Iran wins the War.

[John Johnston]

1 minute ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

He started like he had some idea of the world with the China stuff until he found out that superpowers are painful to fight and he went after everybody else, especially America’s friends. This war happened because he was too weak to resist the Israel Lobby. Now the blame game begins. Vance looks like he’s moving in a paleocon direction, suspicious of all foreign entanglements including with Israel. 

Indeed. I think it show exactly how stupid Trump and Vance really are when they suggested that Venezuela was the same as Iran. Not to mention, they have turned their gaze towards Cuba, just in time to make a complete mess and disaster out of them. This is what happens you elect and appoint uneducated nutbars to office. But then again, the real scary thing is that absolutely everyone could see where this was going to go, but they agreed to it. Well, until the price of gasoline started bugging them. Strange days. 

[John Johnston]

11 minutes ago, John Johnston said:

Indeed. I think it show exactly how stupid Trump and Vance really are when they suggested that Venezuela was the same as Iran. Not to mention, they have turned their gaze towards Cuba, just in time to make a complete mess and disaster out of them. This is what happens you elect and appoint uneducated nutbars to office. But then again, the real scary thing is that absolutely everyone could see where this was going to go, but they agreed to it. Well, until the price of gasoline started bugging them. Strange days. 

America, Trump and Hegseth in particular have insulted and demeaned all their allies and friends around the globe. It will take decades or longer for America to regain any respect or trust they may have had. In less than two years. I don't know where this will all end. But I know for certain much of this was avoidable. 

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

I am being honest. Trump has moved somewhat from his previous clearly stated position of no new wars to no new wars with troops on the ground. The world has taken note. 

1) Trump was 4 years removed from daily WH briefings when he said "no new wars", and 2) people who were lying about him and slandering him can't very well hold him to any promises he made, right? 

If you promise me a rose garden, and then I lie to you and slander you, do you really still owe me a rose garden? Why should you keep your word to me at that point?

And is a ten-week war with less casualties than a weekend of Chicago gang violence really a "war"? 

This wasn't "a war" like Iraq or Afghanistan, it was a 10-week, pants-down spanking of Iran. 

Bottom line: Trump's promise is between him and his voters, and his voters understand why this war was necessary. Other people can be mad, but they have nothing to feel jilted about.

 

The promises that you should be worried about are the ones between the LPoC and you, as their voter.

Did Carney really play no role in moving Brookfield's HQ? No, so he realistically lied to you, not to me. I never took him at his word: I knew he was worthless a long time ago. 

Carney lied to you about his punitive counter-tariffs still being in place, because you thought that he meant it, and I knew he did not.  

Carney lied about elbows up, removing the carbon tax, etc, etc, etc, and that's just how he does business. And it's between you and him. He's dead to me. 

[CdnFox]

5 hours ago, eyeball said:

Who cares so long as the the right wing is happy?

 

Well no matter what happens you'll be angry and blame conservatives    

YOU were the one who said that trump HAD to go after iran if he was serious, otherwise it was just "Mowing the grass"

[eyeball]

12 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

YOU were the one who said that trump HAD to go after iran if he was serious, otherwise it was just "Mowing the grass"

He couldn't even do that.

[CdnFox]

Just now, eyeball said:

He couldn't even do that.

But he did, this is what you called for

[SpankyMcFarland]

Here’s a Daily Mail video on Iran’s targeting of US bases in the region, esp. in Iraq and Kuwait. The Iranian-backed militias in Iraq seem to have used low-cost FPV fibreoptic drones to great effect against high-value targets like radar and surveillance planes. 

I think the Arab states need to bring in the Ukrainians even more than they have. These are the guys with battlefield tech against fibreoptic FPV drones that won’t break the bank. 
 

 

Edited June 22 by SpankyMcFarland

[WestCanMan]

12 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

Here’s a Daily Mail video on Iran’s targeting of US bases in the region, esp. in Iraq and Kuwait. The Iranian-backed militias in Iraq seem to have used low-cost FPV fibreoptic drones to great effect against high-value targets like radar and surveillance planes. 

I think the Arab states need to bring in the Ukrainians even more than they have. These are the guys with battlefield tech against fibreoptic FPV drones that won’t break the bank. 

Iran hit a few targets. Killed a handful of soldiers. 

Go celebrate with Kamala, Obama, Hillary and the ayatollah for destroying a few planes if you want to, but your side got spanked.  

