WestCanMan

Aren't you the guy who posts the snot pictures? FYI no one's trying to impress you: near as I can tell you're a low-IQ, gr-7 stoner.

IF they lose I'll register as a Republican. Vive la 51!

It was interesting to see all the CBC commentators trying to explain why that most recent Carney lie shouldn't matter to voters, when what they really meant was "I wanna keep my job." They're such vile filth.

Shut up, 1diot.

Objectively, CBC sat on that story and pushed that narrative themselves, I'm just shocked that they let the cat out of the bag before the election. Like I said earlier, it must have been coming out in a leak or they never would have let the truth out.

Translation: "DAMMIT! Why didn't he use guns instead of a car???? This would have been the PERFECT time for a terrorist attack by a white supremacist Mexican like Zimmerman, or imaginary MAGAs outside of a Subway restaurant, or an imaginary Chinese-Canadian white supremacist hijab attack in Toronto. Where's that Trudeau photographer who wore the confederate flag jacket? Save us confederate boy!!!!!"

Hmmmm. Kinda like the desperate holdouts from the Russian collusion farce. I wonder who that could beave...

It wasn't a white guy, right? So stories about his FB from 13 years ago weren't included in the story.

One more thing about this, which I'm sure you're not aware of, is that our long-term memories are formed by the emotionally charged events in our lives, which means that it's imperative for your news org to quickly attach their narratives to the most emotional stories you see, corrections to come later, when they're no longer important. That's why an attack can often be instantly understood to have been "CONDUCTED BY ALT-RIGHT, WHITE SUPREMACIST RACISTS!!!!!", based on a 13-yr old FB post, but no one who ever committed a recent mass-casualty atrocity recently has ever had a manifesto or any unseemly FB posts, according to the Dems and the groups that they control. A guy can yell praises to allah while killing gays and then accredit his killings to islamic state while talking to police, and CNN and CBC willcontinue to distance the attack from islamic terrorism for as long as humanly possibly (lone wolf attack by a crazy with GUNZ), while shrieking "THIS IS A GUN-CONTROL ISSUE AND NOTHING ELSE!" Honest to God, they even tried to turn the NYC van attack by muslims into a gun-control issue. CNN: "Lie, lie, lie while emotions are high, quiet/calm corrections can come later." When people find out conclusively that it was in fact an islamic terrorist attack two weeks later, that doesn't change things for them, because the association with "gun control" was made upon initial discovery, and that answer will always stick with them. Most people won't even remember it as 'the thing they learned about 2 weeks later'. I'm sure that when you scan your memory banks for "Pulse nightclub attack", your strongest association is "gun control". The Charlottesville attack featured an out-of-town driver, in car that ended up in an alley surrounded by rioters, which was attacked by a man with a bat before it sped off. If that was an antifa car that was attacked before it sped off, or a BLM car with a black girl in it that sped off, all that you ever saw would have been video of the guy hitting the car with the bat, along with the cry "This car crash was caused by a racist with a bat hitting her car!!!", but CNN et al ignored the fact that someone hit the car with a bat, shrieked "WHITE SUPREMACIST TERRORIST!", and that's what you'll feelz in yer bonez forever. Then CNN tried to call the Waukesha terrorist attack a "car crash", and blamed it on an alleged domestic disturbance that theoretically occurred miles away, which was not captured on camera. How many Christmas parades have there been in the last 100 years, and how many domestic disturbances on those same days, and how many of them resulted in a 50 pedestrian car crash? Just the one, by the guy who used that same car to run over his own girlfriend two months earlier, after he punched her in the face, and who had been posting about the Rittenhouse verdict, which came down just a few miles away, a week earlier. CNN: "Nahhhh. No connections there. This was just a "50-pedestrian car crash"." 🤣 CNN and CBC play you like a Stradivarius buddy. Your whole belief system is centred around their lies, gaslighting and disinformation. You truly have no idea if you're coming or going.

Regardless of what you say, or how hard you try to form a new narrative around this topic, it remains an absolute established fact that Carney lied to Canadians about the tone and overall messaging from that meeting; full stop. It doesn't really matter what Trump said now. It doesn't really matter what the Carney said now. All that matters is we're going to end up with a new 4-year mandate on the 28th, and we will either sink or swim as a country. I think that there's a really strong possibility that this is the last time we're all voting in the same federal election if the Liberals win. Or at least I hope that's the case, because Canada is obviously broken if the bribery-gorged CBC has managed to thwart democracy once again. I'm absolutely not interested in another election in 2028. I'm as open to the prospect of Canada under the LPOC gov't as I am to an islamic theocracy.

