WestCanMan

MAGA becoming stupid is like ice getting warm... Once they descended to a certain level of stupidity they would automatically become Demonrat voters.

Yeah, this is a whole different kettle of fish. I don't know how his accuser keeps up ending up "in his hotel room" when she has a boyfriend, I have my doubts about her, but by the left's standards he did need to be dumped. So now what do they do to keep a Republican out of the capital now? Can Kamalovame Harris enter the fray or is it too late?

No, he was trying to say that my claim somehow lacked the level of evidence that Caroll's claim had, but he was just wrong. "Other people accused him but didn't go to court" isn't "evidence". 1) Nothing that she brought to court constituted evidence that Trump even met her, let alone did anything with her. 2) Her story didn't describe a r4pe or "sexual abuse". My Obama accusation provides the exact same level of evidence as Caroll's does. No year, a location, and a story. If Barqy was admitting that Trump wasn't actually found guilty of r4ping Caroll I'd fall off my chair.

They used the Kavanaugh formula, but added an address. 20+ yr old claim, so there's no worry about getting pressured into a criminal trial, where it would never make it to court no year named no evidence provided no witnesses no police report no medical clinic visit no address -> used a public location where it's possible the accused would have been at some point Leftists LOVE it. Unsubstantiated accusation VS "person they don't like" = GOLD!!!! TRUTH!!!! SCANDAL!!! GUILT!!!!

Yeah but it made such a great thread title, and all that really matters is the accusation, right?

You have some disturbing fantasies about Trump. The lefties will be quiet for a while now, as they all go to rub one out.

He was found liable for "sexual abuse" in a civil suit, so you'll never get leftists to stop saying that "he r4ped her". Also, the left4rd judge said that "the sexual abuse found by the jury met the common definition of "rape", so she must have changed her story from what she wrote in the book. And he's wrong. The common definition of r4pe is "a woman knows that she was r4ped", not "he pushed me against the wall and kissed me and I giggled, then he stuck his fingers in my cooter and I giggled again." It's not like a guy can just "put his fingers in" while he's standing in front of a woman. That required lifting a shirt, getting in or around underwear, and then up and in... If a woman is resisting even half-heartedly it's not possible. She never described that as being any kind of a struggle, which tells me that she was a participant at that point. Fact is that, if her story from her book was 100% accurate, she wasn't r4ped, she just felt used, cheap and slutty. I'd say "disrespected", but I don't think it's possible to disrespect her - she's the lowest of the low. It's literally just a story, exactly like mine, based on the level of evidence we both provided.

Well, the point is that: Caroll just has a story with zero accompanying facts or evidence Anyone can be found guilty of r4pe if we use her trial as a precedent for determining guilt

The same jury that found Trump guilty would have no choice but to find Obama guilty, because the amount of evidence is the exact same. In fact, I coulda said "I didn't really consider it rape until one of my friends said "That might have been a r4pe", because that's what it took for Carroll to start thinking of it as a r4pe. What you're describing isn't evidence of anything. If a woman agrees to model lingerie for someone, and brings them into a changeroom, she doesn't get to charge him with R4pe for grabbing her vaj. She has consented to that much at that point.

The value of Canada's exports matters a lot. We couldn't really import anything if we had nothing of value to export, and petroleum products $140B were almost 3x as much as our 2nd highest exports (cars and part combined = $55B). Yeah, it would be weird for Sask not to go with Alberta. Especially if Alberta is joining the US. I think that BC would be in a weird spot if the USA extended all the way up to the territories. A nostalgic part of me would no doubt still be sad to see Canada break apart, but this version of Canada is not worth saving, and I can honestly say that I feel no kinship at all with Canadians in general anymore. The sheer depravity of the CBC is probably my biggest beef with Canada, they share 50% of the blame for the whole sad covid saga imo, and the Carney shitshow is just the icing on the cake. I think our gov't is equal parts vile and pathetic.