[SpankyMcFarland]

On 6/22/2026 at 2:04 PM, WestCanMan said:

Iran hit a few targets. Killed a handful of soldiers. 

Go celebrate with Kamala, Obama, Hillary and the ayatollah for destroying a few planes if you want to, but your side got spanked.  

It’s not my side, of course. Underestimating the enemy is a foolish game as we have seen.

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

It’s not my side, of course. Underestimating the enemy is a foolish game as we have seen.

Yeah, but it really was, if you're being honest. 

[SpankyMcFarland]

Any reasonable person knows that The Daily Mail is a right-wing outlet. Here’s another illuminating video on the toll Iran exacted on US Reaper drones. I knew a few had been hit but the mainstream media coverage didn’t do justice to how effective the Iranians and the Houthis were. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wMoKLuL8Jc

 

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

Yeah, but it really was, if you're being honest. 

No it isn’t. Don’t be silly. Just because we disagree doesn't mean I support Iran. 

[User]

10 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

No it isn’t. Don’t be silly. Just because we disagree doesn't mean I support Iran. 

And yet you spend all your time focused on attacking America and Trump, critical of them, downplaying anything achieved ignoring what Iran has lost…

[WestCanMan]

5 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

Any reasonable person knows that The Daily Mail is a right-wing outlet. Here’s another illuminating video on the toll Iran exacted on US Reaper drones.

Any reasonable person knows why your confirmation bias has you seeking out moments of joy for the Iranian side.

Quote

I knew a few had been hit but the mainstream media coverage didn’t do justice to how effective the Iranians and the Houthis were. 

Wellllllll. Think about the fact that there were thousands of sorties by fighter planes alone. Then all the sorties that were successfully flown by Reaper drones. Thousands more.

Even the Reapers that were shot down might have all had 1, 3, or even dozens of successful missions before they were shot down.

On top of that, even if a Reaper flew one mission, and hit a high-value before it was destroyed, that's still a massive success.... Think about it: that means that the US projected a very effective amount of power over Iran while the nearest American soldier was thousands of miles away from harm. 

I just typed all that before I found this:

• "There is no exact official public tally of the total number of individual sorties flown by US MQ-9 Reaper drones over Iran. However, during the intense phase of the conflict in spring 2026, the US maintained a high-tempo operation, routinely flying more than \(16[1.2.7]\) to 30 million Reapers over the country at any given time to strike mobile missile launchers and radar sites"

I dunno, it sounds like a ridiculously high number. I was thinking more like 1,000-2,000 a day.

If Iran shot down 24 Reapers out of all those, that's not even a drop in the bucket. But I really doubt there were 30 million Reaper drones over Iran at any one time. That seems like an impossible number.

• The high-risk nature of these deep-incursion missions resulted in significant attrition for the US military. Throughout the conflict, at least 24 MQ-9 Reapers were shot down by Iranian air defenses or destroyed on the ground, representing roughly 20% of the Pentagon's pre-war inventory of the aircraft. [1, 2, 3, 4]

OK, this part makes more sense. The US only had 120 Reapers 🤣

Maybe they mean that Reapers flew 3M miles/day? 

• While the U.S. military has bombed over 13,000 targets in Iran overall, the exact number of individual targets struck specifically by MQ-9 Reaper drones remains classified. However, Air Force officials describe the Reaper as the "most valuable player" of the conflict, noting it has hit "many, many" dynamic targets—including mobile missile launchers—across nine Iranian provinces. [1, 2, 3, 4]
  Because Reaper drones are unstealthy, flying for extended periods in contested Iranian airspace comes at a heavy cost. During the height of the conflict, Iranian air defenses and ground strikes destroyed approximately two dozen MQ-9 drones.

So 24 Reapers were destroyed, but they destroyed a lot of ballistic missiles and launchers. 

I think that each Reaper, on avg, probably destroyed many times own worth before they were destroyed. 

Quote

No it isn’t. Don’t be silly. Just because we disagree doesn't mean I support Iran. 

Like I said, your confirmation bias seems really hungry for any signs of Iranian victory, no matter how small...

 

 

One last thing: your own video describes the Iranian drone tech as being a threat to US military tech, and that they were shipping them out to all their terrorist bases, which TOTALLY underlines the necessity of dealing with Iran, and how far their tech came while operating behind the shield of the JCPOA. This war was neither illegal nor unnecessary.

