Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Goddess said:

So what is the intention of a legislation that says to let rapists and pedos go "as early as possible and with the least onerous conditions"?

What legislation says that?

You forgot the rule about cites already?

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

What did you *think* was going to happen when you introduce legislation that says to give particular attention to the circumstances of Aboriginal accused and those of minority populations?

That conservatives would lose their shit.

  • Haha 2

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
43 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And they're absolutely is a law that specifically does that

It specifically says let child rapists and pedos out on the streets...word for word?

LMAO!

  • Like 1

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
3 hours ago, eyeball said:

That conservatives would lose their shit.

We did. ANd we said things like this and the policy of releasing multiple time violent and sex offenders on bail automatically would lead to more rapes, more deaths, more abuse of children. 

And we were right 
The question at this point is why didn't YOU guys care about any of that 

  • Like 2
  • Downvote 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
20 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

The question at this point is why didn't YOU guys care about any of that 

What makes you think I didn't?

Oh that's right, you didn't think.

  • Haha 1

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

What makes you think I didn't?

 

Your statements and words. Coupled with your defense of the law which allows it and the party that keeps that law in place

You don't give one flying crap. And that is consistent with how you view these things. Acknowledging that this is absolutely horrible and should be unacceptable to anyone would mean speaking against the liberal party that you defend constantly considering they are the reason that happens. And as always you would rather see people die than have that happen

 

I mean even now you don't confend the law, you don't pretend the liberals for allowing the law and putting the law in place, it's all about you and defending the liberals

Edited by CdnFox
  • Downvote 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
30 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Your statements and words. Coupled with your defense

What statements, words and defense are you babbling about?

  • Like 1

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
4 hours ago, eyeball said:

What statements, words and defense are you babbling about?

Oh I love this part, this is the part where you pretend you never say anything and then demand that people go back and point out what you said and then you'll pretend 5 minutes later that you  never said it again :) 

I totally understand your desires to pretend otherwise but you've been quite clear many many times. And you've been called out for it and not just by me.

If a kid dies in a fashion that offends your political sensibilities such as Israeli chilrend being killed by Hamas Suddenly you're not terribly worried about it. The children are harmed by vaccines or drugs or killed by people with something other than a gun then oh well.

But if somebody dies in a fashion that promotes your political agenda and oh my goodness, you're so upset and it's such a tragedy and how could we let this happen

Case in point, the liberals are responsible for the current laws which allow child murders and rapists to go back out on the streets and do the same thing that afternoon that they're caught. This has been disgust and demonstrated ad nauseam. And your response is oh well. Can't be saying negative things about liberal policy

  • Downvote 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Oh I love this part, this is the part where you pretend you never say anything and then demand that people go back and point out what you said and then you'll pretend 5 minutes later that you  never said it again

If it's that easy then go point it out. You know again :)

  • Haha 1

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
2 hours ago, eyeball said:

If it's that easy then go point it out. You know again :)

Why?, you'll simply demand the same thing to post later. And then to post later. And then two posts later And so on

The fact is that every single person here has seen you say those things. I don't need to prove it to anybody. You know you did, everyone else knows you did, I know you did.

So not only do you still have to wear that but now you look like a tool for trying to pretend you never did when we all know you did.

You've got no problem with children being dead as long as it supports rather than takes away from your political ideology

  • Downvote 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You've got no problem with children being dead as long as it supports rather than takes away from your political ideology

Naw, that's just your shit blowing back in your face.

  • Haha 1

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
1 minute ago, eyeball said:

Naw, that's just your shit blowing back in your face.

Oh look, I left Winger who's losing an argument and being raced with his own words is having strange fecal fantasies. We are all shocked! Shocked I tell you! :) 

I get that you hate nothing more than to have your own words thrown back in your face when it's inconvenient. But you've been quite clear. The murder or rate of children or women civilians doesn't bother you in the slightest provided your political ideology is preserved. That's just the kind of person you are, and it's not uncommon on the left these days for some reason

If that bothers you, maybe you should think about whether or not you're on the wrong side.

  • Downvote 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
1 minute ago, eyeball said:

 :) 

Still can't figure out what's going on around here can you grandpa? :) 

image.jpeg.9e1e46cc52224cfe32ae299c51fc22f6.jpeg

  • Downvote 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted

How have the Liberals handled the issue of crime?

