Marc Elias of Democracy Docket explains the Voter Suppression of the SAVE Act

[robosmith]

Already passed by the House, but doomed in the Senate. Video

[Fluffypants]

Do you get all your opinions from Facebook?

You're the dude that considers a porn star an expert.

Edited February 14 by Fluffypants

[robosmith]

44 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

Do you get all your opinions from Facebook?

Do you? It seems you are BLIND to all my other sources.

44 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

You're the dude that considers a porn star an expert.

Are you so stupid you believe porn stars can't have a brain and college degrees? LMAO

Prove there's ONLY ONE Erika Jordan.

Got news for you: the Erika Jordan porn star looks nothing like the psychologist on FB.

[gatomontes99]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Do you? It seems you are BLIND to all my other sources.

Are you so stupid you believe porn stars can't have a brain and college degrees? LMAO

Prove there's ONLY ONE Erika Jordan.

Got news for you: the Erika Jordan porn star looks nothing like the psychologist on FB.

Lmao. oh boy.

She is not a psycologist. She is a sociologist major and an intern. She isn't even a paid professional yet: 

And she has soft porn on her professional page:

You don't even know who you are quoting. Here os here library of film work that includes "Escape From Pleasure Planet" and "Intergalactic Swingers": https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1246933-erika-jordan

 

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Lmao. oh boy.

She is not a psycologist. She is a sociologist major and an intern. She isn't even a paid professional yet: 

And she has soft porn on her professional page:

You don't even know who you are quoting. Here os here library of film work that includes "Escape From Pleasure Planet" and "Intergalactic Swingers": https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1246933-erika-jordan

 

Her acting work is NOT RELEVANT to what I've quoted here, LIAR.

She is a clinical psychology intern.

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1661634/

Quote

Erika Jordan

• Actress
• Director
• Producer

Erika Jordan is a sociologist, writer, and clinical psychology intern whose work focuses on the psychological and social forces shaping identity, relationships, power, and meaning in modern life.

 

[gatomontes99]

19 hours ago, robosmith said:

Her acting work is NOT RELEVANT to what I've quoted here, LIAR.

She is a clinical psychology intern.

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1661634/

No no no. You implied she was not in porn. I blew that lie out of the water. You also said she was a psychologist, she is emphatically not a psychologist.

This is what makes her b.s. so infuriating. Stupìd people believe that she is an authority. She is not. She is a grad student at an internship. She is the epitome of a novice. I have detailed how she has wrong on multiple occasions. She does not know her stuff. Any idiøt with a browser can prover her wrong. She does know how to use fallacies, though. I will give her that. 

[Fluffypants]

On 2/15/2026 at 7:34 PM, gatomontes99 said:

No no no. You implied she was not in porn. I blew that lie out of the water. You also said she was a psychologist, she is emphatically not a psychologist.

This is what makes her b.s. so infuriating. Stupìd people believe that she is an authority. She is not. She is a grad student at an internship. She is the epitome of a novice. I have detailed how she has wrong on multiple occasions. She does not know her stuff. Any idiøt with a browser can prover her wrong. She does know how to use fallacies, though. I will give her that. 

I have noticed the two fallacies she has and that is why stupid men listen to her.

[gatomontes99]

1 hour ago, Fluffypants said:

I have noticed the two fallacies she has and that is why stupid men listen to her.

Fallacy of mamory?

[CdnFox]

On 2/15/2026 at 5:34 PM, gatomontes99 said:

No no no. You implied she was not in porn. I blew that lie out of the water. You also said she was a psychologist, she is emphatically not a psychologist.

This is what makes her b.s. so infuriating. Stupìd people believe that she is an authority. She is not. She is a grad student at an internship. She is the epitome of a novice. I have detailed how she has wrong on multiple occasions. She does not know her stuff. Any idiøt with a browser can prover her wrong. She does know how to use fallacies, though. I will give her that. 

I think you're ignoring @robosmith's OWN contributions to the field. Joking aside, while it may be hard to believe he's been published in the Journal of Psychatric Medicne a few times now.  Admittedly it was as the centerfold, but still. 

[robosmith]

On 2/15/2026 at 5:34 PM, gatomontes99 said:

No no no. You implied she was not in porn. I blew that lie out of the water. You also said she was a psychologist, she is emphatically not a psychologist.

This is what makes her b.s. so infuriating. Stupìd people believe that she is an authority. She is not. She is a grad student at an internship.

She is FAR MORE an expert than you and that is good enough, esp when she posts REFERENCES which support her arguments.

On 2/15/2026 at 5:34 PM, gatomontes99 said:

She is the epitome of a novice. I have detailed how she has wrong on multiple occasions. She does not know her stuff. Any idiøt with a browser can prover her wrong. She does know how to use fallacies, though. I will give her that. 

Too bad you LIE so much you're ON IGNORE.

5 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

I have noticed the two fallacies she has and that is why stupid men listen to her.

That's strange that I have not NOTICED her "falsies" because she doesn't display them.

If she did, I would have noticed them, so you're LYING.
 