[Hodad]

On 6/19/2026 at 11:47 AM, WestCanMan said:

You stupid God-damned loser.

Obama's JCPOA was being completely ignored, right from the start.

FYI one of the main components of the JCPOA was that Iran wasn't supposed to be building ballistic missiles and working towards ICBMs and they started doing it instantly. 

The JCPOA was hot garbage. Completely worthless.

Iran was using the JCPOA as a shield behind which to build ICBMs, build a massive drone army, and supply the Houthis, Hezbollah and Hamas with rockets to bombard Israel, while they were also upgrading their refining capabilities.

Do you honestly see no difference between Iran today and Iran in 2016, when Trump was elected the first time?

Iran is light years behind where they were in 2016 right now. 

Lol. 

Tankers are flowing, free of charge.

Iran has lost their ability to mass-produce ballistic missiles and drones.

Iran has lot their navy.

Iran has lost all of their anti-air defences. 

Iran has lost most if not all of their fighter planes. 

Can you at least admit to that you fking child?

Obama was great at ginning up racial hatred, but his JCPOA was not working. Iran started on the road to nuclear weapons before the ink was dry:

1. They started developing delivery systems for nukes
2. they started ramping up production of those delivery systems to an extremely high lvl
3. they started developing refining technology to build weapons-grade Uranium
4. they started refining mass amounts of Uranium, far beyond what they'd ever need for civilian usage
5. they started to build their conventional military to the point where they felt like they no longer needed to listen

Trump showed them that they need to listen. And not just because nameless soldiers will die, because ayatollahs will die. 

You don't appreciate Trump's strength because you're a gutless loser, but strength is necessary. The less strength you have in terms of policing and military, the more of that you need to do as an average citizen. 

Listen idjit, you didn't complain about that when they were all going to Ukraine for that stupid war that we provoked. 

If NATO wasn't on the verge of moving into Ukraine, not one dollar would have been spent on defending Ukraine and not one missile would have been sent there. 

Iran needed to be taken down. America stockpiles weapons to end Iran-type threats. A nuclear-armed Iran is a threat that you just don't understand. 

The Ukraine war never needed to happen. 

That's just the talking point of a CNN cultist with shit for brains. No one that matters thinks the way you do. 

In his two terms, Trump has killed enough sovereigns (ayatollahs), top generals, generals, mullahs, and terrorist leaders to fill a high school gymnasium, while only losing an amount of soldiers that would fit in a baseball dugout. 

Can you make me the list of all the sovereigns, top generals, generals, mullahs (or state officials of similarly high rank) that were killed by the US military in every other war in their history? 

Try to get to ten.

And once you list is compiled, calculate the ratio of foreign leaders to American servicemn killed. Is that number higher than 1, like it was under Trump? Or is it lower than 1/10,000?

Was the number of US servicemen killed in a previous American war lower than the number of navy ships that were sunk? 

When you say that Trump made America look weak, you're just proving how much of a cultist idjit you are. 

And you really thought that Trump was going to exterminate 60M people, a-hole? 

He was making big threats to get big concessions. It was a war. He wanted to get his way, and he did a lot of big talking. So what? Did he murder all those people, dingus? No.

But he got what he NEEDED to get out of this. 

Knowing what to read and what to ignore is fundamental. 

Reading articles from CNN and CBC is just mental. 

Wow. Is that what the "news" is reporting inside of Trumps massive anal cavity? How do you even get reception in there? 

The MOU is nothing but a gift to Iran. In every way and by every metric, worse than the JCPOA. 

Iran got sanctions lifted and assets unfrozen before they've even agreed to a permanent deal. (The JCPOA was a compliance-based sanctions relief plan.) Plus a promise of $300B if a permanent deal is struck, for which the US is on the hook. They didn't have to give up anything. Nothing. That's how desperate Trump was to roll out the white flag and pray to a big gold idol of himself that prices ease before the midterms. He and his clown car were outsmarted on every level. Embarrassing. 

Trump was bad for the Ayatollah, but the biggest financier of the regime in the last 50 years. 

[CITIZEN_2015]

On 6/17/2026 at 4:19 PM, John Johnston said:

The Republicans have zero balls. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. What a clown show these people are. 

The Islamic Republic won the war because Americans did not have the balls to land ground forces with full scale invasion as they did in Iraq in 2003. The Europeans were even more coward.

