Moonbox Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 (edited) 8 minutes ago, CdnFox said: So here's another liberal who admits something is fact .... but pretends that if it came from facebook the fact doesn't matter and then imagines that's where it came from LOL HOws your math lessons coming along? This is the sort of absolute nonsense that could feature in mental health case studies. What...the actual f*ck...🤣 Edited March 24 by Moonbox Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
CdnFox Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 1 minute ago, Goddess said: Carney has also asked the Supreme Court and Senate to do away with the notwithstanding clause, which was an integral part of the provinces ratifying the Charter. This means he can institute any kind of law that would apply across Canada and provinces would have no say. He is planning something. Something that gives him ultimate control. The censorship bills silence citizens. Getting rid of the notwithstanding clause will silence provinces. He's not doing all this for no reason. It's been the highest priority for him since he got in. Well I don't think there's anything terribly secret about it. The liberals want full control over what people say you can think in public because it allows them to stay in power. If you are allowed to set the narrative and say only that what you think is good and everyone else is evil and can pass legislation that backs that up then pretty soon it's impossible for there to be in opposition government. So they will control the laws, they will control speech, they will demand to be able to see everything you do and say online and everywhere else for that matter and then they will craft a narrative that only certain things are acceptable to think or say and that they are the only party that reflects those things This is why they buy the media. This is why they overfunded the CBC. This is why they want the various online speech laws. This is why they want to control the courts. Not like it's the first time we've seen this in history. I don't think there's any deep mystery to crack here they just want to control society so that they can stay in power and milk it for all its worth Just now, Moonbox said: This is the sort of absolute nonsense that could feature in mental health case studies. You mean the idea that if a fact is on Facebook it's not a fact? Oh hell yeah. But definitely deserve some mental health research money. You guys could be the centerfold for psychology weekly Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Goddess Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 7 minutes ago, CdnFox said: but pretends that if it came from facebook the fact doesn't matter and then imagines that's where it came from They belittle YouTube, but most world governments have YouTube channels that are dedicated to committee meetings and investigative hearings. It's a great place to watch them - no ads, no interruptions. CPAC has a dedicated channel. By belittling YouTube, they can dismiss any information from every committee. But the CBC reigns supreme! 🤣 Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
CdnFox Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 2 minutes ago, Goddess said: They belittle YouTube, but most world governments have YouTube channels that are dedicated to committee meetings and investigative hearings. It's a great place to watch them - no ads, no interruptions. CPAC has a dedicated channel. By belittling YouTube, they can dismiss any information from every committee. But the CBC reigns supreme! 🤣 So here's how it goes with moonbox and a few of the others They're largely on educated on the subjects but they know a tiny amount. When you say something that offends their echo chamber believes, despite the fact that they have no real knowledge of the subject whatsoever they will immediately jump on Google and frantically search for 3 or 4 minutes looking for evidence that proves that what they want to be true is true and that what you have said is false. Four minutes later they will consider themselves to be experts on the matter and will come back and one of two things will happen. They'll realize they can't really argue with your point in which case they'll either argue your source is wrong or then will post something they've half read insisting that this proves they're right. If a research study is posted on Facebook and you read the research study somehow the fact that it's on Facebook means that it's no longer valid according to that. Same about any fact that they don't like that comes from YouTube or Google or any other source. The other thing that sometimes happens is they post all of the sources they just found in three or four minutes and they wind up accidentally posting proof that they're wrong. Moon box and a couple of the others are absolutely famous for it. At that point all they could do is argue that the English language isn't the English language. I've literally had a five-page argument with moonbox about whether or not 100% - 50% is equal to 50% or not. That was literally a debate we had. So because of this they try and stick to discrediting the source these days. It's safer. If you and I see something that we don't believe is true we go out and find our own sources and discover the truth and bring it back and post it. They just complain that the facts don't count because Facebook 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Moonbox Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 2 minutes ago, Goddess said: Don't act like you're interested. You can watch them any time you wanted to. You choose not to. I can watch what? Where would I even start? You've vaguely referenced "senate committees" but provide no links and no specifics to evaluate. Now I'm supposed to go down the rabbit hole trying to find something that (based on your track record) only exists in the imagination of anonymous social media posters? OKAY!! 🙄 Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