[gatomontes99]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

She is FAR MORE an expert than you and that is good enough, esp when she posts REFERENCES which support her arguments.

She never references anything.

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Too bad you LIE so much you're ON IGNORE.

I am on ignore ore because I call you on your lies and back it up with facts. You and reality don't get along. 

[robosmith]

Lawyer Rep Dan Goldman explains the voter suppression of the SAVE ACT.

[Fluffypants]

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Lawyer Rep Dan Goldman explains the voter suppression of the SAVE ACT.

Is he Mark Elias or Dan Goldman or are they twins because its the same Democrat Propaganda video you showed at the start of this thread.

[ironstone]

Ranking of Western Nations by Election Security and Voter Roll Integrity

Based on various metrics like election laws, transparency, technology used, voter accessibility, and historical context, here’s a ranking of some Western nations from strongest to weakest in terms of secure elections and voter roll integrity.

---

Rank	Country	Strengths	Weaknesses
1	Sweden	Strong voter ID laws, transparent electoral process, and high public trust in elections.	Low turnout in some demographics.
2	Norway	Robust voter registration, strong election monitoring, and high participation rates.	Minor regional disparities in voter turnout.
3	Denmark	Consistent election integrity checks and high voter turnout.	Voter registration system can be complex for newcomers.
4	Finland	High levels of technological security, a trustworthy electoral system, and transparency.	Less known internationally, leading to lesser scrutiny.
5	Canada	Reliable voter IDs, independent electoral management, and strong public confidence.	Issues with access in remote areas.
6	Germany	Strong constitutional safeguards and rigorous electoral monitoring.	Recent issues with election systems adapting to changes.
7	Netherlands	Advanced technology in voting systems and a solid electoral framework.	Some concerns regarding voter turnout and engagement.
8	Austria	High levels of electoral integrity due to rigorous monitoring and security protocols.	Complexity in voter registration.
9	United Kingdom	Established electoral systems, independent electoral commissions, and good historical integrity.	Issues with voter ID laws and regional disparities.
10	United States	Decentralized system offers local control, with various states demonstrating strong practices.	Major controversies and disparities in voter access.

[Nationalist]

On 2/15/2026 at 1:00 AM, robosmith said:

Her acting work is NOT RELEVANT to what I've quoted here, LIAR.

She is a clinical psychology intern.

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1661634/

 

She's a desk decoration.

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

Is he Mark Elias or Dan Goldman or are they twins because its the same Democrat Propaganda video you showed at the start of this thread.

No, IT'S NOT. If you see Dan Goldman in the OP video, you need to have your eyes examined. LMAO

 

 

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, ironstone said:

Ranking of Western Nations by Election Security and Voter Roll Integrity

Based on various metrics like election laws, transparency, technology used, voter accessibility, and historical context, here’s a ranking of some Western nations from strongest to weakest in terms of secure elections and voter roll integrity.

---

Rank	Country	Strengths	Weaknesses
1	Sweden	Strong voter ID laws, transparent electoral process, and high public trust in elections.	Low turnout in some demographics.
2	Norway	Robust voter registration, strong election monitoring, and high participation rates.	Minor regional disparities in voter turnout.
3	Denmark	Consistent election integrity checks and high voter turnout.	Voter registration system can be complex for newcomers.
4	Finland	High levels of technological security, a trustworthy electoral system, and transparency.	Less known internationally, leading to lesser scrutiny.
5	Canada	Reliable voter IDs, independent electoral management, and strong public confidence.	Issues with access in remote areas.
6	Germany	Strong constitutional safeguards and rigorous electoral monitoring.	Recent issues with election systems adapting to changes.
7	Netherlands	Advanced technology in voting systems and a solid electoral framework.	Some concerns regarding voter turnout and engagement.
8	Austria	High levels of electoral integrity due to rigorous monitoring and security protocols.	Complexity in voter registration.
9	United Kingdom	Established electoral systems, independent electoral commissions, and good historical integrity.	Issues with voter ID laws and regional disparities.
10	United States	Decentralized system offers local control, with various states demonstrating strong practices.	Major controversies and disparities in voter access.

NO LINK means NO METHODOLOGY, nor EXPERITISE. LMAO 

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

She's a desk decoration.

Does your wife know about YOUR MISOGYNY?

IF she smart enough, she probably never tells you how much it annoys her.

[ironstone]

This is the system that robosmith is defending.

In the second video, 30 people registered to vote with the listed address as...a UPS store.

No ifs, ands or buts...fighting against voter ID means you intend to CHEAT.

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, ironstone said:

This is the system that robosmith is defending.

In the second video, 30 people registered to vote with the listed address as...a UPS store.

No ifs, ands or buts...fighting against voter ID means you intend to CHEAT.

What ^rube. Randos posting youtubes is NOT EVIDENCE. Anyone can LIE in a youtube and MANY DO. 

[ironstone]

7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

What ^rube. Randos posting youtubes is NOT EVIDENCE. Anyone can LIE in a youtube and MANY DO. 

