WestCanMan

From taking a quick glance at the first few pages it's glaringly obvious that there are actual terrorist posting in here now. Plz tell me that people have been banned....?

The tough part about having a decent democracy with free speech is that everyone on earth who thinks that they have a bone to pick with our majority society/race/religion gets to yell their accusatory platitudes and our liberal media outlets make money from giving them a platform to discuss their "issues" as if they have merit. In the end we get stuck with politicians who denigrate our society for easy votes and that's how we got stuck with a total loser like Trudeau.

So true. It's pathetic to see liberal media and their sycophants trying their best to cuddle Trudeau's political career through this storm of his own making. Harper's $90K non-crime got more traction in the media than all 5 of Trudeau's actual ethics breeches combined. Check out how the focus is being shifted away from Trudeau and towards his detractors on CBC: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/cartoonist-to-stop-portraying-women-in-violent-situations-1.5023081 This Charlie Hebdo moment was brought to you by radical liberals doing whatever they can to discourage political commentary that's deemed unflattering to their Supreme Leader.

They're not really "embracing socialism" imo. They're just little kids playing "opposite day" right now. Their platform du jour is just "exactly the opposite of what Trump says". AOC is the furthest left and that's sexy to the generation of voters who blindly follow the loudest, angriest accusations and have no interest in history or relevant facts.

The courts in the US can't "write" laws but "ruling from the bench" is a big problem in the US.

People in the US who don't like the electoral college should look at Canada for an example of how NOT to run a democracy. We basically have a "QuOntocracy" here. If you take a bit of latitude with the pronunciation it's actually quite descriptive.

I can't tell a veteran by looking lol but I agree with everything else.

I could post the whole list of "corrections" for you but it's rather pointless. You either know or you don't know at this point. "Nikki Haley paid $50K for new curtains". "It's too soon to say that it's an act of islamic terrorism" "Is Trump's anti-Semitism to blame?" "Trump is about to be indicted for collusion with Russia." "Did Trump commit treason when he asked the Russians to try to find Hillary's emails?" "Did Jeff Sessions commit perjury when he said that he didn't talk to Russians about collusion in this video clip?" (The correct answer is no and anyone with half a brain that just watched it just saw proof of it) "Trump called all Mexicans rapists." Jimwd just said that the other day lol. "Trump called all immigrants animals." "Trump embraced _______ King over the weekend." Nope, he just let M McConnel handle him. He's not micro-managing. They also let people say stupid things like "walls are racist" without questioning it. Honestly you have to be dumber than a bag of hammers to watch that shit and not throw up. Or you have to appreciate things of a bogus nature.

In the meantime, if you’re bored, just look for a pic of Anderson Cooper kneeling in a ditch to report on flooding lol. “I couldn’t stand on the road because emergency vehicles were constantly going by!” Lol but his cameras were set up there, and it’s so much easier to move the cameras than it is for him to move his lying ass ten feet. CNN is a joke. You can’t see it. That’s not good Bubber. Just out of curiosity, how accurate do you think they are, on a scale of 1-10? I’m just asking you for your honest opinion on that. 1-10. Super easy question to answer.

Like I said before, everything they say is either a lie or it’s so skewed that it doesn’t resemble the truth. You pick a show in advance. I’ll pvr it and give you the rundown.

I did, in less than five minutes, just like I said I would. Just because you choose to say that they didn’t lie doesn’t mean anything, it just proves your bias. Trump was accused of “embracing” King and that’s not the least bit accurate. Does CNN ever say that Obama and the black caucus embrace Louis Farrakhan’s religious bigotry and racism? They say on Fox that those people should denounce him and that they are skeptical of their back-channel dealings with him but they never say they “openly embrace” his more disgusting bigotry. Do they talk about how Hillary actually did openly embrace what Margaret Sanger stood for? Nope. That’s an actual thing. So, in short, CNN does lie and you just back them. You’re as bad as they are

That was Mitch McConnel’s job. It was done instantly.

