WestCanMan

Nothing will top their "evidence" hypocrisy.... A 30-yr-old accusation that can't name a year, a location, a witness, has no police reports or medical records to back it up is "proof of a r4pe" evidence gathered and stored by the US intelligence agencies is suddenly worthless. And not because of the FBI lies and crimes, or the lies by "51 former intelligence agencies"... Even all of their lies and crimes were still 100% legitimate somehow. They're only illegitimate now because somehow Tulsi Gabbard instantly turned them all into criminals with the crime-ray gun that Gru made for her 😂

That's like saying that I'll believe in unicorns or flying pigs when I see one. I will tell you right now what the polls will say for the next 3 years... The LPoC will lead comfortably, PP will be deeply unpopular, and regardless of what happens 6 months or 3 months before the next election: the LPoC will be up by "5-7%", book it, all throughout the last month before the next election, and then on the very last weekend, for no apparent reason, the polls will switch to have the LPoC only up by 1-1.5%. That's what happened the first time Trudeau won, the first time Trump won, the 2nd time Trudeau won, when Trump lost to Biden, when Trudeau won the 3rd time, when Trump won in 2024, and when Carney won in 2025. Every single one of those election seasons had the exact same polling data for the last month... The liberal party was up by 5-7% for 29 days, then the lead magically dropped to 1.5% for the last two days. When CBC et al showed Poilievre up by 20% or whatever in late 2024, that was just so that they could could show a massive swing in popularity when the Libs unveiled their new leader. The "Look how fast Carney is gaining popularity!!!! Everybody LOVES this guy!" narrative was pre-ordained. It was all a con. Just remember that at the time Carney was "gaining popularity", all that he was doing was getting caught on serious lies about 5 times, and implementing previously unpopular Poilievre policies. You know, "PP, the guy with no good ideas or policies!!" according to the CBC. Remember how, right after the election was over, the CBC started their "Poilievre is unpopular with Canadians because he ius too negative!" narrative? He was at 70% in the polls in Dec 2024 but was suddenly seen as negative by "everyone" in March 2025, and for what reason...? I'm not buyin' it. And not just because I know that everything CBC says is a lie, but because no one gets 70% support and then drops to 30% in 3 months unless a video comes out of them punching kittens. From our debt rising at rates that even Trudeau is jealous of, inflation rising, food prices rising, gas prices rising, trade with the US plummeting, businesses leaving our country, job losses, growing lines at food banks, Carney's promises all turning into lies, Canada suddenly being a pro-ayatollah nation, etc. If you told me that Canadian news channels would be spewing pro-ayatollah propaganda, even as late as Dec of 2025, I never would have believed you, and I had less respect for the CBC back then than I did for anal warts. I honestly thought that there was no way for CBC to reach a new low, and then they plummeted through rock-bottom like an overachieving GBU-57. What's left to get worse, Link? We even made India dislike us, and India doesn't dislike anyone aside from shitty motha-fargone Pakistan. It's just us and Pakistan on their shit-list. Go figger - they hate us from clear across the planet now, and are neutral to all the countries in between... Hmmm... The only thing that has gotten significantly better here is the fact that Fentanyl deaths are lower, and do you care to guess why that is? I know you don't. You would rather die than admit to it.

Wow. What a load of epic BS. The most "Albertan" people I know are the most diehard separatists. The people supporting the LPoC are mainly Hamas supporters, they support the ayatollah and the IRGC, they denigrate white people, they propagate false BLM narratives and say "mostly peaceful protests/defund police", they slander 'cisgender' people, promote racial/religious hatred, they are anti-Semitic, they slander Christians, they promote trade with China over trade with the US, they favour oil from Saudi Arabia and Christian-slaughtering Nigeria over Alberta oil, they even support foreign interests over Canadian interests when it comes to global warming BS, etc. It's honestly hard to think of a way that LPoC supporters put born-and-raised Canadians ahead of any other group on earth, aside from maybe nth-gen Americans.

1) Polls are completely meaningless at this point. I wouldn't line a birdcage with them 2) Timing is everything. If things in Canada start to get noticeably better, then the chances of separation will get lower. But if the general trend here continues, and things continue to get worse, we could easily be looking at a number well north of 51%. And I can't even see how Carney could turn things around now. He's just so anti-Canadian that he'd probably rather die.

I wish I could say that I was above that, but if my wife throws out food that I wanted to eat, and I feel like it hasn't touched anything too dirty in the garbage can, I still eat it without even heating it up. It's like a 5-minute(ish) rule, depending on how good the food is. I'm still young enough to survive a bit of food poisoning, but I should probably take into account the size of my life insurance policy and my wife's ability to find an upgrade at this point...