It's been going on for some time in your state.

https://www.cbsnews.com/losangeles/news/cbs2-investigation-uncovers-votes-being-cast-from-grave-year-after-year/

LOS ANGELES (CBSLA.com) — A comparison of records by David Goldstein, investigative reporter for CBS2/KCAL9, has revealed hundreds of so-called dead voters in Southern California, a vast majority of them in Los Angeles County.

"He took a lot of time choosing his candidates," said Annette Givans of her father, John Cenkner.

Cenkner died in Palmdale in 2003. Despite this, records show that he somehow voted from the grave in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2008 and 2010.

But he's not the only one.

Robo...how can a dead person cast a vote...repeatedly?

[robosmith]

29 minutes ago, ironstone said:

It's been going on for some time in your state.

https://www.cbsnews.com/losangeles/news/cbs2-investigation-uncovers-votes-being-cast-from-grave-year-after-year/

LOS ANGELES (CBSLA.com) — A comparison of records by David Goldstein, investigative reporter for CBS2/KCAL9, has revealed hundreds of so-called dead voters in Southern California, a vast majority of them in Los Angeles County.

"He took a lot of time choosing his candidates," said Annette Givans of her father, John Cenkner.

Cenkner died in Palmdale in 2003. Despite this, records show that he somehow voted from the grave in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2008 and 2010.

But he's not the only one.

Robo...how can a dead person cast a vote...repeatedly?

One vote can almost NEVER swing an election result. Duh

We use signature matching here, so some poll workers were obviously not paying attention.

But that's hardly less difficult than producing a fake ID.

Odd that your cite doesn't specify "not the only one."

[ironstone]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

One vote can almost NEVER swing an election result. Duh

We use signature matching here, so some poll workers were obviously not paying attention.

But that's hardly less difficult than producing a fake ID.

Odd that your cite doesn't specify "not the only one."

One vote...two votes..three votes...four votes...

See where this is going?

Signature matching?  Now how hard is it to forge a signature? And you seriously believe that poll workers are scrutinizing every single ballot?

One YouTuber exposes how porous voting is in California. That old lady behind the counter in his video was asked 'how come you don't need voter ID in California?'   Her response: 'you sign an affidavit that swears you're telling the truth...'

Nick Shirley: 'illegal could potentially sign in someone else's name and they could vote?  She responds: 'yeah...but they would be lying!'     (and has a bewildered look on her face, as though she can't comprehend the idea of somebody lying)

It seems like it's pretty easy for anyone to be able to cast a vote in your state.

Opposing the SAVE act is about being able to cheat.

[robosmith]

35 minutes ago, ironstone said:

One vote...two votes..three votes...four votes...

See where this is going?

Errors are always going to happen with ANY METHOD.

35 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Signature matching?  Now how hard is it to forge a signature? And you seriously believe that poll workers are scrutinizing every single ballot?

You have to have an EXAMPLE to forge a signature.

35 minutes ago, ironstone said:

One YouTuber exposes how porous voting is in California. That old lady behind the counter in his video was asked 'how come you don't need voter ID in California?'   Her response: 'you sign an affidavit that swears you're telling the truth...'

Nick Shirley: 'illegal could potentially sign in someone else's name and they could vote?  She responds: 'yeah...but they would be lying!'     (and has a bewildered look on her face, as though she can't comprehend the idea of somebody lying)

Anecdotal means nothing. Signature matching is the key. And to begin to get away with it, you have to know who is not going to vote, otherwise your ballot and theirs will be provisional and vetted thoroughly.

35 minutes ago, ironstone said:

It seems like it's pretty easy for anyone to be able to cast a vote in your state.

That's because you're unfamiliar with the complete process.

35 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Opposing the SAVE act is about being able to cheat.

No it's NOT, ignoramus. It's about the very unpopular RepubliCON party getting desperate to hold onto power when their redistricting plan is FAILING.

[robosmith]

Donald Trump pitched his "Save America Act" as a simple bill to secure elections. He lied. VIDEO

Quote

During the State of the Union, Donald Trump pitched his "Save America Act" as a simple bill to secure elections. He lied. In this video, Marc Elias breaks down the text of the bill to reveal a much darker reality: a plan that doesn't just suppress votes, but fundamentally redefines voting from a right into a "privilege" controlled by the powerful.

The "Save America Act" isn't about election integrity—it’s an authoritarian wish list. From banning mail-in voting to imposing impossible "proof of citizenship" requirements, this legislation is designed to give one man King-like control over who gets to participate in American democracy.

 

[WestCanMan]

On 2/20/2026 at 11:17 AM, robosmith said:

One vote can almost NEVER swing an election result. Duh

We use signature matching here, so some poll workers were obviously not paying attention.

But that's hardly less difficult than producing a fake ID.

Odd that your cite doesn't specify "not the only one."

So at least you've finally gone from "It's impossible to cheat during an election" to "Some shit happens".

That's a really big step for you. Did it hurt? What made you reconsider the possibility of election cheating? Trump's win?