Yeah, Google basically operates as a confirmation bias filter for CNN, CBC, BBC, WashPo, NYT, FB, YouTube and all their other TNI partners. They don't just give preference to disinformation, they also hide information that they don't like. Twitter was part of TNI until Elon Musk bought it, breaking up the monopoly. That's how it was proven that all the Demi bot-accounts and the shadowbans of conservative userswere real. Before that they were all just "conservative conspiracy theories", remember?

Posts from this forum. And FYI it's not easy to find anything on Google that leftists don't want you to find. For example, if you search for the excerpt from Bergdorf-Ho's book about the Trump story it's no longer available. It was everywhere when it was new, but those actual accounts have been replaced by misleading summaries now. Eg, instead of a site showing her actual quote, which reads like: "I went into the changeroom, and he came in behind me and closed the door. Then he pushed me against the wall and kissed me, and I giggled" it will say "He followed her into the changeroom and r4ped her." FYI that's about as accurate as "Trump said 'Can I kiss you, my darling?', to which she breathlessly replied "No, just stick something in my snatch." Try to find the actual excerpt from her book, JJ. Use quotation marks however you want. It doesn't matter. Her actual book excerpt isn't on Google searches anymore. You get disinformation, exclusively.

They could keep the CH, for Club de Habitants if they wanted. (CH is for "Canadiens Hockey" right now) I don't really care. Makes sense.

If they were just being deadbeats it would honestly be a massive improvement. They're mostly pro-Iran cucks (Dems included) who are speaking in favour of the ayatollah, denying the US access to airspace, etc.

I guess the problem for Canada isn't just either Alberta or Quebec leaves, it's: "If Alberta leaves, then the money for Quebec dries up, and Quebec is GUARANTEED to leave as well. Who stays with Ontario? Manitoba, maybe? And maybe the territories? What would happen to the maritimes without AB money?

"... we just want to drain every last drop of blood from it we can without it dying or running away."

It's actually an example of left4rd echo-chamber BS. Ironically, in the thread where they're calling conservatives "cultists", they're overtly circling their wagons around their cultist talking points.

Of course leftists don't want the search function here, because it turns this jumble of a forum into "The North American Repository of Debunked Left4rd Lies and Cultist BS" Right now, all of their lies are scattered across 600 pages of thread titles on this form that can never be accessed in a timely manner. We really need the search function back. There's no good reason why there isn't one. This is already in the steering forum, but nothing is being done.

Of course leftists don't want the search function here, because it turns this jumble of a forum into "The North American Repository of Debunked Left4rd Lies and Cultist BS" Right now, all of their lies are scattered across 600 pages of thread titles on this form that can never be accessed in a timely manner. We really need the search function back. There's no good reason why there isn't one.

Rampant inflation for ten+ years under the LPoC and record-level inflation under Biden, lefta4rd cutists: "I don't see nothin'." 3 weeks of genocidal dictator blasting in Iran, left4rd cultists: "OMG WE NEED TO STOP KILLING GENOCIDAL DICTATORS NOW BECAUSE GAS COSTS ALMOST AS MUCH AS IT DID WHEN BIDEN WAS PRESIDENT!!!!!" Also: You can try answering this as well: Can men get pregnant? Y/N ___ In a modern society with a healthy, functioning justice system: Should a woman have to be able to name what year they were allegedly r4ped, provide proof that they at least met the accused in one of the years that it probably occurred in, and provide at least one flimsy piece of evidence, in order to get a man convicted of r4pe? IOW, does she need to nail her time frame down to 1 calendar year and have more than just a story to get a man convicted of r4pe? Y/N __ Results: Get 0/2, you're a cultist. Get 1/2... you're still a cultist. We already know that you're a cultist, this is just a wake-up call for you personally.

I love that tis threat title stays on the page as long as this conversation goes on... Libs: "Alberta oil has to stay in the ground" Also Libs: "Alberta can't leave because we need all the money from oil, agriculture, etc, that funds Quebec."

