By discussing them and voting on them.
No. Why would I want that? I don't hold much in the way of social conservative views myself, except maybe on immigration and culture. What I believe is that those with so-con views make up a not unsubstantial percentage of this country. They have a right to make themselves heard, and to discuss their issues in public without being screamed at and sneered at and called names. I think there's probably more of them than there are leftist progressives, yet we treat the latter with respect, even allowing them to dictate to the rest of us on occasion, while we dismiss so-cons as idiots and losers from a bygone time.
What I'm saying is that they have the right to be treated respectfully and to air their beliefs in public forums and in parliament, just like the progressives, who I personally consider wack job loonies, and often dangerous wack job loonies. The mainstream opinion makers in media, which is not, of course, mainstream, but leans decidedly to the Left, treats so-con views, even those which are reasonable and not shrill, with complete contempt, as if they're completely illegitimate views. Yet takes the likes of BLM seriously. I put it to you that Niki Ashton is far more of a fruitloop than Brad Trost, and a lot more dangerous. Yet she's treated with respect and is given every opportunity to air her views. She's not dismissed a a wack job, and she and her ilk won't face demonstrations and protests no matter where she goes or what they say. Demand that all business be nationalized? Okay. Demand a 99% tax rate for anyone making over $100k? No problem. Demand we befriend Hamas and Hezbollah and break ties with Israel? Fine. But dare to suggest Canada puts in place the same laws on abortion that Sweden has, and suddenly the media recoils in horror while making signs to ward off evil.