CdnFox Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 1 minute ago, Moonbox said: I can watch what? Where would I even start? You've vaguely referenced "senate committees" but provide no links and no specifics to evaluate. Now I'm supposed to go down the rabbit hole trying to find something that (based on your track record) only exists in the imagination of anonymous social media posters? OKAY!! 🙄 She's not bothering because she knows you're a dishonest slacker who wouldn't bother to watch him would pretend it didn't matter even if she gave you a link to the exact date time and moment where god himself said she was right. If she's wrong surely to god you can find some evidence of that fairly quickly. But of course you're only defense is you believe she may have seen it on Facebook and you provided no evidence of that yet you expect us all to accept it and then dismiss the facts based on that The liberal mind. I provide no facts or information, I make assumptions about you and your facts and information without any knowledge or evidence, I demand you accept what I say is true while also demanding that you prove everything you say by providing sights and sources You could hypocrisy for the Olympics Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Goddess Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 10 minutes ago, CdnFox said: then pretty soon it's impossible for there to be in opposition government. Likely the ultimate goal here. Poilievre did a great job of explaining the role of the Opposition, when he was on Rogan. His is accountable TO THE PEOPLE of Canada, to hold the ruling government to account. But the Liberal party has convinced a slight majority of Canadians that the Opposition is unnecessary and holding the government to account is not just wrong, it's EVIL. It's why their main beef with Poilievre is that he picks the government apart and holds them to account. They DO NOT want that happening. Liberal supporters HATE this with a passion - you see it every day here. It drives them MAD with rage when the faults of the Liberal party are brought to light. If they can't argue the facts, they belittle the source. Liberal supporters WANT no Opposition party. They WANT a one-party system and that MUST be the Liberal party. They WANT a government-funded propaganda mouthpiece. They worship everything the CBC says. It's been said before - "Be careful what you wish for." 8 minutes ago, CdnFox said: So here's how it goes with moonbox and a few of the others They're largely on educated on the subjects but they know a tiny amount. When you say something that offends their echo chamber believes, despite the fact that they have no real knowledge of the subject whatsoever they will immediately jump on Google and frantically search for 3 or 4 minutes looking for evidence that proves that what they want to be true is true and that what you have said is false. Four minutes later they will consider themselves to be experts on the matter and will come back and one of two things will happen. They'll realize they can't really argue with your point in which case they'll either argue your source is wrong or then will post something they've half read insisting that this proves they're right. If a research study is posted on Facebook and you read the research study somehow the fact that it's on Facebook means that it's no longer valid according to that. Same about any fact that they don't like that comes from YouTube or Google or any other source. The other thing that sometimes happens is they post all of the sources they just found in three or four minutes and they wind up accidentally posting proof that they're wrong. Moon box and a couple of the others are absolutely famous for it. At that point all they could do is argue that the English language isn't the English language. I've literally had a five-page argument with moonbox about whether or not 100% - 50% is equal to 50% or not. That was literally a debate we had. So because of this they try and stick to discrediting the source these days. It's safer. If you and I see something that we don't believe is true we go out and find our own sources and discover the truth and bring it back and post it. They just complain that the facts don't count because Facebook BINGO. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
LinkSoul60 Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 31 minutes ago, Goddess said: His cancer research. Which nobody found any fault with until he found fault with the mRNA jabs. Kudo's for taking interest and following someone. You just picked the wrong guy. A lot of people skate through life without crashing into the boards headfirst, until they do. Not that it matters to me, but good to see him pivot into veterinary immunology when the day job fell apart. 36 minutes ago, Goddess said: I'm sure. Too bad you can't apply that to Liberal policies that have crashed and burned. I did, and why I voted for another guy this last election. Quote
