WestCanMan

You can see the narcissism oozing out of every pore of her body. She's another Kamala, who will hurt anyone or do any nasty thing to get ahead. I can tell that fabricating a racially divisive story in order to advance her career was an easy choice for her.

And I'm personally ok with adults doing that. I'll even respect people's pronouns because it's no skin off my nose to say the words that they like. But: I'll never sit in a room and tell people what my pronouns are. Anyone could guess correctly and I don't play stupid games If anyone tells me I can't say the word 'mother' I will find a way to work into every sentence I say, and I will basically shout it Guidance counsellors can't speak to little kids about gender transitioning in secrecy. No wiggle room on that one.

Thanks vax-boy, but no one cares what you 'figure'. Go back to fondling your Fauci blow-up doll.

Kids can do what they want to. I'm just not down with private conversations between children and guidance counsellors about matters of gender. I think that it's really important that there's public trust in guidance counsellors in general because, among other things, kids who are being abused need to have a place where they can reach out to people who can get them help. Guidance counsellors are a critical part of our society. But I think that this gender-interference racket really erodes public trust in them. I wouldn't have thought twice about my kid talking to a guidance counsellor before this notion of "secret gender transitioning conversations between kiddies and counsellors" became a thing. If I was sending a child through the California education system right now I would put them in a Christian school, and I'm an atheist.

"Within the margin of error the day before the election" doesn't mean anything MG. All they have to do is dial up the accuracy in the last few days and they end up with a perfect score. Look at how far Kamala was theoretically ahead in the months before the election... And Hillary... And then right at the end they say that the polls are getting closer, so that they look accurate on election day. The point of having the polls isn't to inform the voter... Giving you information is of no use to CBC. The point of polls is to give false credibility to their narratives. "Everyone likes this guy, just look at the polls." "Everyone believes this guy, just look at the polls." "No one cares about that 'scandal', it wasn't a big deal, just look at the polls." You have no reason to vote for Carney. No one does. It's the same party, he's barely a Canadian, he's far too cozy with China, his party has been colluding with them, his party got caught handing out buttons at a CPC event to make them look like they were using MAGA slogans, he's lying about his role in the '08 recession, his economic plan is to "punish big polluters (industry) which will drive away jobs and he's hamstringing the economy as well (anti-pipeline bill), and he has been caught telling major lies on several occasions. The only thing that he really has going for him is that at the end of every sentence CBC says "HE'S WAY AHEAD IN THE POLLS!!!!" "He ran over a kindergarten class BUT HE'S STILL WAY AHEAD IN THE POLLS!!!!!"

It's like they get "the message" from their handlers and they think that they, and only they, are pure enough to receive the divine message, but then they see that the other cultists have already carved it into their forearm and they get offended, so they try to out-tard each other with next-level BS that's so outlandish that no one else will follow. dbag 1: "I think that a woman should be allowed to terminate a healthy pregnancy at 7 months. A fetus is basically trash until a woman decides to let it out of her snatch." dbag 2: "Well that makes you a misogynist, because a woman should be allowed to terminate a healthy pregnancy at 8 months. You can even just put a snake in your vagina to eat it if you want to." dbag 3: "You're both misogynists, because a woman should be allowed to terminate a healthy pregnancy 1 second before it crowns. She can even just feed it to pigs after it comes out if she wants to." Their best one is: You have to call me xhe and xhey, because he/she offends me. Also, you're not allowed to say mom or mother anymore, because those words offend me. "So what if the words xhe and xhey offend me? Do I still have to say them?" "Of course, because I'm in a special rights group. I'm more offendeder than you. I get 'triggered'. FYI that means I am snotty and everyone has to care." The nice thing about being a conservative is that when other conservatives say stupid shit like "If a 12 yr old girl gets pregnant from being raped she should have to carry the baby to term" you can just say "STFU ret4rd", you don't have to pretend that their argument has any merit.

Stop trying to make the debate into something that it isn't, just so that you can be partly right you worthless little scumbag. This isn't about whether or not there are males, females, plus people with birth defects, genetic deformities and whatnot. And it's not about what people with deformities can/can't/should/shouldn't do. Those people have a hard road and actually need help. It's about whether or not teachers and guidance counsellors should be telling healthy boys and girls that they can choose to become the opposite sex, when all they can do is mutilate their bodies and end up permanently trapped between sexes, and unable to ever procreate. Leftards are even trying to convince other adults that "men can get pregnant", and they simply cannot. If they think that they can get away with saying that BS to adults, what are they telling kids? You don't effing know, do you... Not only that, why are they trying to prevent the parents from being part of the conversation with the little kids? Parents are the decision-makers for their children, period. Not teachers. Fools rush in where angels fear to tread.

You couldn't be more of a whiny bullshit artist if you tried. Oh wait, you are trying. Nvm.

Conservatives don't run in lock-step like leftists. You'll almost always see Dems or Libs vote 100% as a bloc, and you'll almost never see conservatives do that. The wrong Ford brother died. The one that smoked the crack was actually the better one.

Gamblers lose money when they're wrong. Pollsters make money when they're wrong.

Yeah, that's what's going on here Aristedes 🤣 If you can't even admit that Carney's the biggest liar in the history of Canadian politics then you're beyond hope.

