WestCanMan

Poilievre was travelling all across the country, visiting probably 300+ ridings. His opponent stayed in his riding that whole time Poilievre's riding is deep inside of Ontario, Ottawa no less, which is by far majority Libt4rd The Premier of Ontario is a pseudo-conservative (aka traitor to his party and his country) who supported China's Commey The CBC just got another billion-dollar windfall from the federal gov't, so the whole time PP was out working for this country, the CBC was pummelling his constituents with pro-LPOC propaganda Ask yourself: if the CBC was working against the Commey 24/7, and he was running in Edm, would Commey have won? The CBC could have been talking about Commie's lies 24/7 instead of covering them up, as they did with his lie about the Trump phone call. And the Trump/Commie relationship was central to this election... Canadians were told "Commey is the guy to deal with Trump", and "when Trump talks to Commey on the phone there's no mention of "the 51st state", etc... CBC knew that was a lie while they were saying it... What if CBC never told the lie about Trump respecting Commey on the phone? Would that have made a difference, August? What if CBC was saying "Poilievre is the best guy for dealing with Trump" instead? What then, August? FYI it's just a narrative to say that the Commey would have been better at dealing with Trump - that's a purely subjective statement to be thrown down in such a declarative form. You are so immersed within the propaganda bubble that you don't even notice it.

Sorry but your low-IQ BS only works with your fellow tree-hugging m0r0ns. If you wanna go back to living in the stone age then that's your choice, but no one else in this country wants to do that. FYI the people who say that "Canada should become a world-leader in green energy tech and reduce fossil fuel extraction" are all just Xi's useful id10ts: we can't compete with China for a multitude of reasons including: they flout patent laws to sell within their own country, so their companies instantly start off with a billion consumers while our companies have to fight through interprovincial and international tariffs to get to markets of more than a few million people they use slaves to produce goods and we pay people $30/hr their "non-slaves" still work for a fraction of the wages that Canadians work for their companies aren't bound by the same environmental and safety standards that Canadian companies have to abide by, which puts their products at even bigger discounts their gov't goes all-out to lower energy costs, which helps their manufacturers produce goods at a lower cost, while our Liberal gov't is constantly at war with energy extraction and production. Energy costs here have soared, as we all know, and then taxes were added on top of that. Around the globe, countries are producing energy and goods at a furious pace while you're humping trees and screeching at people with actual jobs. They're using that money to increase their political and military clout while you're grandstanding and pouting. If you're being honest with yourself, you're just the prototypical pathetic underling of the ret4rded hag - E. May.

I week ago, if you wanted to lay a bet that the Oilers would advance to round 2 before the Jets did, you could probably get 50-1 odds. It was a thoroughly unconvincing series win though, based on how badly they were beaten in the first two games, and how luck they got to score 3 goals with their goalie pulled (in 2 games) - they even won G4 after scoring one of those. Good news for the Oilers is that, if they really get Ekholm back for Rnd 2, they will be icing their very best team of the entire season... They've never had Ekholm, Klingberg and Walman all dressed for a game this year, and since they got Walman and Klingberg in the reg season, they didn't have McDavid and Draisaitl in most of those games. And all of a sudden the Oilers' 2nd-4th lines are rolling, it's nice to see the coach not rely so heavily on 97 and 29... The Oilers got 6 goals yesterday and those 2 players only combined for 1 assist... The Oil will have a crazy team in Rnd 2 if Ekholm is back. Go Oil! Go Jets!

Being sheeple has never worked for any group. Sooner or later we're all gonna get royally screwed for allowing those a-holes into power.

Take a few more clot-shots and die, loser.

What have you ever seen that gave you the impression that leftists don't like violence? Was it their fervent support of the arson, looting, assaults and murders during the BLM riots, the shooting of Republican congressmen at a baseball game, the death threats against Trump, support for the death threats against Trump, the assassination attempts against Trump, the support for the assassination attempts against Trump, the attacks on Tesla dealerships, their support of MS-13, their support of Tren De Aragua, their support of Hamas, their support of police beating up peaceful protesters in Canada after they surrendered on their knees, their support of Kamala's bail fund to get rioters back on the streets in Minnesota, their lust for the senseless war in Ukraine which isn't even moving the goalposts anymore, their support of forcing healthy young people to take a dangerous injection that doesn't even do anything for them...?

Carney was a part of Trudeau's covid fascism, he was a huge proponent of the carbon tax, and he was down with every part of our economic failure. On top of all that he's a shameless liar who openly used taxpayer money to bribe the CBC, just like Trudeau. You'd have to be utterly ret4rded to vote for a guy like that. On average, Canadians are stupid, gutless and worthless, and you're like the poster child for those things.