Goddess Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 4 minutes ago, CdnFox said: If she's wrong surely to god you can find some evidence of that fairly quickly. Apparently, it takes an intellectual genius to type "CPAC" into YouTube. It's so confusing, he is actually asking for my help to do that. 🤣 1 Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
Goddess Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 3 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: and why I voted for another guy this last election. Riiiiiiiiiight. **wink** Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
CdnFox Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 9 minutes ago, Goddess said: Likely the ultimate goal here. Poilievre did a great job of explaining the role of the Opposition, when he was on Rogan. His is accountable TO THE PEOPLE of Canada, to hold the ruling government to account. But the Liberal party has convinced a slight majority of Canadians that the Opposition is unnecessary and holding the government to account is not just wrong, it's EVIL. It's why their main beef with Poilievre is that he picks the government apart and holds them to account. They DO NOT want that happening. Liberal supporters HATE this with a passion - you see it every day here. It drives them MAD with rage when the faults of the Liberal party are brought to light. If they can't argue the facts, they belittle the source. Liberal supporters WANT no Opposition party. They WANT a one-party system and that MUST be the Liberal party. They WANT a government-funded propaganda mouthpiece. They worship everything the CBC says. It's been said before - "Be careful what you wish for." For sure. The liberals are about power and nothing else. For them canada is a meal ticket. Trudeau ripped the country off huge and he's now 'retired' earning millions of dollars every year "Serving" on the board of directors for companies he funnelled money into when in was in power. And doing speaking tours about how great he actually was. He will spend his years rich and able to attend society's highest functions and such and all he did was run the country into the ground. Carney will be no better. 9 minutes ago, Goddess said: BINGO. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Goddess Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 10 minutes ago, CdnFox said: you believe she may have seen it on Facebook and you provided no evidence of that yet you expect us all to accept it and then dismiss the facts based on that Both YouTube and X have excerpts of Canadian committee meetings and US hearings. So, yes, I sometimes post those excerpts. It's not rocket science to find the entire committee meeting, so you get the context of the excerpt. I "get" they don't like that these things are on X and not on the CBC. But honestly, I can't even remember when the last time was that the CBC even played an excerpt of a committee meeting. If you want to be well-informed, especially in Canada, you HAVE TO search out sources other than the CBC. It's so bizarre to me that these Lib supporters here are so PRIDEFUL of the fact that they have never watched a committee meeting and only get their info from CBC. They literally think only getting their info from the CBC makes them smarter than everyone else. And quick 3-4 minute Googling on various topics when they're here, and they think they're fully informed. 🤣 It used to frustrate me a bit, but now it makes me laugh at how utterly deluded they are. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
CdnFox Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 8 minutes ago, Goddess said: Apparently, it takes an intellectual genius to type "CPAC" into YouTube. It's so confusing, he is actually asking for my help to do that. 🤣 "YOUTUBE?!?! You can't trust ANYTHING on youtube if it speaks negatively about the liberals!! It's fake news! It's misinformation! Lies all lies!!! Unless they said something good about the liberals? If they said something good then after all it's cpac, they just POST on youtube so its fine. Did they say anything nice about liberals? I'd listen to it then.... " -moonbox probably. My problem is even if you give him a link to those specific sections you're talking about he won't watch them. Instead what he'll do is try and find a couple of sections that sound like they're saying the opposite, And he will post those without carefully listening to either one. And almost inevitably the one he posts will contain the same information and prove that what he's saying is wrong and the way you were saying is correct. He will go then go on to attack you personally and claim that his stupidity is your fault in the end. And he cannot imagine why you're not interested in digging up the links for him Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Michael Hardner Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 Too bad this drifted into anti-Vax discussion domain. There is real concern about free speech here. I think liberals (small l) everywhere should be concerned. Quote Dear Dr. Spence-Ariemma, I am writing you as President of the Society for Academic Freedom and Scholarship (SAFS), an association of Canadian scholars committed to the principles of academic freedom and the merit principle. You can read more information about our organization at www.safs.ca. Our organization would like to voice our concerns