WestCanMan

OMG, look at you go, girlfriend. Buddy, the Governors of Minnesota and California are doing everything they can to cover up billions of dollars worth of fraud. Not to investigate it, to cover it up. Somehow the whole governments of California and Minnesota didn't notice all that fraud, and none of the investigative journalists from CNN, MSNBC, NPR, ABC, CBS, NBC etc "noticed" it either... it took a social media influencer with a high school education and an iphone 12 to uncover it all. Then the gov't of California introduced a bill to protect the type of information that Nick Shirley accessed in order to track down all that fraud, and criminalized its use.

Now do Carney 🤣 No? Don't care? Then STFU, hypocrite.

That's a CTV article about a person who has been affected by a Trump policy. It's like listening a muslim tell you about something the Jews did. You have to take their story at about 12% of its face value, and then add the lion's share of guilt to their own side into the story to get a realistic picture. I don't care what happens to one person. Millions of Canadians were treated worse than that during covid. We had protesters go to jail for more time than murderers get. If you wanna judge every country on earth by one injustice then you might as well sign up to live on Mars.

There were still Jews there whose ancestors go back to 2000 BC. Most of the muslim world has gotten used to the idea of Israel existing in the ME. It's only a few countries now who can't see past their violent bigotry right now.

Every time you get on a plane, Iran costs you time and money. And it's not optional. You pay for airport security, and you go through the lineup, and the alternative is an explosion at 35,000 feet. The world would be an entirely different place without the terrorists funded by the Iranian regime to look out for.

Did you want Iran to continue on the path that they were on?

You still don't understand the bigger picture... A ten year agreement is nothing. Iran has been promising genocide for 47 years, and they weren't showing any signs of becoming any less bigoted... What's another 10 years? What was the plan for 20 years? 30 years? The next 47 years? Iran's plan was to bide their time under the JCPOA, and: grow their ballistic missile program, their hypersonic missile arsenal, drone arsenal, and their terrorist-controlled rocket arsenals in Lebanon and Gaza, into an overwhelming bomb-storm that Israel would never be able to cope with. They were even giving ballistic missiles to terrorists organizations like the Houthis... The Houthi tribe is only the size of a really small city and yet they have ballistic missiles develop ICBM's (basically 3-stage ballistic missiles) and they're already building IRBM's (2-stage BM's) grow their fleet of fast-attack ships and drones into a force capable of denying the US navy access to the strait develop an anti-air defence system capable of keeping out American planes FYI they didn't need 100% success in all those areas for their plan to work. Basically, if even one area worked, the plan would be a success. They'd be free to make nukes with impunity. And if you think their plan didn't almost work, consider the fact that Democrats are already saying Iran won this war. IE, half of the US gov't is declaring victory for Iran. That means that the weapons that Iran started creating during the JCPOA years almost got them across the finish line. If Epic Fury was as much of a clusterfork as the Benghazi embassy or the Afghan withdrawal, the world would be looking at a nuclear-armed Iran, with ICBM's, by 2027 or 2028.

TBH I'm just a minor contributor here. You, Reg, Ironstone, Legato, Nationalist, Fluffypants, etc have kept this thread going through some months where I didn't post in this thread at all. Funny thing is, I remember back when I started this thread, the Dems seemingly owned the political humour arena... The conservative side had no late-night presence at all, and even on social media our side just wasn't doing humour - it was almost all just serious business. In the past 5 years the pendulum has swung entirely the opposite way... Conservatives pump out dozens of hilarious memes every day, conservative comedians are common now, and Trump and PP even make jokes that are hilarious. From the left's side, late night isn't funny at all, and memes that are truly funny from the left's side are very few and far between. I honestly feel like we took over the humour aspect completely.

