WestCanMan

Of course that's a "no", dingus. They can't just drop nukes on every country in the region. Now answer this question: "With Hamas and the IRGC both openly dedicated to an eventual genocide against Israel, and hundreds of thousands of rockets aimed at Israeli cities by Hamas and Hezbollah, thousands of ballistic missiles aimed at Israel by the IRGC/Houthis/plus whatever other 2-bit terrorist orgs the IRGC decided to give ballistic missiles to, and a massive terrorist attack on Oct 7th, plus dozens of hostages being tortured/r4ped/killed for 2 years straight, and over 50,000 rockets fired at civilian targets in Israel by Hezbollah and Hamas, HAS ISRAEL SHOWN REASONABLE RESTRAINT? They warn civilians before they blow up rocket caches ffs... That effectively gives Hamas time to save their soldiers, and some rockets. What would you do if you were Israel? And when you give your answer, just remember that you condone the slitting of throats of women after they are gang-r4ped, the burning deaths of babies, shooting tens of thousands of rockets at civilian targets, and openly promising genocide against all Jews, not even just the ones in Israel. None of your comments ever take the reality in Israel into account. On the very first day that their defences are overwhelmed, they will all be massacred. This isn't like Canada's fight in WWII, where losing just meant fascism (like we currently have in Canada) and the slaughter of 2% of the population of another continent... losing for Israel means "every single person that you know gets murdered". Gazans have never faced the threat of a full-on genocide, like the Pakistanis unleashed on Sikhs and Hindus in 1947. The Israelis have been attacked by 6 or more countries twice now, and to call those attacks mere "wars" is to disinform... because those were attempts at genocide. If the Jews lost, the death toll would have been in the millions.

He posted a GIF of a dog barking... By leftist standards, that's an automatic victory.

And then he tells us how he can identify with them because of the Massacre at Glencoe. 300 years ago 🤣 25 people, none of whom he can name. Yeah, ok eyeball, you sit there between Saul and Osama and share your tales of grief.

I saw a poll (3,000 ppl) that said 66% of conservative voters are separatists now. Poll Findings: A May 2026 "Act for Alberta" poll showed that 51% of federal Conservative supporters in Alberta "strongly support" independence, with another 15% saying they "somewhat support" it. Note that's "federal" conservatives, not just Alberta conservatives. I'm not sure what to make of "somewhat support", but the number of separatists is always growing.

We all know what a loss leader is, but a package of wieners at that price is not attractive at all.

@Gaétan, you're the official "everything that happens to Gazans is a genocide" guy. Can you tell me why Egyptians did that? Are the Egyptians secretly Jewish?

Right. But that much of the other types of "sausage" still costs 4x as much. How much did they have to lower their standards to sell those for such a low price? And how much room was there to lower their standards in the first place?

Murdering children by burning them to death is your idea of justice? Killing 14M Jews is your idea of justice? Can you tell us why it was ok for 6 muslim countries to try to commit genocide in Israel in 1948? And again in 1967? Can you tell us why it was ok for all the Arab League Nations to adopt the "Three Noes" policy in Khartoum, whereby an eventual genocide in Israel was the only acceptable solution? Intelligent, civilized people don't think like you. We have nothing common with a filthy, bigoted, genocidal piece of garbage like you. Hamas and the IRGC are both entirely devoted to genocide in Israel, and have been for decades, and all that you do here is regurgitate their propaganda. You might wanna try to remember the last time anything came out of your mouth about this topic that didn't qualify as "the genocidal ranting of the IRGC/Hamas pedophiles who beat their own women and slaughter non-muslim women and children."

