robosmith Posted February 14 Report Posted February 14 Trump Admin Narrative On Epstein Falls Apart Video Quote Trump didn't report Epstein's crimes to PB Sheriff until AFTER the investigation was already public and Epstein was already the arrested. Does MAGAt even know why that's important or why Trump did that? LMAO Quote
Deluge Posted February 15 Report Posted February 15 20 hours ago, robosmith said: Trump Admin Narrative On Epstein Falls Apart Video Does MAGAt even know why that's important or why Trump did that? LMAO Trump is better than Heels up Harris and that's all anyone needs to know. 3 Quote
Michael Hardner Posted February 15 Report Posted February 15 32 minutes ago, Deluge said: Trump is better than Heels up Harris and that's all anyone needs to know. No. 😂 Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
robosmith Posted February 15 Author Report Posted February 15 40 minutes ago, Deluge said: Trump is better than Heels up Harris and that's all anyone needs to know. Trump commits so many crimes he had to run to his SCOTUS and beg for unprecedented IMMUNITY and you need to learn that. Quote
Deluge Posted February 15 Report Posted February 15 1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said: No. 😂 Yes, LOL, and it's not even a discussion. 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Trump commits so many crimes he had to run to his SCOTUS and beg for unprecedented IMMUNITY and you need to learn that. Trump walks all over left-wing Marxists, but that's not a crime, it's a worthy achievement. May God let him continue. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted February 15 Report Posted February 15 (edited) 24 minutes ago, Deluge said: Yes, LOL, and it's not even a discussion. She would not have started knee-jerk trade wars, done lasting damage to international relationships, what caused corporations to pause investments due to instability. I've seen evidence of all of these things. It's not much of a discussion, but we're having one. Edited February 15 by Michael Hardner 1 Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
Deluge Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 (edited) 19 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: She would not have started knee-jerk trade wars, done lasting damage to international relationships, what caused corporations to pause investments due to instability. I've seen evidence of all of these things. It's not much of a discussion, but we're having one. It's only been a year, Mike. Trump said we are open for business and that's what we've been doing - conducting business. If corporations can't deal with that then maybe they can get woke and go broke with Blackrock. With Harris it would've been the same bullshit as with Biden, but probably worse. Edited February 16 by Deluge Quote
Michael Hardner Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 12 hours ago, Deluge said: It's only been a year, Mike. Trump said we are open for business and that's what we've been doing - conducting business. If corporations can't deal with that then maybe they can get woke and go broke with Blackrock. With Harris it would've been the same bullshit as with Biden, but probably worse. Saying we are conducting business... That just steps over the details of what actually has been done. In the next sentence you say, basically, corporations that have been engaging in global trade should go broke. This is not really a serious post actually. 1 Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
Shady Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 19 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: She would not have started knee-jerk trade wars, done lasting damage to international relationships, what caused corporations to pause investments due to instability. I've seen evidence of all of these things. It's not much of a discussion, but we're having one. But she would’ve let in another 10 million people illegally, like Biden did. Quote
Deluge Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 47 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: Saying we are conducting business... That just steps over the details of what actually has been done. In the next sentence you say, basically, corporations that have been engaging in global trade should go broke. This is not really a serious post actually. There's no such thing as a "serious" post with you unless it's Trump bashing. What I'm saying is that if you don't want to cut deals with Trump, then get your own shit going - perhaps even cozy up with the woke cultists at Blackrock and get into the business of ESG scoring. Quote
User Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 20 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: She would not have started knee-jerk trade wars, done lasting damage to international relationships, what caused corporations to pause investments due to instability. I've seen evidence of all of these things. It's not much of a discussion, but we're having one. Well, we all place different priorities and values on things. I will take all the wins we have gotten so far, any day of the week, with a few trade-offs. Quote
