WestCanMan

My guess is that Swallwell's career trajectory is going to mirror Matt Gaetz's... From "popular, emerging, high-end potential", to "retired young due to allegations of sexual impropriety".

Anyways, the hypocrisy accusation against Robo is plain to see... Robo is pleading "no evidence" in Swallwell's case, while knowing full-well that there was "no evidence" in the Trump case, and yet he states that Trump is somehow guilty.

everything about the Swallwell case is stronger than the case against Trump, robo: Swallwell's accuser knew what year it occurred. She even knew the month, the day of the week, and the date - Trump's accuser couldn't even guess what year the incident allegedly happened Swallwell's accuser and the accused both knew each other very well - there's no evidence that Trump ever even met Caroll personally, they are just known to have briefly shaken hands at a large event, several years earlier Swallwell's accuser claims to have clearly indicated to the accused that she was not a willing partner, and that he beat her bloody - Trump's accuser never gave any indication that she was not a willing partner: by her own story she just giggled every time he advanced to the next base, and then she shoved him with one arm, at which point he let her go... Swallwell's accuser has proof that she even went to a clinic and told them she was r4ped - Trump's accuser didn't even think she was r4ped. It was her friend that suggested that it might have been a r4pe, several days later... Carroll's own words The case against Swallwell has FAR MORE ACTUAL EVIDENCE, the accuser knows the year it happened lol, and by all accounts Swallwell's attack was very violent, like an actual R4PE r4pe, not just a grey-area-maybe-date-r4pe. Assuming that both women told the absolute truth about everything, and video was produced that showed things EXACTLY as the accusers described them down to the very last detail: Trump would not spend a day in jail. The judge would rule that there was implied consent at every step, until the accuser showed the very first sign of retracting her consent, at which point she was able to leave. Swallwell would go to jail for "Rape with Aggravating Factors" in California - the highest level of severity under California law (using violence to get sex). He would be a felon and would serve the maximum amount of prison time, because she said that she was "bruised and bloody". The accusation against Swallwell is as serious as it gets. It's what's called "First-Degree Rape" in most jurisdictions. He's not accused of trying to get his fingers in there while she was just wriggling away. He is accused of using violence causing harm to get sex from a victim who was clearly saying she did not want sex.

@robo, I shouldn't be talking to you because I think that you're an evil little f-wit, and that exposure to people like you is toxic for the soul, but here's a thread for you to peruse, from back when Trump was still talking about blowing up Iran's infrastructure, and then fro the next day when reports seemed to be indicating that such strikes were already underway: Look at my 3rd post... FYI that's not support for Trump blowing up bridges, you greasy loser.

I never condemned his threats, I only said that: it would be wrong to follow through on them the IRGC wouldn't be influenced by the threats because they didn't care about human life I honestly have no clue why the IRGC caved. Being bombed like that would have knocked support for the US down by a full 75%. Suicide bombers around the world would have gained the resolve that they needed to throw their lives away.

Memes are only funny when they're true, get it? You woke up with a choice to either: support a brutal dictator or admit that Trump was doing what needed to be done and you chose the former. You don't need any evidence, robobigot... you are the evidence. What do you need proof of? That the ayatollah was a dictator? That he was brutal? That his regime was dedicated to genocides? That they already had IRBM's? That they were close to making nukes? Grow up, robobigot. You won't even admit that a story about "rocks and trees helping one group to murder another group that's just trying to hide" is about genocide.

Not true at all. I didn't see anyone here or anywhere else saying that it would be ok for Trump to do that. I personally would have lost all respect for him. But you still can't compare him to people who actually treat human life with so little value, like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the IRGC.