Correct, but with Libs $90B means $300B, with $150B of wasteful cronyism. Eg: "How did Freeland/Zelensky Construction Inc, which was only in business for 2 months, with 3 employees, land a $400M contract? And what did they do in 3 months to earn all that money?" - the type of question that CBC will never ask

So your theory is that Trump brainwashed people into thinking that: men shouldn't go into girls' bathrooms men can't get pregnant teachers shouldn't be having secret conversations with other people's 8-yr-olds about gender transition therapy when you tell kids a story about "trees and rocks helping muslims to kill Jews who are just trying to hide", that's called a 'parable' etc? 🤣 Listen to the little brainwashed twit trying to call other people cultists 🤣 Quick Cultist Quiz for robobigot...: Can men get pregnant? Y/N ___ In a modern society with a healthy, functioning justice system: Should a woman have to be able to name what year they were allegedly r4ped, provide proof that they at least met the accused in one of the years that it probably occurred in, and provide at least one flimsy piece of evidence, in order to get a man convicted of r4pe? IOW, does she need to nail her time frame down to 1 calendar year and have more than just a story to get a man convicted of r4pe? Y/N __ Results: Get 0/2, you're a cultist. Get 1/2... you're still a cultist. Honestly, 100% of average 8 year olds can answer both of those question correctly. So if you're an adult with an IQ above 70, and you somehow have the wrong answers lodged in your brain somehow, they did not get there from any combination of facts and common sense. Those answers have to have been forced into your pathetic little brain by a process commonly referred to as "brainwashing". Which means that... you - are - a - cultist. Ohhhhhhhhh SANP!!!!!!!!!!! What are you gonna do now, robobigot? Admit that men can't get pregnant, or that you're a cultist?

Civil suits you ret4rded POS. Those were civil suits under a left4rd judge. FYI the burden of evidence required for a civil suit is "no evidence required". Here's the whole case, and all of the evidence presented to arrive at a guilty charge: the accuser almost named a year the accuser told a story from 30 years ago the defendant said the story was a lie zero witnesses zero evidence no police report no trip to a hospital or clinic Where's the evidence, Barqy? Aside from her story - which is unbelievable, portrays her as a cheap slut, and doesn't describe a r4pe at all - she has nothing at all. No evidence. Just "her story". FYI anyone can tell a story. Here's one for ya that's true: When I was about 12 or 14, I was walking out front of a store in Chicago and I met Barack Obama. He was about 19 or 21 then, and he asked me to try on a shirt that he was thinking about buying for his kid brother. So I agreed to try it on, and then he r4ped me in the changeroom. Oh look, Barack Obama is guilty of r4pe now, by your standards. So for the rest of your life, whenever someone says "Barack Obama", you have to say "He's actually a gay rapist". Barack Obama is a gay r4pist, Barqy.

See that? Your problem is that you're just plain old f'n stupid. In case your little pea brain can't retain two facts, here's a recap: I said that the Dems love their slave-class. You tried to make it seem the high minimum wage in the high-tax states was a big deal, and I pointed out that their slave-class was actually the illegals, not BA-baristas, and you somehow feels like the topic was turned away from the Dems' never-ending love of slaves? Slaves aside, the whole 'wealth tax', free bus, free groceries thing isn't just about communism, it's also about division. Fomenting division is a huge step on the road to communism. It's the part of the plan that creates the anger that's required to get people off their asses to kill the oppressors... Mamdani and Obama: "Crackers and Chin-s have too much stuff, the blacks and immigrants are too poor, so IT'S RACIAL INJUSTICE!!! WE HAVE TO TAKE STUFF AWAY FROM THE CRACKERS AND CH-NKS!!!" To be fair, Dems don't use the actual slurs, yet, but those aren't the worst parts of racism... It's the discrimination and hate mongering that's bad, and the Dems are hate-mongering 24/7.