WestCanMan

Enlighten us, herbie berbie.

I'd suggest that the Israelis were aware of hundreds of km of tunnels being dug beneath them, and that they fear that the tunnels would be used to place nukes under Israel. At some point they had to go into Gaza and locate all those tunnel entrances, and that couldn't have waited ten more years. So, do I think that the Israelis let it happen? I've thought that since the beginning. They couldn't possibly be naive enough to have forgotten the anniversary of Yom Kippur. Then again, how did they convince hundreds of Palestinians to come north on a baby-burning expedition? I'm not a huge fan of religion, and I'm even less of a fan of the baconally challenged religions, but the muslims are historically at the bottom of the barrel for all of humanity. They have no room to look down their noses at the Nazis, and you can't say that about too many people.

The percentage of Palestinians who are in favour of a genocide in Israel is the reason that they are considered violent bigots. Find me another place on earth where you can parade around the bodies of half-naked girls who were r4ped and murdered, and people will allow their children to go spit on them... If you were r4ped and murdered, do you think that anyone in NA wants to spit on your corpse? How many people would let their kid spit on your corpse? You know nothing of these people of whom you speak. You were told a victim story and you just fell for it. Tell me why NO muslim countries will take them in. There are good answers to that question, you just don't know any of them, yet here you are running your mouth again.

Yikes. She would win the gold medal in the Olympics for both Dunning Kruger effect and bigotry.

That was a well-written, thoughtful and intelligent reply. I apologize for my tone in the previous post. For me, personally, I am 100% convinced that islamic religious bigotry is the one and only reason that anyone in North America even knows about the Israel/Palestine situation. If 1948 had ended with the slaughter of 99% of the Jews in that region, and what few survivors were left were all living under islamic bigotry that was codified into law, just like it was for 1,000 years before the 1900s, the ME would be peaceful and calm, and no one would be talking about it anymore. Iran wouldn't be funding the surviving Jews so that they could commit terrorist attacks against Palestinians. Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Qatar, etc would have normalized relations with the new state of Palestine on Day 1, just like they did with Pakistan while they were still slaughtering Hindus and Sikhs in 1947. The situation in Gaza is this: They committed that attack on Oct so that there would be reprisals from Israel, and they fully intended for there to be a body count like this. More importantly, Iran funded all of this just for the dead Gazan child photo ops. If they didn't think that they could create hatred in the ME with that attack on Oct 7th, it never would have happened. They would have adopted a different strategy. It's sad for me to admit this, but this eventually ends in a genocide against the Jews. There are just too many mislims who want it too passionately for it not to happen, and the decades and centuries aren't making a dint in their bigotry and hatred.

Sooooooo, you think that this is some kind of new gov't, and that they aren't at all to blame for the dollar's performance pre-2025? Is that your point? Change the socks, change the entire party? I'm gonna write a book about the Carney-for-Trudeau swap called "The Politburo's New Socks". Do I have your permission to quote you in the foreword? "Thuh CBeeC tol me thet it iz a brannoo guvvermint, so it IZ a brannoo guvvermint, dammit! End thuh fact thet Karnee wuz an advyzur for thuh last 3 yeers fer Truedohh donet mean thet he wuz partly to blame for that sheeit, neether." - The Boge

Buddy, you're off the reservation now with your confirmation bias and utter disregard for the truth. Do you honestly think that muslims are tolerant of the LGBT community? Where is your evidence for that? In Iran, Afhanistan, Qatar gay sex acts can get you the death penalty right onw. In Pakistan, gay sex acts can get you the death penalty right now. In Iraq they can get 15 years in jail. Iraqi jail. It's like regular jail, but with more beatings, less food, and heaping sides of religious bigotry. In Saudi, gay sex is illegal but the penalty is uncodified (an authoritarian just arbitrarily decides the fate every time). Egypt and Lebanon are probably the second most tolerant of gays, anywhere in the islamic world, but police still attack gays with impunity. Turkey has some gay rights, believe it or not. In a sea of islamic bigotry and hatred towards gays, Turkey is moderately progressive in that regard. If you were gay, or a woman who refused to wear a hijab, what percent of the cities and towns do you think you could walk around in, in the muslim world, without feeling that your life was in imminent danger? And F-off, I don't need to hear your stupid, dishonest answer.

Keep telling the truth here while you can. If we adopt Britain's laws you're gonna need to wipe every shred of truth from that post.

He has down-arrow syndrome, so he usually just sticks to what he knows. The memes never really work out in his favour.

