Hal 9000

I think we can all agree that it's not about space at all - it's about pushing the thumb down on men...as always. Feminists are intimidated by how some men sit and naturally want them arrested for the act. Personally, I think if someone is that easily intimidated, maybe they should check on their own emotion stability.

Ok, so if a woman can present herself in a way that has nothing to do with men, wouldn't you agree that how a man presents himself may have nothing to do with women?

So, when a woman wears make-up, push-up bra, mini-skirt, heels etc., who is she doing it for...and why?

So, is it wrong because it's an inconvenience or because it's a form of male dominance?

I'm sure it does! But just pay closer attention. Subliminal messages, the media does it with religion and race as well. It's basic social engineering.

The point being; when men do something good or honourable, we negate the gender and use words like person or people, or even simply job titles like force, officer or crew, when he does something we find inappropriate or abhorrent, we emphasize the word "man" or "men". For example; "a man driving a pick-up caused a crash on the highway, and a passing by motorist pulled a baby from the wreckage". Watch the news a little closer and you'll see it all the time.

So, you've never noticed it before, but now that a feminist group pointed it out you do see it - and not only that, they tell you that it's a power thing, testosterone, intimidating, forcing their will etc...and you buy in hook, line and sinker. You've actually gone from not noticing it at all to clearly intimidating. WoW!

I understand that more men do it than women because, well, if women did it as much, there'd be no issue with doing it. There are many things men do more than women, but we aren't allowed to say fireman, we say firefighter or fire person. We even say fisher person now.

What's interesting here is the term; Manspreading. Why not just use "overspreading" or "overextending"? In this age of removing gender and replacing those words with "person" such as we do for "police persons" etc., we seem perfectly fine to assign gender. This is a pretty good indication that the word "man" or "men" is now looked at and used generally for negative connotations. "Mansplaining" is another good example.

One of my favourite Seinfelds

Oh, I see. Sorta like when I'm arguing that a person shouldn't take photos of naked children and someone starts arguing about rape and murder.

You're allowed to use the word man if it's connected negatively to a noun; madman, gunman, manhunt, manslaughter, hitman and yes...strawman among others.

I think the big concern is that for some reason, young girls today think they should be able to inflict physical abuse on men without any consequences or accountability. I do agree with C_F that hitting a girl is a punk move, but she pulled a douche bag move herself. People nudge others at the bar all the time, why she came unwound so easily is perplexing - i guess the alcohol has some part. Should a guy have to take physical and racial abuse from anybody, girls included? He'll have this incident attached to his career forever, she got a bloody nose - big deal!

And, how should women "act"?

...not to mention race relations.

I want to take the test, but i'm afraid I might be considered a SJW!

I just want newcomers to know that the comparisons we're making are with pure breast milk. Sorry, i don't want anybody getting the wrong impression.

It's your attitude that makes young mothers feel inadaquate and unable to bond. That's the only thing I really have against your point.

Just so we're clear, I'll point out that we're talking about breast milk that doesn't contain alcohol, nicotine, marijuana, or pain killers.

But, you did insinuate it! Remember when you said this; If we were to allow men to take early parental leave instead of the mother, then this would have a direct impact on the baby's health if breast milk had to be sacrificed for this to happen. That seems like a lot of pressure for a new mother.

No, I get your point just fine. Like I said way earlier, you'll forgive everything the girl did simply because...Well, she has a vagina. Your point, as always; The man should take whatever a female dishes out - end of! BTW - He tried to hold he off, she proceeded to kick (or knee) him and punch him in the face.

No it was a girl! So, what makes this girl so entitled that she thinks she should be able to act that way toward someone who is clearly much bigger and stronger?

Breastfeeding is more for mom than the baby.

So, little drunk white racist girl should call a dude "nigger" and proceed to take a swing at him - with no accountability? P.S - I'd say she got off light, had it been a small white man, he woulda likely been taken away by ambulance.

Let me guess - La leche league!