The SAVE America Act—is a voter ID and citizenship proof law that just passed the House is actually a Voter Suppression Law

[Reg Volk]

12 hours ago, User said:

Ah yes… the “No Kings!” Protestors who are upset Trump has taken out the Kings in Venezuela and Iran. 
 

You should be celebrating Trump. 

Yes, these fools hold rallies to protect ayatollahs while protesting democratically elected leaders.  The stupidity just never ends.

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Reg Volk said:

hey moronic fool - what do you think that !diot Schumer was saying - if he's claiming the millions of people will be removed by ICE from the voter rolls then he must be saying that illegals are voting!  What else would it be?

That ICE will wholesale remove voters no matter what their status is. Duh

2 hours ago, Reg Volk said:

So to get this straight - in Canada and Somalia, and Australia, just to name a few countries, they require ID to vote.  So you're saying that Canada, Somalia and Australia are suffering from voter suppression?  We need to get on this immediately if true, as Canada is in big trouble with so many people here being denied the vote!  

Do you know how to read? Statistics SHOW blacks are LESS LIKELY to have suitable ID AND LESS able to afford the resources to get them.

There is always a tradeoff between making it harder to vote and security, and voter IMPERSONATION FRAUD is already secure, so making it harder to vote is just VOTER SUPPRESSION.

2 hours ago, Reg Volk said:

Yes, these fools hold rallies to protect ayatollahs while protesting democratically elected leaders.  The stupidity just never ends.

No KINGS is about US. NOTHING to do with foreigners. Duh

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Reg Volk said:

hey moronic fool - what do you think that !diot Schumer was saying - if he's claiming the millions of people will be removed by ICE from the voter rolls then he must be saying that illegals are voting!  What else would it be?

So to get this straight - in Canada and Somalia, and Australia, just to name a few countries, they require ID to vote.  So you're saying that Canada, Somalia and Australia are suffering from voter suppression?  We need to get on this immediately if true, as Canada is in big trouble with so many people here being denied the vote!  

We have better turnouts as a general rule than the united states does.

All these claims were made as voter ID was brought in another countries and none of it has ever turned out to be true

[User]

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

That ICE will wholesale remove voters no matter what their status is. Duh

Just disgusting fear-mongering. 

[gatomontes99]

12 hours ago, robosmith said:

That ICE will wholesale remove voters no matter what their status is. Duh

Based on what evidence? 

[User]

6 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Based on what evidence? 

None. He has been making this stupid assertion for weeks on here now and runs away from them never explaining. 

[August1991]

On 3/11/2026 at 1:47 PM, robosmith said:

Majority vote to change rules. Sometimes referred to as the nuclear option because filibuster is what distinguishes the Senate from the House. 

Of course Trump ONLY cares about himself and his short term objectives, so he's willing to trash the niceties of Senate protocols because he desperately wants to steal the next election with the Save Act VOTER SUPPRESSIONS.

He knows impeachment awaits if he doesn't.

 

Robosmith: I understand that you hate Trump. 

Please explain how a Senate filibuster works.

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, August1991 said:

Robosmith: I understand that you hate Trump. 

Just the FACTS, Jack.

2 hours ago, August1991 said:

Please explain how a Senate filibuster works.

Really? The Senate requires 2/3rd vote to pass most bills. But any Senator can prevent a vote by holding the Podium for as long as s/he can hold the podium with an unending speech (used to be) or just the notification of intent (lately). Not sure what the current rule is. They were talking about going back to the old rule.

Edited March 13 by robosmith

[gatomontes99]

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

Just the FACTS, Jack.

Really? The Senate requires 2/3rd vote to pass most bills. But any Senator can prevent a vote by holding the Podium for as long as s/he can hold the podium with an unending speech (used to be) or just the notification of intent (lately). Not sure what the current rule is. They were talking about going back to the old rule.

No. Just wrong. 

The original Senate rules did have cloture, but it was majority vote. Burr argued that it was redundant, so they eliminated the original cloture rule. That meant debate could go on forever.

The goal of fillabuster was to get to a point where the majority left the chamber and a vote could be called allowing the minority to win. After Democrats fillabustered the Civil Rights Act, Republicans installed the current cloture rule that allowed debate in all cases to be be closed at 60 votes. 

 

[User]

14 hours ago, robosmith said:

Really? The Senate requires 2/3rd vote to pass most bills. But any Senator can prevent a vote by holding the Podium for as long as s/he can hold the podium with an unending speech (used to be) or just the notification of intent (lately). Not sure what the current rule is. They were talking about going back to the old rule.

It is not 2/3, it is 60 out of 100 for cloture. 

[Reg Volk]

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Reg Volk said:

^LYING with memes for fun and profit. LMAO

[User]

29 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^LYING with memes for fun and profit. LMAO

Seriously man. Stop being such a pathetic lying coward. 

1996: “This Is an Anti-Fraud Amendment”

In 1996, Schumer argued in favor of identification requirements tied to preventing fraud.

“Let’s admit the truth,” Schumer said at the time. “Everywhere people go they’re asked for a Social Security card. In fact, one way to prove you’re a bona fide person who can have a job is to ask for a driver’s license and a Social Security card. This is an anti-fraud amendment.”

