All Activity

Why did you ever think he was going to do anything other than f&ck things up worse than they were?

I notice you haven't called out Deluge. Silence is complicity as the saying goes.

Show me where I did that.

Sure, and when we try to engage you people, using the same things you rely on, your own eyes and history, you still fall back on personal attacks. Denial overrules absolutely everything.

You should send your Canadian military to Gaza, full deployment, everything you have, to root out Hamas and maintain the peace there. See how that works out for you. Interesting. So... when did you feel sorry for them?

Keep it down, a$$hole. Remember, nobody gives a shit.

1. It makes sense; you're a moonbat, so it's obvious that trees going down offends you deeply. The problem is the rest of the world needs to keep going, despite your tears and full diapers. 2. What fazes me is a$$holes who fight civilization and progression. I know you'd rather have the third-world throughout the world, but I wouldn't; in fact I hate that idea.

Don't you care how many French people die every year from the cold?

Facts are facts. Truth, logic, and reason are not overruled just because an Expert says something. This is the illogical game you guys play to avoid having to engage yourselves, instead, you just fall back on "experts" and an argument from authority and in this case you threw in some personal attacks.

It's funny as hell. Looks good on the Maga Clowns. LOL 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

The core of it is an arrogance that you know more than an expert. Humility is unknown to them. Their self image seems to come from Dodge Ram Tough ads...

"Notice it says God was manifest in the flesh... This is a critical verse to prove to Jehovah's Witnesses that Jesus is God." You've explained why you believe the KJV reading is theologically stronger. You have not demonstrated that it is textually original. Those are different questions. "A vast number of manuscripts use the word God and only a few... have the word he." That's the Majority Text argument. It is not proof that the minority reading is corrupt. Critical Text scholars argue that an earlier reading preserved in fewer manuscripts can still be original if later scribes expanded or clarified the wording during transmission. You may disagree with that conclusion, but that is the debate. "There was no excuse to change it." That assumes the conclusion. Critical Text scholars would say they didn't change the text. They believe they are restoring an earlier reading based on the manuscript evidence. You haven't demonstrated that their conclusion is wrong, only that you disagree with it. "This makes it far more difficult to convince a JW that Jesus is God." Whether a reading is more useful in defending a doctrine has no bearing on whether it is the original reading. Theological usefulness is not evidence of textual originality. "Acts 8:37... Modern versions leave this verse out." Again, you've explained why you believe the verse is doctrinally important. You have not demonstrated that Luke originally wrote it. Critical Text scholars omit it because they argue it was added later as a baptismal confession and is absent from many of the earliest Greek manuscripts. You may reject that conclusion, but that is a textual argument, not evidence of corruption. The discussion isn't whether these variants exist. The discussion is whether your preferred readings are demonstrably original and the alternative readings demonstrably corrupt. So far you've argued why you prefer the KJV readings, but you haven't demonstrated that the competing readings are corrupt rather than simply different conclusions reached through a different textual methodology.

Sure, like I said I see dead ghost trees multiplying hereabouts on a scale that's never been seen in the historical record. It doesn't seem to faze you in the least when other people do the same as you.

I'm sure all 13 of you cucks are enjoying the new infowars.

Not in 1867. You're not.

Uh-uh. No self respecting American is going to buy that shit when you have border laws and the Naturalization Act of 1790 already in place. We KNOW what the founders wanted, and it's not this. Everything connected to leftism needs to be criminalized, immediately. No more anchor babies, no more endless hordes of refugees and asylum seekers, no more bullshit citizens like Omar and Mamdani. In this country, leftism should be just as offensive as murder.

If it was only yesterday I said these things it should be a snap to point at one so we'll know what you're babbling about.

What will be assured is that Corporate profits will soar, whether or not this will result in cheaper costs for the consumer is the real question.

Wait a minute, roboreich; don't you see the connections? Hitler was also a socialist, and he too hated normal people. That flag is more relevant than your woke brain can comprehend.

Love it! They all belong together in hell.

I'm sorry, comrade, but I don't have the time or the bandwidth to study this shit in order to fight the pseudoscientists at their level. I rely on history and what I see with my own eyes. That's all anyone needs to put you lunatics behind them.