regarding the case of Dr. Paul Finlayson at your institution. According to media reports in December, Finlayson was suspended with pay from teaching following comments he made about the Israel-Hamas war on social media. If you read the comments that he posted they may appear to some to be harsh. However, as a faculty member Finlayson should have the right to express his views on the issues of the day as a matter of extra-mural speech. The collective agreements which the University of Guelph-Humber has signed give voice to this important concept: namely that “universities are communities in which the right to criticize all aspects of society is valued and respected” (UofG, 7.04) while the Humber agreement states that “faculty shall be free to act and speak in their capacity as public citizens” (13.05(iii)). But if such speech outside of work can lead to suspensions from teaching it will make other faculty wary to chime in. This would deprive our society of the voices of faculty members and the important contributions that they can, do, and hopefully will continue to bring to the social debates on the issues of the day be they polite and genteel or sometimes brusque. We hope that you will consider the importance of defending the rights of faculty to academic freedom and extra-mural speech so that the faculty of Guelph-Humber can continue to make important contributions in civil discourse without fear of censure. Sincerely, Robert G. Thomas President, Society for Academic Freedom and Scholarship. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
Moonbox Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 8 minutes ago, CdnFox said: She's not bothering because she knows you're a dishonest slacker who wouldn't bother to watch him would pretend it didn't matter even if she gave you a link to the exact date time and moment where god himself said she was right. She's not bothering for the same reason you never do. You don't actually have any evidence or facts to cite. You're just spinning yarn and insisting that people believe you. 🤡👍 Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
Legato Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 2 minutes ago, Moonbox said: She's not bothering for the same reason you never do. You don't actually have any evidence or facts to cite. You're just spinning yarn and insisting that people believe you. 🤡👍 Just a little help from me to the perpetually uninformed. https://www.cpac.ca/en Go take a look. Quote
eyeball Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 51 minutes ago, Goddess said: By belittling YouTube, they can dismiss any information from every committee. I'm always distracted by the cat videos and ships in big waves. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
LinkSoul60 Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 42 minutes ago, Goddess said: Riiiiiiiiiight. **wink** The guy with no real life practical experience and resume didn't stand a chance... It wasn't a fair fight. Quote
Goddess Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 (edited) 29 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: The guy with no real life practical experience and resume didn't stand a chance... It wasn't a fair fight. He knows the political system inside and out and knows how to make it work for Canadians. His policies show that. He came from humble beginnings and knows first-hand the damage governmental policies can be to the little person because of what happened to his parents. Ya, why would we want a guy like that, right? Carney got very mixed reviews in England. A lot of overspending. A lot of unjustified expenses. A lot of money printing that affected the economy negatively and caused massive inflation. Stuck his nose in policies he had no business sticking his nose in. His wife complained that their living arrangements were not up to their standards. He has lived a privileged life. Admitted he doesn't shop for his own groceries, so he has no clue about that. And doesn't seem to care. Agreed it was not a fair fight. The CBC banned having Conservative views on their programming. So, during the campaign Canadians were only exposed to Liberal propaganda and constant Conservative bashing. And then you were programmed to poop your pants every time Trump tweeted and focus on the US president and not the Liberal bad record, the economic trouble Canada is in, the immigration failures that put all our social networks and infrastructure in jeopardy, the justice file failures......you ignored all that in favor of pooping your pants over Trump. Now we have all the same problems AND tariffs. And the same people in power who CAUSED all the problems. The Conservatives gave Carney the power he wanted to fast-track industry and after a year......ZERO projects fast-tracked. But LOTS of censorship bills fast-tracked. THOSE were prioritized. Ya, you're real smart. 🙄 Let us know when you're done pooping your pants so we can get to work and get this country back on track. Edited March 24 by Goddess Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
Goddess Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 (edited) 56 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: I think liberals (small l) everywhere should be concerned. They're not. Carney's top priority upon gaining power was fast-tracking censorship bills. 4 of them. And a gun grab that supposedly gets illegal guns off the street except the guns they're grabbing aren't on the streets. They're locked in legal owner's gun safes. Small L and Big L liberals - none of them care. Canada is headed down a dark road. Edited March 24 by Goddess Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