Friendly advice: people with IQ's under 80 should use a spell-checker for words with more than 5 letters The source is "evidence intercepted by US intelligence", genius. And it would be recorded, of course. So there's "actual evidence" You're a guy who calls a single person's accusation with no police reports, witnesses, medical visits, or any other form of evidence whatsoever, "from either 1995 or 1996" lol, "proof that someone is a r4pist". By your standards, this story surpasses the burden of evidence required to constitute "proof beyond a reasonable doubt". No, not mere "allegations". Allegations are no more than the words of an accuser, or accusers. This is an instance where intelligence officials have proof that Ukrainians were "talking about an ostensibly criminal plan amongst themselves." It doesn't say that the Biden administration was requesting the funds, or that they demanded the funds before they agreed to send the money, and it doesn't even say that they had contacted any Biden officials to offer them the money, or that there had ever been such an arrangement in the past. So if Biden was implicated in any way whatsoever, there's no mention of any evidence of that. In addition to the fact that your first sentence there was factually incorrect, your second sentence doesn't say what you want it to say. I think you probably meant to say "there were no assertions that the plan was implemented", but TBH, that's not necessarily important. Even if they had proof that Biden's team, or a person with high standing in the Democrat Party, was working with them to implement the plan, that would be enough to incriminate them, 100%. Just the act of planning that constitutes a crime. If "the plan" seemed to be moving along as laid out in the intercepted communications, that would look highly suspect, but again, it still wouldn't be proof of anything on Biden's end, because the Ukraine offering money to an American doesn't constitute a crime on the part of the American unless they were willing to accept it, in the spirit that it was intended. There was no mention of what the project was, or whether the project in question had been started at all, or started and then put on hold, as per the initial plot-line. As it stands, this is a lot of evidence, but it's just evidence that possibly dirty Ukrainians were conspiring to funnel US aid money back to Biden. Nothing more. It doesn't say whether it was their own plan to bribe Biden, or if it was something that they were working on with Dems of any sort. TBH, it's not even incriminating to the Ukrainians right now, because if they felt like bribing Biden with $200M would get their country an extra $5B in aid, then it was an outstanding plan for the people of Ukraine. The only solid accusation that can be made against anyone right now [imo], based on the content of that article, is: "Why didn't US officials look into it further to see if there was any criminality on the part of the Biden administration?" Biden and his people are clearly not implicated by that story at that point. There's a smoking gun, like - red hot - but no proof that anyone was even shot at. This is a "file it on the back-burner" story right now, from my POV, but if you replaced the word "Biden" with "Trump" in that story, CNN and the Dems would be framing it as "100% proof of a crime by Trump", the Comey/Mueller FBI would be committing crimes to fake evidence, Schiff would be promising "new bombshell evidence" every week for 2 years, and you would be adamant that it was 100% proof of Trump's guilt, and that he should be arrested tomorrow 😉 Yeah, own it, robo. You too @BeaverFever. Fking cultist P'sOS.

What difference does it make if you consider the source but always disregard it? That's just as dumb as your previous sentence. Use AI or something to craft your snotty insults for you. There you go, trying to use words with more than 4 letters again 😂

Robo, there's no way that your IQ is over 71. You've never said anything intelligent here, you don't come up with relevant facts of your own, 99% of your posts are either cites or baseless insults. If your IQ was over 71 then you would have come up with something insightful and on-topic to say at least one time by now, but that has ever happened. Can you point to a thread where you used your own words to add something of value to your side of the debate? I'm betting that you can't. Take as much time as you want.

That's all that the government of China sees when they look at old people, and Canada and the US are maybe 1% better, TBH. My mom is 83 right now, and I don't want her to die, but if Carney had his way, he'd send a MAID team over this afternoon.

I think you're gonna find out the hard way about Alberta, Linkie. The worse-off this country gets, the more separatists there are gonna be, and by no means is anything getting better in Canada.

Oh look, the "scream at clouds" kid with the mangina is calling me a complainer 😂

Keeping the CBC (LPoC propagandists) out of their business made sense. When have the Libs let Rebel or any non-sycophant media point a camera at Trudeau or Carney? And I'd keep those fking commie b4stards from CBC out too. They shouldn't be allowed to call themselves "news". Harper didn't do it to hide a laundry-list of scandals, either. Nor did he prevent the police from investigating their $90k Duffygate "scandal". The Libs have been light years worse than the Harper gov't on every level. It's atrocious to pretend that the conservatives were somehow worse. Can you make a post that's more than just an insult to Cdn? Can you try to comment on the topic sometimes? Once? Are you his ex-wife?

3M voters Votes cats in 2023: 60% turnout (1.8M votes) 300,000 names on the list... Just a rough estimate, 950,000 votes needed. Is it easier to get voters out to: sign on for permanent LPoC misrule in Canada ditch the LPoC/CBC dog-and-pony show, and have D Smith as their federal leader? I think that "Stay in Canada" is becoming a harder and harder sale every single day. Internally, the Cdn gov't is becoming the "no-cameras allowed" gov't, the police aren't allowed to investigate any of their scandals, internet censorship is getting stronger, personal freedoms are dwindling, ridiculous immigration levels will never end... What's getting better to counter-balance all of that? Externally the US is ramping up pressure... Trump is gonna keep the heat on to keep separation more and more likely. He already approved pipelines that are just waiting to be built as soon as Ottawa is cut outta the loop. The trade situation is still strained, and Carney's deal with China is still rankling down south, so American resolve against Canadian trade is growing. Q: Was Trump smart enough to install Carney, just because he saw Alberta separation as a far stronger likelihood under another LPoC gov't? Did he con CBC into helping him break up Canada?

