robosmith Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: Blah blah blah... Thanks for demonstrating your level of understanding. LMAO Quote
CdnFox Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 12 hours ago, robosmith said: All he has to do is demand to see his accuser and it will be dismissed when "God" fails to show. PROVE "God given rights." No one can. LMAO The state will bring the charges. The accuser will be the state. I'm pretty sure they'll show up Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
West Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 7 hours ago, robosmith said: That wall was there before Jesus and AFTER. AKA you're dreaming if you believe Jesus had anything to do with it. Try again. LMAO ^^^ this guy thinks Jesus would be on the side of protesters helping child molesters escape authorities. Sad 3 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 9 hours ago, Radiorum said: You guys sound like the maniacs in Salem who shouted, "Burn the witches!" But you know, they weren't witches, right? They were people. I am so proud of you. You graduated from Nazis and Fascists to Salem witch trials. I mean, this is not even close to that, but at least you made an effort. Now, since you don't fully understand history, the Salem Witch Trials were people accused of witchery without evidence. Don Lemon videoed himself violating the rights of these people just so he could get clicks. You guys say his first amendment rights were violated, but what about the first amendment rights of the people he accosted? They were peacefully worshipping and nothing in the video indicates they had an opinion on illegal immigration. Yet, Don Lemon and his minions verbally attacked them. That is a direct violation of the KKK act. No false claim of witchery. there is direct, incontrovertible evidence. He will plea out in the next 60 days. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Barquentine Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 14 hours ago, User said: Going into a Church, on someone else private property, trespassing, refusing to leave when asked, is not a 1st Amendment protected activity. Yes, going into the church was a dumb move. They should get a 'slap on the wrist' but nobody's going to prison for it and no one was hurt. Quote
Nationalist Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 11 minutes ago, Barquentine said: Yes, going into the church was a dumb move. They should get a 'slap on the wrist' but nobody's going to prison for it and no one was hurt. Each and every one should be caged...especially Donna LeMon. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
User Posted January 20 Author Report Posted January 20 57 minutes ago, Barquentine said: Yes, going into the church was a dumb move. They should get a 'slap on the wrist' but nobody's going to prison for it and no one was hurt. If a Pro-Life person obstructs the entrance to a Planned Parenthood clinic preventing women access to abortion…. Is that just a slap on the wrist too? Quote
Radiorum Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 1 hour ago, West said: this guy thinks Jesus would be on the side of protesters Yes, Jesus would be on the side of the protestors, turning over the tables Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Radiorum said: Yes, Jesus would be on the side of the protestors, turning over the tables And why did he turn over the tables? (This ought to be good) Edited January 20 by gatomontes99 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
User Posted January 20 Author Report Posted January 20 1 hour ago, Radiorum said: Yes, Jesus would be on the side of the protestors, turning over the tables What do you base this on? I swear, people who have no idea what the Bible says come up with the dumbest crap. Quote
robosmith Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 3 hours ago, West said: ^^^ this guy thinks Jesus would be on the side of protesters helping child molesters escape authorities. Sad ^LYING AGAIN. Can you read at all? Again: Jesus had nothing to do with the wall around Jerusalem. Quote
West Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 1 hour ago, Radiorum said: Yes, Jesus would be on the side of the protestors, turning over the tables Why? What did they do wrong? 4 minutes ago, robosmith said: ^LYING AGAIN. Can you read at all? Again: Jesus had nothing to do with the wall around Jerusalem. Uh the entire city of Jerusalem and the temple was the design of God himself according to scripture. Duh Quote
robosmith Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 12 minutes ago, West said: Why? What did they do wrong? Uh the entire city of Jerusalem and the temple was the design of God himself according to scripture. Duh Nothing here about "design of God" Quote Yes, Jesus affirmed Jerusalem's divine significance as the "city of the great King" (God) and the Temple as God's dwelling, but he also pointed to a greater reality: his own body was the true temple, and the ultimate dwelling of God would be with His people, culminating in the New Jerusalem. He stated that while the physical Temple and Jerusalem were sacred, their ultimate purpose was to point to God's true presence in himself, the promised Messiah, and in His people. Key Points from Jesus' Teachings: Jerusalem as God's City: Jesus called Jerusalem the "city of the great King" (Matthew 5:35), acknowledging its special status as God's chosen place. The Temple as God's Dwelling: He recognized the Temple as a "house of prayer" (Mark 11:17) and God's dwelling place, cleansing it from corruption. The True Temple is Jesus' Body: When asked for a sign, Jesus declared, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up," referring to the temple of his body (John 2:19-21). Fulfillment in the New Covenant: The New Testament shows that the physical Temple's purpose was fulfilled in Jesus, and the "temple" language shifts to God dwelling in believers (1 Corinthians 3:16) and the future New Jerusalem (Revelation 21:3). In essence, Jesus affirmed the divine importance of Jerusalem and the Temple but clarified that they were temporary symbols pointing to His own embodied presence and, ultimately, to God dwelling with His people forever. Quote
eyeball Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 12 hours ago, User said: Either way, I don't give a shit. The only way for you leftists to lear is to lear the hardway. If you don't give a shit just shut up and get out of the way. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
John Stone Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 Surprised the race card hasn't been employed more against ICE. Argument from heaven - When it goes racial, look out! Quote
West Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 (edited) 40 minutes ago, robosmith said: Nothing here about "design of God" So Jesus recognized a city WITH WALLS as God's city. The blueprints were given to King David, built by King Solomon, destroyed originally by the Persians in 586 BC, restored by Nehemiah around 400 BC. By the time Christ came, Jerusalem was under the control of the Romans who's policy was to allow governors (who were not actually Jewish but in name only to keep control). The city again was destroyed in 70 AD by emperor Nero. Now, they are excavating the WALLS of Jerusalem and better understand it's history. We know there are walls because Jesus enters Jerusalem through the east gate during the period known as Palm Sunday. There will be a time when no walls will be needed at the second coming when Christ establishes his physical throne on earth during the new Jerusalem and judges the living and the dead Duh Edited January 20 by West Quote
User Posted January 20 Author Report Posted January 20 2 hours ago, eyeball said: If you don't give a shit just shut up and get out of the way. Learn how to read. 1 Quote
eyeball Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 1 minute ago, User said: Learn how to read. Learn how to write. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
User Posted January 20 Author Report Posted January 20 37 minutes ago, eyeball said: Learn how to write. Won’t help you. 1 Quote
eyeball Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 22 minutes ago, User said: Won’t help you. That won't be my fault. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
User Posted January 20 Author Report Posted January 20 2 minutes ago, eyeball said: That won't be my fault. Of course not, it isn’t a special needs persons fault they are the way they are. You were born this way. Quote
eyeball Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 39 minutes ago, User said: Of course not, it isn’t a special needs persons fault they are the way they are. You were born this way. Yes, more like a genius as opposed to a savant - maybe you were just dropped on your head. It's not your fault. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
Nationalist Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 @User and patriots. @eyeball appears to actually want civil war. He is undoubtedly a traitor to all humanity. A nobody with a need to start fights...then run and hide. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
CdnFox Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 3 hours ago, eyeball said: That won't be my fault. That is totally your fault What's with you? You're starting to sound like a three year old child and that's not like you. Usually at least sounds seven or eight 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
eyeball Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 2 hours ago, Nationalist said: A nobody with a need to start fights...then run and hide. I'll be right here. 8 minutes ago, CdnFox said: That is totally your fault Nope. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.