Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. According to AI, this is how we make the Jail Act work. To make the JAIL Act functional, Congress must navigate complex constitutional hurdles, specifically judicial immunity and federal-state separation of powers. Congress can make the legislation work by taking the following specific legislative actions: [1, 2, 3, 4] Waiving Immunity for Federal Judges: Congress can legislatively narrow or waive judicial immunity for federal judges in civil actions, stripping this defense so that victims can sue for damages if a habitual violent offender is released and re-offends. [1, 2] Leveraging Federal Funding (Conditional Grants): Under the U.S. Constitution, Congress generally lacks direct police powers over state systems. To influence state and local courts, Congress can attach strict funding conditions to Department of Justice grants (such as the Byrne JAG program), requiring states to waive judicial immunity for pretrial releases or face financial penalties. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] Passing the Bill Through Committee: For either the Senate or House versions of the JAIL Act to become law, they must clear the respective Judiciary Committees, overcome potential constitutional challenges regarding separation of powers, and survive a full floor vote to be sent to the President. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
  3. well, thanks to you perverts, Congress now needs to clarify and adjust.
  4. This thread is about a new law which purports to change judicial tenure, CLOWN. I posted evidence that it CANNOT. Duh You got BUPKIS.
  5. It is when attached to the press release is the evidence. I didn't quote it because it was a scanned document and I would either have to screen shot, crop and attach or type each point out. I am not going to do that.
  6. Why do you believe that is? I think it's because the batteries can be destroyed by a flood and they are 1/3 the value of the car.
  7. It does not need to be changed Duh and Lol and double Lol. Reply for a triple Lol.
  8. My gawd you just gravitate to wrong. Actual bill: Congress It is a bill that removes judicial immunity from litigation. In other words, you can use their asses. None of that shit you posted is a valid criticism.
  9. Well, DUH. That is case NOW. A Federal Law does NOT change the Constitution. LMAO
  10. A "press release" is NOT EVIDENCE. Show us OBJECTIVE REPORTING. Nothing your link says "false reports" which is why YOU QUOTED NOTHING FROM IT. LMAO
  11. I'm sorry, robowoke, but everyone knows states like California are addicted to crime, so it's time for emergency legislation. Thanks to the democrats, lifetime appointments can't work anymore. At least they can't work for you degenerates because you're hardened leftists - no longer compatible with the US.
  12. They hold office "during good behaviour," meaning they can keep their positions for the remainder of their lives unless they resign, retire, or are removed through impeachment by Congress. [1]
  13. You've been duped by FOS LIES AGAIN. LMAO can state court judges be removed by Federal law? Federal judges appointed under Article III of the U.S. Constitution (including Supreme Court Justices, appellate judges, and district court judges) serve lifetime appointments LMAO You are IGNORANT of the LAW HERE. LMAO
  14. I do too, and I wasn't even something I thought about before. Why not slam dunk judges? Most of them deserve it anyways.
  15. See...this is why Canastan is such a mess. You either have very poor comprehension skills, or you can only understand binary thinking. Meh...at least it keeps things simple for ya.
  16. Lol... I picture you as some short little bald guy who wears a wife beater shirt and yells at the kids crossing his parents lawn from your window in the basement. Pretty accurate... yes. The only thing pathetic is you kiddo. Your little minion feelings are hurt because I slagged Trump. That's a shame little guy...
  17. You fit perfectly into Poilievre's and Smith's cross section of the further right crowd of fools. You're sitting in a 'have not' province that relies on those equalization payments yet you're complaining about them because the only thing you know or can think of is a pipeline. If you think that ~27% of the people who live in Alberta that want to separate represent the masses, you need to study math calc's a bit more. You and they can keep doing what you do and give the masses good reasons to keep the liberals in power for another decade...
  18. Today
  19. "Bill would eliminate judicial immunity for federal and state judges whose leniency leads to new violent crimes". I'm OK with it, as long as the penalties are harsh. Looks like it would force judges to follow the law, or not be judges anymore. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/senator-tim-sheehy-soft-crime-judges-need-consequences-jail-act-delivers
  20. This reminds me of that whole Jussi Smollett mess. That race-baiting idlot Smollett was caught dead to rights faking a hate crime, and STILL, after his trial, in which he was made to look like a complete fool, maintained his innocence. Just zero acknowledgment of the part he played in creating fake hate in the US. These people are just as stupid. Give it up you boneheads.
  21. Sad Sad Sad petty little LOSER. You just seem to like to hear or read yourself telling lies. Sad Sad Sad LOSER Once again "When you have to resort to attacking family, even to a dead mother, everyone knows you are a LOSER and and EPIC LOSER " And back to being a pedophile as well....you are for sure a pedophile LOSER HA HA. HA
  22. Exactly. Substantially or exactly? LMAO!
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...