Bottom line: Biden knew that there were crimes committed by Fauci, and he pardoned him to prevent him from facing justice. That was never the reasoning behind presidential pardons. Inspired by English legal tradition, this power exists to serve as an act of mercy, correct potential miscarriages of justice, or promote public welfare According to Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 74, the power is intended to allow the president to act with "judgment" and "humanity" to address injustices and, at times, restore national tranquility. This was only being done to prevent a person from facing proper justice for apparent crimes, for which there is incontrovertible evidence. Realistically, Trump could cite several instances of DoJ, FBI and IRS weaponization and even felonies, while they were working for corrupt Obama and Biden administrations, as reasons why he should pre-emptively pardon all Republicans for anything done in the last 20 years. At what point does this escalation end?

It's not the method that I find disturbing, it's the choice of "proteins". It's all lips, a-holes, blood, noses, fat, eyeballs, testicles, penis and brains, plus preservatives, food colouring and yummy artificial flavouring. I don't doubt that they're able to throw sick animals in there either. I doubt that the recipe for the Superstore wieners is all that different from the $9 smokies, but I just don't get how they can suddenly turn a profit at $2.44... That's like a 1984 price. Are they "Soylent Wiens"? Lol. 👀 👀

Dead people don't know that they're dead. The pain is only felt by others. Same goes for ^^stupid^^ people.

Nothing will top their "evidence" hypocrisy.... A 30-yr-old accusation that can't name a year, a location, a witness, has no police reports or medical records to back it up is "proof of a r4pe" evidence gathered and stored by the US intelligence agencies is suddenly worthless. And not because of the FBI lies and crimes, or the lies by "51 former intelligence agencies"... Even all of their lies and crimes were still 100% legitimate somehow. They're only illegitimate now because somehow Tulsi Gabbard instantly turned them all into criminals with the crime-ray gun that Gru made for her 😂

That's like saying that I'll believe in unicorns or flying pigs when I see one. I will tell you right now what the polls will say for the next 3 years... The LPoC will lead comfortably, PP will be deeply unpopular, and regardless of what happens 6 months or 3 months before the next election: the LPoC will be up by "5-7%", book it, all throughout the last month before the next election, and then on the very last weekend, for no apparent reason, the polls will switch to have the LPoC only up by 1-1.5%. That's what happened the first time Trudeau won, the first time Trump won, the 2nd time Trudeau won, when Trump lost to Biden, when Trudeau won the 3rd time, when Trump won in 2024, and when Carney won in 2025. Every single one of those election seasons had the exact same polling data for the last month... The liberal party was up by 5-7% for 29 days, then the lead magically dropped to 1.5% for the last two days. When CBC et al showed Poilievre up by 20% or whatever in late 2024, that was just so that they could could show a massive swing in popularity when the Libs unveiled their new leader. The "Look how fast Carney is gaining popularity!!!! Everybody LOVES this guy!" narrative was pre-ordained. It was all a con. Just remember that at the time Carney was "gaining popularity", all that he was doing was getting caught on serious lies about 5 times, and implementing previously unpopular Poilievre policies. You know, "PP, the guy with no good ideas or policies!!" according to the CBC. Remember how, right after the election was over, the CBC started their "Poilievre is unpopular with Canadians because he ius too negative!" narrative? He was at 70% in the polls in Dec 2024 but was suddenly seen as negative by "everyone" in March 2025, and for what reason...? I'm not buyin' it. And not just because I know that everything CBC says is a lie, but because no one gets 70% support and then drops to 30% in 3 months unless a video comes out of them punching kittens. From our debt rising at rates that even Trudeau is jealous of, inflation rising, food prices rising, gas prices rising, trade with the US plummeting, businesses leaving our country, job losses, growing lines at food banks, Carney's promises all turning into lies, Canada suddenly being a pro-ayatollah nation, etc. If you told me that Canadian news channels would be spewing pro-ayatollah propaganda, even as late as Dec of 2025, I never would have believed you, and I had less respect for the CBC back then than I did for anal warts. I honestly thought that there was no way for CBC to reach a new low, and then they plummeted through rock-bottom like an overachieving GBU-57. What's left to get worse, Link? We even made India dislike us, and India doesn't dislike anyone aside from shitty motha-fargone Pakistan. It's just us and Pakistan on their shit-list. Go figger - they hate us from clear across the planet now, and are neutral to all the countries in between... Hmmm... The only thing that has gotten significantly better here is the fact that Fentanyl deaths are lower, and do you care to guess why that is? I know you don't. You would rather die than admit to it.