WestCanMan Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 Trump turned Epstein in to the Police 20 years ago. In two terms as president, Barack Obama let Jeffrey Epstein continue to pimp out children. Instead of saving the children he started the Russian collusion witch hunt against Trump. Dem cultists, like @robosmith, were happy with the witch hunt against the president, instead of actual charges against Epstein's accomplices. Trump took action against Epstein again, as president during his first term, and got Epstein put in jail. Joe Biden's administration did nothing about the Epstein files, and instead chose to go after Trump for a loan that he had paid off. Again, Dem cultists, like @robosmith, were happy with the witch hunt against the president instead of action being taken against Epstein's accomplices. Trump's AG released the Epstein files to members of congress, and then tracked their search history as they viewed the docs, to see what they would search for in Google after they saw the files. Instead of being thankful that progress against Epstein was again being made, Demonrat congressmen were offended that the AG took an interest in their initial reaction to the information that they were given. NO ONE WITH INFLUENCE OVER THE US DOJ HAS DONE ANYTHING ABOUT EPSTEIN, OR ABOUT EPSTEIN'S ACCOMPLICES, ASIDE FROM TRUMP. OBAMA LET EPSTEIN PIMP OUT CHILDREN FOR 8 YEARS, AND STARTED A WITCH HUNT AGAINST TRUMP INSTEAD OF USING THOSE FBI RESOURCES TO SAVE CHILDREN. TRUMP PUT EPSTEIN IN JAIL. BIDEN DID NOTHING AGAINST EPSTEIN'S ACCOMPLICES, INSTEAD HE WENT AFTER TRUMP FOR A LOAN THAT HE HAD PAID OFF. Every time the Dems were in power, and had a chance to either stop Epstein from pimping out children or bring justice to Epstein's victims, the Dems chose to use all of the DOJ's resources as weapons against Trump, and Dem cultists were just peachy with the inactivity against Epstein/accomplices. Thank God for Donald Trump. If Hillary had been elected in 2016, and Kamala in 2024, Epstein would still be pimping out children, and robo et al would be happy as clams. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
Hodad Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 18 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Trump turned Epstein in to the Police 20 years ago. In two terms as president, Barack Obama let Jeffrey Epstein continue to pimp out children. Instead of saving the children he started the Russian collusion witch hunt against Trump. Dem cultists, like @robosmith, were happy with the witch hunt against the president, instead of actual charges against Epstein's accomplices. Trump took action against Epstein again, as president during his first term, and got Epstein put in jail. Joe Biden's administration did nothing about the Epstein files, and instead chose to go after Trump for a loan that he had paid off. Again, Dem cultists, like @robosmith, were happy with the witch hunt against the president instead of action being taken against Epstein's accomplices. Trump's AG released the Epstein files to members of congress, and then tracked their search history as they viewed the docs, to see what they would search for in Google after they saw the files. Instead of being thankful that progress against Epstein was again being made, Demonrat congressmen were offended that the AG took an interest in their initial reaction to the information that they were given. NO ONE WITH INFLUENCE OVER THE US DOJ HAS DONE ANYTHING ABOUT EPSTEIN, OR ABOUT EPSTEIN'S ACCOMPLICES, ASIDE FROM TRUMP. OBAMA LET EPSTEIN PIMP OUT CHILDREN FOR 8 YEARS, AND STARTED A WITCH HUNT AGAINST TRUMP INSTEAD OF USING THOSE FBI RESOURCES TO SAVE CHILDREN. TRUMP PUT EPSTEIN IN JAIL. BIDEN DID NOTHING AGAINST EPSTEIN'S ACCOMPLICES, INSTEAD HE WENT AFTER TRUMP FOR A LOAN THAT HE HAD PAID OFF. Every time the Dems were in power, and had a chance to either stop Epstein from pimping out children or bring justice to Epstein's victims, the Dems chose to use all of the DOJ's resources as weapons against Trump, and Dem cultists were just peachy with the inactivity against Epstein/accomplices. Thank God for Donald Trump. If Hillary had been elected in 2016, and Kamala in 2024, Epstein would still be pimping out children, and robo et al would be happy as clams. A top notch batch of knob-gobbling on your part, but it's not reflective of reality. There's a Tale of Two Trumps. 1. Trump did NOT turn Epstein in. He, allegedly, corroborated the abuse narrative to Palm Beach police after Epstein had already been arrested and after police were reaching out to Epstein's inner circle. 2. According to retired Palm Beach police chief Reiter, Trump said in 2006 “Thank goodness you’re stopping him, everyone has known he’s been doing this.” In other words, Trump (and the rest of "everybody) had that knowledge but chose to sit on it and let Epstein rape girls rather than contacting police and shutting him down. 3. Despite that 2006 conversation, in 2019 Trump claimed to have not known or have suspected his buddy's misdeeds. And of Maxwell, he said that he had met her many times and wished her well, "whatever it is." 4. Epstein should have been rotting in prison for two decades already, but in a truly inexplicable sweetheart deal, he was--sort of--imprisoned for 13 months. He had work release to his own offices 12 hours a day, six days a week. 5. The man who gave him that inexplicable, unbelievable deal? Alex Acosta, who Trump elevated to Secretary of Labor. 6. Trump's current AD, Bondi, was Florid AG for 8 years, and ignored victims please to bring new charges against Epstein, and has continued to ignore victims and slow-roll information that she claimed to have "on her desk" long ago. You want to paint Trump as some kind of do-gooder here, but he didn't do anything until after it was policially and socially advantageous to throw Epstein under the bus. Who knows how many rapes he could have prevented if he had actually turned in Epstein when he learned what Epstein was doing. But he chose not to. Trump, Epstein, Acosta and Bondi are all part of the same fetid Florida swamp. 1 1 Quote