CBC's smear piece on Poilievre: https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-criminal-code-proposed-amendment-lawyers-1.7621888 Uhhh, thanks, Stupid Kimmie. Do you really think that the current laws will protect a homeowner who kills someone just for accidentally walking into the wrong house? 😆 "I thought that the bag of groceries was a bag of explosives, and the old lady was a terrorists, so when she yelled "AAAAAAAHHHHHH!" I thought it was the beginning of her saying "AAAAAHHHLAKABOOM!" and I chopped her in half. Can I go get some breakfast now? Are we done here?" You're not even gonna believe this, but this was that stupid tw4t's very next sentence: Schofield says just because someone comes to your door, you "don't have the right to commit a violent act inherently, and we have to act reasonably, and that's, I think, what the Criminal Code allows." The stupid little left4rd just used the word "reasonably" in her own description, after just deriding PP for using the word reasonable in his 😂😂😂 And wtf does she mean by "I think" that's what the current criminal code allows? Doesn't she "know"? She's a f'ing lawyer, and she just tried to make the case that Poilievre's proposal "doesn't clarify or make things simpler"... If she doesn't know then obviously PP was right, and they do need to simplify the wording. And if the laws are so easy to understand, then why did CBC feel like they had to bring a lawyer out to explain it in the first place? They don't have to bring out a lawyer to explain that murder and theft are illegal. Hmmmmmmmm. Last thing: the part of the law that people are worried about is the prosecution trying to make the case "Where did you get that weapon from? How were you able to have it ready so quickly?", as if having a weapon ready in one's home somehow criminalizes the owner.

Stop citing CTV as a source ffs, mor0n. Of course they're gonna smear PP however they can, or find "experts" who will do it for them. You sound a lot like crackhobarbie. Did you just change your username?

You're asking the people who think that Omar Khadr is a better person than Stephen Harper how they feel about protecting the things that are near and dear to them. If you want actual information from them, ask them what it's like to pick your own bumhole. Aside from that, they're not experts on anything.

We're talking about a guy who just broke into another man's house with a loaded crossbow a few days ago, genius, not something that has never happened in Canada before. If there's a thing that happens in Canada, we need to have a discussion about what to do when that thing happens, so that people know what they can do when that thing happens. You just spent two years cheering for young Canadians to get jabbed with the Pfizer juice for a virus that had no chance of harming them, so who the hell are you to chide others about "being prepared for things that probably won't happen to them? You do a good job of sounding snobbish and level-headed, MH, but the things that you say are no more intelligent than the things that eyeball and ex-flyer say. Just thank your lucky stars that herbie's here.

Stop believing what you see on CBC and CNN. Literally no one saying that they'd shoot someone in their back to save their TV. When someone here says that they'd shoot someone in the back to get their TV back, then you get to use that line. Got it?

Definitely don't shoot someone who isn't posing an active threat. If you have the opportunity to wait for the police to arrive, do that lol. A bit of patience is better than a lot of jailtime. That being said, when in doubt, do what it takes to keep you and your family alive. Even a dog has that right.

LMAO. All Trudeau did from 2012 to 2015 was cry about $90k and the CBC acted like it was the story of the century. Poilievre is talking about something that some Canadians care about, and no one cares what a low-IQ cultist like you has to say about it.

F'ing BRILLIANT! I love it.