Wow. What a load of epic BS. The most "Albertan" people I know are the most diehard separatists. The people supporting the LPoC are mainly Hamas supporters, they support the ayatollah and the IRGC, they denigrate white people, they propagate false BLM narratives and say "mostly peaceful protests/defund police", they slander 'cisgender' people, promote racial/religious hatred, they are anti-Semitic, they slander Christians, they promote trade with China over trade with the US, they favour oil from Saudi Arabia and Christian-slaughtering Nigeria over Alberta oil, they even support foreign interests over Canadian interests when it comes to global warming BS, etc. It's honestly hard to think of a way that LPoC supporters put born-and-raised Canadians ahead of any other group on earth, aside from maybe nth-gen Americans.

1) Polls are completely meaningless at this point. I wouldn't line a birdcage with them 2) Timing is everything. If things in Canada start to get noticeably better, then the chances of separation will get lower. But if the general trend here continues, and things continue to get worse, we could easily be looking at a number well north of 51%. And I can't even see how Carney could turn things around now. He's just so anti-Canadian that he'd probably rather die.

I wish I could say that I was above that, but if my wife throws out food that I wanted to eat, and I feel like it hasn't touched anything too dirty in the garbage can, I still eat it without even heating it up. It's like a 5-minute(ish) rule, depending on how good the food is. I'm still young enough to survive a bit of food poisoning, but I should probably take into account the size of my life insurance policy and my wife's ability to find an upgrade at this point...

Friendly advice: people with IQ's under 80 should use a spell-checker for words with more than 5 letters The source is "evidence intercepted by US intelligence", genius. And it would be recorded, of course. So there's "actual evidence" You're a guy who calls a single person's accusation with no police reports, witnesses, medical visits, or any other form of evidence whatsoever, "from either 1995 or 1996" lol, "proof that someone is a r4pist". By your standards, this story surpasses the burden of evidence required to constitute "proof beyond a reasonable doubt". No, not mere "allegations". Allegations are no more than the words of an accuser, or accusers. This is an instance where intelligence officials have proof that Ukrainians were "talking about an ostensibly criminal plan amongst themselves." It doesn't say that the Biden administration was requesting the funds, or that they demanded the funds before they agreed to send the money, and it doesn't even say that they had contacted any Biden officials to offer them the money, or that there had ever been such an arrangement in the past. So if Biden was implicated in any way whatsoever, there's no mention of any evidence of that. In addition to the fact that your first sentence there was factually incorrect, your second sentence doesn't say what you want it to say. I think you probably meant to say "there were no assertions that the plan was implemented", but TBH, that's not necessarily important. Even if they had proof that Biden's team, or a person with high standing in the Democrat Party, was working with them to implement the plan, that would be enough to incriminate them, 100%. Just the act of planning that constitutes a crime. If "the plan" seemed to be moving along as laid out in the intercepted communications, that would look highly suspect, but again, it still wouldn't be proof of anything on Biden's end, because the Ukraine offering money to an American doesn't constitute a crime on the part of the American unless they were willing to accept it, in the spirit that it was intended. There was no mention of what the project was, or whether the project in question had been started at all, or started and then put on hold, as per the initial plot-line. As it stands, this is a lot of evidence, but it's just evidence that possibly dirty Ukrainians were conspiring to funnel US aid money back to Biden. Nothing more. It doesn't say whether it was their own plan to bribe Biden, or if it was something that they were working on with Dems of any sort. TBH, it's not even incriminating to the Ukrainians right now, because if they felt like bribing Biden with $200M would get their country an extra $5B in aid, then it was an outstanding plan for the people of Ukraine. The only solid accusation that can be made against anyone right now [imo], based on the content of that article, is: "Why didn't US officials look into it further to see if there was any criminality on the part of the Biden administration?" Biden and his people are clearly not implicated by that story at that point. There's a smoking gun, like - red hot - but no proof that anyone was even shot at. This is a "file it on the back-burner" story right now, from my POV, but if you replaced the word "Biden" with "Trump" in that story, CNN and the Dems would be framing it as "100% proof of a crime by Trump", the Comey/Mueller FBI would be committing crimes to fake evidence, Schiff would be promising "new bombshell evidence" every week for 2 years, and you would be adamant that it was 100% proof of Trump's guilt, and that he should be arrested tomorrow 😉 Yeah, own it, robo. You too @BeaverFever. Fking cultist P'sOS.

