Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/24/2020 in Posts

  1. My contempt for trudy and billy knows no bounds. Their supreme arrogance and sense of entitlement is absolutely sickening.
    1 point
  2. He frickin' ADMITTED it! Or in your haste to cast aspersions on conservatives did you happen to miss that?
    1 point
  3. That's some intense yet unsubstantiated rhetoric right there.
    1 point
  4. Wondering how the constant foul spotlight on 'The Turd' is affecting the Liberal cabinet? At what point does a caucus member realize that they've 'been played' . . . . they've been lumped in with an inept liar, an entitled shitpump, a thief . . . . A smart caucus member would be looking to cut their personal loss of credibility and self-esteem. To scrape the shit off of their shoe . . . .
    1 point
  5. The focus of the We charity scandal seems to be shifting to Bill Morneau now, for accepting money to help pay for his two charitable trips. Personally, I’m not offended by him being reimbursed for trips that were done in the name of charity. What I am greatly offended by is Trudeau asking We to host events, which are given federal money, and then in turn We gives some of those taxpayer dollars to Trudeau’s mother to speak. To me this all looks like Morneau is being asked to fall on his sword to protect Trudeau. What’s worse is, Morneau doesn’t even really look that guilty. What he did was not nearly as bad as what Trudeau did. It’s like if a Mafia boss murders someone in broad daylight but the MSM puts public focus on the need for police to go after his henchman for not paying to park at the hospital when he visited his mom. This scandal is all about Trudeau imo. Morneau is a side-scandal.
    1 point
  6. Dr. Leslyn Lewis is a strong, smart conservative who will do a lot of damage to the hateful and divisive entities in NA like BLM and the Dems.
    1 point
  7. Lol. You forgot SNC Lavalin? Trudeau hasn't learned anything about conflict of interest. This last case is even more serious - we're rewarding WE to give money to his family! Or, WE is using his family to get to Trudeau. take your pick.
    1 point
  8. The constitution that the Liberals brought in - and did not bring Quebec into? No, you're making that up. Here is what she actually said: But Day 1 of a 47-day campaign began shakily for Campbell. Her key promise was to reduce the deficit, but when reporters questioned her on the issue of unemployment — which then hovered around 11 per cent — she responded that the jobless rate wouldn't likely fall for two, three or four years. "I could say how many jobs I'd like to create, but, I'm sorry, that's old politics," she said. Liberal leader Jean Chrétien jumped on the remark, promising that a Liberal government would bring better times and deliver jobs. "It will be like the good old days," he said. "Canadians will be working." But Campbell would prove correct: the jobless rate didn't fall below 10 per cent until 1996, hovered at eight per cent until 1999, and finally broke seven per cent in 2000. So you're angry she wouldn't give you a false promise and think Chretien was great because he lied to you. https://www.cbc.ca/archives/kim-campbell-the-politician-who-wouldn-t-promise-jobs-1.4813213 Harper had no corruption that even came close to what Trudeau did with SNC Lavelin or this billion dollars to friends. And I bet you can't name any of his 'stupid religious policies, either.
    1 point
  9. If you want real news . . . . you don't listen to CBC.
    1 point
  10. This is the first case for Trudeau after 5 years but in Harper's case corruption cases were numerous.
    1 point
  11. No proof? It was his government that appointed that charity. He admitted himself that his part of the decision making process. That is absolutely all the proof that I need to make my point. Just because he’s busy running a country doesn’t mean that he’s not aware of certain, very basic things, like where his mom, wife and brother got $300,000.00 That’s not a sum of money that you can be unaware of. Even if they just earned $20,000 this would still be bad. He’s the Prime Minister of Canada, his family shouldn’t be getting paid money from a charity that he is giving taxpayer money to. He can’t just pretend to not know that either - ignorance is literally no excuse at all. I get that you love Trudeau no matter what he does, but what he did was inexcusable. It’s time to move on. This is a guy who called for someone to resign over buying a $16 glass of orange juice. This is like a $300,000 glass of orange juice.
    1 point
  12. His ties to this group are numerous and go back years. The leaders are his friends, and he has attended numerous of their cult-like gatherings, as has his wife and mother. Is he unaware of this? Yet he did not recuse himself when the vote came to award them a nearly one billion dollar contract. Neither did Morneau. Did Morneau not know his two daughters worked there? Do you really think it just coincidence that this group was chosen on a no-bid contract worth so much?
    1 point
  13. Really, he didn't know about his wife, mother and brothers receiving payments, he might not have known how much or how many but he had to know. Rachel Wernick (Sr. Asst. Deputy Minister) said: I received a proposal from Craig Kielburger on April 22," That is the same day the Prime Minister announced the program. Testimony at the finance committee WE scandal tells us that the Trudeau-linked WE Charity stood to collect $43 million to run student grant program, more than double previously disclosed $19.5 million! Also: We have no idea how many "volunteers" was the end goal. -the $910 million cost of this program cannot be reconciled. -the idea clearly did not originate from the public service. -no effort to involve any other org. but WE. And, how does a charity that collects funds for schools and clean water in the 3rd world end up with $43.7 M in Toronto real estate?
    1 point
  14. This is just another conspiracy by the desperate conservatives who were fast losing support among the public to take a shot at the popularity of Trudeau government so that they cab reestablish their corrupt scandalist regime. Mistakes may have been made by Trudeau and his family however, him being busy with running a country and economy and Pandemic and everything else he can't possibly have an eye for everything which is happening around him or actions of all members of his family. He has admitted ha has made a mistake and deeply apologize for it. The Cons are after blood.
    1 point
  15. Remember Mike duffy and how the media kept that front page news for 3 yrs. The media is sickening in this country.
    1 point
  16. Hoping that you're right. Backing O'Toole also.
    1 point
  17. It can. O'toole has a great simple plan. But the country has to back him to fight the international enviros and get some pipelines in the ground and sell our product. Very simple. And only a con can stop the west from leaving. The country was quiet when harper was in charge.
    1 point
  18. I think that Dr Lewis will beat Trudeau like a rented mule. She just has to win the leadership race first.
    1 point
  19. And by the same tokens, liberals got less votes, NDP got a lot less votes, bloc got a lot less, and Greens got almost none.
    1 point
  20. The Liberals got more upset over a $16 glass of orange juice.
    1 point
  21. That's B.S. they got a larger % of the popular vote than the Liberals, and with a new leader they will have a much better chance. That being said, liberals don't seem to mind a corrupt PM which speaks to their morals, or lack thereof.
    1 point
  22. So much idiocy condensed into one little post. ICYMI, the conservatives actually won the popular vote. That took a bit more than 0.1% lol.
    1 point
  23. Well the government he leads did go from majority to minority last election. But now he has higher approval ratings because people like getting tons of free money while not having to look for a job.
    1 point
  24. Do you realize that Justin Trudeau's first scandals where back in 2012 or earlier, before he became leader of the LPC, where he was charging 'charities' excessive amounts of money to speak at events? Like $20,000 per speech. Often these speeches would not have much content. That's more than a lot of people earn in this country in an entire year for doing far more work.
    1 point
  25. Anyone who takes a payment from a charity just to speak at an event is a true piece of turd.
    1 point
  26. http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/10/why-to-be-skeptical-of-michael-baden-on-epsteins-death.html He's got plenty of form on this, more interested in his own fame than getting at the truth. Unreliable to say the least.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...