Goddess Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 41 minutes ago, eyeball said: I'm always distracted by the cat videos Me, too. 🤣 And flamenco videos. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
CdnFox Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 45 minutes ago, Moonbox said: She's not bothering for the same reason you never do. But I do. And then you usually come back with something that you think proves me wrong but in actuality winds up proving me absolutely correct And she does. The sheer volume of documentation that she has posted on this forum with regards to this subject is absolutely overwhelming. You complain when my posts go past more than two sentences because they're difficult for you, she makes me look absolutely succinct. And everybody knows that, absolutely no one on this forum thinks "gee i wish she'd post MORE information about covid, there's just not enough". If anything she's too verbose So the main difference is that I find you amusing and will watch you fumble and thrash about till you make a complete ass of yourself, she just thinks you're boring and a waste of time. Sorry was that too long for you? I was going to split it into two posts for you but then my post count would go up and your brain would explode so.. 29 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: The guy with no real life practical experience and resume didn't stand a chance... It wasn't a fair fight. So the job is being the top politician in the country And your argument is that being a politician including a minister for a couple of decades does not represent experience in being a politician. And you present this as an example of the logic that you used when making your decision LOLOL oh kid. You're literally a joke that writes itself Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Goddess Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 52 minutes ago, Moonbox said: She's not bothering for the same reason you never do. I'm not bothering because it's not rocket science finding committee meetings and hearings from all over the world. You have never been interested in them, you've mocked every time excerpts of them have been posted and I don't believe you're interested in them now. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
Goddess Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 6 minutes ago, CdnFox said: And everybody knows that, absolutely no one on this forum thinks "gee i wish she'd post MORE information about covid, there's just not enough". If anything she's too verbose LOL 🤣 To be fair - there are a few people here who follow me around from thread to thread and bring it up, purposely. 7 minutes ago, CdnFox said: she just thinks you're boring and a waste of time. He's not interested in information. He's only interested in knowing others agree with his strictly CBC viewpoints and putting "likes" on all his good buddy's posts, the 12-yr-old. Yes, boring. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
LinkSoul60 Posted March 24 Report Posted March 24 4 minutes ago, Goddess said: He knows the political system inside and out and knows how to make it work for Canadians. His policies show that. He came from humble beginnings and knows first-hand the damage governmental policies can be to the little person because of what happened to his parents. Ya, why would want a guy like that, right? Carney got very mixed reviews in England. A lot of overspending. A lot of unjustified expenses. A lot of money printing that affected the economy negatively and caused massive inflation. Stuck his nose in policies he had no business sticking his nose in. His wife complained that their living arrangements were not up to their standards. He has lived a privileged life. Admitted he doesn't shop for his own groceries, so he has no clue about that. And doesn't seem to care. Agreed it was not a fair fight. The CBC banned having Conservative views on their programming. So, during the campaign Canadians were only exposed to Liberal propaganda and constant Conservative bashing. And then you were programmed to poop your pants every time Trump tweeted and focus on the US president and not the Liberal bad record, the economic trouble Canada is in, the immigration failures that put all our social networks and infrastructure in jeopardy, the justice file failures......you ignored all that in favor of pooping your pants over Trump. Now we have all the same problems AND tariffs. And the same people in power who CAUSED all the problems. The Conservatives gave Carney the power he wanted to fast-track industry and after a year......ZERO projects fast-tracked. But LOTS of censorship bills fast-tracked. THOSE were prioritized. Ya, you're real smart. 🙄 Let us know when you're done pooping your pants so we can get to work and get this country back on track. Why do you say I'm 'pooping' my pants when you're melting down every 15 minutes over some made-up conspiracy or fictitious news. It's quite clear that you're the one 'pooping' on a regular basis. Clean up on aisle 2... 💩 What is there to debate about a career politician who has zero practical experience in the real world. And what policies? He's done nothing. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.