Carneywatch.ca

[LinkSoul60]

8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I meant Trudeau  but you admitted voting for him too.  And when carney faceplants and fails and is thrown out youl'l insist that whomever is his replacement is WAY better than that loser  As you are doing now. 

You don't care who's the best.  You care about your tribe, and make decisions in a cult like fashion instead of doing what's right for your country and you've done so for well over a decade. 

 

Yeah, I said I voted for Trudeau in 2015.  After that...no.  

Other than that.... your typical partisan and rambling view of the world isn't even worth a response.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You clearly don't pay attention...  Find one post or comment where I said that I supported Trudeau, just one.

 

Search feature is disabled, which you knew when you asked. Are you saying it this time that you never supported Trudeau?

Quote

No you're not cultish... you're just a foolish hack who is unabashedly the conservative party's biggest cheerleader.

Amazing, I bet you absolutely wow the kids on the playground at recess with that kind of logic and come back

I have reasons for everything I say and I can articulate them in a coherent intelligent argument.

You say stupid things and then switch to nothing but insults when you're called on your stupidity.

You are Cultish. I'm rational. Which is why you keep losing these little discussions so badly

[CdnFox]

24 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Yeah, I said I voted for Trudeau in 2015.  After that...no.  

 

ANd before it was  "Find one post or comment where I said that I supported Trudeau, just one."

And like one post later you admit i was right after you demand  DEMAND I TELL YOU that you've never said such a thing.  Then you point out you said such a thing.  

Kid, you're a liar and you just proved it. Never voted for trudeau, then immediately admits you voted for trudeau, then we're suppossed to believe after that you didn't? 

You supported  trudeau, you support carney who's doing exactly the same things as trudeau and who advised trudeau for 6 years. 

I can certainly understand why you're ashamed of it though, and why you'd try to obfuscate. 

I'm sure you'll have never voted for carney when the time comes. 

[LinkSoul60]

5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Search feature is disabled, which you knew when you asked. Are you saying it this time that you never supported Trudeau?

Think what you want and makes you happy fool.

8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Amazing, I bet you absolutely wow the kids on the playground at recess with that kind of logic and come back

I have reasons for everything I say and I can articulate them in a coherent intelligent argument.

You say stupid things and then switch to nothing but insults when you're called on your stupidity.

You are Cultish. I'm rational. Which is why you keep losing these little discussions so badly

You are fùcking stunned....  truly stunned.

[LinkSoul60]

5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

ANd before it was  "Find one post or comment where I said that I supported Trudeau, just one."

And like one post later you admit i was right after you demand  DEMAND I TELL YOU that you've never said such a thing.  Then you point out you said such a thing.  

Kid, you're a liar and you just proved it. Never voted for trudeau, then immediately admits you voted for trudeau, then we're suppossed to believe after that you didn't? 

You supported  trudeau, you support carney who's doing exactly the same things as trudeau and who advised trudeau for 6 years. 

I can certainly understand why you're ashamed of it though, and why you'd try to obfuscate. 

I'm sure you'll have never voted for carney when the time comes. 

Your inability to listen and blatantly ridiculous bias were a couple of the reasons I blocked you last year.  Time to revisit that feature....

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Think what you want and makes you happy fool.

 

You're the one who asked so it seems to be what you wanted more than anything

Quote

You are fùcking stunned....  truly stunned.

Now now,.. no crying little guy.  GO ask your mom to change your diapers, you'll be fine. 

[LinkSoul60]

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You're the one who asked so it seems to be what you wanted more than anything

Now now,.. no crying little guy.  GO ask your mom to change your diapers, you'll be fine. 

Thatta boy.... wouldn't expect anything less than you digressing to your usual self before long.  You're consistent.

[CdnFox]

31 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Thatta boy.... wouldn't expect anything less than you digressing to your usual self before long.  You're consistent.

Yeah, the truth's like that. Just stays the same.  I can understand how that's confusing to people like you who's story changes all the time  

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Yeah, the truth's like that. Just stays the same.  I can understand how that's confusing to people like you who's story changes all the time  

Not as fast as Carney's lol. When he's not lying he's going back on his word.

"Elbows up!!" -> "Mmmmm, these WH pillows are TASTY!"

"TARIFFS!! HAHA!!" -> "No Tariffs."

"Chinese EV's!!" -> "Everyone has to buy a Ford or GM."

"The war is good!" -> "The war is illegal." -> "We might join the war."

"I no longer work for Brookfield." -> "Every time I talk to a foreign leader, Brookfield signs a billion-dollar deal with them."