While the American did not wish a little of pain for a short time (over $4 gas) Iranians form a human chain on many bridges and power plants so that Americans cannot bomb them. This shows the difference between the two.

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

Wow. Is that what the "news" is reporting inside of Trumps massive anal cavity?

You're the resident expert on anal cavities, you tell me.

Quote

The MOU is nothing but a gift to Iran. In every way and by every metric, worse than the JCPOA. 

Oh, fer sure, eh? We just heard it right from the biggest cultist on the internet so it must be true. Thanks for all the sites and links that you posted with your BS.

Quote

Iran got sanctions lifted and assets unfrozen before they've even agreed to a permanent deal.

This is a work in progress, and can't be judged until the final deal is in place, and the monitoring is occurring.

Quote

(The JCPOA was a compliance-based sanctions relief plan.)

And the sanctions were relieved despite the fact that Iran was never in compliance:

• "While the 2015 JCPOA did not legally ban Iran's missile development, UN Security Council Resolution 2231—which endorsed the deal—called upon Iran not to undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to deliver nuclear weapons. [1, 2, 3]
  Iran continually defied this restriction with ongoing tests and development following the deal's implementation in January 2016. Notable early examples include: [1, 2]
  • March 2016: Iran tested multiple ballistic missiles (including Qiam-1s) labeled with slogans calling for the destruction of Israel.
  • January 2017: Iran conducted a medium-range ballistic missile test, which prompted the United States and other member nations to raise formal concerns at the UN about defiance of Resolution 2231

2231 was a mandatory part of the JCPOA, and Iran was NEVER in compliance with that. Not for one second.

So the whole time that Iran was protected by the JCPOA, they were building a nest around their nuclear weapons program:

• building, researching, test-firing ballistic missiles, and IRBMs, on the way to eventually having ICBMs
• ramping up their ballistic missile production to epic proportions
• building a drone fleet, ballistic missile arsenal, navy, anti-air defences, etc, to the point where attacking them was no longer possible
• arming their terrorist proxies with drones, ballistic missiles and rockets to aid in their defence/the genocide against Israel.
• increasing their refining capacity and capabilities in under-mountain facilities so that they could quickly start making large amounts of weapons-grade uranium once their conventional military assets were strong enough to allow them to ignore any attempts from outsiders to stop them

What part of all that wasn't happening behind the safety blanket provided by the JCPOA? 

Quote

Plus a promise of $300B if a permanent deal is struck, for which the US is on the hook.

The US isn't on the hook for a cent, lying dummy.

Quote

They didn't have to give up anything. Nothing.

Iran gave up everything you daft tart.

What didn't they give up?

Quote

That's how desperate Trump was to roll out the white flag and pray to a big gold idol of himself that prices ease before the midterms.

• The midterms are still 5 months away
• listen to yourself, admitting that leftists were working on behalf of the IRGC, and using this war as a political tool against Trump instead of supporting their own country in a war. You basically just admitted that you're a traitorous fking piece of sh1t, as if we didn't already know that. 

Quote

He and his clown car were outsmarted on every level. Embarrassing. 

Where is Iran's navy, dumbass?

Where are Iran's anti-air defences, dumbass?

What happened to Iran's BM production, dumbass?

What happened to Iran's nuclear material production, dumbass?

What happened to Iran's generals, ayatollahs, mullahs, etc, dumbass?

 

Almost everything that Iran built under the protection of the JCPOA was destroyed. They had to resort to sinking tankers to defend the ayatollah, and all of you "patriotic environmentalists" were cheering it on. Fkin disgusting maggots. 

Quote

 

Trump was bad for the Ayatollah, but the biggest financier of the regime in the last 50 years.

 

That is one of the dumbest things you ever said, and you've never said anything intelligent in 5,600 posts. 

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, Hodad said:

Wow. Is that what the "news" is reporting inside of Trumps massive anal cavity? How do you even get reception in there? 

Then once again a lefty who's losing an argument starts having weird homosexual fantasies about people's butts

What is that, like the fifth time today? What the hell is wrong with these people

[SpankyMcFarland]

The Shaheds are such puny low tech weapons but therein lies their strength. Cost is tiny and they can be mass produced during a war while under fire. Imagine the volume of such drones China could field in a conflict. It’s a real wake up call for the US. 

