Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

You are a shameless liar regarding Russian collusion, which was definitively established. It's recorded history. Undeniable. 

Denied.

 

Guess it wasnt undeniable.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/cia-director-ratcliffe-the-truth-about-the-origins-of-the-russia-collusion-hoax-was-hidden-from-the-american-people/ar-AA1Jo0pr

"And, unfortunately, what we saw with Joe Biden's election was another four years to be able to continue to bury the truth. And so it's only now, with Donald Trump having been reelected that, through DNI Gabbard, myself, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, all of this intelligence, all of this evidence that's been hidden and buried from the American people is finally coming to light."

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Denied.

 

Guess it wasnt undeniable.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/cia-director-ratcliffe-the-truth-about-the-origins-of-the-russia-collusion-hoax-was-hidden-from-the-american-people/ar-AA1Jo0pr

"And, unfortunately, what we saw with Joe Biden's election was another four years to be able to continue to bury the truth. And so it's only now, with Donald Trump having been reelected that, through DNI Gabbard, myself, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, all of this intelligence, all of this evidence that's been hidden and buried from the American people is finally coming to light."

The Trump administration continues to lie about it? Shocker! But you buy it hook line and sinker. 

The Steele dossier was NOT the foundation of the FBI investigation. They didn't get the Steele dossier until months later. 

The FBI was already to investigating because Papadopoulos was boasting about his Russia connections having dirt on Hillary.

And yes, the collusion is documented and undeniable. Trump's campaign chair was feeding a known Russian agent sensitive internal campaign polling and strategy. Over and over again through elaborately contrived secret channels. Information which Kilimnik passed to Russian intelligence. The same agency actively (again, well documented) engaged in an influence campaign against American voters. All of that is known.

The collusion above is entirely documented in congressional reports. What they were unable to establish was chargeable criminal conspiracy. The communication tracks were so thoroughly covered they couldn't verify that Manafort knew how his information would be used. But let's get real, Manafort is corrupt and traitorous, but he's not stupid. And he certainly wasn't going to take a deal when Trump was advertising a pardon. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, Hodad said:

The Trump administration continues to lie about it? Shocker! But you buy it hook line and sinker. 

The Steele dossier was NOT the foundation of the FBI investigation. They didn't get the Steele dossier until months later. 

The FBI was already to investigating because Papadopoulos was boasting about his Russia connections having dirt on Hillary.

And yes, the collusion is documented and undeniable. Trump's campaign chair was feeding a known Russian agent sensitive internal campaign polling and strategy. Over and over again through elaborately contrived secret channels. Information which Kilimnik passed to Russian intelligence. The same agency actively (again, well documented) engaged in an influence campaign against American voters. All of that is known.

The collusion above is entirely documented in congressional reports. What they were unable to establish was chargeable criminal conspiracy. The communication tracks were so thoroughly covered they couldn't verify that Manafort knew how his information would be used. But let's get real, Manafort is corrupt and traitorous, but he's not stupid. And he certainly wasn't going to take a deal when Trump was advertising a pardon. 

NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION. NONE.

ScreenShot2026-01-26at10_14_57PM.thumb.png.36d28ff1182606e8b37385f521533632.png

Do a google search, dummy. Look at the top 30 hits ffs.

Manafort pimped his services to other people. That's his career, dingus: managing political campaigns. Creating propaganda, like CNN or CBC.

  • Like 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
18 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION. NONE.

ScreenShot2026-01-26at10_14_57PM.thumb.png.36d28ff1182606e8b37385f521533632.png

Do a google search, dummy. Look at the top 30 hits ffs.

Manafort pimped his services to other people. That's his career, dingus: managing political campaigns. Creating propaganda, like CNN or CBC.

That's what Trump's pet, Barr, said dummy. It's not what Mueller said--so much so that Mueller issued a statement in response correcting the facts. 

And Mueller was not the last investigation. You know that. You've been told dozens of times. You just won't stop lying about it though. It's dogma for your kind, and no amount of facts can interfere with your deeply held religious belief. 

Posted
5 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Hodad... sorry but part of being a cultist is not actually knowing that you're in a cult

You're certainly the expert on ^this. One day you'll wake up and wonder why you've been a fool for so long. LMAO

Posted
9 hours ago, Hodad said:

That's what Trump's pet, Barr, said dummy. It's not what Mueller said--so much so that Mueller issued a statement in response correcting the facts. 

