All Activity
- Past hour
-
When that happens you have a vacuum. Look what has happened in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria. As bad as Saddam may have been; he kept Iran occupied instead of Israel and was really no threat to the region after the 1st Gulf War. The US and Britain engineered the overthrow of a democratic regime in Iran during the 50's and put the Shah in power. The eventual result was the Islamic revolution, not because most Iranians loved the Ayatollah's but they hated the Shah even more.
-
Massive attack on Islamic Republic by Israel.
August1991 replied to CITIZEN_2015's topic in The Rest of the World
I am not so certain that simply killing a Hitler will change a regime. ==== The British bombed/destroyed Dresden and Russian soldiers raped German women. Konigsberg is now Kaliningrad. -
Massive attack on Islamic Republic by Israel.
athos replied to CITIZEN_2015's topic in The Rest of the World
When fake "Semites" advise own a "peacemaker" -
Meme/Cartoon of the Day
Fluffypants replied to WestCanMan's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
-
No it is not fair point but a misleading point because Israelis and US have said it many times that their goal is to neutralize Islamic Republic nuclear capabilities and it is up to the people of Iran to topple this regime. Unlike Iraq and Afghanistan there will be NO ground forces landing or military invasion. Military, intelligence, mercenary security forces must be attacked from the air and regime's criminal leaders must be eliminated same way that Hezbollah leaders were eliminated.
-
Nobody said the US or Israel should change the regime. I said Israel and US should eliminate the Islamic Republic murderous leaders in particular the top leader hiding in a hole and the commanders of Sepah and oppressive apparatus of the regime to pave the way for the people of Iran to rise up and pour into streets and overthrow this fascist regime for once and all without being massacre by the mercenary security forces. This nation has risen up many times in the past 8 years and each time thousand were shot dead on streets or died under torture after their arrests and this included women and children.
-
Meme/Cartoon of the Day
Fluffypants replied to WestCanMan's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
That whole 4 hours was rough for liberals since the right rioted at their temple of worship. -
Nothing "disputes my memory", stupid. By your own quote, Trudeau said that Canada is phasing out the oil sands. Not tomorrow, but tomorrow and 20 years from now are the exact same thing to someone who wants to invest $35 billion. This is where your low IQ fails you, stupid: FYI investors go where their money is safe, and can grow. They don't go where BLM is burning down buildings, they don't go where politicians are saying "defund police", and they don't go to places where the gov't is saying "We're actually phasing out that industry in that area". Conservatives all understood the long-term effect of creating uncertain, dangerous, or even hostile investment conditions while left4rds were all acting like they were saving the planet. Trudeau absolutely played up the genocide card. He absolutely pretended that there actually were dead children in that hole, that the only possible reason for them being there was genocide, and he absolutely used the word genocide when talking about the fake graves. He even talked about the missing and murdered aboriginal women as a genocide, while at the same time pretending that white people were responsible for all of those deaths. He also pretends that 100% of the hate crimes against Jews are by "whitey". He acts like our terroristically inclined persons don't commit hate crimes against Jews. Go figger. You don't just have a closed mind, flyer, you're a stupid cultist.
-
A very interesting site I gave you above. Take a note here on page 19 - Financial Summary https://fpcc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/AnnualServicePlanReport.pdf They managed to spend $10 mil in salaries and benefits administering programs / grants of $50 mil. They have zero surplus or deficit. The salaries and benefits they paid themselves were $2.5mil over the budget. In other words, whatever they were left with, they took it all.
- Yesterday
-
Yawn. lets do a quick check. Facts.... nope .... angry rhetoric unsupported by reason or logic... yep Addresses the issues raised? Nope. So back to your old trick of when you can't argue what we were discussing you change the topic and pretend we were arguing the new one all along, How boring, And if you went to university go demand your money back. You are an utter failure, There's no reverse engineering here, Once you take the hatred and bigotry that blinds you out of it, the historical records are pretty clear You obviously know nothing and yet pretend otherwise to defend your tribe, Pathetic. You didn't even know that communism is a type of socalism. Studied it? Please, give me a break. Sorry kiddo, putin is not right wing. I can go through and list why each of your examples is just bullshit lies, but its' moot. Socialists are MORE PRONE to it. I did not say exclusive and in fact i was very careful to point out otherwise, Sorry kiddo, I guess NO socialists have EVER been dictators as long as you change the definition of socialism to exclude them Next time talk about something you know something about. You're embarrassing yourself
-
That guy was saying that we stripped the illegals due process. When he went before the immigration judge and was told nope time to go and he wants a do over. You know like we get do overs as citizen, we get convicted of murder with a self defense claim, then they go no no we need to retry you based on an insanity plea and that is how our system works, right? No, we get convicted of a crime we can appeal but that is based on the defense itself but how the trial was conducted.