11 years ago Marco Rubio spoke about the long-term ramifications of the JCPOA. It was going to provide Iran with the cover to: build a nuclear program at scale, with a collection of facilities capable of making large quantities of weapons-grade Uranium very quickly build a MASSIVE ballistic missile program, large enough to even provide ballistic missiles to small tribes of people with large terrorist populations, like the Houthis - they are the only large-town-sized group of people on earth to have ballistic missiles. build a massive, sophisticated drone stockpile build anti-aircraft radar systems, missile batteries, etc, to keep American forces away create a large, purpose-built, fast-attack craft navy to keep America's navy out of the gulf accumulate a fleet frigates with anti-air, submarine, and surface to surface capabilities supply Hamas and Hezbollah with massive stockpiles of rockets to fire at Israel What Marco Rubio understood 11 years ago, and committed to the public record in that now-famous speech, which the Dems still don't understand to this day, was the fact that the JCPOA provided cover for Iran to accumulate a conventional military, and accompanying well-stocked terrorist armies, with enough power to prevent Iran from being bullied out of building their nuclear weapons program at some point in the near future. Sure, this year, the US and Israel managed to pull off both the greatest and the most historically significant military victory in the history of planet earth to this point, but it's hard to say just how close Iran came to victory this year... The point could be made that, if Hezbollah fired their 150,000 rockets at the same time that Hamas was firing their 50,000 rockets, they could have overwhelmed Israel's Iron Dome and maybe this would have been America alone vs Iran. Or maybe Iran was a month or so away from installing more advanced anti-air defence systems from Russia or China which would have secured victory for Iran. Or it's possible that if America just had a bad day with the availability of E3-Sentry (AWAC) planes or other electronic warfare planes, maybe they would have lost an aircraft carrier and support for the war would have zeroed. Hell, if you listen to CNN today, Iran is still winning this war right now. But this much is certain: if Trump didn't do this, and the Dems gained the WH in 2028, then Iran definitely would have gotten to the point of having ICBM's and nuclear weapons. Building bomb shelters in America would have become normal again in this decade. Bottom line: Marco Rubio's ability to forecast the future that would be created by America relying on the JCPOA, from all the way back in 2015, still surpasses the average Democrat's ability to understand the present, even with the benefit of both hindsight and current military intelligence.

When the LPoC's internet censorship bills finally get passed, re-posting this kind of content will be illegal.

Canada voted to put Iran on the UN council that deals with women's rights, human rights, and terrorism prevention. Our government couldn't possibly be any more corrupt and worthless.

Yes. The investigation where the FBI spied on Trump associates, lied about them, lied to the FISA court, leaked info to the press.... It's not every day that the FBI gets caught committing felonies. I'm not sure how you forgot about that one. Except when they're working for the Dems. Running Russian collusion witch hunts, Ukrainian collusion witch hunts, chargiing people with "paying off a loan", and for being the unlucky 10,000th politician to get an NDA signed. For example?

Ooooh. Is that as bad as when Obama used the DoJ to attack the dems political opponents? Recent Allegations and Investigations As of July 2025, new declassified documents released by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard have sparked fresh controversy: Manufactured Intelligence: Declassified reports and internal communications allegedly suggest that the Obama administration directed top officials (including John Brennan and James Comey) to create a false Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA). This assessment reportedly claimed Russia interfered to help Donald Trump, which critics now argue was a manufactured narrative designed to undermine his presidency. DOJ Referrals and Grand Jury: The Department of Justice recently confirmed receipt of a criminal referral regarding these claims. Additionally, a secret grand jury investigation was reportedly launched to evaluate potential criminal indictments related to these allegations.

The biggest problem in the US is the weaponization of the DoJ by the Dems. Trump is solving problems around the world that you can't even appreciate yet.