And Mueller was not the last investigation. You know that. You've been told dozens of times. You just won't stop lying about it though. It's dogma for your kind, and no amount of facts can interfere with your deeply held religious belief. 

No collusion, left the door open for "obstruction" to appease the woke mob who at the time were maliciously targeting people who got in their way (and still are). Duh

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Hodad said:

That's what Trump's pet, Barr, said dummy. It's not what Mueller said--so much so that Mueller issued a statement in response correcting the facts. 

And Mueller was not the last investigation. You know that. You've been told dozens of times. You just won't stop lying about it though. It's dogma for your kind, and no amount of facts can interfere with your deeply held religious belief. 

Me, lying 😂

Buddy, the FBI committed crimes, and you're worried about whether my post was only 99.76% accurate?

Mueller never found evidence of Trump colluding with Russia, period. The whole secret server thing was a lie. That's how you properly use the word 'lie' in a sentence, buddy.

Or you could say that the FBI lied about people that they were investigating.

Or "the FBI lied about the Hunter laptop".

Or you could say that the FISA court judge, Rosemary Collyer, basically said that the FBI lied so many times during the Russian collusion investigation that every other investigation they ever took part in has come under suspicion.

Or you could say that the  FBI lied so much that the FBI director was forced to come back before a judge with a list of improvements that they could make so that they wouldn't get caught lying so much.

Or you could say that the FBI offered reduced sentences to people who were convicted of offences not related to collusion, to get them to lie about Trump, but no one did.

Or you could say that the FBI allowed Hillary Clinton to lie under oath dozens of times.

It's a 3-letter word, buddy. It's one that you've heard a million times from your mom, while she was shaking her head in disappointment. You need to learn how to use that word because you look like a id10t every time.... nvm. It's not gonna help. 

  • Like 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
17 hours ago, Hodad said:

You are a shameless liar regarding Russian collusion, which was definitively established. It's recorded history. Undeniable. 

Lemon is a journalist with a first amendment right to cover those events. He will not be convicted of anything. 

Some of the others may be, depending on what they actually did. 

It's an embarrassing projection for you, of all people, to try to call anyone else a cultist. 🤣

No it was not definitively established in the slightest. It was completely disproven and the only liar here is you.

The sounds you make trying to insist that something so discredited is still true is the sound of your credibility flushing down the toilet

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
12 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION. NONE.

ScreenShot2026-01-26at10_14_57PM.thumb.png.36d28ff1182606e8b37385f521533632.png

Do a google search, dummy. Look at the top 30 hits ffs.

Manafort pimped his services to other people. That's his career, dingus: managing political campaigns. Creating propaganda, like CNN or CBC.

"finds no collusion" does NOT MEAN there was none.

You're IN DENIAL about the collusion found by SoS Marco Rubio's Senate Intelligence Committee. 

And you keep LYING about that because "you can't handle the truth." LMAO

2 hours ago, West said:

No collusion, left the door open for "obstruction" to appease the woke mob who at the time were maliciously targeting people who got in their way (and still are). Duh

Your ^SPECULATION is DELUSIONAL BULLSHIT.

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

"finds no collusion" does NOT MEAN there was none.

 

With almost 70 agents looking into it? Yes it does.

There's no collusion. And unless you can prove otherwise which you can't that is the way it is

  • Like 2

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

 

Mueller never found evidence of Trump colluding with Russia, period. The whole secret server thing was a lie. That's how you properly use the word 'lie' in a sentence, buddy.

 

That is patently false. That investigation uncovered a metric shit ton of evidence of collusion. To the point that it's factually indisputable. It just doesn't stop you from disputing it. 

What Mueller lacked was the "intent and agreement" piece of the puzzle to effectively charge criminal conspiracy.  

Perhaps you don't know what the word "evidence" means?

Edited by Hodad
  • Thanks 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, Hodad said:

That is patently false. That investigation uncovered a metric shit ton of evidence of collusion. To the point that it's factually indisputable. It just doesn't stop you from disputing it. 

What Mueller lacked was the "intent and agreement" piece of the puzzle to effectively charge criminal conspiracy.  

Perhaps you don't know what the word "evidence" means?

