Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Horseback? I am reminded of an old joke. If Henry Ford had asked farmers in 1910 what they want, they'd have said: "I want a faster horse."
  3. Ben Mulroney . . . ? Chugs a six pack of Red Bull, lights his hair on fire, and delights in broadcasting his contempt for Liberals, especially the wanker Justin Trideau.
  4. Poilievre? I remember Pierre Trudeau's famous phrase: "I want to put Quebecers in their place. And their place is in Canada." Obama should have said the same: "I want to put blacks in their place. And their place is America." ===== "I want to put Albertans in their place. And their place is Canada."
  5. In Canada: like California, there is the Left - and the crazy Left. (Liberals under Carney, the NDP... ) I reckon Poilievre is unelectable in federal Canada.
  6. The nazis were nazis. The facists were facists. They are both based on a concept of severe nationalism and a socialist market based economy. But they are still different.
  7. uhhh,,,, that's actually a good thing. I understand that you on the left run on hatred and violence and bigotry these days but it's actually better if you can sit down with an opponent and find common ground. I get that you don't think like that but lots do.
  8. Of COURSE!! It's all harper/cpc's fault that you support a corrupt gov't! How could i forget
  9. In Canada, we used to have an opposing view. French-speaking people. Catholics. We no longer have that. Everyone agrees with Carney and the CBC. Even Radio-Canada agrees with Carney.
  10. You're laughing that a helicopter and it's crew was killed? Well. You laughed about charlie kirk and that insurance exec so i guess i shouldn't be surprised.
  11. Today
  12. 35 years. Have a nice life Anthony. BTW...what is your dad sorry about? Did he happen to work you into a violent frenzy and set you loose?
  13. They'll always get their best support from a hopeless useless conservative opposition.
  14. Your post WAS drivel, so it seems connected somehow
  15. You just need to part the doo. Better without you people cluttering things up. Rainbows.
  16. It's hilarious and deeply concerning that the first thing you think about when talking about tampon tim is other guys being "hard". Like, Zucchini hard? Is that what you mean? Either way it's very weird
  17. Fine. Its accepted that they've done it and broke no laws, whether they did or didn't. Like every investigation into liberal corruption they know you'll still love them and support them.
  18. So what? Seems like a pretty reasonable thing to say. Villifying folk who aren't thrilled with what Canada has to offer isn't exactly going to bring them back into the fold, is it? The folks behind disinformation campaigns and conspiracy theories sure, but the deluded and misenfranchised not necessarily.
  19. LOL awww kiddo, we can all hear you crying from here We can tell every time you go to ALL CAPS BOLD BUPKIS FOS!!! LOL you're such a dunning kruger!
  20. Actual facts: https://share.google/aimode/rc7XSYUrS6uVAtl1F KA was the aggressor. KA created the situation. KA brought the weapon where it was not allowed.
  21. It was not proportional reaction and he was the aggressor.
  22. Hilarious. Split that hair good. Do you do wash and set too? Ahhh...gee, almost like ANTIFA eh? You cowards are so pathetic. How do you live with yourselves? Incredible. Do you fart daisies as well?
  23. Correction. YOU dont believe me. But the facts and truth bear me out...not your racist perception. Meh...must be more broken family syndrome.
  24. Trayvon Martin was a kid hunted relentlessly through the dark of night by a stranger--like something from a damn horror movie. He had literally every reason to be afraid for his life. Another case where he had a reasonable right to defend himself against the man hunting him. But he too happened to be Black, so again Republicans made a hero out of Zimmerman, who was armed and actively seeking out a conflict. Hunting a kid through the dark simply for being Black. That's farked up behavior, but he's a hero on the right. And in case you haven't been paying attention, again, I'm NOT defending SYG laws. I'm condemning them. But as long as they exist, Black citizens should have an equal right to that option.
  25. Do you wanna revisit your stance on the Trayvon Martin shooting? Is that what you're doing? I think that you feel like Trayvon really shouldn't have attacked that guy, and you're realizing that the stand your ground law actually should apply to someone who is actually attacked, and realistically defending themselves, so you're going overboard in defence of "stand your ground" laws. If you know right from wrong, you know that Karmelo is a murderer. If you know right from wrong, you know that Zimmerman had a right to shoot someone who physically jumped him. The problem is that you see skin colour instead of morality, and reasonable conduct, because you're a hateful little racist. 😉
  26. False. There are no property rights for a team tent at sporting event. He did have a right to SYG. -- He was sheltering from the rain and went in to say hi to a friend. The other team got territorial. There are no property rights or personal entitlements associated with a team canopy at a track meet. It's common, in fact for athletes to mingle. Nice try though.-- In fact, if the home team were decent hosts they'd be happy to let a visiting athlete shelter from the rain with them. It's called sportsmanship. But teen boys are often a-holes. The scenario you describe is several levels more provocative than the Anthony case, but if someone were to assault the interloper, he may well have a claim on SYG. The correct answer is not for students to assault people, but to call security. Agreed that Metcalf probably didn't need to be killed. Almost certainly so. But SYG makes people feel entitled to exactly that escalation. They don't behave rationally because they are aware that they can escalate to deadly force without serious repercussion. Many of them--the concealed carry crowd especially-- are actively hoping for an excuse to use their weapons. Rittenhouse and Zimmerman, for example. They deliberately put themselves into situations of confrontation because they are emboldened--or eager by the option to escalate to the weapons they brought. This was a Black kid doing the exact same thing. But the usual suspects aren't lining up to cheer him on. Wonder why?
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...