Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. You decry "no evidence" then proceed with anecdotal evidence and shadowy leagues of "elites". There's certainly a conversation to be had, if people can leave their baggage outside.
  3. Media Matters is not reputable to you? I thought all you lefties loved it? There are multiple vids of the guy saying the same thing. You guys are not unpredictable, you are the opposite. I even called you out and disproved your post before you even posted it.
  4. Rather level headed. Good.
  5. Of course it happened, denial is still denial. Media Matters a registered, legitimate 501(c)(3) nonprofit and media watchdog. However, its legitimacy as an objective news source is debated; it is an explicitly progressive/liberal organization that exists to monitor and correct conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.
  6. Not a fan of one of the ancient tribes.
  7. Biden promised his DOJ would prosecute his political enemies and ordered Merrick Garland to do it. See the difference.
  8. Naked links are NOT EVIDENCE. Quote it here from a reputable source, or it didn't happen.
  9. You're an lDIOT. Prosecuting crimes with EVIDENCE is the job of the DOJ. Duh You have ZERO EVIDENCE that Obama/Biden interfered with their DOJ. Trump promised HIS DOJ would prosecute HIS POLITICAL ENEMIES and ORDERED Bondi to do it. You're so stupid you CANNOT SEE THE DIFFERENCE.
  10. You lied about it in a particularly embarrassing fashion you mean. Yes I agree The answers were provided in full when asked originally each and every time. You then spent four pages denying that I had answered any of them when they have all been answered and the answers are complete and full They are also accurate. The government did not Substantially worn the public about the dangers of this type of vaccine. They should have and I explained exactly how they should have. I have also not stood behind people now that they are suffering from unexpected side effects and in my opinion they should. And you spent pages lying about that. Yawn.
  11. Open eyesey and looky at the linky. There will you find the evidency.
  12. America and Israel definitely do not share everything at the moment. They share a lot but definitely not everything So I took the time to actually read the legislation that's been proposed and read some analysis pro and con with regards to it As usual it would look like both sides are kind of overhyping things. To be clear this wouldn't actually give the Israelis access to much in and of itself. But it would establish an appointed official specifically to facilitate providing access and doing joint ventures moving forward. So people are right when they say lay the groundwork or open up the possibility that in the future there would be more cooperation and integration. However it doesn't require that and most of the areas are already areas where America and Israel share some information already. It seems mostly to make it easier to do joint ventures to cooperatively explore new technologies Proponents say this will give Israel the ability to build its own advanced weapons without the us having to provide them. Opponents feel that this will be a permanent back door that Israel can use to improve its own military technology which can then be used to oppress others in the region My feeling is that this is an effort to make it harder for future administrations to walk away from Israel entirely and ensure that Israel has continued us support even if a israel negative government were to be elected. Some will say that's good, some will say that's bad. But I don't think it's handing America's technology Over to anyone selling out america to the Israelis. So when people say it's harmless and just the way to facilitate things they're probably being a little disingenuous, and when they say that this is an integration or blending of american and is really military that's probably a gross overstatement as well What is true is it does facilitate and make it easier for America to provide support to Israel and for Israel to be a little more independent of America militarily and whether or not that's a good thing would be a matter of discussion
  13. Not really. I outlined how your latest attempt didn't really answer most of them at all. You ignored that and literally admitted you were. That is running away. This was your original assertion, and you still have not provided any real argument to support this version of it. "Obviously this is somewhat Canada specific, but I think a big part of the problem was that the government was unwilling to admit that there was a possible risk in any meaningful way"
  14. @gatomontes99 Tweets are NOT EVIDENCE. Anyone can post a FAKE Tweet.
  15. Today
  16. All you're capable of is an endless loop. It's your go to emotional defense when you have one of your melt downs and hissy fits LOL i always do, making you cry is always entertaining to me Every time you do this i know I've crushed your weak little liberal mind a little more
  17. . On your part. The questions were answered, and everybody can see it. You spent three pages acting like a complete coward, running away from the truth at every turn. And for what? The truth that you fear for whatever reason remains the same The government did not substantially warn Canadians about the threat and dangers of taking the vaccine. They did not stand behind people who became ill now. I think that's bad because it will make people even more hesitant in the future.And you've spent endless time looking like a complete twat trying to deny these simple truths
  18. Yes by striking Spencer down with ballot fraud they have made him 10x more powerful.
  19. No. Just the same stupid game. If you want to engage, go back to where I just gave you a lengthy response you literally said you were ignoring. You can’t engage on the facts, you just play this endless circle jerk with yourself quibbling about how you answered the questions calling me a liar.
  20. Holy crap, now you have gone full anti-Semite.
  21. The Left has been beating society over the head with the phrase "Diversity is our strength" for decades now, with no evidence whatsoever to support the belief, but an abundance of curses and insults directed at anyone who challenges it. Of course, the people pushing it are rarely those who have to deal with it. It's the peasants who have to live, day to day, amid a growing throng of people who barely speak their language, don't care about or for their culture, and in many cases, resent them due to decades of cultural propaganda in their homelands which blamed whites for all manner of social ills. Their former countries were poor because they were cheated, not because of corrupt, incompetent governments. We go about our lives as usual, but the everyday interactions we have in the course of our days are now frequently with people who are not like us. Communication is sparse, confined to business. It often lacks the casual friendliness of dealing with people just like us. Half the time, their language skills are clearly not capable of much in the way of conversation, and in many cases they exude a strong of foreignness which suggests they'd have little interest anyway. The difference is notable. When we get a person on the phone without an accent, for example, or a repair person shows up who was born here, or an Uber driver who is white, we feel a bit of a sense of relief. Easy interaction often follows. It isn't just about language, nor at all about colour. The South Asian repair guy sent by your internet company can speak understandably, at least, but clearly doesn't give a damn about anything and is uninterested in your level of satisfaction. The bored bank teller might or might not understand you, but there's definitely no friendliness there, just script following. You'll exchange no banter with the people at the store, and usually sit quietly in the back of your uber or taxi since the driver can barely grunt a few words in English. In all of this the social in society is lost. And you know things are only going to get worse because the political elites keep flooding us with foreigners for their own purposes, and the flood is far too large to integrate even if we urged them to, which the elites most definitely do not do. And as the minorities become the majority, and they don't think like you or have the same culture as you, what then? Then they vote for one of theirs to run things, like the minority majority did in the mayoral elections in New York and London. Then the state/provincial governments become like that, then the federal government. And none of them, competing as they do for tribal votes, give a damn about what you want or think. https://archive.is/jYDmf
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...