Naw. That little maggot LOVES to say that Trump IS a r4pist just because E J Caroll said "He stuck his fingers in my cooter while I was giggling back in 1995 or 1996." That's his standard, not mine. If his line in the sand is "no witnesses, no evidence, no police report, can't even name the year, regardless of whether the defendant is known to have ever even met her" is enough evidence for a R4pe conviction, then he has no choice but to admit that Swallwell IS a r4pist. And TBH, he also considered Kavanaugh guilty based on the same level of evidence. Or even less, because Kavanaugh's accuser couldn't even name a place. So in TWO instances he declared someone was an actual r4pist based on zero-evidence/unknown-date testimony. Swallwell's accuser has a date, a place, witnesses that she said she was r4ped, claims to have borne physical evidence of a r4pe (but never mentioned if she had witnesses for that), she has proof that she claimed to be a r4pe victim when she went to a clinic to get tested for STD's and pregnancy right afterwards... For me, personally, I wouldn't find someone guilty of r4pe based on what's written there, because my standards don't waver. That doesn't mean that I'd let him come within 50' of my daughter, I just wouldn't throw a man in jail without more evidence than that.

Did I hear you say that Swallwell is a r4pist? You need to come out and state clearly and unequivocally, in no uncertain terms, that Eric Swallwell is a r4pist. Otherwise you are the epitome of a hypocrite.

IOW... 1) Facts that you can't refute so you're just gonna try to brush them aside 2) a ridiculous and childish snuck-premise 3) baseless accusation 😘

That means nothing. By the left's own established standard, aka "legal precedent", the accusation alone stands as 100% proof of guilt, regardless of a complete lack of evidence, or even a year the event allegedly took place. And it's not like this is a weaker accusation than the one against Trump. From Google AI search: 2019 Incident: An accuser alleged that in September 2019, while still part of his staff, she woke up naked in his hotel room one morning, following a night of heavy drinking, with little recollection of the previous night. 2024 Incident: The same staffer alleges that in April 2024 [3 years after she quit working for him], after a gala in New York, she was heavily intoxicated, and Swalwell forced himself on her in his hotel room. She stated she pushed him away and said "no," but he continued, leaving her with signs of physical trauma, including bleeding and bruises. Corroboration: The woman’s 2024 account was corroborated by friends she confided in at the time, her former boyfriend, medical records showing she sought testing for STDs, and text messages sent to friends shortly after the alleged incident. I'm gonna admit right here that I had to edit the info in the AI reply in order for it to make sense. Look at this blatant BS that it spewed: The blue highlighted text in the photo contains all the info that I used above.... I put the events in chronological order, so that there's no mistaking the way things happened, and changed the wording a bit, just for the sake of clarity. For "some reason", the events were written out of their chronological order in the AI reply, and then they strengthened the misdirection with the use of the word "still" in the next paragraph: "2019 Incident: The same staffer alleged that in September 2019, while still working for him," The way the AI search is written, it seems like she kept on working for him after he committed the r4pe which she actually has memories of, which makes readers think: "why would she have kept working for him if that really happened? It seems false." Yes, the dates are in there, but a lot of people will "feel the chronology" in the order that the claims are presented to them, without keying in on the dates. And again, the use of the word "still" in the second paragraph reinforces the chronological misdirection. The start of the Google AI reply is shown below, just so that you can see everything they wrote before the section I quoted: Google has a well-established history of promoting and protecting leftists, and omitting information that's unflattering for them from searches. At times like this, when they can't get away with a full omission, we are presented with misleading garbage like what I just copied and pasted.

Swallwell's only "done" if the leftists have a stronger candidate. That way they can afford to throw him under the bus. Otherwise "that b1tch is loonie". Luckily for Swallwell, the whole world can see Kamala's ret4rdation, Newsom's hypocrisy/scandals/failures, AOC's anger and stupidity, and the leftists all know that Josh Sahpiro is a Jew.