Some of the psychiatric science of 30 years ago is ow quackery. Some of the psychiatric science of today will be considered quackery in 30 years. Some psychiatrists call other psychiatrists quacks today, and maybe they're both right sometimes. Who knows, some of it might come full circle and change sides again. I get that there is a lot of knowledge out there, and there is no doubt constant progress, but I think that times change and psychiatry is always changing. Two things spring to mind: life changes constantly, and I think that the kids of today, whose minds were formed while playing iPads instead of hunting frogs, are probably quite different from the kids of 80 years ago the philosophy of legalizing drugs but getting users more involved in society so that their dependency lessened, which allegedly worked in Portugal 20 years ago, probably doesn't work anymore in the age of fentanyl. I'm no expert so I'll shut up now, but long story short, I consider psychiatry a thoroughly inexact "science". And I understand that's just a layman's opinion.

The question is, are we paying for them either way? There's a cost associated with the crime of a large homeless population, homeless shelters and meal provision, overworked ambulances drivers, crammed ER's, lost tax revenue from tent cities in front of businesses, lost property tax revenue from the lowered values of downtown condos, overworked police, lost tourism dollars, etc. If downtown Vancouver had less homeless people and less crime then it would be a more desirable destination for people to live and visit. It's current reputation is still largely based on its former glory: Vancouver gets dirtier and uglier every year, to the point where it's really depressing now. So, while there's a cost associated with better care for people with mental health issues, there's also a huge cost associated with doing nothing, imo.

Of course you'd laugh. You're still laughing at the people who were injured or killed by the covid jabs, you vile little piece of sh1t. You're still laughing at people who lost their jobs because they didn't want to put snake oil in their veins. Ironically enough, you're still butthurt about something that happened to your distant kin from back in Scotland over 330 years ago. That's called "a pathetic (even psychotic) mix of hypocrisy and amorality". The reality is that you and exflyer are the posters here who have to hope that karma isn't really a thing.

Hey, would ya look at that: myata the lying weasel ran away scared. Little herbie, an equally amoral wriggler, tried to chime in to give herbie's screed some back-up, but herbie also failed to describe how conservatives are somehow wallowing in a cesspool of blah, blah, blah. Where are the groundless accusations? Where's the "pure distilled hatred"? Where's the irrational negativity? Where is there rage where there should instead be understanding and mutual respect? Leftists have been accusing conservatives of horrible things for a long time now, and herbie's vile invective is a perfect example of it.

I 100% agree with you that "sanitariums", or whatever else you wanna call those barbaric hellholes, were not the answer. I saw some of the footage from Geraldo Rivera's exposé on a NY State sanitarium from the 1980s and it was beyond horrific. 1980s. It was like a concentration camp for the mentally disabled, but with more feces than you might imagine. Anyone who says "trust the science" clearly has no idea what a dark and horrible history science has. Anyone who trusts vaccines has never heard of the Tuskegee Experiment, or the covid vaccines. But I honestly think that now, in an age where transparency in mental institutions can be far greater than ever before, we can once again put public safety ahead of the freedom of dangerous people. I fully believe that modern facilities would be far better for people with mental health issues than life on Hastings Street.

Chat GPT: a perfact example of just how unintelligent artificial intelligence still is: "Did Mark Carney lie to Canadians about Brookfield: "1. Brookfield Headquarters Relocation Conservative critics assert that Carney misrepresented his involvement in Brookfield Asset Management's decision to relocate its headquarters from Toronto to New York City. They point to a December 2024 letter where Carney, as chair, endorsed the move and recommended it to shareholders. However, Carney later stated that he had no role in the decision, claiming he had resigned from the board before the formal vote in January 2025. This discrepancy has led to accusations of dishonesty. ^Chat GPT just lied.^ It's not a mere "discrepancy", it's a complete discrepancy between the truth and his portrayal of events. Fact: Conservative critics didn't "assert that carney misrepresented" anything. They proved that he lied. Full stop. "Carney stated that he had no role in the decision" - yes, 100% The Brookfield board unanimously voted to move Brookfield to NY on Oct 31st while Carney was its chairman, months before Carney left. The move was announced on Nov 1st 2024, months before Carney left. In no way shape or form is that "no role in the decision", so he 100% lied. The naked truth is that he said that he had no involvement but we was not only involved, he was the absolute leader of the charge. There is not 1 single person on this planet who played as big a role in moving Brookfield's HQ as Mark Carney. In addition to Carney's lie about whether or not he played a role in moving Brookfield's HQ: Carney also lied about his phone call to Trump. Carney also lied about helping Martin balance the budget in the 1990s. Carney also lied about the extent of his role in helping Canada avert a recession in 2008, vastly exaggerating his own role and understating the roles of key players above him. Carney not only lied about the fact that he met with the JCCC, he slandered the Globe and Mail when they called him out for it, saying "You can't believe everything you see in the Globe and Mail." Everyone on this site is fully aware of the fact that Carney is the biggest liar in North American politics. No one has ever told bigger lies than him, except maybe the Russian collusiontards on CNN. And there's not a single leftard here than can find an example of Poilievre telling even one lie that compares to any of the top 5 lies on Carney's laundry list. That ship has sailed herbie, you can take your disinformation elsewhere, child.