WestCanMan Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Hodad said: A top notch batch In two terms as president, Barack Obama let Jeffrey Epstein continue to pimp out children. Did you catch that? In two terms as president, Barack Obama let Jeffrey Epstein continue to pimp out children, while he instead directed the FBI to carry out a witch hunt against Trump. Can you acknowledge that: "in two terms as president, Barack Obama let Jeffrey Epstein continue to pimp out children"? What did Obama do about Epstein, aside from "allow him to continue to pimp out children"? One more thing: Trump could have easily lied about Epstein in 2006, just like Carney lies, just like all of Hilary's accomplices lied for her, just like AG Lynch and Bill lied about their secret conversation, just like Fauci lied about the origin of the virus and the safety and efficacy of the pseudovaxes, etc. What exact comment did Trump make about Epstein in 2019? You never actually quoted Trump, you just supplied your own bit of out-of-context paraphrasing, which was no doubt entirely deceitful. Edited February 16 by WestCanMan Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
robosmith Posted February 16 Author Report Posted February 16 4 hours ago, Shady said: But she would’ve let in another 10 million people illegally, like Biden did. When the judge schedules an ASYLUM HEARING, that makes it LEGAL, doofus. Quote
robosmith Posted February 16 Author Report Posted February 16 56 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Trump turned Epstein in to the Police 20 years ago. In two terms as president, Barack Obama let Jeffrey Epstein continue to pimp out children. Instead of saving the children he started the Russian collusion witch hunt against Trump. Dem cultists, like @robosmith, were happy with the witch hunt against the president, instead of actual charges against Epstein's accomplices. Trump took action against Epstein again, as president during his first term, and got Epstein put in jail. Joe Biden's administration did nothing about the Epstein files, and instead chose to go after Trump for a loan that he had paid off. Again, Dem cultists, like @robosmith, were happy with the witch hunt against the president instead of action being taken against Epstein's accomplices. Trump's AG released the Epstein files to members of congress, and then tracked their search history as they viewed the docs, to see what they would search for in Google after they saw the files. Instead of being thankful that progress against Epstein was again being made, Demonrat congressmen were offended that the AG took an interest in their initial reaction to the information that they were given. NO ONE WITH INFLUENCE OVER THE US DOJ HAS DONE ANYTHING ABOUT EPSTEIN, OR ABOUT EPSTEIN'S ACCOMPLICES, ASIDE FROM TRUMP. OBAMA LET EPSTEIN PIMP OUT CHILDREN FOR 8 YEARS, AND STARTED A WITCH HUNT AGAINST TRUMP INSTEAD OF USING THOSE FBI RESOURCES TO SAVE CHILDREN. TRUMP PUT EPSTEIN IN JAIL. BIDEN DID NOTHING AGAINST EPSTEIN'S ACCOMPLICES, INSTEAD HE WENT AFTER TRUMP FOR A LOAN THAT HE HAD PAID OFF. Every time the Dems were in power, and had a chance to either stop Epstein from pimping out children or bring justice to Epstein's victims, the Dems chose to use all of the DOJ's resources as weapons against Trump, and Dem cultists were just peachy with the inactivity against Epstein/accomplices. Thank God for Donald Trump. If Hillary had been elected in 2016, and Kamala in 2024, Epstein would still be pimping out children, and robo et al would be happy as clams. You just can't keep from LYING because Trump has CONNED you so thoroughly. As required, Democratic POTUS never involved themselves with DoJ business. It ONLY fell on Trump because HE ROUTINELY VIOLATED the "Chinese wall" prohibiting interference by the POTUS in DoJ business. And you don't even understand why that exists. LMAO Quote
robosmith Posted February 16 Author Report Posted February 16 17 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: In two terms as president, Barack Obama let Jeffrey Epstein continue to pimp out children. Did you catch that? In two terms as president, Barack Obama let Jeffrey Epstein continue to pimp out children, while he instead directed the FBI to carry out a witch hunt against Trump. Can you acknowledge that: "in two terms as president, Barack Obama let Jeffrey Epstein continue to pimp out children"? What did Obama do about Epstein, aside from "allow him to continue to pimp out children"? One more thing: Trump could have easily lied about Epstein in 2006, just like Carney lies, just like all of Hilary's accomplices lied for her, just like AG Lynch and Bill lied about their secret conversation, just like Fauci lied about the origin of the virus and the safety and efficacy of the pseudovaxes, etc. What exact comment did Trump make about Epstein in 2019? You never actually quoted Trump, you just supplied your own bit of out-of-context paraphrasing, which was no doubt entirely deceitful. Why do you keep pretending it is the job of the POTUS to interfere in DoJ business? After Nixon, it was made clear that the interfering of the POTUS in the DoJ business did NOT SERVE JUSTICE because it was POLITICAL. Quote
User Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 17 minutes ago, robosmith said: When the judge schedules an ASYLUM HEARING, that makes it LEGAL, doofus. 10 million people did not and do not have asylum hearings. Clown. Quote
User Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 41 minutes ago, Hodad said: You want to paint Trump as some kind of do-gooder here, but he didn't do anything until after it was policially and socially advantageous to throw Epstein under the bus. Who knows how many rapes he could have prevented if he had actually turned in Epstein when he learned what Epstein was doing. But he chose not to. Trump, Epstein, Acosta and Bondi are all part of the same fetid Florida swamp. And this is why you hide from me like a coward, because I would pick this statement apart. Quote
Hodad Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 (edited) 1 hour ago, WestCanMan said: In two terms as president, Barack Obama let Jeffrey Epstein continue to pimp out children. Did you catch that? In two terms as president, Barack Obama let Jeffrey Epstein continue to pimp out children, while he instead directed the FBI to carry out a witch hunt against Trump. Can you acknowledge that: "in two terms as president, Barack Obama let Jeffrey Epstein continue to pimp out children"? What did Obama do about Epstein, aside from "allow him to continue to pimp out children"? One more thing: Trump could have easily lied about Epstein in 2006, just like Carney lies, just like all of Hilary's accomplices lied for her, just like AG Lynch and Bill lied about their secret conversation, just like Fauci lied about the origin of the virus and the safety and efficacy of the pseudovaxes, etc. What exact comment did Trump make about Epstein in 2019? You never actually quoted Trump, you just supplied your own bit of out-of-context paraphrasing, which was no doubt entirely deceitful. Sure, do everything you can to deflect from Trump's complicity. I'm sure pointing at Obama is the latest meme in your echo chamber.🙄 Lame. Meanwhile what actually happened... Acosta negotiated a Non-Prosecution Agreement with Epstein in 2007, before Obama ever took office, effectively giving him immunity. That was a shield against federal prosecution for Epstein and his accomplices. At that point, federal hands were tied. Bondi could have prosecuted additional at the state level, but did nothing. It wasn't until 2019 that an AG in NY successfully made the case that the NPA, as written, wouldn't shield Epstein from prosecution in districts outside of Florida. Why, you ask, did it take until 2019? Because the original case was sealed. Epstein's heinous crimes were whitewashed by Acosta, reduced to a fairly banal "soliciting a minor" charge, then sealed. So, for anyone not on the inside of that case, it was a small potatoes local case. Nobody was looking for more. Not until 2018, when the Miami Herald surfaced the story again. People were outraged. That's when it caught the nation's attention and the SDNY started testing the limits of the NPA. Here's a timeline, if you're not familiar. ‘No idea. I had no idea’ In the years after that call, Trump repeatedly said he had no knowledge of Epstein’s sex crimes. He has also claimed that he kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago after he found out the financier was poaching spa club employees. In July 2019, when asked by reporters in the Oval Office if he had any suspicions about Epstein “molesting … underaged women”, Trump responded: “No, I had no idea. I had no idea. I haven’t spoken to him in many, many years.” Trump has also been less forthcoming about his feelings toward Maxwell in the years since. When asked in October 2020 how he felt about her when she was facing federal charges of helping Epstein recruit, groom and sexually abuse young girls, Trump said, “I just wish her well, frankly.” Trump Whitehouse Archives: Q Two questions, please. With regard to Jeffrey Epstein, did you have any suspicions that he was molesting young women, underaged women? THE PRESIDENT: No, I had no idea. I had no idea. I haven’t spoken to him in many, many years. But I had — I didn’t have no idea. Edited February 16 by Hodad 1 Quote
User Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 1 hour ago, Hodad said: Sure, do everything you can to deflect from Trump's complicity. Complicity? You have done nothing to prove any complicity other than make the worst inferences from vague public statements. You are completely speculating and overstating this yourself: -“Everyone has known” does not automatically mean “everyone had confirmed knowledge of specific criminal acts.” -Social rumors about someone being inappropriate are not the same as verified evidence of sex trafficking minors. -There is no documented proof Trump had concrete knowledge of criminal acts and chose not to report them. Quote
Shady Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 2 hours ago, robosmith said: When the judge schedules an ASYLUM HEARING, that makes it LEGAL, doofus. No, it actually doesn’t. Quote
robosmith Posted February 17 Author Report Posted February 17 33 minutes ago, Shady said: No, it actually doesn’t. In reality, Judge talks and ^BULLSHIT walks. Quote
CdnFox Posted February 17 Report Posted February 17 On 2/14/2026 at 2:19 PM, robosmith said: Trump Admin Narrative On Epstein Falls Apart Video Does MAGAt even know why that's important or why Trump did that? LMAO That's kind of what you'd expect. You've seen some stuff that is questionable, it's announced that police are investigating, you call up and share information that you have Unless you actually personally witnessed a crime why would you call them before they were investigating. You don't seem to understand how law works or how investigations work Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.