Carney: "Follow the law 😂🤣😭😂. TURN THOSE FU--IN' CAMERAS OFF, PEON!!! TELL THOSE COPS TO POUND SAND! 😎" After 11 years of supporting the Liberals, you feel like you're in a position to comment 😂. Fking priceless. I would jump into a flaming bus that was speeding off a cliff to get away from you fking maggots.

People become more and more of a "burden" to society the further they get past 65 years old. Just a fact. They contribute less and less, and demand more and more medical care all the time. From the POV of a gov't, they all take up housing space for 1, use just as much electricity and heating fuel as a working man, and use a bit less water, food, etc, but also account for 10x the medical expenses. In China, that is tens of millions of people. If Big Pharma wasn't milking old people for trillions of dollars a year, there would probably be a hunting season in 'Murica lol.

I said from the very beginning of the pandemic: I wouldn't put it past China to let out a virus that kills off old people (remember what they were doing to babies 15 years ago....). America? Wellllllll??? Yeah.

Right now, at Superstore in Langley, you can get 12 oversized hot dog wieners for $2.44. I told someone that while they were drinking coffee and it almost came out of her nose 😂. Not kidding. I don't wanna imagine what's in there, but at that price it's a fkin amazing dog treat. And it makes me feel like my $9 smokies are sooooo healthy lol. Should we thank our PM for these lower food prices? 🤔

Fauci: "Two words, donkeys... PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY 😎" All he has to do is get a couple of "experts" to testify that it could be natural, and then Fauci, along with the governments of China and the US are off the hook for creating the virus. Luckily for Fauci, it's not just his fat that's in the fire. My bet is on "coming up with the required amount of expert testimony" to save Fauci and the two global superpowers from responsibility lol. Fauci, Xi, Biden, Trump and Obama could all be seen with smoking guns and broken vials in their hand, surrounded by the corpses of 100,000 80-yr-olds, and they won't be found guilty. Book it.

There are two possible options: There was evidence against them, or Biden was just a drooling m0r0n and did it for no reason. OK, we'll call it 50/50. Buddy, the Dems were caught - caught - weaponizing the IRS, the DoJ and the FBI. They were 100% guilty, and there's no denying that. Now here you are pretending that the GOP are doing the same thing, and acting like they invented it. Grow up. FYI the Demonrats' Russian collusion witch hunt (that was not an FBI investigation, it was entirely run by the Democrat Party) lasted years and wasted tens of thousands of FBI man-hours at a time when there were plenty of real crimes for them to be looking into. Epstein Island, for one. Somehow, with the majority of the FBI focused on an imaginary collusion investigation, Trump still managed to get them to go after Epstein, after Obama let him skate for 8 years.

If the comment would normally be construed as something extremely violent in nature, and it's being said by a man with a criminal past, about someone he already committed crimes against, it's a dog-whistle. 95% of people seeing that phrase take it to mean one thing, and that's the exact same thing that dozens of other high-profile Democrat supporters talk about on social media, and in public. Back-peddled, lied. It was in 2025. Trump was already shot once before that, ret4rd.

Honestly, 86 is the very high end of the spectrum for leftists. I would put Beave there, that's about it. 95% of them are between 65-75. Probably only crakhobarbie and Gaetan would be at 60.

Of course, stupid. What would be the point of pardoning them if there was no evidence of their crimes? His mandate is not to lie or to promote false narratives, and put researchers and virologists all over the world on the wrong track. He was managing America's pandemic response, fool. That was the most serious job in the US for a while, if not the world. And while acting in that capacity, he was busy lying, hiding the truth, and conspiring with others to hide/destroy evidence of his own nefarious/criminal actions. Buddy: the vast majority of what Fauci did was spread disinformation. Almost nothing he ever said was true. Random, anonymous posters from Canada with no medical degrees shouldn't be able to tell that he's BS'ing in real time.

If you ever find the bank card of a blue-haired 300-lb'er, or a university-educated femme-boy with a functional IQ of 12, that's their pin number.

86 can mean a lot of things. When it's used to describe something that happened in the past, like Hegseth did, that drops from "a lot of things" down to one exact thing - the one that already happened. In this case, it just means that they were turfed. Using the term vaguely, for a future event, is not narrowed down to one thing. It could mean anything from "throw something/someone out", fire someone, or kill someone. When you're couching your words, for a future event, while talking about a president who has had 4 assassination attempts against him, and who Dem supporters frequently target with death threats, the normal assumption is that it's meant as a death threat. You can't dog-whistle about killing the president. Comey should have known that.

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1BsrxmKbfB/?mibextid=wwXIfr This is what female cops did as soon as the shooting started.... In my opinion, ONE cop who confronts danger is worth more than 100 that flee...