[CdnFox]

26 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Not as fast as Carney's lol. When he's not lying he's going back on his word.

"Elbows up!!" -> "Mmmmm, these WH pillows are TASTY!"

"TARIFFS!! HAHA!!" -> "No Tariffs."

"Chinese EV's!!" -> "Everyone has to buy a Ford or GM."

"The war is good!" -> "The war is illegal." -> "We might join the war."

"I no longer work for Brookfield." -> "Every time I talk to a foreign leader, Brookfield signs a billion-dollar deal with them."

WE MUST GO FORWARD, NOT BACKWARD! UPWARD, NOT FORWARD! AND ALWAYS... ALWAYS TWIRLING TWIRLING TWIRLING

You know honestly when Aaron O'Toole started to go back on his word and flip flop conservatives called him out for it by the bucket load. He said there'd be no carbon tax and then came up with a new idea for carbon tax and even though technically it wasn't really a carbon tax the same way people still call them on it saying that's close enough. When you Backtrack on gun owners conservatives turn around and said that's weak you shouldn't do that

Liberals seem to be the opposite. They seem to actually respect their leader more if he lies or waffles or flip-flops or any of that. Honestly I just can't even get myself to think down to that level

[CdnFox]

34 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Not as fast as Carney's lol. When he's not lying he's going back on his word.

"Elbows up!!" -> "Mmmmm, these WH pillows are TASTY!"

"TARIFFS!! HAHA!!" -> "No Tariffs."

"Chinese EV's!!" -> "Everyone has to buy a Ford or GM."

"The war is good!" -> "The war is illegal." -> "We might join the war."

"I no longer work for Brookfield." -> "Every time I talk to a foreign leader, Brookfield signs a billion-dollar deal with them."

For those who haven't seen it in a while .....

 

[ironstone]

Canada is the highest per capita contributor to Ukraine among the G7 nations with $25.5 billion given to date. Trudeau and Carney have both stated that Canada will back Ukraine 'for as long as it takes'.

Brookfield has substantial  investments in Ukraine and these assets are under significant threat from Russia. 

Despite the threats, there is also a potential silver lining. As a ceasefire or truce is pursued, opportunities for reconstruction and investment in various sectors (such as energy infrastructure) may arise. The reconstruction effort will likely require substantial financial input, and private sector involvement, including companies like Brookfield, could play a crucial role.

Did Trudeau(advised by Carney) and now PM Carney send $25.5 billion primarily to protect Brookfield investments?😐

[WestCanMan]

57 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Liberals seem to be the opposite. They seem to actually respect their leader more if he lies or waffles or flip-flops or any of that. Honestly I just can't even get myself to think down to that level

Wanna see something funny?

I decided to see what AI could find about covid deaths but it kept dicking me around when I asked about the percentage of vaxed vs unvaxed covid deaths, so I accused AI search of lying 🤣

Check this out:

Honestly, AI kept trying to dick me around and say "The majority of..." and "base rate fallacy" but it wouldn't give me the number. It was like talking to eyeball.

But when you finally get specific enough, it "kinda" knows. It said some BS about 1 dose, but all of those deaths were among the 2x, 3x and 4x vaxed. 

33.3% +

41.4% +

10.9% =

85.6%

I had 85.7%, but it's 0.1% different.

Maybe AI truncated the number instead of rounding it off properly, and 85.6 plus 14.3 is only 99.9%, so yeah, I'm gonna take the W.

 

Anyhow, heya @eyeball, heya @Hodad, heya @BeaverFever

See the part where AI says:

• According to Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) data archived in October 2022, the breakdown of COVID-19 deaths by vaccination status for the four-week period ending September 25, 2022, shows: 
• Total Vaccinated (1+ doses): 85.7% of deaths
  • Primary series only (2 doses): 33.3%
  • Primary series + 1 additional dose: 41.5%
  • Primary series + 2 or more doses: 10.9%
• Unvaccinated: 14.3% of deaths

The 2x plus 3x plus 4x-vaxed accounted for 85.7% of covid deaths and 85% of Canadians were vaxed.

Go ahead and say "It kinda works" if you want, but it definitely wasn't working well enough to be inflicted on people who didn't need it, and it wasn't preventing leftists from givin' it to their grannies.

🤣 GFYS

Edited March 6 by WestCanMan

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Honestly, AI kept trying to dick me around and say "The majority of..." and "base rate fallacy" but it wouldn't give me the number. It was like talking to eyeball.

