WestCanMan

The same jury that found Trump guilty would have no choice but to find Obama guilty, because the amount of evidence is the exact same. In fact, I coulda said "I didn't really consider it rape until one of my friends said "That might have been a r4pe", because that's what it took for Carroll to start thinking of it as a r4pe. What you're describing isn't evidence of anything. If a woman agrees to model lingerie for someone, and brings them into a changeroom, she doesn't get to charge him with R4pe for grabbing her vaj. She has consented to that much at that point.

The value of Canada's exports matters a lot. We couldn't really import anything if we had nothing of value to export, and petroleum products $140B were almost 3x as much as our 2nd highest exports (cars and part combined = $55B). Yeah, it would be weird for Sask not to go with Alberta. Especially if Alberta is joining the US. I think that BC would be in a weird spot if the USA extended all the way up to the territories. A nostalgic part of me would no doubt still be sad to see Canada break apart, but this version of Canada is not worth saving, and I can honestly say that I feel no kinship at all with Canadians in general anymore. The sheer depravity of the CBC is probably my biggest beef with Canada, they share 50% of the blame for the whole sad covid saga imo, and the Carney shitshow is just the icing on the cake. I think our gov't is equal parts vile and pathetic.

Yeah, Google basically operates as a confirmation bias filter for CNN, CBC, BBC, WashPo, NYT, FB, YouTube and all their other TNI partners. They don't just give preference to disinformation, they also hide information that they don't like. Twitter was part of TNI until Elon Musk bought it, breaking up the monopoly. That's how it was proven that all the Demi bot-accounts and the shadowbans of conservative userswere real. Before that they were all just "conservative conspiracy theories", remember?

Posts from this forum. And FYI it's not easy to find anything on Google that leftists don't want you to find. For example, if you search for the excerpt from Bergdorf-Ho's book about the Trump story it's no longer available. It was everywhere when it was new, but those actual accounts have been replaced by misleading summaries now. Eg, instead of a site showing her actual quote, which reads like: "I went into the changeroom, and he came in behind me and closed the door. Then he pushed me against the wall and kissed me, and I giggled" it will say "He followed her into the changeroom and r4ped her." FYI that's about as accurate as "Trump said 'Can I kiss you, my darling?', to which she breathlessly replied "No, just stick something in my snatch." Try to find the actual excerpt from her book, JJ. Use quotation marks however you want. It doesn't matter. Her actual book excerpt isn't on Google searches anymore. You get disinformation, exclusively.

They could keep the CH, for Club de Habitants if they wanted. (CH is for "Canadiens Hockey" right now) I don't really care. Makes sense.

If they were just being deadbeats it would honestly be a massive improvement. They're mostly pro-Iran cucks (Dems included) who are speaking in favour of the ayatollah, denying the US access to airspace, etc.

I guess the problem for Canada isn't just either Alberta or Quebec leaves, it's: "If Alberta leaves, then the money for Quebec dries up, and Quebec is GUARANTEED to leave as well. Who stays with Ontario? Manitoba, maybe? And maybe the territories? What would happen to the maritimes without AB money?

"... we just want to drain every last drop of blood from it we can without it dying or running away."

It's actually an example of left4rd echo-chamber BS. Ironically, in the thread where they're calling conservatives "cultists", they're overtly circling their wagons around their cultist talking points.

Of course leftists don't want the search function here, because it turns this jumble of a forum into "The North American Repository of Debunked Left4rd Lies and Cultist BS" Right now, all of their lies are scattered across 600 pages of thread titles on this form that can never be accessed in a timely manner. We really need the search function back. There's no good reason why there isn't one. This is already in the steering forum, but nothing is being done.

Of course leftists don't want the search function here, because it turns this jumble of a forum into "The North American Repository of Debunked Left4rd Lies and Cultist BS" Right now, all of their lies are scattered across 600 pages of thread titles on this form that can never be accessed in a timely manner. We really need the search function back. There's no good reason why there isn't one.