-
This more of your made up gibberish. Communism by definition is a planned economy and communists believe you must first have socialism to get to communism. LMAO absolutely NOT by definition! YOU don’t know what socialism means. Your self-taught, self-invented gibberish is amusing though. So please provide us with a definition. But don’t make one up, go online and provide a link. Someplace credible like an actual encyclopedia or something not conservapedia. LMAO no, too many to name! Most dictatorships are not socialists, pick any. Here is a non-exhaustive list: Putin is a right wing dictator. Viktor Orban is a pro-Putin darling of republicans and has turned his formerly democratic country into a right wing authoritarian state Trump’s right wing dictator buddy Bukele in El Salvador Edogan in Turkey Modi in India Lukashenko in Belarus Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Pakistan, all conservative dictatorships, none are socialist Many of the juntas and dictators of Africa, especially Uganda and the pro-Russian juntas of the Sahel. . The right wing junta that ruled Greece in the 60s and 70s The bloody right wing dictators and generalisimos of central and South America that the US backed during the cold war like Augusto Pinochet and Fulgencio Batista amongst others. Francisco Franco of Spain I’ve studied it in university and read about it most of my adult life while you have invented your own gibberish nonsense that defies established facts and logic, based on nothing but a desire to slap that label on anything you want to associate with people you don’t like. Rather than actually learn history you’ve tried to reverse engineer an understanding of it by extrapolating from the diet of constant right wing propaganda you obviously consume regularly and you think it sounds credible but just comes out as nonsense. Hitler’s Mussolini’s, Franco and Pinochet all practiced different dorms of fascism. But they are all forms of fascism and none were socialist But they were all socially conservative, economically right wing, and all supported by the wealthy right wing members of their country, including republicans in the USA.
-
I mean... that's kind of a fair point honestly.....
-
That's no problem, we just have to teach the current one to lie cheat steal and corruptly control the media and the liberals will love him to death Meanwhile everybody's talking now about how badly carney look like a for trump who then basically pushed him aside and went off to deal with more important things But its still incredible to me that you're whining and crying about this long after the election
-
That you're a hypocrite who, like a child, posts a portion of what people post and then takes it out of context as you'd expect of a preteen living in mommies basement? Yeah, you don't need to admit it. We know Seriously, who on earth do you think would not think less of you for that childishness
-
Ya, the US has such a great record when it comes to regime change in the Middle East.
-
Oh please You did no such thing That he's an impartial source who's acutally educated on the subject. And it's pretty clear he's not Blah blah lie lie bullshit bullshit. Always the same with you. You did not refute the points, and your source is garbage. You haven't said anything at all. You posted Some twat and other than that you're only things were to try and throw insults and whine and cry. You didn't advance a position in the slightest So when I claim he's a dictator you say I'm wrong and when I say are you saying he's not a dictator you say I'm right but still pretend that I'm wrong Go back and read everything again kid. You looking Dumber by the minute See this is your example of trying to refute things. You just lie and throw something out there and pretend that you somehow made some sort of counterpoint. That's not how it works. I know exactly what socialism is and what socialist means. It's not radically complicated. It is painfully obvious that you don't. I know a hell of a lot more than you and you make it obvious with every post. And I can tell that you know nothing about this because rather than actually make a valid point you just stick with insults and then try and claim you've rebutted things. I'm sure your level of intellectual discourse is killing them in grade four And no, socialism and communism are not separate things. Socialism is a general term that encompasses communism. It would be like saying that capitalism laissez-faire capitalism are seperate things. There are dozens and dozens of different types and flavors and models of socialism. About the only thing they really all have in common absolutely is they control the economy either through Collective ownership of one model or another or by extensive and overbearing regulation of a private market. The fact that you don't understand this demonstrates that you really have no clue what you're talking about And the name does mean something. Hitler explained in great detail what the name meant and they actually lived up to that. What you mean is that you don't like that Nazis were socialists because it makes you feel bad about your chosen political leaning and so you deny the obvious truth. I suppose someone so stupid that he believes that there's only one type of socialism as you do might get confused by it but I'm afraid that's just not accurate The Nazis were socialist. They believed in strict control of the economy and the means of production through regulation and partial ownership of an otherwise free market. The expressly believed that this should be for the benefit of the state and the people as a group and that the people and the corporations had a duty to the goals and vision of that state.