You're so stupid you shouldn't be allowed to vote ffs. Yes, the perps commit the crimes, Chrissy. Here are some question for you Chrissy, along with the answers, because I can't listen to any more of your stupid crap today: 1) Who is more likely to commit a violent crime: someone who has committed violent crimes in the past, or someone who has never committed any crimes of any kind before? violent criminals are more likely to commit violent crimes than non-criminals, Chrissy. By a massive margin. 2) Is there anything that we can do, as a society, to protect vulnerable women and children from these violent criminals, who have a nasty habit of re-offending? yes. We can lock violent offenders in jail where there are no women and children to harm. 3) Is it bad to let violent criminals out of jail? It depends on your moral compass. Some people think that beating or raping women is bad, some think that it's something that we should just live with as a society. Conservatives say "violence against women and children is bad, and we should protect them when possible", liberals say "violent crime is part of life, so criminals should be free to walk our streets, and the safety of women and children is of secondary importance". 4) Who lets the violent criminals out of jail? The janitors union, Chrissy. Only you and I know that though, so let's keep it our little secret. Is there something that you still don't understand?

Too easy: "What did the nutjob "state" in his nuthouse last time? Look who's interested. Just look: it means something." Care to guess what the village idjit said last? "What did the nutjob "state" in his nuthouse last time? Look who's interested. Just look: it means something."

Good point. Let's blame the janitor's union for this, Chrissy. Keep those gems coming.

You just licked Trudeau's boots for 9 years and he was just a substitute teacher with a penchant for young 'uns, Einstein. In the end, all that your little princess is known for is huge scandals, high interest rates, killer inflation, vaxtard-fascism, and ridiculously high immigration rates resulting in a massive increase in homelessness. Can you point to something incorrect there? Oh, and we ended up in a trade war two trade wars as well while your idjit was running the country. Is there even one area that you can point to where Canada improved since 2015? Well, the MSM has been earning a lot more money round election time, so there's that. OK, aside from that one, how did Canada get better? So after all that failure, your solution was to ELECT ALL OF THE SAME SYCOPHANT DOLT MP's AGAIN, WITH AN EVEN BIGGER LIAR THAN WE HAD BEFORE 😂 Thanks for the laughs, dumbass. And FYI Poilievre is light years ahead of where la turd was when he became PM. You just voted for Xi's puppet. Trump's guy. The biggest liar in the history of politics. And all of Trudeau's toadies. Again, thanks for the laughs.

You must have just eaten a fish head.

Left4rds, let's work together! Let's face it: this election was probably a little too close for comfort for you guys... Even with the help of the Chinese gov't, the help of Donald Trump, and a billion dollar bribe (taxpayer money of course) to the CBC, the CPC gained 25 seats and the Libs only gained 9. When you take into consideration the fact that the Libs actually gained those 9 seats in Quebec, at the expense of the Bloc (-11), that means that basically all of the new CPC MP's across the rest of the country actually came at the expense of the NDP, and those were the most diehard left4rd voters before 2025. To make matters worse, the CBC was using the "FEAR TRUMP" card on them when they all switched to the right. Just imagine leftists, the biggest sheeple on earth, ignoring the Fear Trump narrative. It's like jellyfish somehow swimming up over a waterfall. That should scare you. Bottom line: with the help of China and Trump, a billion dollar bribe to the CBC, and a sweet "fear Trump" narrative, the Libs only finished 25 seats ahead of the CPC, out of 343 ridings, and the CPC gathered a lot of support from people who used to be way to the left of intelligent. So, 4 years from now, when the country is even worse off than it is now, will the CBC and China be able to drag the LPOC across the finish line again, with all that solid CPC support in AB and Sask? Let's face it, if you guys really want 1-party rule, you need Alberta and Sask to separate. If that happens, it will be a cakewalk for the LPOC to win every election. You won't even need to bribe the CBC. TBH, this whole "Canada unity" message ends up with Alberta and Saskatchewan still in Canada. Is that really what you want? The wolf will always be at the door when the CPC win 95% of the ridings in those two provinces. Left4rds: help us help you get to the promised land of 1-party rule. Let's all get together and make western separation a priority. Can we at least do this one thing together? Call your local MP and just let them know that you really thought this through, and in your heart of hearts, you really want those two gone. What's the worst that could happen?

OMG, look at myata suddenly opening his gutless little mouth! 🤣 And look at his supporting links! Just kidding, he just came here to lie again. Shocker.

If anything it was the CBC that he "outwitted", but the CBC wanted Carney anyways. It's like the fish just jumped in the boat, and all the CBC had to do was whack it over the head with an oar. In the end, maybe we can all win. If the west separates (Sask and AB) then Canada will definitely have one-party rule.