Ironically robo is looking at the manual for cultist tactics and didn't notice his own picture in Chapter 1. FYI the first sign that you're in a cult is the inability to consider something as basic as "The vaccines don't prevent you from getting sick", or "Hamas and Iran leaders keep on saying that they want to commit genocide against the Israelis/Jews in general. Here are the quotes, here's what "Quds Day and Quds Force mean, here is the original Hamas charter...." ^^That^^ means that you have an iron-clad confirmation bias, so that reality never gets its ugly tentacles into your brain. When pertinent facts can't be discussed, you're a cultist. When your responses are limited to a few different versions of "CNN DIDN'T SAY IT, SO IT'S NOT TRUE!!!! YOU LIE!!!", then you're a cultist. Eg: You guys post, but you don't contribute. Get it? You say words, but they are just in the form of unsubstantiated accusations, propaganda and platitudes. For example, Re: Iran: All the adults in the room know why Iran can't be allowed to get nukes. That's in the general knowledge category, and should never have to be explained to you. America crushed Iran's defences with very few casualties. And that's what the military is for. Iran's strategy of blowing up tankers to "win the war" was disgusting, and not something that leftists should have been celebrating. It should be easy to celebrate an American victory against a genocidal cult that killed 42,000 of their own people this year, but you just can't find it in you I would really for any one of you to repeat the most grown-up sentiment that you have ever expressed about the current Iran war. Just knock me out with it. I honestly think that you can't name a single thing that you said about this war that was both reasonable and true, can you...

OMG, dummy. You can't point to France on a map, can you...

To live in Canada and worry about the state of America's democracy is like being in Iran and speculating about the Swiss gov't's aggression towards Israel.

(AI search) Whether the Russia-Ukraine war is a proxy war is a subject of intense debate. Many experts and officials define it as a proxy war between Russia and the West/NATO, with Ukraine serving as the battleground, as Western powers provide significant arms, intelligence, and financial support to weaken Russia. Look, dummy: A proxy war is a conflict where major powers support opposite sides (states or non-state actors) to advance their own strategic interests without fighting each other directly. These external powers provide funding, weapons, and training to their proxies, allowing them to undermine rivals while avoiding direct, large-scale confrontation. And this: (AI search) Claims that Britain, specifically former Prime Minister Boris Johnson, prevented Ukraine from accepting a peace deal with Russia in 2022 have been primarily made by Russian officials, certain Ukrainian negotiators, and some Western commentators. These claims argue that during a visit to Kyiv in April 2022, Johnson urged Ukraine to abandon negotiations and continue fighting. If Ukrainian negotiators are saying that "Britain wouldn't allow Ukraine to sign a peace deal", what does that tell you?

It is EXACTLY like I said: The US didn't have much for trade relations with Russia, and Europe was only interested in Russia's energy products and resources. Everyone buys their vodka. It was AMERICAN-LED, 100%. Their high-level politicians were speaking directly to the crowds. Just because they didn't write cheques while they were standing on the stage doesn't mean that they weren't organizing and funding them. Of course the US was doing that. Even with zero evidence at all you would still know that they were there pulling strings. But they had sitting SENATORS there, motivating the protesters to keep fighting, making big promises about security and trade, and threatening the Ukrainian gov't. I'm not sure what you think the definition of leadership is, but that was clearly "leadership". And "support". Grow up, ffs. NATO is not "defensive". FYI using a proxy to fight a bloody war is not "defensive". You lie like a leftist now. You're just gaslighting. Missiles and drones are being sent there to kill Russians you m0r0n. It's a proxy-war. Did you miss the memo? That's what we did, back when we were ostensibly a defensive alliance. But that is no longer the case. CBC and CNN totally run the "Russia's fault" narrative. There are even people saying that "Russia's goal is to take over Ukraine Ukraine and then continue on a war of expansion." They can barely gain ground against Ukraine alone, but somehow you all apparently think he's on his way to the west coast of Europe lol. Your i10cy knows no bounds.

It gets weird if someone is even accused. My wife's ex-brother-in-law was accused of that, but the accuser withdrew the claim before it went to court or anything. Still, you never know... We don't run into him anymore, but it would be impossible to consider him in the same light now. And super-awkward if we ever do see him. If he was convicted, yeesh. I could never talk to him again.