It means that it should be a dead issue now, just like the issue of whether or not Sikhs and Hindus should get their homes back in Pakistan. Right? The only reason there's an issue is that in this instance it's "Jews holding land in the ME at the expense of muslims", instead of "muslims holding land in Pakistan at the expense of Jews or Sikhs and Hindus". In other words, Israel/Palestine is purely an issue because of the hyper-bigoted muslims in that region. If the situation was reversed, and this was a case where muslims had benefitted at the Jews' expense from 1948-present, do you think that Iran would give a shit about what happened to the Jews there in 1948, or even since Oct 7th? Somehow I don't think that you're gonna come up with the right answer on that one Spanky, because the answer isn't in your liberal soapbox notes. You clearly have no functional grasp of this issue. Let me explain: If there's a guy who's in a random class/workshop that you're attending, and unbeknownst to you he's a murderer, rapist, pedophile, and he takes people as slaves, are you guilty of those things by the nature of your association with him? Somewhat guilty? Not guilty at all? Not guilty is the correct answer, in case you were wondering. But is your unwitting opinion of him a measure of your own character? Maybe he's the nicest guy in class, because he has so much to hide. Maybe he even bought everyone lunch a few times. So if you think that he's a swell guy, based on what you know, does that make you a bad person? No. It does not. Now, what if you know all those horrible things about him, and you regard him as a prophet of your God? At that point, what kinds of things can we conclude about your character? Would it be wise to assume that, given the opportunity, you would join a group like Islamic State, and do all of those despicable things yourself, if you knew that you could get away with it? What part of your Canadian upbringing makes you feel like the most worthy human being of all time was a rapist, a pedophile, a murderer and a slaver? Can you name a person who did those things for whom you feel nothing but admiration? Can you tell me how many rapes and beheadings Jesus and Buddha conducted? Do you have any reason to believe that they were pedophiles, or forced women and children into slavery? Cite, plz.... It's just my simple estimation that you're wildly ignorant of the nature of the islamic religion, and how it compares to other religions. That's all. Last thing... this is the one generalization that you can take to the bank with you, regardless of Twain's famous maxim: You can't judge people, to great extent, by what they do in the face of adversity, or any mundane scenario. The best way to judge a person is by what they do when they are in a position of power. Do they use that power to viciously inflict themselves on other people, do they just horde possessions and remain neutral to the plights of others, do they help people a little bit? A lot? When people aren't in a position of power, like your muslim friends, what can they actually do to you? Can they force your wife to wear a hijab? Can they beat her up if she refuses? Can they take your daughters as slaves and have sex with them, even as they're still children? Can they take your young sons as slaves? Nope. They can't do anyt of those things, because they are a vast minority here, so they have no power over you. So what happens if you go to a muslim-majority country? Any muslim-majority country that isn't a brochure destination... Can your wife walk around without a hijab? Nope. Will she be beaten if she refuses? Yep. What will the cops do? Nothing - they'll ask why that wh-ore wasn't wearing a hijab. For real. That's what muslims are like when they are in a position of power. Book it. IOW, your opinion of the islamic faith, based on your interactions with muslims over here who are powerless, is nothing more than a distraction from the truth about their people in general. And if the ones who are over here are bothered by the behaviour of the ones overseas, both now and historically, then why the F would they still be muslims? I will tell you right now that any woman who wears a hijab and rages against misogyny is a faker, because the hijab is the universal symbol of misogyny and religious bigotry, and nothing else even comes close. Even a burning cross on a lawn just bears a moon-cast shadow of the hate and malice that has been inflicted upon women by the hijab. FYI you can take a muslim woman with a hijab into the remote areas of Canada and she won't get beaten or threatened or spat upon for wearing it. I f'ing dare you to take your wife to any small town in Iraq, Iran, Qatar, UAE, Saudi, Pakistan, Afghanistan, etc and see how far she can go without putting on a hijab. There's actually a really good chance that you will both end up dead, and the cops/gov't won't give a shit, just as long as they can keep it from gaining international notoriety.

Is the US the country that might lose 20% of their small businesses, stupid? FYI if Carney's tariffs were actually doing anything then Trump would just tell him to take them off you f'ing ******. Have you not being paying attention at all this whole time? Whenever Carney does something that Trump doesn't like, Trump either: puts out a mean tweet, and Carney reverses course tells Carney what to do on TV and Carney does it, or summons Carney to the WH for a public spanking, and then Carney does his bidding. Don't feel sorry for Carney, Beavey boy, because you do Trump's bidding too. When Trump said "Vote for Carney", you did as you were told like a good little cultist. Trump orders Carney around like the servile little doggie that he is, and then he gives him a public attaboy, and you fawn all over Carney, just like Trump wants you to. "Awwww, shucks. Isn't Carney the best little doggie? Trump LOVES him. That means that he's the best!" - Beavey Boy You know that Carney removed his "elbows up!" punitive tariffs before the debate, right? He pretended that they were still there, and Trump never tipped us off, but our Pillow Muncher and his cabinet had already voted to remove them, as per Trump's orders. Trump let Carney keep that a secret because Trump was controlling the way people like you vote, Beave. How does it feel to know that you're Trump's pawn?

Stop saying "explained to you" when you just talked out of your ass, idjut.

Herbosexual: afraid of facts, conservatives, cisgender devils, white people, math, and girls.

New drinking game: whenever CBC cites "polling data" and you believe them, you put a stick of dynamite in your mouth and do the world a favour. PM stands for 'Pillow Muncher' now.

They felt normal. They always run their mouths and then end up being wrong. In fact, I'm gonna stop calling them left wing and start calling them "wrong wing" now. Ask them how they feel the first time they're right about something, if you're still young enough to type when the time comes. You stated that 'perfectly' 😘

You should also know that those same people can kill as many or more people with trucks, knives or explosives, so effectively, all that denying people guns does is deny them an interest and leave them easy prey for criminals. The fact that you might have a gun in your house isn't lost on potential home invaders, and that makes a lot of people non-home invaders...

Im not a big proponent of the church, I'm an atheist with a full appreciation of the relative freedoms guaranteed by the gov'ts in Catholic, Hindu, Buddhist, etc states, but in Canada it seems like most people who have no religion, and therefor see the Cdn gov't as their moral compass and their only leaders, are completely blind to reality. For the past ten years I recognized Dems in the US as a cult, but since about 2019 it has been growing ever clearer that LPOCers are cultist as well. From the outside looking in, the level of credulity and stupidity of the left is mind-blowing.