The Atlantic provinces actually have way more voting clout than they should based on their population. Some of them get about 1.4 votes compared to Albertans IIRC. I did the math on that during the 2021 election.

https://www.westernstandard.news/opinion/morgan-carneys-liberals-are-eyeing-your-home-equity/63897 The Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) is the federal government arm managing home financing. The CMHC has been tasked multiple times and spent hundreds of thousands of tax dollars studying how to implement a home equity tax on primary residences. Each time this leaked into the public, the Liberals denied they were considering such a tax. Then they would dig into the issue again. The CMHC tapped the wisdom of an extreme activist named Paul Kershaw who manages a group called Generation Squeeze. His focus is on intergenerational wealth redistribution and he sees taxing home equity as a means to his ideological end. Kershaw referred to homeowners are “lottery winners” and said people who owned homes gained equity while sitting around watching TV. It is a gross insult to the people who scraped and saved to get into the home ownership market and dedicated thousands of hours of their lives to maintaining and upgrading their properties. Kershaw demonstrates the vilest of politics of envy, where he refuses to acknowledge the right of others to enjoy the fruits of their labour and feels it’s the role of the state to take that equity away from them. Kershaw counselled the Liberal cabinet directly in a retreat they held on Prince Edward Island less than two years ago. You don’t bring somebody as extreme as Kershaw to lecture your top government lieutenants without a plan to embrace his teachings. Most of the cabinet ministers who sat in on that retreat are still with Carney’s team today. The money that Carney needs to fund mass-immigration will come at the expense of Canadians who have lived and worked here for generations. Best part for him is, if he steals a chunk of your equity when you go to move to a different house, then you'll need to get a loan for that amount just to buy another house that costs the same amount.

Libbies aren't exactly soft. Libbies in the US did billions of dollars of damage to homes and businesses, assaulted and killed citizens, scalped a ret4rded kid, assaulted thousands of cops, and even assassinated cops. Some of their crimes were so serious that Kamala Harris couldn't get them out of jail, and the bail fund she promotes put killers on the street. After all that, our PM said that the BLM movement was a perfect example of the type of protest that he supports... So all this time you could have been assaulting and killing people but instead you were just smearing your feces on Teslas and then licking the windows 😉

@BeaverFever Did you read^^ that^^, left4rd? Do you finally understand that words came out of the Carney's gob that were the exact opposite of the truth? Do you know what that means? If I told people that I helped you write your stupid post, would you just say "That's close enough to the truth, I can live with that"? Do you understand that's the exact same thing that Carney did, when he said "It was my privilege to work with Paul Martin when he balanced the books and kept the books balanced"? If you still don't understand all this, don't worry. The English language is just too complex and nuanced for illiterate cultists to fully understand. Just nod your head and F-off. People are used to seeing you do that now.

By "Fighting Economic Growth"? You said the quiet part out loud, Libbie.

If anyone's going anywhere it's you, b1tch.

Martin was just the finance minister for Chretien when he balanced the budget: The latest nose stretcher from Carney is that he helped Paul Martin balance the budget. “It was my privilege to work with Paul Martin when he balanced the books and kept the books balanced,” Carney said during Tuesday’s debate. Here’s the problem with that statement: Mark Carney, according to his own resume on his LinkedIn profile, never worked with Paul Martin while he was balancing the books as Jean Chretien’s finance minister. Martin introduced his first budget to take Canada back to balance on Feb. 27, 1995, and over the next several years did the hard work so that it was balanced in 1998. The plan was to make changes to Canada’s economy and government spending to bring about the first balanced budget in nearly 30 years. He never said he was just a central figure. That would have been ok. He just said that he did it. He has allowed others to make the claim while he didn't deny it, and he has talked about it as if he did it himself. Wrong. He did nothing to stop our banks from adopting failed bank policies - that was legislated before he got that job. as early as the 19th century, Canadian and American banking systems took different paths. Canada set up a strong, single-regulator-concentrated banking system which they say, “absorbed the key sources of economic risk — mortgage and investment banking,” while the U.S. developed what they refer to as a “relatively weak, fragmented, and crisis-prone” banking system. In contrast to Canada, what emerged in the U.S. was a lightly to unregulated banking system and ultimately many more smaller and less stable banks. the relative stability of Canada’s banking system in comparison to the U.S. during the 2008 crisis was not a “one-off event,” as Canadian banks were able to avoid other financial crises experienced in the U.S. from 1863-1914 (a period of panics and recessions) and the Great Depression of the 1930’s for the same reasons. These circumstances pre-date Liberal leadership and prime ministerial-hopeful Mark Carney by over a century. That being said, the historical differences were not enough to stop two Alberta banks in the 1980’s — Northland Bank and Canadian Commercial Bank (CCB) from diverging from regulatory practices and engaging in behaviours similar to those that fuelled the U.S. 2008 financial crisis. But the individual who stepped in to investigate and address these practices was not Mark Carney, who was living in Alberta and 21 years-old at the time, but former Supreme Court judge Willard Estey. Estey was ahead of his time and instrumental in making recommended changes to Canada’s banking system that protected the country from the 2008 crisis. Carney can make no such claim. Carney entered his role as Bank of Canada Governor in 2008, after the practices that caused the financial crisis in the U.S. were already in full swing. So, he could not have set up any protections against it. Thank you National Post.

How much did the gov't of China like the fact that Poilievre lost in his own riding? If they didn't support fanjoy, I'm Julius Caesar.

Who cares? He's an id10t. The less he says here, the better. Anyways, F unity. Liberals are worse than cancer. I have no more interest in uniting with Liberals than the Taliban.

What? Notley was NDP. I thought that you were some kind of commie...