They're both pre-eminent in their field, and they are both Jews from NY. The social circles they ran in would overlap, and be tight AF. Their wives and children would know each other. They would be expected to hire each other's children if possible. That's just how religion and power work together. As a confidence man, for Epstein to establish a rapport with and have a publicly recognized friendship with a high-profile Democrat and nationally recognized lawyer like Dershowitz would go a long way to lending him instant credibility with investors and clients. In Epstein's line of work, flashing your rolodex and dropping names is worth tens of millions of dollars. As is the case with Trump, and even Clinton, it's possible that AD never laid eyes on an underage girl in a bikini when he was with Epstein. It's not like he could just tell every single person he knew: "I can get some underage hookers here for you to bang." That would just be stupid. He had to have some squeaky clean guys around to pump up his image. At this point, I'm gonna find it really hard to believe any accusations coming out of the Epstein files. They've had so much time to sif through, redact, omit, negotiate, etc, that the list of accused will be the exact same as the list of deceased, powerless, and unpopular. Gavin Newsom and JD Vance could be in videos having sex with underage girls and no one will ever know. It's just the Swallwells, Gonzalezes and Franklins who are gonna be named. I thought that Dershowitz might get singled out, as he doesn't have a lot of conservative friends yet and the Dems hate him, but maybe they have nothing on him.

Be honest, the US and Russia never had real trade relations. Europe was interested in oil and natural gas, that's it. There were Republican and Democrat American senators there at Euromaidan giving speeches to the protesters. Victoria Nuland was also there handing out food. That's not support? You don't think they threw some money into it? (You don't think the Dems get their supporters to organize and fund Antifa riots, BLM riots, and anti-ICE riots?) The Americans were threatening Kyiv with sanctions repeatedly. Joe Biden was doing that. Wouldn't that be weird if US senators were here giving speeches during the Freedom Convoy protests? Would that seem like there was some kind of "involvement from the US gov't"? Look up, turd. Stop playing games. You know for a fact that the US was working those protests. You'd have to be a complete ret4rd to think that they were sending senators there, from both parties, to urge on the rioters, but they weren't sending money. It's like you've never heard of the USA before now. Russia had no choice but go to war. NATO was inexorably grinding their way to Russia's front door. All that was left to do was establish the final red line. If you only think ahead ten minutes at a time, sure, there was no need for war. Employ your goldfish defence of NATO's actions, and go vote for the Libs, because that's how far they see too. But if you think in terms of generations, and centuries, then what NATO did was way too much. FYI I was a NATO soldier. When I was training, it was to fight Russians. That's it. Al Qaeda and the Taliban weren't even on our radar as warfighters. Maybe for CIA spooks, or CSIS, but not for us. We did recognition briefings on Russian fighter planes, ships, and subs, and no one else's. Not Iran's, not India's, not even China's. Just Russia. And that's in case they were in our waters, not so that we'd know which ship was which when we were going in and out of their f'ing harbours. I'm not looking at this as a trivia question from a faraway land like you are. I grew up thinking that Russia was an enemy to us, and now I see that it is us that is an enemy of theirs. I imagined that one day we might be repelling an invasion of some kind, not going over there to kill people. If I was still in the military, I'd be out now, and there would be war if MP's came to get me back in. I just have no desire to go to Europe and kill Russians for Tory Nuland and Barack Obama. That don't just watch CBC or CNN and repeat their propaganda verbatim. When CBC and CNN are talking, they're lying. There's basically nothing on either channel that's true or accurate. That is never their goal. Their only goal is to control how you think, and sometimes they win.

Sketchy, as in, incriminating?

Imagine if a SWAT team showed up at the homes of the VIOLENT criminals that knocked that TPUSA reporter down the other day, and pointed 17 AR's in their faces... "OMG TRUMP IS NAZI!!!!" But it was the Biden DoJ so 👍😎🥰