A Google search still comes out strongly supporting the theory that Poilievre's riding is likely going liberal. Where did you see the contrary version of that story?

Just stop with the lying already. 1) You were the one who came in here denying our gov't's fascist covid BS, so you got called out for being a Trudeau toady 2) You've waved the pom-poms for Trudeau for the whole time I've been on this site. I've never once seen you post an objective comment about anything. 3) I know that if you opine about CBC's integrity or Carney's integrity right now you'll weasel, deny, dodge and throw shade. It's what you do. Can you admit that Carney's lies in the past month have been way beyond the pale? I don't even call Trudeau a liar all that often. He lines the pockets of his family, friends and cronies, he goes fascist for pharma, he sells out Canadians, he's either an id10t or he intentionally caved-in our economy, but he didn't tell blatant, whopping lies like Carney constantly does. Carney's lies are just so easy to catch him on that it's ridiculous. He's like a little kid with chocolate all over his face saying "I don't know what happened to the cake, mommy". It's like he's sully ret4rded. Carney is just a new breed of politician entirely in Canada.

My loyalty to whom? And how could your "principles" lead you to vote for Carney? He's not Canadian He even calls himself a European He tells huge lies with alarming regularity... Several/most of his most important statements have been 100% false. He tries to pretend that his government would constitute some kind of huge change, but he was the LPOC economic advisor during this nosedive, and 150 of the Lib MPs are still the same. Including the 9 who colluded with China (colluding with a foreign gov't is suddenly ok now. Just ask @BeaverFever) His ties to the Chinese gov't, and those of his MP's, are quite deep and sinister. Even lucrative. I'll just stop there for now. Pray tell what "principles" are guiding you? From where I stand you look like you have all the morality of an asteroid.

Unless he tried to take credit for winning WWII then yeah, he's the standard for honesty among Canadian and US leaders. Are there any more questions from the kiddie table? Yeah, they wouldn't want to create any false impressions 🤣

I was shocked that CBC broke the news, but not shocked that they waited until 1 month to do so, and only after 7M Canadians had already voted. I'm thinking that someone was leaking this somewhere, so CBC wanted to get out ahead of it.

No one watches CNN, and now no one votes for Trudeau 🤣 He kinda reminds me of that guy here who swears that he's a conservative, but who also thinks that Trudeau walks on water.

No, what's stupid is how far up Trudeau's ass your head has been for 9 years. If you're not one of his sons or his mom then you have no excuse for your ridiculous blind loyalty.

So how does the chain of command over vote totals work? So 1 guy watches a bunch of ballots get counted, and then they get to follow that vote count right to the point where it gets put on the official total that gets put on TV? How do they know if the votes that were dropped before he dropped he got there to drop his off were all legit? Maybe he's the first one, but there are already a few boxes there? How does a scrutineer know if all the people on the voter roll that came to drop off ballots were legit? Where I drop mine off there's only 1 person there scratching off names. What if 50 people all come along and say "I'm Tony Soprano" and they all get in to vote? How do they know if a different couple of scrutineers are really "us and them" groups, or if leftards just posed as humans to get in on a fake vote count? How do they know if other polling stations are legit? What if there are a bunch of votes come in from MLK elementary but there wasn't even a polling station there? What if you're working with this guy? "Hey, who voted for Bugsy?" If it works on this guy below, it will work on Aristedes, myata, eyeball, exflyer, etc:

I think they might have talked about this earlier, but they wanted to keep a bit of distance between the major lies, and they never got the chance because the whoppers just keep on coming so fast. Look at that, the left🤡rds all effed off again 🤣

I think you're just so stupid that you can't see it happening.

Oh look, it's a left4rd making snotty accusations with no proof. It must be a day of the week ending in "y". This is from your own cult-handlers, so read this (take as many days as you like), memorize it (to what extent you can), and regurgitate it on command, peon: According to two Radio-Canada sources with knowledge of the discussion, the issue of Canadian sovereignty was raised in the first part of the conversation. At the end of this moment, described as "not easy" by one source, Carney said: "We'll agree to disagree on that one." According to Radio-Canada's sources, Trump brought up the issue of the 51st state during the March 28 call, explaining the advantages of Canada joining the U.S. Carney let him speak before expressing his disagreement. That contradicts what the prime minister told journalists in a news conference later that day, when he suggested that Trump had put his expansionist language aside during the conversation. "The president respected Canada's sovereignty today both in his private and public comments," Carney said on March 28. FYI the red part means that Carney lied, dummy. Right from CBC. And "two Radio-Canada sources" is completely believable, there would have been at least two flunkies there with him, and that's if no one was on ball-duty. March 28th, ie, almost a full month ago lol. 7M people already voted.... CBC sat on this info for a month. It must have been leaked somewhere, otherwise it would have stayed in the vault, under all the radioactive waste, for about 17,000 years. Anyways, add this to the laundry-list, dumbass.

New Carney lie - Trump phone call. *yawn*

Same reason I assume that Donald Trump Jr voted for Trump. I didn't see him mark the ballot, or put it in the box, but I'm pretty sure...

1) Whoa, another Carney lie. Whodathunkit! CBC must be going APEshit 2) Go Yves Blanchet! 3) I bet this is the last straw for LPOC cultists 🤣🤣🤣🤣