 

 

 

 

[SpankyMcFarland]

20 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Any reasonable person knows why your confirmation bias has you seeking out moments of joy for the Iranian side.

Wellllllll. Think about the fact that there were thousands of sorties by fighter planes alone. Then all the sorties that were successfully flown by Reaper drones. Thousands more.

Even the Reapers that were shot down might have all had 1, 3, or even dozens of successful missions before they were shot down.

On top of that, even if a Reaper flew one mission, and hit a high-value before it was destroyed, that's still a massive success.... Think about it: that means that the US projected a very effective amount of power over Iran while the nearest American soldier was thousands of miles away from harm. 

I just typed all that before I found this:

• "There is no exact official public tally of the total number of individual sorties flown by US MQ-9 Reaper drones over Iran. However, during the intense phase of the conflict in spring 2026, the US maintained a high-tempo operation, routinely flying more than \(16[1.2.7]\) to 30 million Reapers over the country at any given time to strike mobile missile launchers and radar sites"

I dunno, it sounds like a ridiculously high number. I was thinking more like 1,000-2,000 a day.

If Iran shot down 24 Reapers out of all those, that's not even a drop in the bucket. But I really doubt there were 30 million Reaper drones over Iran at any one time. That seems like an impossible number.

• The high-risk nature of these deep-incursion missions resulted in significant attrition for the US military. Throughout the conflict, at least 24 MQ-9 Reapers were shot down by Iranian air defenses or destroyed on the ground, representing roughly 20% of the Pentagon's pre-war inventory of the aircraft. [1, 2, 3, 4]

OK, this part makes more sense. The US only had 120 Reapers 🤣

Maybe they mean that Reapers flew 3M miles/day? 

• While the U.S. military has bombed over 13,000 targets in Iran overall, the exact number of individual targets struck specifically by MQ-9 Reaper drones remains classified. However, Air Force officials describe the Reaper as the "most valuable player" of the conflict, noting it has hit "many, many" dynamic targets—including mobile missile launchers—across nine Iranian provinces. [1, 2, 3, 4]
  Because Reaper drones are unstealthy, flying for extended periods in contested Iranian airspace comes at a heavy cost. During the height of the conflict, Iranian air defenses and ground strikes destroyed approximately two dozen MQ-9 drones.

So 24 Reapers were destroyed, but they destroyed a lot of ballistic missiles and launchers. 

I think that each Reaper, on avg, probably destroyed many times own worth before they were destroyed. 

Like I said, your confirmation bias seems really hungry for any signs of Iranian victory, no matter how small...

 

 

One last thing: your own video describes the Iranian drone tech as being a threat to US military tech, and that they were shipping them out to all their terrorist bases, which TOTALLY underlines the necessity of dealing with Iran, and how far their tech came while operating behind the shield of the JCPOA. This war was neither illegal nor unnecessary.

So with this overwhelming victory, did Iran surrender unconditionally? Is that the current state of affairs in your opinion? 

[WestCanMan]

3 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

So with this overwhelming victory, did Iran surrender unconditionally? Is that the current state of affairs in your opinion? 

What was this war about? Who got the main concession?

If it was a quest for the Holy Grail, and one guy got the Grail, did he win? 

Iran's line in the sand was that they were not going to give up pursuing a nuclear weapon, and where are we at with that now? 

The main part of the JCPOA that Iran ignored was the building and researching of ballistic missiles/ICBMs. That was handled by a military intervention - their capacity is gone now. 

Iran's nuclear program is undoubtedly behind where it was on Jan 1 2017. 

 

Of course it wasn't a full, unconditional surrender, but it was a critical victory with very low loss of American soldiers. 

 

Saying that Iran won is just a pathetic, sad, disgusting lie. They lost the vast majority of their military infrastructure (if not all), several dozens of their leaders and generals were killed, their cardboard ayatollah had to hide in a bunker for the last two months, their oil extraction/refining/shipping capacity are two years away from being back to normal, their air force and anti-air defences were obliterated, their entire navy was sunk, etc.

The US lost a handful of soldiers and one electronic warfare plane. The rest of the losses were insignificant from a major military standpoint. 

• 13 US soldiers died in the Iran war
• 118 people were killed in Chicago in the last 3 months

If Democrats don't care about 118 people from Chicago, why do they care about 13 US soldiers?