He continued by saying one of the main concerns constituents raised about illegal immigration was that individuals could obtain jobs and benefits “because of fraud.”

The comments reflected a broader bipartisan push in the 1990s toward tightening documentation standards tied to employment and benefits.

https://wabcradio.com/2026/02/16/schumer-back-tracks-on-voter-id-anti-fraud-then-jim-crow-2-0-now/

[gatomontes99]

On 3/14/2026 at 7:48 PM, User said:

Seriously man. Stop being such a pathetic lying coward. 

1996: “This Is an Anti-Fraud Amendment”

In 1996, Schumer argued in favor of identification requirements tied to preventing fraud.

“Let’s admit the truth,” Schumer said at the time. “Everywhere people go they’re asked for a Social Security card. In fact, one way to prove you’re a bona fide person who can have a job is to ask for a driver’s license and a Social Security card. This is an anti-fraud amendment.”

He continued by saying one of the main concerns constituents raised about illegal immigration was that individuals could obtain jobs and benefits “because of fraud.”

The comments reflected a broader bipartisan push in the 1990s toward tightening documentation standards tied to employment and benefits.

https://wabcradio.com/2026/02/16/schumer-back-tracks-on-voter-id-anti-fraud-then-jim-crow-2-0-now/

Well, we won't see @robosmith in this thread again. 

[robosmith]

Democracy Docket  Video

Quote

The SAVE America Act isn't about securing free and fair elections — it's actually the opposite. It’s about stealing the 2026 midterms. Marc Elias breaks down exactly how this voter suppression bill works, and why millions of Americans could lose their right to vote.

 

[Reg Volk]

Millions of Americans won't lose their "right to vote".  This is just nonsense.

[robosmith]

36 minutes ago, Reg Volk said:

Millions of Americans won't lose their "right to vote".  This is just nonsense.

^Canucks KNOW NOTHING about US history. Esp the history of RepubliCON voter suppression.

[Reg Volk]

lol I know about Democrat voter suppression of black people in the South, but that's the Democrats, they always cheat.  The Democrats are a disease.

[robosmith]

38 minutes ago, Reg Volk said:

lol I know about Democrat voter suppression of black people in the South, but that's the Democrats, they always cheat.  The Democrats are a disease.

Thanks for proving your IGNORANCE. Ever since Nixon's Southern strategy, all the Jim Crow racists vote Republican.

That's why all the Southern states are RED. LMAO

You don't even know what a Dixiecrat was; they are EXTINCT now.

[gatomontes99]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

^Canucks KNOW NOTHING about US history. Esp the history of RepubliCON voter suppression.

Literally 36 states have these types of laws. No one will be hurt. 

[Nationalist]

On 3/11/2026 at 6:40 PM, robosmith said:

That ICE will wholesale remove voters no matter what their status is. Duh

Do you know how to read? Statistics SHOW blacks are LESS LIKELY to have suitable ID AND LESS able to afford the resources to get them.

There is always a tradeoff between making it harder to vote and security, and voter IMPERSONATION FRAUD is already secure, so making it harder to vote is just VOTER SUPPRESSION.

"Black people dumb!"

You're such a blatant racist.

[robosmith]

43 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

"Black people dumb!"

You're such a blatant racist.

No, you're unable to comprehend that the statistics show they are less prepared. That is FACT.

And you are clueless to understand that can be the RESULT of racism.

But you'll make up ANYTHING to avoid acknowledging that Voter ID is unnecessary because OUR ELECTIONS ARE SECURE without them.

[ironstone]

7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

No, you're unable to comprehend that the statistics show they are less prepared. That is FACT.

So why are they 'less prepared'?

Voting in California is quite something.

 

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, ironstone said:

So why are they 'less prepared'?

I don't know. Why don't you ask THEM?

2 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Voting in California is quite something.

 

Your faith in random youtubes is FOOLISH. You got a CREDIBLE SOURCE?

You know O'Keefe was arrested and convicted of FRAUD.

Quote

Yes, James O'Keefe has a record of legal issues, including a 2010 arrest and subsequent conviction. 

• 2010 Arrest/Guilty Plea: O'Keefe was arrested for entering the federal office of then-U.S. Senator Mary Landrieu under false pretenses. He pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor count of entering a federal building under false pretenses, which resulted in three years of probation, 100 hours of community service, and a $1,500 fine.
• Settlement/Payment: In 2013, O'Keefe agreed to pay $100,000 to a former California ACORN employee to settle a lawsuit regarding the surreptitious recording of a video.
• Financial Mismanagement: In February 2023, Project Veritas removed O'Keefe from his position as leader due to allegations of financial malfeasance, with the board alleging he "spent an excessive amount of donor funds in the [previous] three years on personal luxuries".
• Defamation Case: In 2024, O'Keefe and Project Veritas settled a defamation lawsuit brought by the postmaster of Erie, Pennsylvania, regarding false claims about mail-in ballots. In the settlement, O'Keefe stated he was "aware of no evidence or other allegation that election fraud occurred in the Erie Post Office during the 2020 Presidential Election"

 

[ironstone]

20 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I don't know. Why don't you ask THEM?

On the YouTube videos where blacks are asked if it's hard to get something like an ID, them are insulted by that notion.

And rightfully so.

The racism of low expectations.