Jump to content

OftenWrong

Senior Member
  • Posts

    10,597
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    118

Everything posted by OftenWrong

  1. You can argue about the classification until the sun don't shine. Who cares. What is the point I am saying? Ever ask yourself this? Those are the suburban areas where urbanites moved to. They are the fringes of the tumourous growth. Those who live there are city-slickers only temporarily displaced.
  2. I see, it's about me now. Well in my defense it seems you read too quick.
  3. I'm well aware of that. I posted the data and can tell you anything you want to know about it. But I didn't... Obviously you do not like it, hence the desperate dashing to and fro to find some small fly speck that you can point to and say, "oh, you left a little spot there." And you are going to make the most you can out of that fly-speck.
  4. Not at all. Most people live near Toronto because that's where the work is. It is usually the first destination for newcomers to Canada, big urban centre, lots of opportunity to get a job and get started. Weather is a luxury consideration for migrants. Toronto being on the western side of the lake it does not benefit much from the prevailing west-east weather pattern that picks up air from lake Ontario and maintains a moderate temperature region. Those areas to the east benefit from it far more, yet they are relatively unpopulated. I'm sorry but your thesis does not hold up under peer review. The list is well categorized, just not by your standard. The category is there in front of your face, dead centre, yet you missed it. These places are population centres. I can only ask questions and drop hints for so long, and if you don't get the answer you will fail.
  5. Come on, the chart was a pretty nice way to show the data, really. It is organized by population, from 1 -12. These are the top 12 populated cities. Geography is mountains and rocks. We don't have that much here in Ontario, I think you complained about that earlier. That's probably why you don't understand Ontario and you don't get the chart. Anyway this is about sociology, not rocks. What is the will to high population density. Man's inhumanity to man. What Stalin said about statistics. The primal human reaction to when there are many, and when there are few. Crocodile Dundee in Manhattan.
  6. So math evidently not your forte.
  7. And since Ontario consists of a shithole coefficient of 0.657, we are back to my earlier post. You have come full circle, my little padawan. There is hope for you yet...
  8. If you like the smell of piss and shit everywhere, then yes. Yes it is.
  9. You assume many things. The chart shows everything I need it to show. Again I cannot hep the unobservent
  10. Sorry, but I cannot be of further assistance. This is not Spoon-feed Liberals 101.
  11. Perhaps it is the best, but only in very small clusters. Actually the majority of Ontarians live in a shithole. Population data: 1 Toronto Large urban 5,429,524 2 Ottawa–Gatineau Large urban 989,567 3 Hamilton Large urban 693,645 4 Kitchener Large urban 470,015 5 London Large urban 383,437 6 Oshawa Large urban 308,875 7 Windsor Large urban 287,069 8 St. Catharines–Niagara Large urban 229,246 9 Barrie Large urban 145,614 10 Guelph Large urban 132,397 11 Kanata Large urban 117,304 12 Milton Large urban 101,715 Total 9.2 M Total in Ontario: 14 M Shithole coefficient: 0.657
  12. They don't even have internet.
  13. BC would be great but for all the leftists who run it, and the Chinese.
  14. You can’t have everything in one place, but the Laurentians are not far. Not from eastern ON, the best part of the best province in Canada. Don't tell anybody.
  15. I read a few of those, they were rude and obnoxious. They were offensive. But generally it was about satirical humour, and I disagree that he needed jail. His publication is online at http://yourwardnews.com/ ETA- Why is this in this thread? What is this thread about?
  16. Donald Trump: I have come here to piss in your wine.

    1. scribblet

      scribblet

      You mean whine 

    2. OftenWrong

      OftenWrong

      Yes they are whiners! Trump meets Macron in France today. On the table is a French threat to impose a tax on US goods. Trump has said if they do that, he will put tariffs on French wine.

  17. Bird up

    1. Vid

      Vid

      I may be banned, but it will be worth it, to finally call out BubberMiley.

    2. BubberMiley

      BubberMiley

      I definitely agree. It was worth it. :lol:

  18. Britain ditched him for a reason- his case is complicated and he cannot be charged. If he was denied his human rights he may even have a case against the UK government. An easy $10M. If he didn't do anything then they would not give a crap, yet the do so he probably did. Hence the Brits made a brilliant move- if thy hand offend thee, cut it off. Same reason our Liberal Prima-donna Minister is so miffed. He is downright annoyed, he is! I'll bet he gives the British Ambassador to Canada such a stare.
  19. I mean, all these fancy political theories can only work when you have a well-educated, intelligent electorate. Most importantly they have a political education.

    We don't have that level of intelligence yet. Hence the reason our democracy is so... stupid.

  20. Can you imagine if he gets re-elected?
  21. Two Chinese guys overheard on a bus: "Canada arrest Meng over Huawei, make a bad trade deal, then let Canadian company go, after they make same same." "加拿大逮捕孟為政治" "Trudeau say Canada a nation of law, but himself bleak law. He try to change law to let company go, so they can make lots of money and get the jobs." "加拿大總理對加拿大人撒謊" "Canada act like hypocrite".
  22. The Google oracle returns to you the answers it wants you to see, not what you're looking for and not necessarily even the truth. Just remember that...

    1. scribblet

      scribblet

      Try duckduckgo 

      According to wikki:  The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) is the change in consumer preferences from manipulations of search results by search engine providers. SEME is one of the largest behavioral effects ever discovered. This includes voting preferences. A 2015 study indicated that such manipulations could shift the voting preferences of undecided voters by 20 percent or more and up to 80 percent in some demographics.[1][2]

      The study estimated that this could change the outcome of upwards of 25 percent of national elections worldwide.

      Google denies it.    

      study from 2015  https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2015/08/03/1419828112.abstract?sid=2096de02-a382-4aeb-89e0-df794a4ca03a

      I think they broke up AT & T for less 

×
×
  • Create New...