No. It didn't

In fact it didn't find a single drop of evidence of collusion or conspiracy. They mostly came up with was one guy who worked for trump knew a Russian. But there's absolutely no evidence of any kind of collusion or conspiracy

You are just straight out and out lying at this point

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

That is patently false. That investigation uncovered a metric shit ton of evidence of collusion. To the point that it's factually indisputable. It just doesn't stop you from disputing it. 

What Mueller lacked was the "intent and agreement" piece of the puzzle to effectively charge criminal conspiracy.  

Perhaps you don't know what the word "evidence" means?

And by "evidence" you mean a sitting senator meeting with a foreign diplomat in his official capacity? A diplomat who lived in Washington under the approval of the United States government and routinely met with lawmakers? Yeah such solid "evidence" there pal 😆 

There was a lot of Democrats blowing smoke and trying to impune innocent people for routine behavior in their existing roles. Was actually quite vile.  And one of the main reasons why I used to be sympathetic to the Democrat party until I saw that they were dishonest and vile

Edited by West
Posted
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

That is patently false.

Buddy, you cherry-picked ten % of it to say it was all wrong, and even the part that you cherry picked was correct.

The "secret server" issue that you just quoted was actually just 100% BS. AKA lies.

Quote

That investigation uncovered a metric shit ton of evidence of collusion.

No evidence. 

If there was "a metric shit-ton of evidence of collusion" then 

  1. there would have been an indictment
  2. the FBI wouldn't have had to lie to the FISA court to get their warrants renewed. FYI they needed to be uncovering new evidence to get the warrants renewed, and they weren't getting any new evidence, hence their lies.. 
Quote

What Mueller lacked was the "intent and agreement" piece of the puzzle to effectively charge criminal conspiracy.  

So, in other words, they lacked ALL OF THE F'ING EVIDENCE you idjit. 😂

If there was no intent, and no agreement, what was there? Manafort pimping his services, as a campaign manager (fancy word for propagandist) to Russians? So what? 

In the words of the FBI (paraphrasing): Russians spent a pittance on FB ads to sow discord among Americans. And it was the best $200k spent in the whole history of the world. 

Putin spent ten minutes worth of his country's GDP to divide Americans, and that small investment caused a shitfight that cost Americans hundreds of millions of dollars, all things considered. And you're still munching on that ten-yr-old bait, getting pulled to the surface, every day.

Quote

Perhaps you don't know what the word "evidence" means?

I'll tell you what it isn't lol:

  • Hillary's Russian-made dossier
  • testimony coerced from people who were convicted for unrelated things
  • BS about secret servers at alfa bank
  • emails that were altered by the FBI to change their meaning entirley
  • all the statements made by the FBI that contradicted information which was in their possession 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
6 minutes ago, West said:

And by "evidence" you mean a sitting senator meeting with a foreign diplomat in his official capacity? A diplomat who lived in Washington under the approval of the United States government and routinely met with lawmakers? Yeah such solid "evidence" there pal 😆 

There was a lot of Democrats blowing smoke and trying to impune innocent people for routine behavior in their existing roles. Was actually quite vile.  And one of the main reasons why I used to be sympathetic to the Democrat party until I saw that they were dishonest and vile

WTF? You're like a pre-AI bot.

Paul Manafort has never been a senator and Kilimnik is not a diplomat. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Hodad said:

WTF? You're like a pre-AI bot.

Paul Manafort has never been a senator and Kilimnik is not a diplomat. 

What about Jeff Sessions? They maligned and spread false information about him so democrats could gain a narrative. 

That isnt politics. Its disgraceful but par for the course for the scumbag democrats 

Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Buddy, you cherry-picked ten % of it to say it was all wrong, and even the part that you cherry picked was correct.

The "secret server" issue that you just quoted was actually just 100% BS. AKA lies.

No evidence. 

If there was "a metric shit-ton of evidence of collusion" then 

  1. there would have been an indictment
  2. the FBI wouldn't have had to lie to the FISA court to get their warrants renewed. FYI they needed to be uncovering new evidence to get the warrants renewed, and they weren't getting any new evidence, hence their lies.. 

So, in other words, they lacked ALL OF THE F'ING EVIDENCE you idjit. 😂

If there was no intent, and no agreement, what was there? Manafort pimping his services, as a campaign manager (fancy word for propagandist) to Russians? So what? 

In the words of the FBI (paraphrasing): Russians spent a pittance on FB ads to sow discord among Americans. And it was the best $200k spent in the whole history of the world. 

