Leaderboard

Got distracted by Pelosi, sitting behind Trump. What's up with her mouth? She seemed to be sucking through her dentures, or what! And you could tell when she doesn't agree with Trump - her lips seemed to work overtime!

NATO already accused Russia of violating this treaty, therefore the treaty was no longer effective. It was only dangerous to maintain it unilaterally. Want to know who to really blame for this? Blame Russia... Vlad Putin... supreme puppet-master of the left.

100% bullshit. Let's talk about the yellow cake from Niger that never happened. Let's talk about the babies thrown out of incubators which never happened. Let's talk about the elusive WMD that were never found. I wonder if this is the same Mueller everyone seems to love these days. IF he lied then, why would anyone trust what he says now?

Honest people, if they are smart, do not show themselves.

The Ukraine is the new Poland, and will suffer in Soviet era purgatory for generations.

Non state actors can destabilize and escalate entire theaters and the world, I certainly wasn't expecting a global forever war to be breaking out, when I was sitting in a hot tub with my wife, on 10 September 2001.

Yep...it's a fascinating game even at the engineering level. A nuclear weapons deterrence must be credible, reliable, and survivable. They are the most aggressive form of military munition available today, and warhead arming and fuzing protocols compete with each other to make for control, safety, and long operational shelf life coupled with a turgid determination to effectively nuke the bastards without fail, so much so, overkill is required by the math/modeling. Jimmy Carter and Curtis LeMay in the same warhead design. Plus there are numerous issues with service life & extension for delivery systems, rocket motors, EMP hardening, and just ordinary materials degradation. The bigger contemporary risk is non-state actors (e.g. terrorists) who care not a damn about such nuclear weapons etiquette....they just want a big boom or radiological disaster.

It's not possible for Mr. Trudeau to take that position and be taken seriously. It is too late for him to establish himself has politically credible, let alone normal. He and his government have made enough mistakes already re: the Chinese debacle. They've stumbled a number of times, illustrating they are out of their depth on foreign relations. Perhaps the only person who understood the Chinese was McCallum, who tried to use a press event to say the right words that would make the Chinese back off a little. His statements were nothing but empty Chinese-style rhetoric, lots of nice words, reassurance that all will be well and that we are all friends, while making no firm commitments. McCallum's speech followed the three golden rules to doing business with this country: never impose your own values; never interpret acknowledgment as agreement; and don’t assume the people you are talking to have any authority to strike a deal. Chinese understand what rhetoric is. For this however, he was shit-canned, and in a rather inglorious way. This too sent a message to China. Mr. Trudeau could have done a lot more. He could have reached out personally to his contacts in China, if he had a useful relationship there but he doesn't. Instead, he has taken an adversarial approach by his constant virtue signalling that has alienated him from having a useful personal relationship. There is not a damn thing he can do to remedy the situation, but he can avoid making the situation worse, by keeping his festering clapper shut.

"When Canada does it its legal" /Nixonian Liberals When George W, Bush does it; "crime", when Justin Trudeau does it; "Sunny Ways".

Let me know when you get around to kicking nationals from China, Iran, etc. out. Do come up with you list of nationals you want to deport. That could be a long list don't you think in all seriousness. Also what if those Saudis came here to get away from the Saudi Arabian government? Call me crazy but deportations might be a tad more complex than you think. By the way and you will love this, at the current time Canada deports about 30 persons a day. It has no capacity to go higher than that. You know as we speak Trudeau is planning to allow all illegal entrants to stay in Canada and apply for work visas which in effect tells legitimate immigrants to phack off for following the law properly. But hey he is sure this will pan out in the ethnic communities and get him re-elected.

Is that the first-rate team that advised him to display a mind-blowing ignorance of how Google's algorithms work, causing him to foolishly accuse google of some bias for muslim terrorists because its search results displayed his obsession for Omar Khadr? Was that an example of them running rings?

As I said, there is no signal, signals can be imitated too. There is only one way, just be as unfailingly honest as you possibly can be. There's no quick fix or magic bullet, honesty itself is the answer to your question.

Accents have Jack sh*t to do with it. There's only one way, be an honest person. Anything less is to be dishonest.

If you are going to beat the gun grabbers, the impetus you must resist, is a mandate to take the black mans gun away. And the Indian man too, don't take his gun away. Reason being, all gun grabbing is based on taking the black mans gun away, and taking the Indian mans gun away. You don't have to love the black man, you don't have to love the Indian man, but if you let them take their guns away, that's the wedge in the door to come after you next, whitey. In the UK, the hysterical fearmongering used to impose draconian gun control, was that the bomb throwing socialists were going to use the guns to overthrow the Crown. But in America, it's all about pointing to the black man as a threat, and then using that to get everybody to sign their gun rights away.