What difference does it make if you consider the source but always disregard it? That's just as dumb as your previous sentence. Use AI or something to craft your snotty insults for you. There you go, trying to use words with more than 4 letters again 😂

Robo, there's no way that your IQ is over 71. You've never said anything intelligent here, you don't come up with relevant facts of your own, 99% of your posts are either cites or baseless insults. If your IQ was over 71 then you would have come up with something insightful and on-topic to say at least one time by now, but that has ever happened. Can you point to a thread where you used your own words to add something of value to your side of the debate? I'm betting that you can't. Take as much time as you want.

That's all that the government of China sees when they look at old people, and Canada and the US are maybe 1% better, TBH. My mom is 83 right now, and I don't want her to die, but if Carney had his way, he'd send a MAID team over this afternoon.

I think you're gonna find out the hard way about Alberta, Linkie. The worse-off this country gets, the more separatists there are gonna be, and by no means is anything getting better in Canada.

Oh look, the "scream at clouds" kid with the mangina is calling me a complainer 😂

Keeping the CBC (LPoC propagandists) out of their business made sense. When have the Libs let Rebel or any non-sycophant media point a camera at Trudeau or Carney? And I'd keep those fking commie b4stards from CBC out too. They shouldn't be allowed to call themselves "news". Harper didn't do it to hide a laundry-list of scandals, either. Nor did he prevent the police from investigating their $90k Duffygate "scandal". The Libs have been light years worse than the Harper gov't on every level. It's atrocious to pretend that the conservatives were somehow worse. Can you make a post that's more than just an insult to Cdn? Can you try to comment on the topic sometimes? Once? Are you his ex-wife?

3M voters Votes cats in 2023: 60% turnout (1.8M votes) 300,000 names on the list... Just a rough estimate, 950,000 votes needed. Is it easier to get voters out to: sign on for permanent LPoC misrule in Canada ditch the LPoC/CBC dog-and-pony show, and have D Smith as their federal leader? I think that "Stay in Canada" is becoming a harder and harder sale every single day. Internally, the Cdn gov't is becoming the "no-cameras allowed" gov't, the police aren't allowed to investigate any of their scandals, internet censorship is getting stronger, personal freedoms are dwindling, ridiculous immigration levels will never end... What's getting better to counter-balance all of that? Externally the US is ramping up pressure... Trump is gonna keep the heat on to keep separation more and more likely. He already approved pipelines that are just waiting to be built as soon as Ottawa is cut outta the loop. The trade situation is still strained, and Carney's deal with China is still rankling down south, so American resolve against Canadian trade is growing. Q: Was Trump smart enough to install Carney, just because he saw Alberta separation as a far stronger likelihood under another LPoC gov't? Did he con CBC into helping him break up Canada?

Carney: "Follow the law 😂🤣😭😂. TURN THOSE FU--IN' CAMERAS OFF, PEON!!! TELL THOSE COPS TO POUND SAND! 😎" After 11 years of supporting the Liberals, you feel like you're in a position to comment 😂. Fking priceless. I would jump into a flaming bus that was speeding off a cliff to get away from you fking maggots.