And yet you believe that everyone that worked in residential schools was a pedophile and a child abuser, there were mass-murders there which were kept secret, and that the schools were actually conceived and created for the exact purpose of doing such things. Try not to take this personally, but you just shut up and make people guess how stupid you are.

Just recognize what I said as a prediction, that's all. I'm purely saying that: because the MSM is so actively disseminating evidence of this person't mental health issues before they're releasing the name, it's going to be a minority. Period. We're at this point in this country where the MSM is 100% politicized and devoid of integrity.

I'm making a prediction, dummy. Every time the excuse of "mental health" is thrown out to the public, as the root cause of a mass-casualty event, the attacker is a minority, usually a blacktivist or muslim, or the victims are a conservative group. The mental health excuse is being shouted well in advance of the perp's passport status/race/religion for reasons that we're both aware of, but which you will plead ignorance to. If the Vegas shooter fired into a crowd at a rap concert we both know that "political/racial motivation" would have been the MSM consensus, not just "mental health." It would have been a terrorist attack, white supremacist attack, etc. FYI white people still form the majority of this country. By pure random chance, I'm likely to be hoisted on my own petard here, because there's more than a 50% chance that any random person here is white.

That's still no counter to my claim that people who need to be on anti-psychotic drugs in order to be considered safe to society are let out onto the street to take their meds at their own discretion.

We all know that @myata is too much of a gutless, lying loser to address my post... His slanderous thread title is basically his snotty little contribution to the forum. In the words of the left's saint, Justin Trudeau: "We have to ask ourselves as leaders, and as Canadians, should we even tolerate hate-mongers like myata?" And don't ask me what Trudeau means by "should we tolerate them?", but I'm sure it's dreamy and beautiful.

What "topics" are mentioned in the OP, ret4rd? You said "look at the topics here" in the thread title.... What topics, ret4rd? You've just made diabolical accusations against a massive chunk of the population for which you have provided absolutely ZERO proof. FYI in England people actually go to jail for spreading hate in a far less egregious manner than you just did there. Or, excuse me if I missed it, but what "proof" did you even provide to back up the alleged topics that you didn't even name, ret4rd? Where's the "cesspool of negativity, rage, wild groundless accusations and pure distilled hatred" that you referred to? Is it a "cesspool of rage" to point out that Mark Carney is a serial liar, whose most consequential statements to date have all been proven to be 100% false"? What's wrong with telling the truth, ret4rd? What change would conservatives make to this world that would make it more dark and dangerous? Can you name it, ret4rd? Because I can name several changes that left4rds are making that make the world more dark and dangerous: forcing young, healthy adults to take experimental medications which they don't need dividing citizens into two groups based on false medical (political) determinations and then providing one group with a gesundheitspass so that they can ostracize the other letting violent re-offending criminals out onto the streets who end up harming other innocents bringing in hundreds of thousands more people than we have created shelter for, making it inevitable that hundreds of thousands of people here end up homeless spinning fabrications of mass-murders of children by Canadian citizens, not bothering to even investigate them for years while the accusations are inciting violence and destruction within our communities, and racial division is growing, and then lying about the level of evidence that is finally gathered (as in Rosemary 'Lying b1tch' Barton's recent statement about the existence of unmarked mass-graves Can someone put that ret4rd back in his cage, and unplug his mom's computer?

That's true, but: it's also truthful to say that a lot of people who are theoretically considered "only safe if medicated" are wandering our streets, and only taking their meds of their own volition there are also a lot of people who are undiagnosed, and have been found guilty of multiple-and-increasingly-harmful violent offences, who are let out on low bail, or early on probation, etc, and we don't need those people on our streets. They don't contribute to society, and it's only ever a matter of time before they inflict themselves on innocent victims again. We see that over and over, but the same group of people just keeps giving violent reoffenders chance after chance to reoffend - with eerily predictable results.

Nice snuck premise, hotshot. Now do the Charlottesville car attack. Or any other attack that you can name where a white person attacked a minority... Or how about you take your bullshit excuse that's always applied along political lines and shove it up your arse? "We can lump this attack into an political attack on conservatives, so this story is 100% about political/racial activism, but that attack was against white people, churches, people at a country music festival, or it was by a minority/immigrant so it has to be lumped into the "mental health issue" category". Right? Can you name the example that goes against the grain? Was an attack by a white guy against a minority ever due to a mental health issue, Aristedes? Care to find me that example? We're up into the hundreds of churches burned, assh0le. Where's that story? And why is Rosemary Barton pretending that there were bodies of children discovered in mass graves, to continue spreading the false backstory behind the great reason for burning churches? Wanna know who's mentally unhealthy? Rosemary "lying b1tch" Barton, and everyone who considers her a legitimate member of the journalistic community.

Leftists: "That man was a VICTIM, dammit. This story is a testament to his tragedy, and the woman who was almost killed is an afterthought. In fact, she was probably just a CPC racist who deserved it. We need more victims like him released, not less. ALL HAIL CARNEY!"