I watched some of Hannity on Monday or Tuesday, they listed a bunch of the major “corrections” made by major msm outlets over the past year or so. It was surprisingly lengthy and a lot of the “corrections/retractions” were pertty serious in nature. That doesnt even take into account all the instances where they make baseless accusations and just pile on as if what they’re saying has some basis in fact. It also ignores stupid BS like the NBC interview with that kid yesterday, where the interviewer described his decision to stand his ground as a type of aggression. Through all of this the extreme bigots of the Lost Children of Israel get a free pass from the MSM. It was interesting to see Fox talk about them a bit the last couple of days. I encountered those guys when I was in NY at the end of ‘08 and I never even knew that level of hatred and bigotry existed in the US. They stand in large gangs and just yell out how much them and their god hate everyone and want to kill them. I didnt know if it was for real or part of a movie or a social experiment these last ten plus years because I never heard anyone else talk about them until this week. Theyre just a bunch of rabid, racist, religiously-bigoted losers.

Lol. If I had your level of understanding I’d be gullible enough to believe everything I saw on CNN too.

Billshit Bubber. I didn’t say anything inaccurate. They did. And now so did you.

People who believe in hard work and a helping hand are conservatives. It has nothing to do with race. People who believe in excessive government handouts and extreme taxation are liberals. Liberals try to claim moral superiority for some extra votes, it's just a crock.

No shit there were vulnerabilities. We were warned of vulnerabilities when he first started talking about replacing our immigration system with a turnstile.

I guess a lot of people must miss the burning cities and muslim terrorist attacks from the Obama years.

Ok, just watched it again. Right at the beginning of the PVR session it's the end of Cuomo's show. There's a HUGE WHITE BANNER with black letters at the bottom of the screen says in all caps "TRUMP EMBRACES WRONG KING ON MLK WEEKEND" and Cuomo is talking about back in the day when there was way too much racism. Cuomo is basically man-splaining how CNN is in lock step with MLK's sentiments and then says "even if the President chooses to let us all know that he will not stand up against his fellow Republican's ugly message of bigotry he still represents a minority".... Don Lemon starts off with "Chris let's be honest, we're always honest" lol. So there you have it. The 1st second of CNN and they're blaring out in ALL CAPS that Trump embraced the wrong King on MLK weekend. I didn't see any signs of him espousing that guy's words, or standing up for his character, or hanging out with him, or excoriating McCallum for removing him from every group that he was in. CNN just went on a rant about Trump and they do it whether he does or doesn't do something. "Trump will be the first President not to spend time with the troops on new year's day" or whatever. Then he shows up in Iraq and instead of apologizing they bitch because he signed some hats. That's CNN. Make whatever Trump does into a hatefest. Only idiots could watch that shit for more than a couple minutes at a time. So go to hell Bubber. I didn't lie and I didn't miss the point.

Yeah I wasn't "guilty" of anything. I'll watch it again. I'm sure he talked about Trump "embracing" King, meaning philosophically and not literally wrapping his arms around him.

My PVR starts recording before the show starts. It might be at the end of Cuomo's show, whatever that's called. To paraphrase, Don Lemon came on and he was basically saying that Trump should be "embracing" Martin Luther King instead of the King in Iowa who was making the racist comments.

Don Lemon, talking to Cuomo. They were saying that Trump was a racist for "embracing" the Iowa politician who just made racist comments the other day. There was no proof offered of their serious accusation. Don Lemon's show was a bad one to pick for evidence of lying, he just talks in generalities. I can try to watch some more of his show later to see if he tries to state any "facts" but honestly, he's just a hateful person and his show is hard to watch.

Hahahahaha. Cry me a river.

The evidence there is that the whole first 5 minutes of the show was idle speculation disguised as proof of something diabolical. We're moving right now and we had the kid home all weekend. I find the tone of CNN too hateful in general, I can't put it on when my kid is home. I'll tape a show that's supposed to be actual news, not just a talk show.

You still lied when you said that "Trump is racist for trying to portray people seeking asylum from oppressive violence as a grave threat to nation", and people crossing in instance #2 are still dangerous. Are you honestly trying to say that you know that there is no one trying to cross the border illegally for the wrong reasons? Because that's just stupid. Are you honestly trying to say that Trump is racist for trying to stop people from crossing the border illegally for the wrong reasons? Because that's just stupid. Are you honestly trying to say that rich people like Trump who own businesses don't benefit from cheap labour crossing the border? Because that's just stupid. Are you honestly trying to say that cheap labour crossing the border doesn't hurt the bottom line for lower class people who are working and paying their taxes, when they try to compete with people who are working under the table and sometimes even receiving government money? Because that's just stupid. Why don't you try and say something about the topic of border walls that is honest and reasonable?