Rampant inflation for ten+ years under the LPoC and record-level inflation under Biden, lefta4rd cutists: "I don't see nothin'." 3 weeks of genocidal dictator blasting in Iran, left4rd cultists: "OMG WE NEED TO STOP KILLING GENOCIDAL DICTATORS NOW BECAUSE GAS COSTS ALMOST AS MUCH AS IT DID WHEN BIDEN WAS PRESIDENT!!!!!" Also: You can try answering this as well: Can men get pregnant? Y/N ___ In a modern society with a healthy, functioning justice system: Should a woman have to be able to name what year they were allegedly r4ped, provide proof that they at least met the accused in one of the years that it probably occurred in, and provide at least one flimsy piece of evidence, in order to get a man convicted of r4pe? IOW, does she need to nail her time frame down to 1 calendar year and have more than just a story to get a man convicted of r4pe? Y/N __ Results: Get 0/2, you're a cultist. Get 1/2... you're still a cultist. We already know that you're a cultist, this is just a wake-up call for you personally.

I love that tis threat title stays on the page as long as this conversation goes on... Libs: "Alberta oil has to stay in the ground" Also Libs: "Alberta can't leave because we need all the money from oil, agriculture, etc, that funds Quebec."

Correct, but with Libs $90B means $300B, with $150B of wasteful cronyism. Eg: "How did Freeland/Zelensky Construction Inc, which was only in business for 2 months, with 3 employees, land a $400M contract? And what did they do in 3 months to earn all that money?" - the type of question that CBC will never ask

So your theory is that Trump brainwashed people into thinking that: men shouldn't go into girls' bathrooms men can't get pregnant teachers shouldn't be having secret conversations with other people's 8-yr-olds about gender transition therapy when you tell kids a story about "trees and rocks helping muslims to kill Jews who are just trying to hide", that's called a 'parable' etc? 🤣 Listen to the little brainwashed twit trying to call other people cultists 🤣 Quick Cultist Quiz for robobigot...: Can men get pregnant? Y/N ___ In a modern society with a healthy, functioning justice system: Should a woman have to be able to name what year they were allegedly r4ped, provide proof that they at least met the accused in one of the years that it probably occurred in, and provide at least one flimsy piece of evidence, in order to get a man convicted of r4pe? IOW, does she need to nail her time frame down to 1 calendar year and have more than just a story to get a man convicted of r4pe? Y/N __ Results: Get 0/2, you're a cultist. Get 1/2... you're still a cultist. Honestly, 100% of average 8 year olds can answer both of those question correctly. So if you're an adult with an IQ above 70, and you somehow have the wrong answers lodged in your brain somehow, they did not get there from any combination of facts and common sense. Those answers have to have been forced into your pathetic little brain by a process commonly referred to as "brainwashing". Which means that... you - are - a - cultist. Ohhhhhhhhh SANP!!!!!!!!!!! What are you gonna do now, robobigot? Admit that men can't get pregnant, or that you're a cultist?

Civil suits you ret4rded POS. Those were civil suits under a left4rd judge. FYI the burden of evidence required for a civil suit is "no evidence required". Here's the whole case, and all of the evidence presented to arrive at a guilty charge: the accuser almost named a year the accuser told a story from 30 years ago the defendant said the story was a lie zero witnesses zero evidence no police report no trip to a hospital or clinic Where's the evidence, Barqy? Aside from her story - which is unbelievable, portrays her as a cheap slut, and doesn't describe a r4pe at all - she has nothing at all. No evidence. Just "her story". FYI anyone can tell a story. Here's one for ya that's true: When I was about 12 or 14, I was walking out front of a store in Chicago and I met Barack Obama. He was about 19 or 21 then, and he asked me to try on a shirt that he was thinking about buying for his kid brother. So I agreed to try it on, and then he r4ped me in the changeroom. Oh look, Barack Obama is guilty of r4pe now, by your standards. So for the rest of your life, whenever someone says "Barack Obama", you have to say "He's actually a gay rapist". Barack Obama is a gay r4pist, Barqy.

See that? Your problem is that you're just plain old f'n stupid. In case your little pea brain can't retain two facts, here's a recap: I said that the Dems love their slave-class. You tried to make it seem the high minimum wage in the high-tax states was a big deal, and I pointed out that their slave-class was actually the illegals, not BA-baristas, and you somehow feels like the topic was turned away from the Dems' never-ending love of slaves? Slaves aside, the whole 'wealth tax', free bus, free groceries thing isn't just about communism, it's also about division. Fomenting division is a huge step on the road to communism. It's the part of the plan that creates the anger that's required to get people off their asses to kill the oppressors... Mamdani and Obama: "Crackers and Chin-s have too much stuff, the blacks and immigrants are too poor, so IT'S RACIAL INJUSTICE!!! WE HAVE TO TAKE STUFF AWAY FROM THE CRACKERS AND CH-NKS!!!" To be fair, Dems don't use the actual slurs, yet, but those aren't the worst parts of racism... It's the discrimination and hate mongering that's bad, and the Dems are hate-mongering 24/7.