-
Nope...you don't seem to know the difference between celebrating and mourning. I celebrate and you still mourn.. for the 4th time and another 4+ years. "CPC's chances next time you're obviously scared spitless. ".....unless you get a real leader, you will suffer the same fate as the last 4 times. LOL Sucks to be a conservative in Canada LOL
-
Admit that the conservatives lost.. for the 4th time...for sure I admit that. :) It's OK LOSER!!!
-
Oh, so you wanna stay dating? LOL The Liberals beat the conservatives and got their leader beaten and are the government...that makes Canada great LOL 10 plus years in power, 4 elections won and 4_+ years still in power...that makes C great.... sucks to be you LOL
-
For sure! I've studied your kind for years now and consider myself to be a leading expert. I"m like the Dianne fossey of glue sniffers. Gorrilla glue in the mist so to speak You do all the time, but the glue has screwed with your short term memory so you don't recall. Very common amongst heavy users such as yourself
-
I wonder where this alphabet came from and if it is the same for all Indian bands. I will not ask if they can read "šxʷməθkʷəy̓əmasəm", because I am sure they can't. Just found this: https://fpcc.ca/resource/orthographies/ All seems complete mumbo-jumbo. Maybe I should click on the 'apply for grants" button and ask them for $1mil to develop my $#@**&%$ language?
-
Will Trump divide "British" Columbia?
cougar replied to August1991's topic in Provincial Politics in Canada
There are MP's that have long term vision and MP's with jus short term goals. -
Stop with the lying. I refuted the false claims, stated the facts and cited a widely acclaimed expert. LMAO. You re hilarious. Just because your uneducated ass can’t name a single expert on the subject (or any subject) doesn’t mean he’s a no name hack. What exactly are you disputing, that he’s a Yale professor? That he’s written 5 books on the subject? That he was invited to Big Think? You don’t know a thing about him or his motives, all you know is he said something you don’t like so once again you start completely inventing claims with no supporting evidence…all to falsely accuse someone else of making claims with no evidence while defending an anonymously written conservapedia post that could have been written by literally be anyone, even a child, on a website whose stated purpose is to provide conservative-biased information. Do you know how absolutely ridiculous that makes you sound? The only pathetic arguments here are yours I refuted every point. Id you say the capital of Russia is Paris and I say “wrong, its Moscow” that’s refuted. Especially if I then post a video by one Americas foremost geography experts who says the same thing. And keep in mind buddy you don’t even attempt to post a single shred of evidence to back up any of your nonsense because it’s all made up by you. As the expression goes “that which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence” but I still gave you a video. We’ve had this argument before, I’ve given you the links, which you don’t click and complain that it’s too much reading. If I find a video of sock puppets I’ll send it your way. But I haven’t even said anything that’s controversial, it’s widely accepted common knowledge that everyone learns in high school. Are you serious? It was a cult of personality which by definition means it was a dictatorship since he was also the leader of the country. Are you trying to argue that these are mutually exclusive things? Like literally the national culture was for the citizens to praise his name while they passed each other in the street. He wasn’t just some dude who happened to leading the party at the moment He created Nazis and it died when he died. No, you just don’t know what the word socialist means, you apply the label to anything or anyone you don’t like. But you don’t understand the subject. And they all hated each other but were all socialist. Don’t lecture me on topics you know nothing about. Technically speaking communism and socialism are both Marxist ideas but they separate. Marx believed state-run socialism is a logical temporary stage between a capitalist state and his ideal stateless utopia of communism where there are no countries or governments or nation states. Nazis were fervently opposed to all of this and were not socialist, period. The Nazis were authoritarian so controlled most things to their will but that’s not what socialism means. They had no desire to redistribute wealth from the rich to the poor or live in some egalitarian commune. To the contrary they were the party of the rich and powerful and enforced that strict social order, which is why so many Republican anti-communists in the USA like Charles Lindbergh and Henry Ford and conservatives around the world including members of the British royal family celebrated and admired them early on. As you have been told repeatedly the name doesn’t mean anything: North Korea’s official name is the “Democratic Republic of Korea”. Do you think that means they’re a democratic republic?