 

The $300B that leftists love to talk about was all negotiated from gulf states, not the US. And if you think about it, Iran needed financial help from somewhere, and the last thing the US wants is for that to come from China. If China got a hold of their own extraction and refining capacity in the ME as a result of this war, it could be a net loss for the US. 

[User]

34 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

The Shaheds are such puny low tech weapons but therein lies their strength. Cost is tiny and they can be mass produced during a war while under fire. Imagine the volume of such drones China could field in a conflict. It’s a real wake up call for the US. 

 

 

 

 

Which is why the US was already fast tracking interceptors for these last year that were already fielded in Ukraine and in the war with Iran…

I notice once again your ire is directed towards the US.

This isn’t a wake up call for NATO? For Taiwan? For anyone else?

 

 

[Hodad]

18 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

You're the resident expert on anal cavities, you tell me.

Oh, fer sure, eh? We just heard it right from the biggest cultist on the internet so it must be true. Thanks for all the sites and links that you posted with your BS.

This is a work in progress, and can't be judged until the final deal is in place, and the monitoring is occurring.

And the sanctions were relieved despite the fact that Iran was never in compliance:

• [1, 2, 3]
  Iran continually defied this restriction with ongoing tests and development following the deal's implementation in January 2016. Notable early examples include: [1, 2]
  • March 2016: Iran tested multiple ballistic missiles (including Qiam-1s) labeled with slogans calling for the destruction of Israel.
  • January 2017: Iran conducted a medium-range ballistic missile test, which prompted the United States and other member nations to raise formal concerns at the UN about defiance of Resolution 2231

2231 was a mandatory part of the JCPOA, and Iran was NEVER in compliance with that. Not for one second.

So the whole time that Iran was protected by the JCPOA, they were building a nest around their nuclear weapons program:

• building, researching, test-firing ballistic missiles, and IRBMs, on the way to eventually having ICBMs
• ramping up their ballistic missile production to epic proportions
• building a drone fleet, ballistic missile arsenal, navy, anti-air defences, etc, to the point where attacking them was no longer possible
• arming their terrorist proxies with drones, ballistic missiles and rockets to aid in their defence/the genocide against Israel.
• increasing their refining capacity and capabilities in under-mountain facilities so that they could quickly start making large amounts of weapons-grade uranium once their conventional military assets were strong enough to allow them to ignore any attempts from outsiders to stop them

What part of all that wasn't happening behind the safety blanket provided by the JCPOA? 

The US isn't on the hook for a cent, lying dummy.

Iran gave up everything you daft tart.

What didn't they give up?

• The midterms are still 5 months away
• listen to yourself, admitting that leftists were working on behalf of the IRGC, and using this war as a political tool against Trump instead of supporting their own country in a war. You basically just admitted that you're a traitorous fking piece of sh1t, as if we didn't already know that. 

Where is Iran's navy, dumbass?

Where are Iran's anti-air defences, dumbass?

What happened to Iran's BM production, dumbass?

What happened to Iran's nuclear material production, dumbass?

What happened to Iran's generals, ayatollahs, mullahs, etc, dumbass?

 

Almost everything that Iran built under the protection of the JCPOA was destroyed. They had to resort to sinking tankers to defend the ayatollah, and all of you "patriotic environmentalists" were cheering it on. Fkin disgusting maggots. 

That is one of the dumbest things you ever said, and you've never said anything intelligent in 5,600 posts. 

 

Quote

1. listen to yourself, admitting that leftists were working on behalf of the IRGC, and
2. using this war as a political tool against Trump instead of supporting their own country in a war

1. You're really quite delusional.🤪
2. Yes, all the meanies using Trump's gross incompetence against him. How rude!

 

Quote

1. "While the 2015 JCPOA did not legally ban Iran's missile development,"
2. 2231 was a mandatory part of the JCPOA, and Iran was NEVER in compliance with that

Do you even read the dumb shit you post, or are you too busy spamming? Developing non-nuclear weapons was not a violation of the JCPOA. Noncompliance with a nonbinding UN resolution that's NOT part of the JCPOA does NOT mean that Iran was not in compliance with the JCPOA.

In fact, they were in compliance--and it was working fine--until Trump tore it up. It's literally a problem that he caused. Just because you're both dumb doesn't mean you have to defend every ridiculous thing he does. It's not a club. 

Before, during and after the JCPOA

[Hodad]

41 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

The US isn't on the hook for a cent, lying dummy.