Putin spent ten minutes worth of his country's GDP to divide Americans, and that small investment caused a shitfight that cost Americans hundreds of millions of dollars, all things considered. And you're still munching on that ten-yr-old bait, getting pulled to the surface, every day.

I'll tell you what it isn't lol:

  • Hillary's Russian-made dossier
  • testimony coerced from people who were convicted for unrelated things
  • BS about secret servers at alfa bank
  • emails that were altered by the FBI to change their meaning entirley
  • all the statements made by the FBI that contradicted information which was in their possession 

Yes I typically ignore most of your copy+paste Gish gallop  ADD bullshit and focus on one of your lies at a time. 

If you had a paper trail of your wife having secret meetings and elaborately concealed communications with another man, you'd damn sure consider that "evidence" even if you couldn't definitively prove what was happening in the cheap motel room. No problem?

And there's far more evidence than that in the Manafort case. No

You keep trying to pretend like it was just an innocent, casual marketing meeting. But have you ever known anyone to deploy extensive spycraft techniques to conceal casual, innocent conversations? That sounds reasonable to you? 

You really think Manafort didn't know what Kilimnik was going to do with that information? Really?

And if Manafort had taken and shared Trump's sensitive campaign intel to serve his own interests, shouldn't Trump have been angry at that betrayal? So angry he pardoned him. Lol

If you truly believe any of that,  you're a bigger cuck than the sad sack in the motel hypothetical.

 

18 minutes ago, West said:

What about Jeff Sessions? They maligned and spread false information about him so democrats could gain a narrative. 

That isnt politics. Its disgraceful but par for the course for the scumbag democrats 

Sessions didn't catch heat for the meetings, he caught heat for lying about having been at the meetings. 

Edited by Hodad
  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Yes I typically ignore most of your copy+paste Gish gallop  ADD bullshit and focus on one of your lies at a time. 

If you had a paper trail of your wife having secret meetings and elaborately concealed communications with another man, you'd damn sure consider that "evidence" even if you couldn't definitively prove what was happening in the cheap motel room. No problem?

And there's far more evidence than that in the Manafort case. No

You keep trying to pretend like it was just an innocent, casual marketing meeting. But have you ever known anyone to deploy extensive spycraft techniques to conceal casual, innocent conversations? That sounds reasonable to you? 

You really think Manafort didn't know what Kilimnik was going to do with that information? Really?

And if Manafort had taken and shared Trump's sensitive campaign intel to serve his own interests, shouldn't Trump have been angry at that betrayal? So angry he pardoned him. Lol

If you truly believe any of that,  you're a bigger cuck than the sad sack in the motel hypothetical.

 

Sessions didn't catch heat for the meetings, he caught heat for lying about having been at the meetings. 

He never lied about shit. They attempted to smear him with a vile narrative and forced him out so they could run with a ridiculous story. 

Democrats couldn't win the election so in turn came up with a delusional conspiracy theory so the other side couldn't govern 

Posted
49 minutes ago, West said:

He never lied about shit. They attempted to smear him with a vile narrative and forced him out so they could run with a ridiculous story. 

Democrats couldn't win the election so in turn came up with a delusional conspiracy theory so the other side couldn't govern 

  • During his January 2017 confirmation hearing for Attorney General, Sessions was asked about communications between the Trump campaign and Russian government officials and stated he was "not aware of any of those activities" and "did not have communications with the Russians". It later emerged that he had met with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak on at least two occasions during the campign.
  • Thanks 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, Hodad said:
  • During his January 2017 confirmation hearing for Attorney General, Sessions was asked about communications between the Trump campaign and Russian government officials and stated he was "not aware of any of those activities" and "did not have communications with the Russians". It later emerged that he had met with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak on at least two occasions during the campign.

Right and then when asked about it he clarified. But democrats in the media already had their story given to them by the Democrat party

Posted (edited)

First black man to ever be charged under the KKK act is in jail according to his lawyer:

 

 

Notice who the lawyer is. It is Hunter Biden's lawyer.

Edited by gatomontes99
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

First black man to ever be charged under the KKK act is in jail according to his lawyer:

 

 

Notice who the lawyer is. It is Hunter Biden's lawyer.

Pre dawn raid his law office!

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,017
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    taylor66
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Canadaisintrouble earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • AlizyMalik earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...