Violent crime, hate crimes and thefts remain high in Canada, finds think tank's justice report card

Police-reported hate crimes increased an alarming 85 per cent between 2020 and 2024
 

Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...

Posted
On 3/1/2026 at 12:12 PM, eyeball said:

It took me a week to think of a response and all i could come up with is a stupid picture, Sorry i suck so bad. 

image.gif

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
On 2/28/2026 at 2:38 PM, eyeball said:

Only a loon would imagine there's legislation that intentionally does.

I'm sure it doesn't. And I'm sure that wasn't the intention. It was, however, the result. And to admit one was wrong is simply not in the playbook of the Liberal party. So they soldier on, ignoring the bodies piling up, hand-waving away all the complaints.

  • Bill C-75 (2019): This legislation codified the "principle of restraint," directing police and courts to release accused persons at the "earliest reasonable opportunity" and on the least restrictive terms.

Add to this that Canadians probably don't even understand what 'bail' is because our cultural views are shaped by American television. In the US, you pay some money to be out on bail. If you violate your bail, you lose that money. In Canada, you virtually never put up any money. And if you violate your bail, there's no charge other than 'violating release conditions', and that always gets rolled in with whatever the original offense is, so that they're served concurrently. So there is essentially no punishment.

Bill C-75 was aimed at reducing pre-trial detention for marginalized groups 

That seems more important to the Liberals than the safety of the community. Although the very term 'marginalized' is insane as it suggests a group being acted upon by society as opposed to a group being the victim of their own bad behaviour.

 

  • Like 1

"A civilization is not destroyed by wicked men; it is destroyed by weak men who cannot defend what is good.” — G. K. Chesterton

Posted
6 hours ago, I am Groot said:

I'm sure it doesn't. And I'm sure that wasn't the intention. It was, however, the result. And to admit one was wrong is simply not in the playbook of the Liberal party. So they soldier on, ignoring the bodies piling up, hand-waving away all the complaints.

  • Bill C-75 (2019): This legislation codified the "principle of restraint," directing police and courts to release accused persons at the "earliest reasonable opportunity" and on the least restrictive terms.

Add to this that Canadians probably don't even understand what 'bail' is because our cultural views are shaped by American television. In the US, you pay some money to be out on bail. If you violate your bail, you lose that money. In Canada, you virtually never put up any money. And if you violate your bail, there's no charge other than 'violating release conditions', and that always gets rolled in with whatever the original offense is, so that they're served concurrently. So there is essentially no punishment.

Bill C-75 was aimed at reducing pre-trial detention for marginalized groups 

That seems more important to the Liberals than the safety of the community. Although the very term 'marginalized' is insane as it suggests a group being acted upon by society as opposed to a group being the victim of their own bad behaviour.

 

Everyone knew that. It's been posted here before. He deliberately lies in order to shill  for the liberals

The liberal law that puts known repeat violent offenders back on the streets within an hour or so of being caught has been slammed by most of the premiers, tons of police, it's been widely reported, the libs have promised to 'fix' it but haven't for years,  he's just a bad person who cares more about the liberal party than he does about girls getting raped or people getting killed

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted

Image

According to the Windsor Police Service, the victim reported the incident to police on Feb. 17, 2026. She told investigators that a man known to her approached her near the intersection of Goyeau Street and Wyandotte Street East and forced her into a vehicle.

Police say the suspect then drove the woman to a hotel in Windsor’s west end, where she was allegedly held for approximately one week.

During that time, investigators allege the suspect administered a drug to the victim without her consent, the woman was sexually assaulted and threatened, with weapons used or displayed to prevent her from leaving.

After the suspect left the hotel room, the woman was able to escape and contact police.

On March 11 at approximately 11 am, members of the Repeat Offender Parole Enforcement Unit located and arrested Michael Walter Peltier, 34 in downtown Windsor.

He has been charged with:

-Kidnapping

-Forcible confinement

-Sexual assault with a weapon

-Sexual assault

-Assault with a weapon (x 2)

-Overcoming resistance to offence by administering a drug

-Discharging a firearm

-Uttering threats

-Failure to comply with a release order

Peltier was charged in July 2024 after allegedly holding a female against her will and sexually assaulting her. Later Peltier approached the female victim and threatened serious bodily harm if she did not recant her statement to police.