 

LOL quote of the week

[WestCanMan]

11 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

• According to Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) data archived in October 2022,
• • Primary series + 2 or more doses: 10.9%

One thing to add about the 4x-jabbed here: barely anyone had 4 jabs at that point, and all of those 4x-jabbed who quickly died after their 4th in 2022 had already survived covid for all of 2020 and the first part of 2021 while 100% of them were unjabbed.

1 year unvaxed vs novel covid, they all survived, 4 months with 4 jabs, dead.

The little blue line at the bottom right corner of the graph below is "All of the 4x-jabbed Canadians up until Oct 2022". There were zero in April 2022, the first Canadians completed their waiting periods in May 2022, where that blue line starts.  

The reporting period in question ended right where that grey line is on the right side. The dots there are at Sept 11th, the beginning of the next reporting period, but HEALTH CANADA STOPPED SHARING THE "COVID DEATHS BY VAX STATUS" DATA AT THAT POINT , BECAUSE IT WAS A MASSIVE EMBARRASSMENT FOR THE PSEUDOVAXES AND THE VAX-PIMPS.

Let that sink in: when multi-jabbed deaths were climbing to 90% and higher, our gov't just decided to keep it all a secret. 

The number of vaxed deaths in 2022 almost certainly outnumbered the total number of deaths in 2020, but we will never know because Health Canada is hiding that info. (15k covid deaths in 2020 and 19K total deaths - vaxed plus unvaxed -  in 2022)

Say Base Rate Fallacy to this:

• 84% of Canada's population in 2022 accounted for more deaths than 100% of Canada's population experienced in 2020, when covid was a novel virus and zero Canadians had developed "acquired immunity". And the weakest among us had already died in 2020 and 2021.... it was people who had survived 2 years of covid who were dying in 2022.

If covid deaths were still climbing after 85% of us were vaxed, why did the hysteria die down to complete calm? That's weird. 

Anyways, this topic truly is dead now. No one's ever gonna do a deep dive into who was lying to us, why they lied, and how much they were all profiting. If you think the Epstein files are a secret and that the MSM loves to ignore it, just look how much attention the covid lies, BS and vax-fascism are getting.

[Legato]

[WestCanMan]

44 minutes ago, Legato said:

And at the same time, they all take off their masks to eat lol. 

The "omicron variant" came from S Africa to every square inch of Canada within a couple of weeks while only vaccinated people were allowed on airplanes.

But hey, "CHILD VACCINES ARE NOW AVAILABLE, EVERYONE!! LOOK AT LITTLE SUSIE GETTING VACCINATED WHILE SHE'S HOLDING HER DOLLIE!!"

[WestCanMan]

https://www.carneywatch.ca/#promises

Edited March 7 by WestCanMan

[ExFlyer]

12 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

https://www.carneywatch.ca/#promises

[ironstone]

It's a pity that mainstream media doesn't do much investigative reporting when it comes to Carney and the Liberals.

 

[John Johnston]

25 minutes ago, ironstone said:

It's a pity that mainstream media doesn't do much investigative reporting when it comes to Carney and the Liberals.

 

https://www.thecanadianpressnews.ca/fact_checking/fact-file-canada-a-top-contributor-to-ukraine-aid-but-per-capita-claims-exaggerated/article_86412543-4110-596e-a32c-d7ccf8208c13.html

Pretty easy to find. 

 

[ironstone]

8 minutes ago, John Johnston said:

https://www.thecanadianpressnews.ca/fact_checking/fact-file-canada-a-top-contributor-to-ukraine-aid-but-per-capita-claims-exaggerated/article_86412543-4110-596e-a32c-d7ccf8208c13.html

Pretty easy to find. 

 

You missed the point of the clip which is raising the question, are the Carney Liberals sending all those billions to Ukraine in order to protect Brookfield's investments(Carney's investments) in that country?

[John Johnston]

9 minutes ago, ironstone said:

You missed the point of the clip which is raising the question, are the Carney Liberals sending all those billions to Ukraine in order to protect Brookfield's investments(Carney's investments) in that country?

My Alcan Stocks are doing well. 

[Reg Volk]

LOL - this is awesome.  Carney you just plain suck.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Reg Volk said:

LOL - this is awesome.  Carney you just plain suck.

This generally isn't the kind of thing that breaks a politician's window but it does leave hefty cracks.  On top of it all it's now completely overshadowned his trade mission. And that's a problem because the trade mission was about optics, not results. There won't be any results from it for quite some time if ever and he needed to score the points now.