Leaderboard

Just reading the posts from the lefties on this board. Wow, 4 years of eating the MSM pablum has really affected the left. I actually feel sorry for you, I hope you're not actually this afflicted with bitterness and fear, but there's a simple cure either way. Shut off all forms of media that you consume for 3 weeks. I'm serious. I know it sounds impossible for some of you, but re-centering yourself is an important step. The problem is, you're probably addicted to your phones and wouldn't be able to turn them off if your lives depended on it. Drooling like Pavlov's dog every time we hear the phone chime or buzz and going through actual withdrawal should it be taken away, is a clear illustration that something's not right. Once you've been physically and emotionally separated from your phone, and the din of the media, you'll be surprised at how your attitude and inner peace improves.

Good enough for Bill Clinton....good enough for Donald Trump.

Why ? The point is that President Trump remains active and is tweeting just as before...COVID or not.

I know. Sounds a little kinky...

Most of you remember chants in the streets of Middle East countries over the years "Death To America! ". I used to wonder how anyone could sink down to that level and that mindset couldn't make it's way to North American society. Clearly I was wrong. Growing support among young people for Socialism/Communism in the United States of America? Using violence as a means to an end? Brownshirts openly and freely causing chaos in the streets in 2020 and with the mainstream media turning a blind eye. How did it come to this with the Democratic Party?

She's probably too old for him.

The two previous times when Biden ran for President, in 1988 and 2008, he was among the first ones in the primaries to pull out. He just didn't have what it takes to become a presidential candidate. Now he is supposedly the best they've got. Has the standard really fallen? I don't think Biden has become much better than he was before.

He rapes his wife...

Theres a lot of wondering, imagining, and wishing going on. Last vestige of scoundrels

That's literally the dumbest article I've ever seen... 1) 170 golf games in 117 weeks is not a lot. That's 1.5 golf games per week. 6 or 7 hours. Are you really going to take the position that a working man can't have 7 hours a week to themselves? 2) When people like Trump (and Obama) golf it takes about 4 hrs and they can get a lot of work/networking done in that period of time. It's not the same as when a carpenter or plumber golfs, they obviously can't install a kitchen from the 9th green. 3) Is golf the only thing Trump and Obama do when they're not at work? Did you ever consider that maybe Obama just doesn't like golf as much? Maybe he prefers to sit at home and plan riots with BLM and Antifa. Isn't that cool with you?

you just wish you could get women as hot as him, is all.

That is interesting. Woodrow Wilson, the first American president (if you ignore Teddy's end of term infection) to identify himself as what they call a "Progressive."

Good for her. I hope she wins the suit as this issue of boys who take advantage of claiming they are transgender in order to compete with girls is utter bullshit.

Right...you want to continue the free ride on American taxpayers, just like the EU. It is ironic that you are so reliant and dependent on Trump's "shit-hole" country while wishing it continues a "traditional" role. Fight Russia and China on your own dime first....

Argus is normally against freeloaders. But apparently American taxpayers subsidizing European taxpayers for their own defence is just fine with him. This is another example of how Trump Derangement Syndrome rots people’s brains, and leads them to take stances opposite to what they would normally take. The EU paying more, strengthens NATO. What Argus means by traditional role of leader, he really means traditional financier, at the expense of the American taxpayer. That shit should’ve changed long ago.

I'm guessing this thread was accidentally placed under "Moral & Ethical Issues"? Does "IME" mean, "in my experience"? I'm not a texter and can't presume meaning to one's words without your clarification. As to math with regards to science, it is just a formal means to relate patterns of logic to nature as it is. I happen to hold that you should begin a logical inspection of total reality by assuming 'nothing' while recognizing that this implies 'everything'. Science is about this particular Universe and we assume consistency postulates for anything we do in science. As such, there can be (and I am confident, is) any number of Universes that have pattern while an infinite more (continuously) without. Only the patterned ones are what math, as an extension of logic, are used to find a fitness to the realities we sense for this Universe. Many think that "science" is limited to this Universe and/or similar patterned ones. But it doesn't mean the others do not exist. The debate by many is to whether science should be limited to the observational logic and its induction or to allow philosophy and logic to play a role with regards to interpretaion and the theories proposed. So many will not like to think science should allow for such speculation. But there is, in my opinion (and something I believe can be proved) a totatlity that 'originates' without any logic from an absolute state of Nothingness. That is, IF, there is an original foundation, where Nothingness lacks even rules or laws, it has no power to obey nor disobey any laws or logic. But this also applies to breaking them. When you begin with this assumption, all universes exist, whether patterned, rational, or not. Then our particular Universe is of the class of logical universals that have pattern. There should be EXCLUSIVE barriers to universes in this way of thinking because if absolutely everything were 'true' somewhere in Totality, then this must include the "impossible". But the exclusivity of them in fact make them 'non-sensible' in the strict meaning of our ability to directly observe any. However, logically, you CAN argue why these can still exist. This will not likely be accepted in the domain of institutional science though because of practical reasons, the most significant is to the politics and religions of people that almost always attempt to utilize logic WITHOUT respect to our local universe and our limitations of our senses. (Note the term "science" comes from an origin based on sensory terms, like "sense", "scents", and "to see") Godel's "Incompleteness Theorem" actually helps express why we have certain limitations to certainty with respect to our physical limitations to 'finite' concepts. So I'm not sure what you meant by "Godel worlds". Can you explain?