In October 2024 Peltier was arrested again for breaching his release order, he was released on bail again.

In December 2025 Peltier was arrested again for assault and threatening to burn the victims house down and released on bail.

 

 

 

  • Downvote 1

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

Posted

The judges letting these criminals out on our streets could be impeached by Parliament.

Why isn't the Liberal party doing that?

Maybe because their defense would be, "You can't impeach us. We're going by the law YOU guys put in place."

  • Downvote 1

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

Posted
12 minutes ago, Goddess said:

The judges letting these criminals out on our streets could be impeached by Parliament.

Why isn't the Liberal party doing that?

Maybe because their defense would be, "You can't impeach us. We're going by the law YOU guys put in place."

The liberal party are the ones who brought in the get out of jail free law. How is this any surprise to you?

  • Downvote 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
On 3/6/2026 at 10:34 AM, ironstone said:

How have the Liberals handled the issue of crime?

Violent crime, hate crimes and thefts remain high in Canada, finds think tank's justice report card

Police-reported hate crimes increased an alarming 85 per cent between 2020 and 2024
 

AI

  • High Perception of Crime: Despite recent year-over-year decreases in some crime metrics, a majority of Canadians (roughly 3-in-5) believe crime has increased in their communities, often influenced by high-profile violent incidents or local increases.
  • Reporting Levels: While police report, not all crimes are reported by victims. The "fear factor" and high-profile reporting can influence the public perception of crime, which sometimes contradicts the nationwide statistical trend, which suggests crime is actually below previous highs from the early 1990s. 
In summary, violent crime has increased in specific areas over the long term, while overall crime rates have recently fluctuated, generally decreasing in the most recent 2024 data."

You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.

Posted
16 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

AI

  • High Perception of Crime: Despite recent year-over-year decreases in some crime metrics, a majority of Canadians (roughly 3-in-5) believe crime has increased in their communities, often influenced by high-profile violent incidents or local increases.
  • Reporting Levels: While police report, not all crimes are reported by victims. The "fear factor" and high-profile reporting can influence the public perception of crime, which sometimes contradicts the nationwide statistical trend, which suggests crime is actually below previous highs from the early 1990s. 
In summary, violent crime has increased in specific areas over the long term, while overall crime rates have recently fluctuated, generally decreasing in the most recent 2024 data."

Why violent crime is surging in Canada: Dave Snow in The Hub | Macdonald-Laurier Institute

The analysis shows the naysayers are wrong: Violent crime severity increased considerably in every province and nearly every major city over the last decade. In most provinces, the past few years have produced the highest levels of violent crime severity recorded at any point since the index began in 1998.Feb 23, 2026

The numbers don’t lie: Violent crime has surged across Canada - The Hub

Violent crime in Canada’s cities has not only risen – it has become a growing threat affecting urban communities across the country.

Urban-Violent-Crime-Report_Final.pdf

 

Sorry kid. Violet crime is in fact radically up in Canada even in 2025

Yeah evidence is overwhelming.

It's sad that you felt the need to lie to protect your beloved liberals

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted

Anyone want to bet he gets bailed again?

 

https://www.insauga.com/armed-robbery-charges-for-man-wanted-for-19-probation-violations-in-ontario/

A man stabbed a woman to death in BC in 2012 and got off easy on manslaughter. Today he was arrested in Montreal for first degree murder for another stabbing.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/montreal/on-patrol/article/man-charged-with-1st-degree-murder-after-montreal-store-owner-killed/

"A civilization is not destroyed by wicked men; it is destroyed by weak men who cannot defend what is good.” — G. K. Chesterton

Posted

Judge Cathaline Heinrichs put all Kelowna girls in danger by granting bail to a 9-time rapist on March 13.  His 3rd bail release on this matter.  He assaulted 2 girls in February, while out on bail.

So, he's out on bail again now.

B.C. repeat offender granted bail again despite nine child sex assault charges

A 28-year-old B.C. man, Dylan Hartley-Gulliford, was granted bail last week despite facing nine criminal charges for allegedly sexually assaulting four separate teenagers, according to local Kelowna news outlet Castanet. The charges date back to 2024.

9 criminal charges relate back to alleged assaults against 4 separate teenage victims, all underage girls, some charges involving girls under 16.

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,017
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    taylor66
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Canadaisintrouble earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • AlizyMalik earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...