk about being progressive and moving forward, yet by your own admission, your whole life is revolving around the murder of 25 (clan MacDonald's own verified number of slain, there may have been more) to a high of 38 people that happened 328 years ago. Are you f'n kidding me? FYI that wasn't the only "genocide" of the past 3 centuries. Pakistan committed two genocides in the last 80 years that were several orders of magnitude greater than that. 10M people died when Pakistan separated in the late '40s, and then their government killed 3M people when Bangladesh separated. Their militias also committed the systemic genocidal rape of 300,000 women. Way, way, way back in 1971. 49 years ago. Mostly Hindus though. Is the death of 3,000,000 Hindus not as important to you as the deaths of 25 MacDonalds? Guess what eyeball. If the Pakistanis only killed 25 people every day, and they started doing it on the same day as Glencoe, they'd just be finishing up right around now. That's literally like the entire Glencoe slaughter, every single day, from Feb 13 1692 until today. Your extremely small/narrow version of history explains a lot. Canada just let 30 members of islamic state back to walk free here. How many deaths do you think those 30 terrorists were responsible for eyeball? How many women and children do you think they helped to enslave? Were the deaths by the hands of those terrorists (or bonny fighters, according to our PM) no big deal, compared to the deaths of some of Clan MacDonald 328 years ago? You're and embarrassment to your ancestors, with your puny cries of anger for their plight. Theirs was a drop in the bucket in the grand scheme of things. I'll admit to a certain admiration for the Bruce. I read Nigel Tranter's books about 20 years ago. But even I'll admit that the whole tribal/clan system was the epitome of thinking small. As much as I hate the Plantagenet for what he did to the Scots, his end goal was just a unified country, which would mean the end of the ceaseless clan wars which were no more worthwhile than England's plan to unite the Isles. Progressive people don't fixate on things that happened 328 years ago. They don't fixate on the 1760s. They don't fixate on the 1860s. They look at the progress made by America in just the last 150 years. Progress unmatched by most other countries over the course of more than a millennium. How far has Saudi Arabia come since 1500 eyeball? How far has Iran come? You're talking about a gleaming beacon of peace and unity that's unmatched in history as if it's the scourge of the planet. You. Think. Small. You need to see the world from 20,000 feet son. 50,000 feet. We'll never see eye to eye because you've got the grand vision of an earthworm in a wheel rut.

Social distancing guidelines change when you're exerting yourself. Heavy exhalations blow out a lot more moisture, a lot further. Just think how much stuff is flying out of their mouths when they're yelling profanities at police.

The Dems used the collusion investigation and all it's frauds to wrestle control of the House from the GOP in the mid-terms. Maybe the timing of the trials will be favourable to the GOP. Honestly there have to be some charges laid, even if they're against relative nobodies. The FBI can't just flush all their credibility down the toilet for one failed coup attempt. Someone has to fall on their sword to vindicate the FBI and some top Dems. My guess is that it's Strzok. Even if there are a lot of charges, Strzok is the only person guaranteed to get a sentence. He's the one having an affair so he looks 'un-FBI-ish' anyways, he's the one with all the incriminating text messages, he was the point man/slimedog on the farcical collusion investigation [and the Hillary investigation]. Bruce Orr might be indicted for working with Steele after he was discredited by the FBI, there will be some strong words said about Rice, Clapper, Comey, and Brennan, but they probably won't be indicted unless someone says something catchy during Strzok's trial. My guess is that those top dogs will all turn on Strzok and possibly some other stooge in order to get immunity. Shit rolls downhill. I could see Schiff being ousted from the Senate Intel Committee as well. They'll probably ask for his resignation and he'll give it. That will be all that's required for the Dems to save some face.

Is the Betsy Ross Flag considered racist because Betsy Ross was an abolitionist, because Obama flew it at his inauguration and he's "a little bit racist if he's being completely honest", or is it just because Colin Kaepernick hates the American flag? Wait a sec, I thought that he only knelt during the anthem because 'all pigs is racist'?

I understand that you don't Right on cue you go to the sandbox insult vault because you can't answer the question asked of you. Or you could, but the answer would be incriminating, so you dodge. I'm just a person who's not afraid to tell the sad truth about Michelle and Barack Obama. What seems clearer now is that when people tell stories that you like they're "100%VERIFIED!!!!!!!" and when you're presented with facts which are known to be true which don't please you, you call people names. The way that George was killed was PROOF POSITIVE that there was no other possible reason aside from racism. Right? If killing one person that way can only be racism, then killing another person that exact same way has to be racism as well, don't you think? How can it possibly be something else? Are you questioning your own theory, and thinking that the way George was killed wasn't proof of racism? Hmmmmm. Kumbaya is here eyeball. Just admit it. Chauvin isn't the reason why you failed to launch. Who said that was a right-wing anything? It was a backlash against government overreach. I thought that kind of thing was right up your alley? Are you saying that you're a dreaded right winger? Can't be too sure. Take off your watch now, and do the right thing. The window of opportunity for rioters to attack people's homes with impunity ended in Jan 2017. Sorry little guy.

What you, and the rest of the leftists in NA don't get, is that when people cross the border illegally, and don't have SIN numbers, they largely work under the table. They take jobs from kids fresh out of school and from people who are legally here trying who are to make a living wage but don't have a lot of skills. Bernie's guarantee of "a living wage" can't be met when employers don't have to put their workers on the books. Rich, pontificating Democrats say to themselves "Am I going to pay Juan a living wage, or pay Jose $7 under the table? Hmmmmmmm. Tough choice." You just end up with an illegal immigrant working for poverty wages and an American dipping into Bernie's Bottomless Benefit Bucket (not actually bottomless, FYI).