We promised them $300B. Trumpco SAID that the US wouldn't have to fund it, but the obligation has been created with no agreement from anyone else to fund it. 

This is EXACTLY like when the orange baboon started building a wall and told you that Mexico would pay for it. You mouth breathers swallowed it down. What happened with that? 

The bottom line is that the US is on the hook for delivering that $300B and there is nobody else lined up to pay. Maybe Trump can pass the tin cup around and get others to chip in. Maybe not. We'll see how eager the gulf states are to send money to the country that has been lobbing missiles at them. 

[robosmith]

On 6/19/2026 at 8:47 AM, WestCanMan said:

You stupid God-damned loser.

Obama's JCPOA was being completely ignored, right from the start.

FYI one of the main components of the JCPOA was that Iran wasn't supposed to be building ballistic missiles and working towards ICBMs and they started doing it instantly. 

The JCPOA was hot garbage. Completely worthless.

Iran was using the JCPOA as a shield behind which to build ICBMs, build a massive drone army, and supply the Houthis, Hezbollah and Hamas with rockets to bombard Israel, while they were also upgrading their refining capabilities.

Do you honestly see no difference between Iran today and Iran in 2016, when Trump was elected the first time?

Iran is light years behind where they were in 2016 right now. 

Lol. 

Tankers are flowing, free of charge.

Iran has lost their ability to mass-produce ballistic missiles and drones.

Iran has lot their navy.

Iran has lost all of their anti-air defences. 

Iran has lost most if not all of their fighter planes. 

Can you at least admit to that you fking child?

Obama was great at ginning up racial hatred, but his JCPOA was not working. Iran started on the road to nuclear weapons before the ink was dry:

1. They started developing delivery systems for nukes
2. they started ramping up production of those delivery systems to an extremely high lvl
3. they started developing refining technology to build weapons-grade Uranium
4. they started refining mass amounts of Uranium, far beyond what they'd ever need for civilian usage
5. they started to build their conventional military to the point where they felt like they no longer needed to listen

Trump showed them that they need to listen. And not just because nameless soldiers will die, because ayatollahs will die. 

You don't appreciate Trump's strength because you're a gutless loser, but strength is necessary. The less strength you have in terms of policing and military, the more of that you need to do as an average citizen. 

Listen idjit, you didn't complain about that when they were all going to Ukraine for that stupid war that we provoked. 

If NATO wasn't on the verge of moving into Ukraine, not one dollar would have been spent on defending Ukraine and not one missile would have been sent there. 

Iran needed to be taken down. America stockpiles weapons to end Iran-type threats. A nuclear-armed Iran is a threat that you just don't understand. 

The Ukraine war never needed to happen. 

That's just the talking point of a CNN cultist with shit for brains. No one that matters thinks the way you do. 

In his two terms, Trump has killed enough sovereigns (ayatollahs), top generals, generals, mullahs, and terrorist leaders to fill a high school gymnasium, while only losing an amount of soldiers that would fit in a baseball dugout. 

Can you make me the list of all the sovereigns, top generals, generals, mullahs (or state officials of similarly high rank) that were killed by the US military in every other war in their history? 

Try to get to ten.

And once you list is compiled, calculate the ratio of foreign leaders to American servicemn killed. Is that number higher than 1, like it was under Trump? Or is it lower than 1/10,000?

Was the number of US servicemen killed in a previous American war lower than the number of navy ships that were sunk? 

When you say that Trump made America look weak, you're just proving how much of a cultist idjit you are. 

And you really thought that Trump was going to exterminate 60M people, a-hole? 

He was making big threats to get big concessions. It was a war. He wanted to get his way, and he did a lot of big talking. So what? Did he murder all those people, dingus? No.

But he got what he NEEDED to get out of this. 

Knowing what to read and what to ignore is fundamental. 

Reading articles from CNN and CBC is just mental. 

Iran GAINED CONTROL of the Strait of Hormuz and that is much more powerful than nukes because it can be USED.  Duh

All you got is gratuitous ad hominem attacks and unsubstantiated OPINIONS. LMAO

Edited Wednesday at 06:42 PM by robosmith

[CdnFox]

9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Iran GAINED CONTROL of the Strait of Hormuz and that is much more powerful than nukes because it can be USED.  Duh

 

That's one of the stupidest things you've ever said. And it was up against some pretty stiff competition