Leaderboard

Many times more Muslims do not engage in the vile behaviour that you seem to only attribute to Muslims. So who represents Muslims? The small minority that you keep highlighting or the overwhelming majority that you don't like discussing?

I never posted that they did...you have jumped to such a conclusion to suit an agenda. Both can co-exist as protected speech/expression. Defend and protect both.

Most of the voting age population didn't. Clinton lost the election...America doesn't change the rules just to favour your foreign desires / outcomes.

Yes. I have never claimed any moral high ground....and this not about me. Personal attacks only weaken your position. Again, freedom of speech and expression are protected rights.

The same kind of "slime" who wrote the U.S. Constitution. Moral high ground is for losers who continue losing. Looks real good on anti-Trumpsters like Justin Trudeau right now. Fact check that.

China agrees with you....America didn't.

A lot of folks are missing the whole point in this latest Justin Trudeau blackface controversy. It isn't about racism. This is about character . The character of Justin Trudeau. Defined along this context (from Merriam): - the complex of mental and ethical traits marking and often individualizing a person, group, or nation (the character of the American people) - moral excellence and firmness (a man of sound character) The SNC-Lavalin scandal had shown us that he can indeed lie. He has no problem with that. This latest blackface scandal had clearly shown, he's good at it. This isn't a learned trait from being a politician. But, having been raised in politics - the art of lying, must've come with it. Having the skill at drama and acting (after all, he was a drama teacher), only makes that art of lying even more compelling and believable. It's been proven! He's a liar. He consciously lied. We have so many proofs! Fool me once, shame on you! Fool me twice, shame on me! Fool me THRICE............ what? We're the ones proven morons? We deserve what we get? Why should we believe and settle for a proven liar? How can one even believe anything that he promise? Lol. It's not even like we have an efficient leader at the helm! Look at all the fiascos he'd made one after another! From that India trip (surprising he didn't put on a brown make-up to go with that costume and dancing), to buying a used pipeline for billons of dollars.......... that we could've gotten for free! Not to mention, becoming an international HYPOCRITICALLY sanctimonious embarrassment...... of a huge calibre! Is this liar worth it? If you're so cynical to believe all politicians are liars anyway - well, I do suggest then - let's try another liar! Another liar, who may at least do something good for this nation.

Actually he really sucks at it. So how come everytime I've complained about politicans who lie the right wing response has been laughing rolley-eyed emotions and references to leftish political naivete? Now look at conservatives, crying like a bunch of hard-done by naive snowflakes.

Cut to the chase . . . . get rid of Quebec and we'll have a country again. With Quebec gone, Ottawa is powerless. Simplistic? Yes, but Quebec never signed into being a part of this country, has never contributed to the concept of the country of Canada. If Quebec doesn't leave, all transfer payments must stop. Quebec is Canada's parasite, an insatiable tapeworm. We won't have a country until we swallow the medicine and shit-out our parasite.

Many of which are smuggled through reserves but no one wants to discuss that.

Police say criminals get their guns illegally most often, coming from the US. They aren't going to get drugs illegally through the US and then not get guns LOL.

I don't see bush_cheney2004 claiming that Canada should change it's first past the post system just because Trudeau won. I do see Zeitgeist claiming that America should change the Electoral College system because Donald Trump won though. I also see that Zeitgeist still doesn't understand that it's congress that is gerrymandered, not the Electoral College. He doesn't seem to have a clue what the EC is, which no doubt plays into why he wants to change it.

Correct...but this is hardly new. What is different is that new media has democratized national and global speech/expression, and a president took advantage of this development, just like the one prior to him. So now the political and culture wars have been enjoined by "fact checking" sites, which have their own agenda as well. Oh look...Russians !

Oh its far worse than that - I'm a leftist.

I think the point of the thread is more of interest to people who are looking for the truth, regardless of which political side it favours.

No...America is not a democracy. America doesn't change the rules just to favour your foreign desires / outcomes.

Yes....perfectly constitutional. Again.... America doesn't change the rules just to favour your foreign desires / outcomes.

Free speech and expression rights trump fact checking "sites". Where was the hue and cry for "fact checking" when the left pursued its agenda years ago ?

The world would be a better place had Hillary won, America included.

Trump wins again on tax returns in California....unconstitutional.

Another great Trump lie: Justin Trudeau is "very dishonest and weak"......how could that ever be true ?? /s

That said, conservatives merely whine about the left without every doing anything about us. That kind of suggests conservatives are who should really be blamed for letting the world turn to shit don't you think? You can see the problem clearly but you never do anything about it. Are you planning on waiting until it's too late or something? I thought you guys were the responsible ones - the adults in the room so to speak.

Sealioning: The subtle art of trolling, involving bad-faith questions. To disingenuously frame your conversation as a sincere request to be enlightened, placing the burden of educating one entirely on the other party. If your bait is successful, the other party may engage, painstakingly laying out their logic and evidence in the false hope of helping someone learn. In fact you are attempting to harass or waste the time of the other party, and have no intention of truly entertaining their point of view. Instead, you react to each piece of information by misinterpreting it or requesting further clarification, ad nauseum.