Cultists aren't known for telling the truth, Link. If someone says "grass is green" do you see evidence of cultism there? ^That^ is 100% true. There's nothing to debate there. Mamdani's wife clicked like on Hamas terrorists' FB posts and Zoran didn't even try to deny it, he just called her "the love of his life". Leftists supported that. There's no weaselling your way out of that one, Link. You are part of a vile cult that supports the rape/murder of women and the burning deaths of babies. At least Zoran's wife had the stones to click "like" there, you're only capable of showing tacit support. What's wrong with reminding everyone of robo's overt support of a blatant call to genocide? I don't want to write that into every post I make, but it's extremely important for people to see that quote, and to be constantly reminded who robo really is and what he stands for. And FYI, to this day, robo has never admitted what that obviously means, and then distanced himself from it. He still considers it "a parable." Well, it's only a parable for children who are raised to slaughter people without remorse. What do you think, link, is that little hadith tale a parable? Nice "salmon" shirt. And there you are, doing just that. You say that after years of violent BLM riots (leftist militia), antifa riots (leftist militia), anti-ICE riots (leftist-controlled criminal mobs), BLM police killing black kids, widespread leftist support for talk of assassinating the president, multiple incidents of LGBTQers shooting up schools, terrorist attacks against conservative groups like the one in Vegas, and ONE 3-hr riot at the capitol where only the DC cops were killing people... Only a cultist could have such a warped/twisted/backwards view of the obvious facts that played out right in front of them, day after day, for years on end.

You're just a raging, cultist id10t, Link. I can't honestly tell if you're an IRGC propagandist or a Dem/LPoC cultist, and I doubt that anyone else can either. If you are IRGC, then give yourself a pat on the back for helping to shepherd the mindless cultist left4rd flock, and if you're a Demi/Libt4rd, you should really take a long look at the company you keep. It's clearly conservatives who are the enemies of violent bigotry, misogyny and fascism, in this day and age, while the libs are enablers and supporters of it.

But a wealth tax would bring America one step closer to communism...

Left4rds have no choice but consider Swallwell guilty now, because a woman said that he r4ped her. she doesn't have to say what year it happened she doesn't need to have any witnesses there doesn't have to be any evidence of any kind whatsoever her story doesn't even have to include any non-consensual activity in it she can just say that "her friend felt like she might have been r4ped" and Swallwell is "GUILTY!" by left4rd judges' accepted standards. Dang. I guess he needs to go to jail.

That right there stands as an example of how being viewed out-of-context can make a falsehood true. Nevermind what you hear. The truth isn't for simpletons like you, that's why you're a demonrat cultist. All that matters is that Iran ends up with nothing when Trump is finished with them. If they still have the capacity to make nukes when this is over then Trump will have failed, just like Obama and Biden did. There was this thing called "Biden and Trudeau's wars on domestic energy" that you may have heard of, which caused all kinds of energy prices to spike, not just gasoline, dummy. "Unnecessary war" lol. That comment alone pegs your IQ at 70 or lower. As a kindness, I'm gonna leave that there for you, just so that people think of you as being honest for once.

Neat. Now tell me what the minimum wage is for all the illegals that the Dems bring in to work under the table and live in slums? It's totally racist for the Dems to guarantee a minimum wage for Americans that's so much higher than what their illegals make.

CNN and MSNBC have a keyboard hotkey for "Scream at clouds sessions near me".

Wow, are you ever stupid. Would you rather pay a bit extra for gas for 2 months now to avoid a nuclear war later? FYI gas was this high under Biden and he wasn't winning a war or preventng a nuclear war... He was just f'ing up. Your opinion is worthless.

The man is a genius. With two tweets he managed to: get the weakest, dumbest person elected PM in Canada get woket4rds to stick up for the Catholic Church With his next tweet he's gonna get them interested in finding jobs and going off of welfare.

There's no difference between being an actual terrorist, who burns children to death, and a person who just clicks like on the videos. ZM didn't try to deny that she likes their videos: when confronted with the news that she was liking them he just said "She's the love of my life." There is no debate whatsoever about whether or not Z's wife likes Hamas videos. That's a matter of the public record. If Melania was clicking "like" on videos like that the left would be losing their collective half-mind.

If you're not an ayatollah supporter then you're a victim of their propaganda.

This is YOUR THREAD, id10t. You made a thread about Melania. I talked to you about your Melania comments. Then you went off on a tangent about Trump. You're either off your meds or you're a cheap-ass bot. 1986 "AI".