Wrong, liar. There's nothing wrong with grabbing women by the **** if they don't complain, and if you're a famous billiionire, there are a lot of women who will let you do that. Ditto for famous basketball players, football players, movie stars, singers.... Adam Levine and Michael Jordan could each grab 500 pussies a day if they wanted to. That's just the way the cookie crumbles. Trump has never been convicted of r4pe, or anything remotely close. There was a civil suit against him, never a criminal trial, and even then the jury found him not guilty of r4pe. There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever, anywhere on this planet, that Trump r4ped Caroll. Her original story, in her own words, depicts a sleazy, non-r4pe. Swallwell is known to have r4ped a former staffer of his.

My guess is that Swallwell's career trajectory is going to mirror Matt Gaetz's... From "popular, emerging, high-end potential", to "retired young due to allegations of sexual impropriety".

Anyways, the hypocrisy accusation against Robo is plain to see... Robo is pleading "no evidence" in Swallwell's case, while knowing full-well that there was "no evidence" in the Trump case, and yet he states that Trump is somehow guilty.

everything about the Swallwell case is stronger than the case against Trump, robo: Swallwell's accuser knew what year it occurred. She even knew the month, the day of the week, and the date - Trump's accuser couldn't even guess what year the incident allegedly happened Swallwell's accuser and the accused both knew each other very well - there's no evidence that Trump ever even met Caroll personally, they are just known to have briefly shaken hands at a large event, several years earlier Swallwell's accuser claims to have clearly indicated to the accused that she was not a willing partner, and that he beat her bloody - Trump's accuser never gave any indication that she was not a willing partner: by her own story she just giggled every time he advanced to the next base, and then she shoved him with one arm, at which point he let her go... Swallwell's accuser has proof that she even went to a clinic and told them she was r4ped - Trump's accuser didn't even think she was r4ped. It was her friend that suggested that it might have been a r4pe, several days later... Carroll's own words The case against Swallwell has FAR MORE ACTUAL EVIDENCE, the accuser knows the year it happened lol, and by all accounts Swallwell's attack was very violent, like an actual R4PE r4pe, not just a grey-area-maybe-date-r4pe. Assuming that both women told the absolute truth about everything, and video was produced that showed things EXACTLY as the accusers described them down to the very last detail: Trump would not spend a day in jail. The judge would rule that there was implied consent at every step, until the accuser showed the very first sign of retracting her consent, at which point she was able to leave. Swallwell would go to jail for "Rape with Aggravating Factors" in California - the highest level of severity under California law (using violence to get sex). He would be a felon and would serve the maximum amount of prison time, because she said that she was "bruised and bloody". The accusation against Swallwell is as serious as it gets. It's what's called "First-Degree Rape" in most jurisdictions. He's not accused of trying to get his fingers in there while she was just wriggling away. He is accused of using violence causing harm to get sex from a victim who was clearly saying she did not want sex.

@robo, I shouldn't be talking to you because I think that you're an evil little f-wit, and that exposure to people like you is toxic for the soul, but here's a thread for you to peruse, from back when Trump was still talking about blowing up Iran's infrastructure, and then fro the next day when reports seemed to be indicating that such strikes were already underway: Look at my 3rd post... FYI that's not support for Trump blowing up bridges, you greasy loser.

I never condemned his threats, I only said that: it would be wrong to follow through on them the IRGC wouldn't be influenced by the threats because they didn't care about human life I honestly have no clue why the IRGC caved. Being bombed like that would have knocked support for the US down by a full 75%. Suicide bombers around the world would have gained the resolve that they needed to throw their lives away.

Memes are only funny when they're true, get it? You woke up with a choice to either: support a brutal dictator or admit that Trump was doing what needed to be done and you chose the former. You don't need any evidence, robobigot... you are the evidence. What do you need proof of? That the ayatollah was a dictator? That he was brutal? That his regime was dedicated to genocides? That they already had IRBM's? That they were close to making nukes? Grow up, robobigot. You won't even admit that a story about "rocks and trees helping one group to murder another group that's just trying to hide" is about genocide.

Not true at all. I didn't see anyone here or anywhere else saying that it would be ok for Trump to do that. I personally would have lost all respect for him. But you still can't compare him to people who actually treat human life with so little value, like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the IRGC.